Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Dobkin

Publications and source records attributed to C Dobkin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Fmr1 knockout mouse has a distinctive strain-specific learning impairment.

The Fmr1 gene knockout mouse is a model for the human Fragile X mental retardation syndrome. Fmr1 knockout mice with a C57BL/6-129/OlaHsd hybrid background have been reported to have only a very mild deficiency in learning the Morris water maze task. We compared the effect of this knockout mutation on learning in mice with either an FVB/N-129/OlaHsd hybrid background or a C57BL/6 background. When FVB-129 mice were tested in a cross-shaped water maze task, the knockout mice showed a pronounced deficiency in their ability to learn the position of a hidden escape platform in comparison to normal littermates. In contrast, knockout mice with a C57BL/6 background learned the maze just as well as their normal littermates. Fear conditioning did not reveal differences between knockout and normal mice in either background. These results show that silencing the Fmr1 gene clearly interfered with learning a specific visuospatial task in FVB/N-129 hybrid mice but not in C57BL/6 mice. The strain dependence may model the influence of genetic background in the human Fragile X syndrome.

Animals↗

Reduced mRNA for G3BP in fragile X cells: evidence of FMR1 gene regulation.

Although fragile X syndrome is caused by the absence of fragile X gene expression, little is known about the pathogenic processes underlying the mental retardation. Recent findings that the fragile X protein, FMRP, contains RNA binding motifs and nuclear transport signals and associates with ribosomes suggest that FMRP may be involved in either mRNA processing, transport, or translation. To test the hypothesis that absence of FMRP may affect the processing of specific transcripts, we have used an RNA differential display assay (RDDA) to identify differentially expressed transcripts in lymphoblast lines derived from fragile X syndrome patients. A 0.9-kb cDNA fragment that showed reduced expression in a fragile X lymphoblast cell line was found to be identical to G3BP (Ras-GTPase-Activating protein SH3-domain-binding protein). Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction showed that the expressed levels of G3BP mRNA in fragile X lymphoblast cell lines were significantly less than controls. Our results indicate that G3BP mRNA may be regulated by FMRP and supports the hypothesis that FMRP may modulate the transcription of specific transcripts.

Base Sequence↗

Accelerated prenatal diagnosis of fragile X syndrome by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment detection.

Prenatal diagnosis of fragile X syndrome requires detection of the full FMR1 mutation in chorionic villus or amniotic fluid cell samples. Although analysis of genomic DNA restriction fragment pattern is a highly reliable technique for identification of the full FMR1 mutation, standard Southern blot determination of this pattern requires significantly more genomic DNA than is initially available from a prenatal sample. To overcome this limitation we developed a method that determines the diagnostic pattern of genomic restriction fragments from a fraction of a prenatal specimen. The prenatal DNA sample is first digested with EcoRI and EagI, and after agarose gel electrophoresis, the 2- to 10-kb region of the gel is serially sectioned and amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Analysis of prenatal samples from an unaffected male and from a full mutation male showed that this approach generated a diagnostic pattern comparable with a Southern blot of 100-fold more material. This innovation enables laboratories to prenatally diagnose the full FMR1 mutation sooner than standard techniques.

Blotting, Southern↗

Human type I cytokeratin genes are a compact cluster.

A YAC clone (211F11) containing approximately 0.5 Mb of human DNA was isolated from a human genomic library by PCR-based screening with cytokeratin (KRT) 13-specific primers. The YAC clone was mapped by FISH to the long arm of chromosome 17 (17q12-->q21), a region to which several other type I KRT genes had been mapped previously. We now show by Southern blot hybridization and PFGE analyses that KRT13, 14, 15, and 16 are all contained within YAC clone 211F11. Long-range restriction mapping analysis of clone 211F11 and of two smaller YAC clones that were also isolated with KRT13-specific primers, suggests that KRT13, 14, 15, 16 and their linked type I genes KRT17 and 19, are contained in less than 150 kb of genomic DNA. According to our reconstruction it then appears that at least six type I KRT genes are arranged in a highly compact cluster. The three YACs reported in this study represent a new tool to dissect the molecular structure of the locus of the human type I KRT genes.

Base Sequence↗

Fragile X "gray zone" alleles: AGG patterns, expansion risks, and associated haplotypes.

