Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Bogdan

Publications and source records attributed to C Bogdan.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Of microbes, macrophages and nitric oxide.

One of the most prominent functions of nitric oxide (NO) is its participation in antimicrobial and antiviral defense. This paper summarizes the evidence for this function and compiles the infectious agents which are currently thought to be controlled via high out-put generation of NO as it occurs in activated macrophages and other cells expressing the inducible isoform of NO-synthase (iNOS, NOS-2). Several less appreciated forms of interaction between NO and microbes will also be reviewed, including the role of NO as an immunosuppressive or tissue-destructive molecule during the course of infections, the regulation of microbial antioxidant systems by host cell-derived NO, the contribution of NO to parasite stage conversion, the induction or suppression of macrophage iNOS by microbial products, and the existence of endogenous NO synthase pathways in certain bacteria and parasites.

Animals↗

Reactivation of latent leishmaniasis by inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase.

Nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) is required for the resolution of acute cutaneous leishmaniasis in resistant C57BL/6 mice. As is the case in several other infections, the clinically cured host organism still harbors small amounts of live Leishmania major parasites. Here, we demonstrate lifelong expression of iNOS at the site of the original skin lesion and in the draining lymph node of long-term-infected C57BL/6 mice. iNOS activity in the lymph node was dependent on CD4+, but not on the CD8+ T cells. By double labeling techniques, iNOS and L. major were each found in macrophages (F4/80+, BM-8+, and/or MOMA-2+) and dendritic cells (NLDC-145+), but not in granulocytes or endothelial cells. In situ triple labeling of lymph node sections revealed that approximately 30-40% of the L. major foci were associated with iNOS-positive macrophages or dendritic cells. The majority of the L. major foci (60-70%), however, was located in areas that were negative for both iNOS and the macrophage and dendritic cell markers. In L. major-infected C57BL/6 mice, which had cured their cutaneous lesions, administration of L-N6-iminoethyl-lysine (L-NIL), a potent inhibitor of iNOS, led to a 10(4)-10(5)-fold increase of the parasite burden in the cutaneous and lymphoid tissue and caused clinical recrudescence of the disease. Persistent expression of iNOS and resumption of parasite replication after application of L-NIL was also observed in resistant C3H/HeN and CBA/J mice. We conclude that iNOS activity is crucial for the control of Leishmania persisting in immunocompetent hosts after resolution of the primary infection. Failure to maintain iNOS activity might be the mechanism underlying endogenous reactivation of latent infections with NO-sensitive microbes during phases of immunosuppression.

Animals↗

Murine epidermal Langerhans cells do not express inducible nitric oxide synthase.

In Leishmania-infected macrophages (M phi), the formation of reactive nitrogen intermediates by the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is critical for the killing of the intracellular parasites. We have recently shown that, in addition to M phi, epidermal Langerhans cells (LC) can phagocytose Leishmania major, but they do not allow parasite replication. Therefore, we analyzed whether LC and M phi display the same leishmanicidal effector mechanism. Unlike M phi, stimulation of unselected epidermal cells with interferon-gamma/lipopolysaccharide did not lead to the release of nitric oxide (NO), and inhibition of NO production had no effect on the rate of infection of LC. iNOS mRNA was clearly detectable in M phi as well as unselected epidermal cells (the majority of which consists of keratinocytes) after stimulation with different cytokines. In contrast, pure LC obtained by single-cell picking from cytokine-activated or L. major-infected epidermal cells did not express iNOS mRNA. Addition of the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine to already-infected LC did not alter their rate of infection, indicating that LC do not utilize exogenous NO for the control of intracellular Leishmania. These results suggest that in the L. major-infected skin, activated M phi and keratinocytes, but not LC have the ability to express iNOS activity. Therefore, an as yet unidentified, NO-independent mechanism appears to be responsible for the control of parasite replication in LC.

Animals↗

Invasion, control and persistence of Leishmania parasites.

