Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C D Buckner

Publications and source records attributed to C D Buckner.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.

Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is frequently used for mobilization of autologous CD34(+) progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for subsequent collection and support of high-dose chemotherapy. The administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy is typically followed by a myeloid growth factor and is associated with variable CD34 cell yields and morbidity. The two most commonly used myeloid growth factors for facilitation of CD34 cell harvests are granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). We performed a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing G-CSF, GM-CSF, and sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF following administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We evaluated CD34 yields, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of the three cytokine schedules. One hundred and fifty-six patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, or lymphoma received cyclophosphamide with either paclitaxel or etoposide and were randomized to receive G-CSF 6 microg/kg/day s.c., GM-CSF 250 microg/m(2)/day s.c., or GM-CSF for 6 days followed by G-CSF until completion of the stem cell harvest. Compared with patients who received GM-CSF, patients who received G-CSF had faster recovery of absolute neutrophil count to 0.5 x 10(9) per liter (median of 11 vs14 days, P = 0.0001) with fewer patients requiring red blood cell transfusions (P= 0.008); fewer patients with fever (18% vs 52%, P = 0.001); fewer hospital admissions (20% vs 42%, P = 0.13); and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% vs 59%, P = 0.001). Patients who received G-CSF also yielded more CD34 cells (median 7.1 vs 2.0 x 10(6) kg per apheresis, P = 0.0001) and a higher percentage achieved 2.5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (94% vs 78%, P = 0.21) and 5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (88% vs 53%, P = 0.01) or more CD34 cells per kilogram with fewer aphereses (median 2 vs 3, P = 0.002) and fewer days of growth factor treatment (median 12 vs 14, P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving G-CSF alone and the sequential regimen. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with G-CSF or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34 cells and had faster platelet recovery with fewer patients requiring platelet transfusions than patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by GM-CSF. In summary, G-CSF alone is superior to GM-CSF alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. An economic analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these three effective schedules is ongoing at the time of this writing.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison of radiation-based and chemotherapy-only preparative regimens.

The aim of this study was to compare toxicity and efficacy of total body irradiation (TBI), cyclophosphamide (CY) and etoposide (E) (TBI/CY/E) vs busulfan, melphalan and thiotepa (Bu/Mel/T) in patients receiving autologous stem cell infusion (ASCI) for malignant lymphoma (NHL). Between September 1990 and July 1998, 351 patients with NHL were treated with TBI/CY/E (n = 221) or Bu/Mel/T (n = 130) followed by ASCI. Patients in first, or second remission, first responding or untreated relapse were defined as having less advanced disease before transplantation. The median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-9) and 3.5 years (1-6) for patients receiving TBI/CY/E and Bu/Mel/T, respectively. The cumulative probabilities of survival, event-free survival (EFS) and relapse at 5 years were 44%, 32%, 49% following TBI/CY/E and 42%, 34% and 42% following Bu/Mel/T. The probability of EFS at 5 years for patients who had prior dose-limiting radiation (n = 59) was 32% after Bu/Mel/T therapy. Transplant-related mortality was 16% for TBI/CY/E and 21% for Bu/Mel/T. In univariate and multivariate analyses, more advanced disease status was associated with poor outcome (TBI/CY/E: RR 0.70, CI 0.50 to 0.97 P = 0.04; Bu/Mel/T: RR 0.61, CI 0.39 to 0.97 P = 0.03). No significant differences in toxicities and outcomes were observed between these two regimens despite the inclusion of patients who had received dose-limiting irradiation in the Bu/Mel/T regimen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell yields and morbidity after myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized to receive filgrastim (n = 51), sargramostim (n = 52), or sargramostim for 5 days followed by filgrastim (n = 53) after MC with either cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 75) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 81). RESULTS: Compared with those who received sargramostim, patients who received filgrastim had faster recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L or greater (a median of 11 v 14 days; P =. 0001), with fewer patients requiring RBC transfusions (P =.008), fewer patients with fever (18% v 52%; P = 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (20% v 42%; P =.013), and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% v 69%; P =.001). Patients who received filgrastim yielded more CD34(+) cells (median, 7.1 v 2.0 x 10(6)/kg/apheresis; P =.0001), and a higher fraction achieved 2.5 x 10(6) (94% v 78%; P =.021) and 5 x 10(6) (88% v 53%; P =.001) or more CD34(+) cells/kg with fewer aphereses (median, 2 v 3; P =.002) and fewer days of growth-factor treatment (median, 12 v 14; P =.0001). There were no major differences in outcomes between the filgrastim alone and the sequential regimens. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with filgrastim or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34(+) cells and had faster platelet recovery (P =.015), with fewer patients (P =.014) receiving fewer platelet transfusions (P =.001) than patients receiving sargramostim-mobilized PBSCs. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that filgrastim alone or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim were superior to sargramostim alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities after MC.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (CY) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial of 3 vs 4 g/m2 of CY.