The risk for fragile X "gray-zone" alleles to expand appears to depend on the absence of stabilizing AGGs, which interrupt the CGG repeat region. To characterize such alleles better, we analyzed a series of 101 chromosomes with triplet repeat lengths ranging from 35 to 59 for variations in their AGG interspersion patterns. Among these, 11.9% had 3 AGGs, 59.3% had 2, 24.8% had 1, and 4.0% had 0. An inverse relationship between FMR1 repeat length and the number of interrupting AGGs was observed. Within the range of 35-44 repeats, 98.7% of alleles were found to have a pure CGG repeat length (PCGG) of less than 33. However, among alleles with 45-59 repeats, 50% were found to have 0 or 1 AGG and a PCGG of more than 33. Thus, gray-zone alleles with 45-59 repeats frequently have a long stretch of pure CGGs and thus are more likely to be unstably inherited than alleles with 35-44 repeats. We found length associations of PCGG with 2 flanking microsatellites, DXS548 and FRAXAC1: a PCGG < or = 20 was strongly associated with haplotype 20-19, whereas a PCGG > 20 was more strongly associated with the haplotype 25-21. This result could reflect a founder effect or a generalized instability of CGGs and microsatellites.

Alleles↗

Reverse mutations in the fragile X syndrome.

Three females were identified who have apparent reversal of fragile X premutations. Based on haplotype analysis of nearby markers, they were found to have inherited a fragile X chromosome from their premutation carrier mothers, and yet had normal size FMR1 repeat alleles. The changes in repeat sizes from mother to daughter was 95 to 35 in the first, 145 to 43 in the second, and 82 to 33 in the third. In the first family, mutations of the nearby microsatellites FRAXAC2 and DXS548 were also observed. In the other two, only mutations involving the FMR1 repeats were found. We suggest differing mutational mechanisms such as gene conversion versus DNA replication slippage may underlie such reversions. We estimate that such revertants may occur among 1% or less of premutation carrier offspring. Our results indicate that women identified to be carriers by linkage should be retested by direct DNA analysis.

DNA Replication↗

A survey of FRAXE allele sizes in three populations.

FRAXE is a fragile site located at Xq27-8, which contains polymorphic triplet GCC repeats associated with a CpG island. Similar to FRAXA, expansion of the GCC repeats results in an abnormal methylation of the CpG island and is associated with a mild mental retardation syndrome (FRAXE-MR). We surveyed the GCC repeat alleles of FRAXE from 3 populations. A total of 665 X chromosomes including 416 from a New York Euro-American sample (259 normal and 157 with FRAXA mutations), 157 from a Chinese sample (144 normal and 13 FRAXA), and 92 from a Finnish sample (56 normal and 36 FRAXA) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. Twenty-seven alleles, ranging from 4 to 39 GCC repeats, were observed. The modal repeat number was 16 in the New York and Finnish samples and accounted for 24% of all the chromosomes tested (162/665). The modal repeat number in the Chinese sample was 18. A founder effect for FRAXA was suggested among the Finnish FRAXA samples in that 75% had the FRAXE 16 repeat allele versus only 30% of controls. Sequencing of the FRAXE region showed no imperfections within the GCC repeat region, such as those commonly seen in FRAXA. The smaller size and limited range of repeats and the lack of imperfections suggests the molecular mechanisms underlying FRAXE triplet mutations may be different from those underlying FRAXA.

Alleles↗

Prenatal diagnosis and carrier screening for fragile X by PCR.

During the past three years, we have conducted fragile X DNA studies for carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis using a previously described PCR protocol that accurately resolves normal FMR1 alleles and premutations and detects most full mutations [Brown et al., JAMA 270:1569-1575, 1996]. A total of 344 pregnant women with a family history of mental retardation of unknown cause were screened and 6 fragile X carriers were identified: two had full mutations, and four had premutations. The mentally retarded relatives of two other women were found to be fragile X positive although the women themselves were not carriers. In all, 6 carriers and 8 fragile X families were identified by this screening. We have also screened 40 pregnant women who were members of previously identified fragile X families, but whose carrier status was unknown. Ten were found to be carriers and were offered prenatal diagnosis. Prospective prenatal testing of 84 carrier women correctly detected 31 fetal samples (19 females, 12 males) with full mutations and 6 with premutations (2 females, 4 males). No false positives but one false negative occurred early on due to undetected maternal cell contamination. In addition, screening of 806 males with developmental delays of unknown cause gave positive results in 33 (4.1%). Potential problems and pitfalls of direct DNA testing are discussed. Because of the proven success of fragile X screening with direct molecular analysis, screening of all undiagnosed individuals with mental retardation and at risk pregnant women should now be considered. The identification of fragile X carriers and prenatal diagnosis of their pregnancies should significantly reduce the prevalence of this syndrome.