Significant advances in research on the immunopathogenesis of leishmaniasis include the discovery of novel putative evasion and survival strategies of Leishmania parasites, a more detailed understanding of the function and regulation of interleukin-12, definition of molecules involved in cognate interaction between macrophages and T cells and new ideas concerning the mechanisms of host resistance and susceptibility. The use of transgenic mice for (re)probing certain immunological aspects of leishmaniasis has yielded not only predictable and confirmatory but also unexpected and pioneering results which require critical appreciation.

Animals↗

L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine potently inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase and is superior to NG-monomethyl-arginine in vitro and in vivo.

L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine is a novel inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, which similar to aminoguanidine but unlike NG-monomethyl-L-arginine is 30-fold more selective for the inducible than for the constitutive isoform of the enzyme. Here, we characterized this inhibitor for the first time in intact cells and during infection of mice with a NO-sensitive parasite (Leishmania major). L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine potently inhibited the activity of inducible NO-synthase in primary macrophages. After stimulation by interferon-gamma the IC50 of L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine was 0.4 +/- 0.1 mu M and 10- or 30-fold lower than that of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine or aminoguanidine, respectively. In vivo, L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine (0.4-9 mM in the drinking water) suppressed inducible NO-synthase activity and caused a dramatic exacerbation of leishmaniasis, despite a counterregulatory increase of inducible NO-synthase protein in the tissue. In contrast, considerably higher concentrations of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (20-50 mM) were required in order to achieve comparable effects. NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, but not L-N6-(1-imino-ethyl)-lysine led to weight loss, reduced water and food consumption. We conclude that L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine should be used instead of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine for potent suppression of inducible NO-synthase in vitro and in vivo.

Animals↗

2,4-Diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine, an inhibitor of tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis, downregulates the expression of iNOS protein and mRNA in primary murine macrophages.

2,4-diamino-6-hydroxy-pyrimidine (DAHP), an inhibitor of GTP cyclohydrolase I, blocks the synthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), which is a known cofactor of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Previously, DAHP was shown to suppress the production of nitric oxide by cytokine-activated fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells or endothelial cells which could be attributed to its function as a cofactor antagonist. Here, we demonstrate that in interferon-gamma-activated murine peritoneal macrophages DAHP suppresses the expression of iNOS mRNA and protein in a BH4-independent manner and, thus, acts by a novel mechanism.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗

Vesicle membrane association of nitric oxide synthase in primary mouse macrophages.

The isoform of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) whose activity is independent of elevated Ca2+ and exogenous calmodulin (iNOS; NOS type II) is inducible in a wide variety of cells and plays a major role in pathophysiology. The notion that iNOS is predominantly cytosolic is based on studies of a transformed cell line; almost nothing is known about the subcellular localization of iNOS in primary cells. Accordingly, we undertook a combined immunoelectron microscopic and biochemical analysis of iNOS in primary mouse macrophages. Approximately one-half of their iNOS activity and protein could be sedimented from 1 M KCl at 100,000 x g. The morphologic counterpart of particulate iNOS was a population of 50 to 80 nm vesicles that did not correspond to lysosomes nor peroxisomes. Vesicular iNOS arose from cytosolic iNOS by undergoing a post-translational modification that increased its apparent molecular mass by 4.5 kDa and promoted its salt-, detergent-, acid- and urea-resistant association with membranes, in the absence of detectable alternative splicing, myristoylation, palmitoylation, acetylation, glycosylation, or COOH-terminal truncation. Although primary macrophage iNOS underwent phosphorylation, ubiquitinylation, and binding of calmodulin tightly enough to resist boiling in SDS, these modifications did not allow us to distinguish between the cytosolic and particulate variants. The apparently novel iNOS-positive vesicles may translocate to phagosomes containing appropriately opsonized particles.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗

Lack of inducible nitric oxide synthase activity in T cell clones and T lymphocytes from naive and Leishmania major-infected mice.