The purpose of this study was to develop a regimen of docetaxel, cyclophosphamide (CY) and filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 66). A phase I trial of CY 2, 3 or 4 g/m2 with docetaxel 100 mg/m2, in consecutive cohorts of four patients each, did not reveal any dose-limiting toxicities and subsequent patients were randomized to receive 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients was 11.06x10(6)/kg (range, 0.03-84.77) from a median of two aphereses (range, 1-7); 6.52x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis (range, 0.01-52.07). Target CD34+ cell doses > or =2.5 and > or =5.0x10(6)/kg were achieved in 89% and 79%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in CD34+ cell yields or target CD34+ cell doses achieved following 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. Patients with only one prior chemotherapy regimen yielded a median of 12.82x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis compared to 5.85 for those receiving > or =2 regimens (P = 0.03). It was concluded that the combination of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, CY 3 g/m2 without mesna could be administered with acceptable toxicity with collection of adequate quantities of PBSC from the majority of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for high-dose chemotherapy.

Several studies have clearly documented a more rapid hematopoietic recovery with growth factor-mobilized PBSC than with bone marrow. Time to engraftment for neutrophils and platelets average 8-12 days in contrast to 2-4 weeks after bone marrow. This rapid hematopoietic recovery with PBSC has decreased the duration of hospitalization, transfusion requirements, and costs. Although growth factors alone may mobilize enough PBSC for high-dose chemotherapy, administration of growth factor after submyeloablative chemotherapy increases the yield of CD34+ cells. Based on the current data, CD34+ cell content of PBSC appears to be the single most powerful predictor of hematopoietic recovery. Infusion of > or =5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg is associated with a rapid engraftment of neutrophils and platelets, although successful engraftment has also been reported with infusion of 2.5-5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Age, prior radiotherapy, marrow involvement, and prior chemotherapy regimens are important factors influencing the yield of stem cells. Therefore, using these pa-rameters, we may identify the patients who will fail to mobilize sufficient numbers of PBSC before collection and use new strategies for stem cell mobilization. Because of the ease of collection and rapid engraftment after myeloablative therapy, PBSC have replaced bone marrow for autologous transplantation and may supplant bone marrow for allogeneic transplantation in the near future.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1999

Adjuvant dose-intense chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in stage II-III breast cancer with five to nine involved axillary lymph nodes.

The purpose of this study is to determine outcomes for patients with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Forty-three patients with stage II-III disease, five to nine positive axillary lymph nodes, and a median age of 44 years (range, 27-60 years) were enrolled in a study that included: 1) standard dose doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate adjuvant therapy; 2) cyclophosphamide, etoposide, filgrastim, and peripheral blood stem cell harvest; and 3) high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) followed by peripheral blood stem cell infusion. All 43 patients received doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate, 42 (98%) received etoposide, and 41 (95%) received CTCb. Thirty-two patients (74%) are alive, 28 (65%) without relapse at a median of 55 months (range, 41-87 months). Two died (5%) of treatment-related causes, (subclavian catheter complication after etoposide and late radiation pneumonitis), and nine other deaths (21%) were associated with recurrent breast cancer. The probabilities of overall and event-free survival at 4 years were 0.77 and 0.67, respectively, compared with 0.82 and 0.69, respectively, for 72 similar patients with 10 or more positive axillary nodes receiving the same sequence of therapy. Thus, patients with five to nine positive axillary lymph nodes have a similar risk of failure after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell support as patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Single-agent paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support.

