Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Bury

Publications and source records attributed to C Bury.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Type and position of promoter elements in retroviral vectors have substantial effects on the expression level of an enhanced green fluorescent protein reporter gene.

PURPOSE: Although gene transfer with retroviral vectors has already been applied to patients as part of clinical protocols, low expression of transgenes in target cells still remains a problem. Therefore, we compared various retroviral vectors using different promoters and backbones for expression of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene in fibroblasts and CD34+ cells. METHODS: The N2A retroviral vector was used to test expression from the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter (vector N2A-TK-EGFP), a human phosphoglycerate kinase promoter (vector N2A-PGK-EGFP), and the SV40 promoter (vector N2A-SV-EGFP). Additional constructs used the spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) long terminal repeat (LTR) as promoter and expressed EGFP alone (vector SFbeta1-EGFP) or EGFP and a downstream (vector SFbeta1-EGFP-IRES) or upstream (vector SFbeta1-IRES-EGFP) internal ribosomal entry site. RESULTS: For NIH 3T3 cells the fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed that the most active internal promoter was the SV40 promoter in the vector N2A-SV-EGFP (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI, 66.7 +/- 0.4), followed by N2A-PGK-EGFP (26.3 +/- 1.8 MFI), and N2A-TK-EGFP (4.8 +/- 0.1 MFI). Expression from the SFbeta1-EGFP vector (82.6 +/- 6.7 MFI) and the SFbeta1-EGFP-IRES vector (102.8 +/- 6.2 MFI) was higher than from SFbeta1-IRES-EGFP vector (15.5 +/- 1.8 MFI). In human CD34-positive cells, the EGFP expression from all vectors was considerably lower than in fibroblasts with the SFbeta1-EGFP vector still being four- to fivefold more active than the internal promoters tested. CONCLUSION: The SFFV LTR seems to allow a high expression of transgenes, as long as the transgene is not expressed downstream of an internal ribosomal entry site. Internal promoters may be useful for targeted gene expression in specific cell types, but the reduced level of expression from some internal promoters has to be taken into consideration.

3T3 Cells↗

Repression of the c-Jun trans-activation function by the adenovirus type 12 E1A 52R protein correlates with the inhibition of phosphorylation of the c-Jun activation domain.

The early region 1A 52R polypeptide, a protein expressed exclusively by the in vivo oncogenic adenovirus subtype 12, represses the trans-activating function of the cellular transcription factor complex AP-1 consisting of c-Jun-c-Jun homodimers. In this report we demonstrate that the repression in vivo correlates with a direct physical interaction of the adenovirus protein with c-Jun in vitro. Interestingly, the 52R protein binds to the bZIP domain of c-Jun essential for dimerization and DNA binding but not to the c-Jun activation domain. This interaction does not prevent the promoter binding of c-Jun/AP-1. Moreover, the physical association between c-Jun and the TATA box-binding protein TBP is not disturbed by the 52R polypeptide. In fact, we show evidence that down-regulation of c-Jun activity by the adenoviral protein is due to the inhibition of phosphorylation of the c-Jun trans-activation domain. In vivo phosphorylation of the c-Jun activation domain is necessary for the interaction of c-Jun with specific cofactors such as CBP and therefore a prerequisite for the activation of target genes. Due to these results we propose a model in which the 52R protein represses the trans-activating function of c-Jun by preventing its phosphorylation through a specific kinase necessary for the activation of the cellular transcription factor.

Adenovirus E1A Proteins↗

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Germany↗