Nitric oxide (NO) generated by the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is implicated in a number of immunological processes including killing of intracellular parasites, suppression of T cell proliferation, production of cytokines and destruction of tissue in autoimmune diseases. Considering that cytokine-activated mouse macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells are potent producers of NO, we investigated whether T cells, as central participants in immune responses, can also be activated for the release of NO. Neither thymocytes nor type 1 or type 2 T helper cell clones generated significant amounts of nitrite (the stable end product of NO in culture supernatants) when stimulated by T cell mitogens, cytokines or antigen in the presence of irradiated antigen-presenting cells. Similarly, T cells freshly isolated from mice acutely infected with the intracellular pathogen Leishmania major did not produce NO upon restimulation in vitro. The lack of NO production was not due to the expression of enzymatically inactive iNOS, as we were unable to detect any iNOS protein in activated T helper clones or in freshly isolated T cells from infected mice by Western (protein) blot analysis. Finally, we tested whether iNOS expression in T cells might be restricted to a minor subpopulation and therefore only detectable on a single cell level. After immunofluorescence staining of lymph node or spleen cells from infected mice with antibodies against iNOS, F4/80- or Thy-1-antigen, macrophages, but no T cells, were found to express iNOS. Thus, we have no evidence that activated T helper cell clones or T cells from L. major-infected mice are high producers of NO.

Animals↗

Tissue expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase is closely associated with resistance to Leishmania major.

Previous studies with inhibitors of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) suggested that high-output production of nitric oxide (NO) is an important antimicrobial effector pathway in vitro and in vivo. Here, we investigated the tissue expression of iNOS in mice after infection with Leishmania major. Immunohistochemical staining with an iNOS-specific antiserum revealed that in the cutaneous lesion and draining lymph nodes (LN) of clinically resistant mice (C57BL/6), iNOS protein is found earlier during infection and in significantly higher amounts than in the nonhealing BALB/c strain. Similar differences were seen on the mRNA level as quantitated by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Anti-CD4 treatment of BALB/c mice not only induced resistance to disease, but also restored the expression of iNOS in the tissue. In situ, few or no parasites were found in those regions of the skin lesion and the draining LN which were highly positive for iNOS. By double labeling experiments, macrophages were identified as iNOS expressing cells in vivo. In the lesions of BALB/c mice, cells staining positively for transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), a potent inhibitor of iNOS in vitro, were strikingly more prominent than in C57BL/6, whereas no such difference was found for interleukin 4 or interferon gamma (IFN-gamma). In vitro, production of NO was approximately threefold higher in C57BL/6 than in BALB/c macrophages after stimulation with IFN-gamma. We conclude that the pronounced expression of iNOS in resistant mice is an important mechanism for the elimination of Leishmania in vivo. The relative lack of iNOS in susceptible mice might be a consequence of macrophage deactivation by TGF-beta and reduced responsiveness to IFN-gamma.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗

Mechanism of suppression of nitric oxide synthase expression by interleukin-4 in primary mouse macrophages.

Nitric oxide (NO) contributes to the antitumor, antimicrobial, and immunosuppressive activity of macrophages. An inducible form of NO synthase (iNOS) is responsible for high output generation of nitric oxide by macrophages after stimulation with cytokines and/or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In the present study, we demonstrate that interleukin 4 (IL-4) suppressed production of NO by primary mouse peritoneal macrophages exposed to IFN-gamma with or without LPS, even while synergizing with IFN-gamma to increase the secretion of TNF-alpha. Suppression of NO production was paralleled by decreases in iNOS enzyme activity and iNOS antigen. IL-4 did not inhibit induction of iNOS mRNA 4-6 h after exposure to IFN-gamma, but strongly reduced iNOS mRNA at later times of stimulation (24-72 h), without increasing its turnover. The conditions for maximal suppression of iNOS expression by IL-4 and the mechanisms of suppression differed from those determined in parallel for transforming growth-factor-beta as described elsewhere. These results illustrate the diversity of phenotypes of macrophages deactivated by different cytokines, and demonstrate that IL-4 has the potential to reduce one component of the anti-tumor, antimicrobial, and immunosuppressive activities of macrophages.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗

Control of nitric oxide synthase expression by transforming growth factor-beta: implications for homeostasis.