The purpose of this trial was to determine the effects of paclitaxel in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer scheduled to receive high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Eighty-four patients received anthracycline-based induction and two doses of paclitaxel at 170 mg/m2 (n = 52) or 250 mg/m2 (n = 32). Eighty-two (98%) received cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 50) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 32) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells, and 79 (94%) received cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with peripheral blood stem cell support. One patient (1%) died of infection and 56 (67%) died of progressive disease. For patients with measurable disease, the complete response rate was 21% after induction and 29% after paclitaxel (p = 0.54). Results were compared with those of 125 patients who received the same sequence of therapy without paclitaxel. The complete response rate after high-dose chemotherapy was 54% for patients receiving paclitaxel and 62% for those not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.60). The probabilities of overall survival and event-free survival at 3 years for patients receiving paclitaxel were 46% and 24%, respectively, compared with 54% and 22%, respectively, for patients not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.62). Further trials evaluating this dose and schedule of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy are not warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Tempo of hematologic recovery correlates with peripheral blood CD34+ cell level in patients undergoing stem cell mobilization.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between the time to recovery of peripheral blood counts and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood (PB) and apheresis collections of patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy followed by rhG-CSF. Twenty-three patients with a median age of 42 years (range 17-64) with malignancies underwent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection after cyclophosphamide (CY) 4 g/m2 and etoposide (600 mg/m2) followed by rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg/day). The WBC, platelet counts, CD34+ cell counts per ml of PB, and CD34+ cells in apheresis products were followed in all patients. The relationship of the time to recovery of WBC > 1,000/microl, >3,000/microl, >10,000/microl and platelets >20,000/microl and 50,000/microl was compared to the average daily CD34+ cells/ml in each patient using the Spearman Correlation test. The tempo of recovery of WBC and platelets were highly correlated with the average CD34+ cell count in blood. In order to derive some useful guidelines for the timing of apheresis, the patients were divided into two groups, early recover (ER) and late recover (LR) based on the median time (day 10) to reach WBC count greater than 1,000/microl. ER patients had an average daily PB CD34+ cell count of 9.04 x 10(4)/ml (range 0.44-17.5) and a median yield of CD34+ cells of 10.43 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.60-25.95) compared to LR patients, who had 1.87 x 10(4)/ml (range 0.32-5.44) in the PB (P = .001) and a yield 3.20 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells (range 0.037-9.39) (P = .001). Patients recovering their WBC to 1,000/ml within 10 days of completing this regimen may undergo PBSC collection and achieve minimum-target cell doses of >2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg--100% of the time.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Intravenous immunoglobulin and the risk of hepatic veno-occlusive disease after bone marrow transplantation.

Recent reports using historical controls or registry cohorts suggest, respectively, either an increase in the mortality or a decrease in the incidence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) with the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v.Ig) after bone marrow transplantation. These divergent results prompted us to conduct a retrospective analysis of two randomized clinical trials conducted at our center to determine the effect of i.v.Ig infusions on the development and severity of VOD. Patients were randomized to receive (n=318) or not to receive (n=315) i.v.Ig prophylaxis after human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling (n=414), mismatched or unrelated (n=178), or autologous or syngeneic (n=41) marrow transplantation. To determine the relationship of i.v.Ig to the development and severity of VOD, a single observer reviewed data displays created for each patient for grading VOD without knowledge of patient i.v.Ig use. In this analysis, VOD was defined as hyperbilirubinemia > or =2.0 mg/dL before day 20 and abrupt weight gain > or =2% before day 14 posttransplant in the absence of other causes of liver disease. Hepatic VOD developed in 235 (37%) of the 633 randomized patients. No evidence for VOD was found in 230 (36%) patients. The remaining 168 (27%) patients were classified as having liver disease of uncertain etiology. Hepatic VOD was judged to be severe in 63 (10%) and mild or moderate in 172 (27%) patients. The number of patients developing any VOD or severe VOD was similar between those randomized to i.v.Ig prophylaxis and untreated controls (115 vs. 120 and 32 vs. 31, respectively). Logistic regression models identified several covariates as significant (p < 0.01) factors associated with the development of severe VOD. Increased risk occurred with elevated pretransplant serum aspartate aminotransferase (odds ratio [OR] = 2.64) and earlier year of transplant (OR = 3.73); decreased risk occurred with autologous or twin donors (OR = 0.09) and acute myeloid leukemia (OR = 0.39). The development of any VOD was associated with an elevated pretransplant alkaline phosphatase (OR = 4.1), pretransplant use of vancomycin (OR = 1.6) or amphotericin (OR = 3.0), posttransplant use of cyclosporine (OR = 2.5), older patient age (OR = 1.03), and obesity (OR = 0.78). We concluded from the controlled trials of 633 patients that the administration of i.v.Ig did not influence the development or severity of VOD after bone marrow transplantation.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗
PubMed1998