Amniocentesis↗

Fragile X founder effects and new mutations in Finland.

The apparent associations between fragile X mutations and nearby microsatellites may reflect both founder effects and microsatellite instability. To gain further insight into their relative contributions, we typed a sample of 56 unrelated control and 37 fragile X chromosomes from an eastern Finnish population for FMR1 CGG repeat lengths, AGG interspersion patterns, DXS548, FRAXAC1, FRAXE and a new polymorphic locus, Alu-L. In the controls, the most common FMR1 allele was 30 repeats with a range of 20 to 47 and a calculated heterozygosity of 88%. A strong founder effect was observed for locus DXS548 with 95% of fragile X chromosomes having the 21 CA repeat (196 bp) allele compared to 17% of controls, while none of the fragile X but 69% of controls had the 20 repeat allele. Although the FRAXAC1 locus is much closer than DXS548 to FMR1 (7 kb vs. 150 kb), there was no significant difference between fragile X and control FRAXAC1 allele distributions. The FRAXE repeat, located 600 kb distal to FMR1, was found to show strong linkage disequilibrium as well. A newly defined polymorphism, Alu-L, located at approximately 40 kb distal to the FMR1 repeat, showed very low polymorphism in the Finnish samples. Analysis of the combined loci DXS548-FRAXAC1-FRAXE showed three founder haplotypes. Haplotype 21-19-16 was found on 27 (75%) of fragile X chromosomes but on none of controls. Three (8.4%) fragile X chromosomes had haplotypes 21-19-15, 21-19-20, and 21-19-25 differing from the common fragile X haplotype only in FRAXE. These could have arisen by recombination or from mutations of FRAXE. A second haplotype 21-18-17 was found in four (11.1%) fragile X chromosomes but only one (1.9%) control. This may represent a more recent founder mutation. A third haplotype 25-21-15, seen in two fragile X chromosomes (5.6%) and one (1.9%) control, was even less common and thus may represent an even more recent mutation or admixture of immigrant types. Analysis of the AGG interspersions within the FMR1 CGG repeat showed that 7/8 premutation chromosomes lacked an AGG whereas all controls had at least one AGG. This supports the hypothesis that the mutation of AGG to CGG leads to repeat instability and mutational expansion.

Finland↗

Fragile X gene instability: anchoring AGGs and linked microsatellites.

Interspersed AGGs within the FMR1 gene CGG repeat region may anchor the sequence and prevent slippage during replication. In order to detect the AGG position variations, we developed a method employing partial MnlI restriction analysis and analyzed X chromosomes from 187 males, including 133 normal controls (117 with 20-34 and 16 with 35-52 repeats), plus 54 fragile X premutations with 56-180 repeats. Among controls, the interspersed AGG positions were highly polymorphic, with a heterozygosity of 91%. Among the control samples, 1.5% had no AGG positions, 25% had one, 71% had two, and 3% had three. Among the fragile X premutation samples, 63% had no AGG, while 37% had only one AGG. Analysis of premutation samples within fragile X families showed that variation occurred only within the 3' end of the region. Thus, the instability was polar. Controls with > or = 15 pure CGG repeats were associated with the longest alleles of two nearby microsatellites, FRAXAC1 with 20-21 repeats and DXS548 with 202-206 bp and with increased microsatellite heterozygosity. The association of long pure CGG regions, as with fragile X chromosomes, with the longer and more heterozygous microsatellite alleles suggests they may be related mechanistically. Further, our results do not support a recent suggestion that the frequency of fragile X alleles may be increasing. Finally, analysis of a set of nonhuman primate samples showed that long pure CGG tracks are variable in size and are located within the 3' region, which suggests that polar instability within FMR1 is evolutionarily quite old.

Alleles↗

Fragile X founder chromosome effects: linkage disequilibrium or microsatellite heterogeneity?