Production of nitric oxide (NO) can be stimulated by inflammatory cytokines and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in mammalian cells via an inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Conversely, the transforming growth factor-beta s (TGF-beta s) suppress NO production by reducing iNOS expression. Production of NO leads to disparate consequences, some beneficial and some damaging to the host, depending on the cell and context in which iNOS is induced. The TGF-beta s counter these NO-mediated processes in macrophages, cardiac myocytes, smooth muscle cells, bone marrow cells, and retinal pigment epithelial cells. Autocrine or paracrine production of TGF-beta may thus serve as a physiological counterbalance for iNOS expression, a mechanism which may be subverted by pathogens and tumors for their own survival. A greater understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of NO and TGF-beta production may lead to effective therapeutic strategies in various diseases.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗

Mechanisms of suppression of macrophage nitric oxide release by transforming growth factor beta.

Activated mouse peritoneal macrophages produce nitric oxide (NO) via a nitric oxide synthase that is inducible by interferon gamma (IFN-gamma): iNOS. We have studied the mechanisms by which transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta) suppresses IFN-gamma-stimulated NO production. TGF-beta treatment reduced iNOS specific activity and iNOS protein in both cytosolic and particulate fractions as assessed by Western blot with monospecific anti-iNOS immunoglobulin G. TGF-beta reduced iNOS mRNA without affecting the transcription of iNOS by decreasing iNOS mRNA stability. Even after iNOS was already expressed, TGF-beta reduced the amount of iNOS protein. This was due to reduction of iNOS mRNA translation and increased degradation of iNOS protein. The potency of TGF-beta as a deactivator of NO production (50% inhibitory concentration, 5.6 +/- 2 pM) may reflect its ability to suppress iNOS expression by three distinct mechanisms: decreased stability and translation of iNOS mRNA, and increased degradation of iNOS protein. This is the first evidence that iNOS is subject to other than transcriptional regulation.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗

Traces of bacterial lipopolysaccharide suppress IFN-gamma-induced nitric oxide synthase gene expression in primary mouse macrophages.

A nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inducible by cytokines and microbial products contributes to the cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of mouse macrophages. Bacterial LPS interacts synergistically with IFN-gamma to induce iNOS when both stimuli are added together. In contrast, we show here that pre-exposure of peritoneal macrophages to low concentrations of LPS suppresses the induction of iNOS when IFN-gamma is added subsequently. Suppression required pretreatment with LPS for at least 8 h and was optimal with LPS concentrations in the range of 50 to 200 pg/ml. Suppression was exerted by smooth and rough forms of LPS from Escherichia coli and by lipid A from Salmonella minnesota, but not by a biologically inactive lipid A from Rhodobacter sphaeorides. Suppression of nitrite accumulation and iNOS enzyme activity by prior exposure of macrophages to LPS could be explained by their markedly decreased content of iNOS protein, as revealed by immunoblot with monospecific anti-iNOS IgG. Messenger RNA for iNOS was affected in a biphasic manner by pretreatment with LPS. Five hours after addition of IFN-gamma, iNOS mRNA levels were unaltered or even enhanced by pretreatment with LPS, but by 24 to 48 h, expression of iNOS mRNA was inhibited strongly enough to account for the reduced levels of iNOS protein. Suppression by LPS did not appear to be mediated by endogenous prostaglandins, transforming growth factor-beta, or TNF-alpha, even though pretreatment with exogenous TNF-alpha was also suppressive. These findings suggest that preactivation of pathways normally contributing to synergistic induction of iNOS may deplete macrophages of factors needed for its expression. Regulation of iNOS in vivo may depend on the relative tempo with which the inflammatory and immune responses evolve.

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗

Modulation of macrophage function by transforming growth factor beta, interleukin-4, and interleukin-10.