High-dose chemotherapy with BUCY or BEAC and unpurged peripheral blood stem cell infusion in patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Forty-nine patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BUCY) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and CY (BEAC) followed by unpurged autologous peripheral blood stem (PBSC) infusion. All patients had failed initial chemotherapy or progressed after an initial remission. Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized with CY alone (n = 1), CY, etoposide (n = 19), or CY, etoposide and cisplatin (n = 29) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Twenty-two patients received BU, 16 mg/kg, and CY, 120 mg/kg. Twenty-seven patients received carmustine 300 mg/m2, etoposide 600 mg/m2, cytarabine 600 mg/m2, and CY 140 mg/kg. Four patients (8%) died of non-relapse causes, two (9%) in the BUCY group and two (7%) in the BEAC group. Twenty-seven patients (55%) relapsed or progressed at a median of 9.4 months (2-38) from PBSC infusion. Ten patients who relapsed are alive a median of 31 months (range, 6-47) after relapse. The probabilities of relapse at 3.6 years for patients receiving BUCY or BEAC were 0.57 and 0.70, respectively (P = 0.92). Twenty-seven patients (55%) are alive at a median of 3.6 years (range, 1-5). The probabilities of survival at 3.6 years for patients receiving BUCY or BEAC were 0.58 and 0.55, respectively (P = 0.72). The probabilities of EFS at 3.6 years for patients receiving BUCY or BEAC were 0.36 and 0.28, respectively (P = 0.82). It was concluded that BUCY is an active regimen for the treatment of patients with low-grade NHL.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

High-dose chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: evaluation of infusing peripheral blood stem cells containing occult tumor cells.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of detecting occult tumor cells in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvests and to determine the impact of infusing such cells on relapses after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Peripheral blood stem cell harvests from 223 patients with breast cancer were examined by an immunocytochemistry (ICC) method for detection of occult tumor cells, and infused after HDC without consideration of test results. Two hundred and four patients, 114 with stage II-III and 90 with stage IV disease who received only PBSC, that were tested by ICC were evaluated for time to relapse. Five hundred and eighty-one of 619 PBSC harvests (94%) from 223 patients were tested. Fifty-three of 581 harvests (9%), 8% from stage II-III and 10% from stage IV patients, were positive by ICC (P = 0.68). Forty-one of 223 patients (18%), 17/122 (14%) with stage II-III and 24/101 (24%) with stage IV disease, had positive harvests (P = 0.06). Eleven percent of patients who had 1-2 harvests tested were positive as compared to 32% of patients who had > or =3 PBSC harvests tested (P < 0.001). Nineteen patients who were infused with a mixture of ICC negative and untested PBSC harvests were excluded from analyses of relapse. The probabilities of relapse at 18 months for the 97 patients with stage II-III disease infused with ICC-negative and the 17 with ICC-positive PBSC were 0.19 and 0.13, respectively (P = 0.48). The probabilities of relapse at 18 months for patients achieving a CR or a CR in non-bone sites and improvement in bone lesions were 0.55 for the ICC-negative group (n = 30) and 0.45 for the ICC-positive group (n = 11) (P = 0.60). It was concluded that occult tumor cells were detected by ICC in PBSC harvests from a relatively small fraction of women with breast cancer, but were not associated with a significant increase in the probability of early relapse or progression when infused after HDC.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I-II evaluation of rapid sequence tandem high-dose melphalan with peripheral blood stem cell support in patients with multiple myeloma.