Previous studies of founder chromosome effects in fragile X have been based on linkage disequilibrium with either FRAXAC1 or DXS548 alone or combined with FRAXAC2. Recently, we found no linkage disequilibrium of FMR-1 with FRAXAC2, but rather, found FRAXAC2 was complex and highly mutable. Therefore, we have now analyzed FRAXAC1 and DXS548 together for haplotypes, two markers which have not been jointly analyzed previously, to test for disequilibrium. We typed 315 fragile X (FX) chromosomes and controls, further subdivided into large controls (LC) and small controls (SC) with < or = 35 repeats and identified 26 different haplotypes. Two were more frequent and one less frequent in FX than SCs, thus confirming apparent linkage disequilibrium in fragile X. However, we noted increased FX microsatellite heterozygosity, either individually (results quite similar to previous studies) or as haplotypes. This heterozygosity covaried with FX > LC > SC, which may indicate alternative explanation exists for the apparent disequilibrium. We hypothesize that large FMR-1 CGG repeat allele genes may be associated with the generation of new microsatellite mutations. Possible mechanisms include gene conversions between CGG repeats and flanking microsatellites involving unequal double cross-overs, the expansion of small control CGGs to larger sizes associated with episodic generalized microsatellite instability or as a direct result of mutant FMR-1 gene function. We conclude that the founder effects observed with the use of these CA repeats is likely to reflect both linkage disequilibrium and increased microsatellite instability of fragile X chromosomes.

Alleles↗

Distribution of FMR-1 and associated microsatellite alleles in a normal Chinese population.

The CGG repeat size distribution of the fragile X mental retardation gene (FMR-1) was studied in a population of normal Chinese X chromosomes along with that of two proximal microsatellite polymorphic markers: FRAXAC1 and DXS548. The most common CGG repeat allele was 29 (47.2%) with 30 being second most common (26%). This distribution was different from that seen in Caucasian controls, where the most common allele was 30 repeats. Other differences with Caucasian controls included a secondary modal peak at 36 repeats and the absence of peaks at 20 or 23 repeats. There were only two FRAXAC1 and five DXS548 alleles found in the Chinese sample. A striking linkage disequilibrium of FMR-1 alleles with FRAXAC1 alleles was observed, in that 90% of the 29 CGG repeat alleles but only 41% of the 30 CGG repeat alleles had the FRAXAC1 152 bp allele (18 AC repeats). This disequilibrium suggests that slippage between the closely spaced normal CGG repeat alleles, 29 and 30, and between 152 and 154 FRAXAC1 alleles is very rare. This study lays the groundwork for an understanding of founder chromosome effects in comparing Asian and Caucasian populations.

Alleles↗

Rapid fragile X carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis using a nonradioactive PCR test.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a rapid, nonradioactive test using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) capable of detecting full fragile X mutations, premutations, and resolving normal alleles and to apply this to prenatal diagnosis and carrier screening of pregnant women at risk for fragile X carrier status. DESIGN: Prenatal and blood sample PCR analysis with confirmation by direct Southern blotting and cytogenetic techniques. SETTING: Samples sent to a DNA diagnostic research laboratory at a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women with a family history of undiagnosed mental retardation or known fragile X syndrome and controls. RESULTS: A rapid, nonradioactive PCR screening protocol for the fragile X mental retardation-1 gene for both normal and mutant alleles was developed. Analysis of 570 control X chromosomes showed a modal number of 30 CGG repeats (range, 12 to 52 repeats) and a calculated heterozygosity of approximately 80%. No excess of homozygosity was found, indicating the test was accurate for normal allele resolution. In addition, 150 unrelated pregnant women were screened. Within known fragile X families, five of 20 pregnant women were diagnosed as carriers. Two new fragile X families were diagnosed among relatives of 130 females with family histories of undiagnosed mental retardation, although no carriers were identified. Prenatal PCR testing of 28 carriers accurately detected nine fetuses with full mutations. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid, nonradioactive PCR protocol allows accurate resolution of normal alleles as well as simultaneous detection of carrier alleles and full mutations. With this approach, efficient screening of pregnant women at risk for fragile X carrier status, subsequent genetic counseling of identified carriers, and reliable prenatal diagnosis can be offered.

Base Sequence↗

A complex mutable polymorphism located within the fragile X gene.

While studying founder chromosomes in the fragile X syndrome, we have unexpectedly found linkage equilibrium to FRAXAC2, an Alu-associated microsatellite within the defective gene, FMR-1. DNA sequencing of 265 chromosomes revealed 39 alleles and a complex microsatellite of form (GT)x-C-(TA)y-(T)z. A mutation rate of 3.3% was observed but only among fragile X maternally derived meioses. Finding a second mutable locus within FMR-1 suggests that the target for tandem repeat instability may not be confined to the (CGG)n repeat alone and raises the possibility of an FMR-1 mutation mechanism involving microsatellites.

Base Sequence↗