Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C D Hepler

Publications and source records attributed to C D Hepler.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1978

Absorption of oral intramuscular chlordiazepoxide by alcoholics.

The effect of chronic alcoholism on oral and intramuscular plasma levels of chlordiazepoxide (CDX) was assessed. A 50-mg oral dose of CDX resulted in significantly higher plasma levels in the 2 hr following CDX than a 50-mg intramuscular dose administered to acute withdrawing alcoholic subjects. The same CDX dose was administered 7 days later and the same differences were observed between the mean oral and intramuscular plasma levels during the first 2 hr after administration of CDX. Peak concentration occurred significantly sooner after the oral than intramuscular dose of CDX in both the initial dose and the dose given a week later. It was also observed that the areas under the curve for CDX were significantly greater initially than 1 wk later. It is suggested this effect may be at least partially the result of the longer CDX half-lives initially than a week later. The active metabolite, N-desmethylchlordiazepoxide, peaked significantly earlier with the oral dose than with the intramuscular dose after the patient was alcohol free for a week.

Absorption↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Therapeutic outcomes monitoring: application of pharmaceutical care guidelines to community pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: To design a pharmaceutical care model, and develop and field test a set of community pharmacy guidelines and practice support materials--Therapeutic Outcomes Monitoring (TOM) modules. DESIGN: Concept interviews with pharmacists, physicians, and patients; development and field testing of practice guidelines. SETTING: Community pharmacies. PARTICIPANTS: Five independent, five chain, and two clinic site pharmacies. INTERVENTIONS: A prototype TOM module for asthma was developed through a seven-step process. Concept interviews were held with pharmacists, physicians, and patients to determine the desirability and feasibility of the TOM concept, prototype, and materials. Two field tests were completed and modifications made. Results were gathered through further concept interviews at the completion of the second field tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants' opinions and experiences. RESULTS: Pharmacists, physicians, and patients expressed favorable attitudes about community pharmacists' participation in this pharmaceutical care model. Of the 12 participating pharmacists, 7 successfully implemented TOM in their practice sites and participated in the project throughout the testing; 49 patients were recruited into the study; and 22 patients remained in the program at the end of the second field test. In providing TOM services to these patients, the two most problematic areas for the pharmacists were in documenting care and reporting to physicians. A final phase of the TOM project has not been conducted in the United States because of insufficient numbers of patients for evaluating patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: The TOM project was successful from a technical but not a marketing perspective. Useful practice guidelines can be written and taught to pharmacists. Enrollment of patients was difficult, and the concept is not likely to spread spontaneously within the existing market for pharmaceutical services.