This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of high-dose melphalan (HDM), with peripheral blood stem cell support, that could be given twice within 90 days to patients with multiple myeloma. Twenty patients received tandem HDM at 160, 180 or 200 mg/m2 and a total of 55 were treated at the estimated MTD of 200 mg/m2. Seventeen of 55 (31%) did not receive cycle 2; six because of low CD34+ cell yields, three because of severe (n = 1) or fatal toxicities (n = 2) and eight for other reasons. The median interval between doses for 38 patients was 70 days (range 41-225). Three of 55 patients (5%) died of treatment-related causes. In patients completing two cycles of HDM, at any dose level, the complete remission rate improved from 15% following cycle 1 to 55% following cycle 2. The probabilities of survival, event-free survival and relapse or progression at 18 months for the 55 patients treated at the MTD were 0.84, 0.76 and 0.20, respectively, with a median follow-up of 19 months (range 9-36) from mobilization chemotherapy. It was concluded that two cycles of HDM, 200 mg/m2, could be administered to approximately 70% of patients under the age of 66 with multiple myeloma in a median interval of 70 days, with improvement in CR rates.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

High-dose busulfan, melphalan and thiotepa followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) rescue in patients with advanced stage III/IV ovarian cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with busulfan, melphalan and thiotepa (BUMELTT) followed by autologous PBSC infusion in treating patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Thirty-one patients, 18 with stage III/IIIc and 13 with stage IV ovarian cancer, were treated with BU (12 mg/kg), MEL (100 mg/m2) and TT (500 mg/m2) and autologous PBSC rescue. Fifteen patients were in clinical complete remission (CR) at treatment; 11 had platinum-sensitive disease. Sixteen patients were not in CR; two had platinum-sensitive disease. The probabilities of overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and relapse (R) for all patients at 18 months were 0.57, 0.30 and 0.63; for patients in CR, the rates were 0.87, 0.44 and 0.49 and for patients not in CR, 0.38, 0.13 and 0.81. Two patients (6.5%) died of treatment-related causes. Among the 13 patients with platinum-sensitive disease, all are still alive, with seven having relapsed 129-1021 days after PBSC infusion. OS, EFS and R were 1.00, 0.52 and 0.48. Of the 18 patients with platinum-resistant disease, four remain alive (two in remission). Six patients did not respond and eight relapsed from days 104-429. The OS, EFS and R were 0.33, 0.11 and 0.78. We conclude that BUMELTT is well tolerated in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and results are equivalent to other published HDC regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A randomized trial of once vs twice daily administration of intravenous granisetron with dexamethosone in patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin.

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal schedule of i.v. granisetron and dexamethosone for control of nausea and emesis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Seventy patients with breast cancer received high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTCb) for 3 consecutive days. All 70 received dexamethasone 12 mg i.v. and granisetron 1 mg i.v. prior to infusion of CTCb and were randomized to receive placebo (n = 37) or an additional identical dose of granisetron (n = 33) 12 h later. Beginning on day 2 of chemotherapy administration, 55 patients evaluable later self-administered a cocktail of diphenhydramine (benadryl), lorazepam (ativan) and dexamethasone (BAD). Fourteen of 37 patients (38%) receiving granisetron once a day and 15/33 (44%) receiving it twice a day had a complete response during the first 24 h following the first doses of chemotherapy (P = 0.52). In the 55 evaluable patients receiving BAD, 18 of 29 (62%) in the once daily group and 14/26 (54%) in the twice daily group required additional medications (P = 0.54). The median time to first emetic episode was 20 h (range 6.6-79.5) for patients receiving once a day and 21.4 hours (range 5.8-105.3) for patients receiving twice a day granisetron (P = 0.48). Five patients in the once daily and seven patients in the twice daily group had complete control of nausea and emesis throughout the study period (P = 0.37). It was concluded that there were no statistically significant differences in nausea and emetic control between dexamethasone with once daily or twice daily i.v. granisetron administration in patients receiving high-dose CTCb.

Adult↗