Asthma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Regulating for outcomes as a systems response to the problem of drug-related morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the evidence that preventable adverse outcomes of drug therapy are prevalent in the United States and Europe, to describe the causes of this problem, to outline a systems response that would correct or improve the problem, to discuss pharmacy's contribution to that solution, and to propose a strategy for implementation. SUMMARY: The causes of the widespread problem of preventable drug-related morbidity (PDRM) that have been identified in the literature constitute system failure. Health professionals can understand an individual patient's care system if they organize their thinking about systems as efficiently as they organize their thinking about medical or pharmaceutical problems. Six essential system characteristics are proposed, based on the PDRM literature. Regulations should mandate regular patient and system performance assessments--specifically, that health professionals (1) identify, resolve, and document specific pharmacotherapy problems; (2) assess system performance and identify recurring root causes of problems; and (3) document assessments, problems found, actions taken, and follow-up. These regulations would, in essence, mandate individual quality improvement (QI) programs. QI and pharmaceutical care require similar processes of decisions and actions, one from a practice (multipatient) perspective and the other from a patient perspective. CONCLUSION: Health care accreditation agencies are moving toward regulation for outcomes. Pharmacy managers should embrace and regulatory boards should participate in this movement. Such regulations would clarify pharmacy's role in support of safe and effective pharmacotherapy and would constitute a commitment to pharmaceutical care as public service. A widely adopted system of measuring and improving the quality of medication use and outcomes could eventually lead to quality benchmarks in the community pharmacy setting, which would more firmly establish the value of the pharmacist in pharmacotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improving drug therapy for patients with asthma--part 1: Patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a therapeutic outcomes monitoring (TOM) program on selected process and outcome measures. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Community pharmacies throughout Denmark (16 intervention, 15 control). PATIENTS: Five hundred patients with asthma aged 16 to 60 years and treated in primary care. INTERVENTION: TOM is a community-based program for pharmaceutical care. Using a structured, seven-step, cyclical outcome improvement process, TOM pharmacists identify and resolve (or refer) problems with drug therapy that, if not addressed, might result in therapeutic failure or adverse effects. Equal emphasis is placed on the patient's perspective (e.g., coping, control, and empowerment) and the professional's perspective (e.g., adherence, patient knowledge, and therapeutic problems). TOM requires cooperation among pharmacists, patients, and physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Asthma symptom status, days of sickness, health-related and asthma-specific quality of life, use of health care services and resources, and satisfaction with health care and pharmacy. INTERMEDIATE OUTCOME AND PROCESS MEASURES: Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), knowledge of asthma and asthma medications, inhalation errors, and drug therapy problems in the TOM group. RESULTS: The mean individual differences for TOM and control patients were tested. Beneficial effects were found for the following outcome measures: asthma symptom status, days of sickness, and health-related and asthma-related quality of life. Satisfaction with health care and pharmacy varied throughout the course of the project, with no significant difference between groups at the final evaluation. Although not statistically significant, differences in use of services were considered to be clinically significant and encouraging. Beneficial effects were found for knowledge of asthma and medications, inhalation errors, drug use and drug therapy problems. No significant differences were found for PEFR. CONCLUSION: The project demonstrated that therapeutic outcomes monitoring by community pharmacists is an effective strategy for improving the quality of drug therapy for asthma patients in primary health care.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improving drug therapy for patients with asthma-part 2: Use of antiasthma medications.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of antiasthma drugs among the study patients and to evaluate whether therapeutic outcomes monitoring (TOM) is associated with improved quality of drug therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, multicenter study. Consumption of antiasthma medications was measured as the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) purchased. Data were collected from the pharmacies' computer systems for a period beginning 6 months before the start of the study (period 1) and during its first and second half-years (periods 2 and 3). Treatment changes for TOM patients were classified on the basis of drug regimens at periods 1 and 3. SETTING: Community pharmacies in Denmark (16 intervention, 15 control). PATIENTS: Five hundred patients with asthma aged 16 to 60 years who were being treated in primary health care; this study used data from 350 patients from this sample. INTERVENTION: TOM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the use of individual drugs and changes in therapeutic patterns--distribution of purchased drugs; proportion of corticosteroid users; frequency of drug regimens used; treatment changes for TOM patients. RESULTS: TOM patients' consumption of beta2-agonists decreased by 12% overall from period 1 through period 3, while control patients' consumption of these medications decreased by only 1%. TOM patients' use of inhaled corticosteroids increased by more than 50% compared with 9% among controls. In both groups, about one-half of all purchased DDDs were for inhaled beta2-agonists. The proportion of inhaled corticosteroids increased from 27% to 42% of total DDDs for the TOM group and remained constant for controls. Of patients using beta2-agonists, 68% also used inhaled steroids initially in both the TOM and control groups. The proportion of inhaled steroid users in the TOM group increased to 84%, and to 70% among controls. The most common regimen was inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists and corticosteroids in combination, and the second most common regimen was monotherapy with short-acting beta2-agonists. With time, the regimens changed more toward consensus guidelines among TOM patients. Changes in drug therapy totaled 451, averaging 2.4 changes per TOM patient. The largest number of changes (49%) involved inhaled corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Changes in medication use among TOM patients were toward improved asthma treatment. Our results show that community pharmacists, physicians, and patients, working together, can improve prescribing, solve drug therapy problems, and improve outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of acute and chronic terfenadine on free and total serum phenytoin concentrations in epileptic patients.

Terfenadine is a unique H1-receptor antagonist devoid of adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects. Terfenadine is highly protein bound and has been shown to stimulate hepatic microsomal enzymes, making an interaction with phenytoin (PHT) possible. After assuring constant PHT levels for 7 days, 12 epileptic patients were studied with PHT alone, after a single daily dose of terfenadine (60 mg twice daily), and again after 2 weeks of chronic terfenadine therapy. Samples for PHT were drawn over 24 h, and urine was collected for determination of the PHT metabolite 5-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (HPPH). The pharmacokinetic parameters calculated for total and free PHT and HPPH were area under the time concentration curve (AUC), the maximum serum concentration (Cmax), the minimum serum concentration (Cmin), and the percentage of fluctuation between maximum and minimum concentrations. A factor analysis was used to clarify interrelationships. Five dependent variables were found to represent the data. These were assessed by multi-variate analysis of variance (MANOVA); p less than 0.05 was considered significant. No significant differences were observed for any of the parameters for the acute or chronic effects of terfenadine. We conclude that terfenadine does not interfere with PHT.

Adult↗