The findings reviewed above leave no doubt as to the complexity of actions of TGF-beta, IL-4, and IL-10 on monocytes/macrophages. Along with MDF, whose actions were recently reviewed elsewhere, TGF-beta, IL-4, and IL-10 are the only presently known, purified cytokines that have been shown to have strong macrophage-deactivating effects. However, none of them can be categorized as purely macrophage deactivating since they also exert macrophage-activating effects. In vitro, their effects, both in terms of extent and direction (activating vs. deactivating), are strongly influenced by the stimulation conditions (e.g., triggering signal, cytokine concentration, timing of cytokine addition), the species (mouse vs. human), the source (blood vs. peritoneal, alveolar, colostral) and the state of differentiation/activation of the macrophage (e.g., resting vs. inflammatory). In addition, TGF-beta, as well as IL-4 and IL-10, up- and/or downregulates the function of several cell types other than macrophages, which further hampers our ability to predict, on the basis of in vitro experiments with macrophages, possible effects during an immune response in vivo. Despite this complexity, the highly reductive approach of in vitro studies has revealed important differences in the ability of TGF-beta, IL-4, and IL-10 to modulate the phenotype of monocytes/macrophages. The disparities have been most striking with regard to the secretory function of monocytes/macrophages (see Table 2). First, TGF-beta, IL-4, and IL-10 have a different spectrum of activity. Thus, TGF-beta, but not IL-4 or IL-10, can induce resting human monocytes to produce TNF, IL-1, and IL-6. Second, they affect monokine and RNI and ROI production to a different extent. For example, IL-10 is an approximately 25-fold more potent suppressor of LPS-induced TNF production by mouse macrophages than is TGF-beta. Third, they differ in their ability to overcome additional activating stimuli, so that in the presence of LPS, IL-4, but not TGF-beta or IL-10 suppresses IFN gamma-induced RNI release. Fourth, their macrophage-deactivating effects require different stimulation conditions. Thus, IL-4, but not TGF-beta, interferes with RNI release strongly only after preincubation of the macrophages. Finally, these agents deactivate macrophages by distinct mechanisms. For example, IL-10 causes massive downregulation of TNF mRNA, whereas TGF-beta suppresses TNF release on a translational level. It will be a challenge to define clinical applications for these potent macrophage modulators on the basis of their different spectrum of activities. For TGF-beta and IL-4 such studies have already been initiated.

Animals↗

Cytokines in leishmaniasis: a complex network of stimulatory and inhibitory interactions.

The work of immunologists, cell biologists and parasitologists in the field of leishmaniasis has not only provided important insights into the immunopathogenesis of this disease, but also yielded fundamental contributions to our understanding of basic immunological phenomena and of host-parasite interactions. The ability of recombinant interferon-gamma to induce the microbicidal activity of phagocytes and the opposite effect of inhibitory cytokines was first demonstrated with Leishmania-infected macrophages. The selective development of protective and disease-mediating CD4+ T lymphocytes as well as their differential influence on the course of the disease has been long investigated in the murine Leishmania major model and now represents one of the best examples for the in vivo induction of type 1 versus type 2 T helper lymphocytes. At the same time, this model has also been extensively used for immunization studies and cytokine therapy, which shed light on the functions of cytokines in vivo as well as on the mechanism(s) of disease resistance and susceptibility. In this review we will discuss the present picture of the cytokine network in murine L. major infections.

Animals↗

Contrasting mechanisms for suppression of macrophage cytokine release by transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10.

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and interleukin (IL)-10 inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophage production of the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF), IL-1 alpha, and IL-1 beta by contrasting post-transcriptional mechanisms. TGF-beta acted slowly and late, as it required 12-16 h to exert a suppressive effect, and inhibited TNF production even when added 6 h after LPS. TGF-beta affected neither the level of TNF mRNA, the release of preformed TNF nor the degradation of TNF. Thus, TGF-beta appeared to inhibit translation of TNF mRNA. IL-10 not only suppressed TNF release to a 25-fold greater extent than TGF-beta, but also inhibited release of IL-1. In contrast to TGF-beta, IL-10 acted on an early step in cytokine production, its effect being maximal 3 h after addition of LPS. Unlike TGF-beta, IL-10 markedly suppressed TNF, IL-1 alpha, and IL-1 beta mRNA levels. However, this was accomplished without suppressing transcription of the corresponding genes. Moreover, cycloheximide antagonized the IL-10-dependent reduction in cytokine mRNA levels. Thus, IL-10 may induce a ribonuclease active on cytokine transcripts or may induce a protein that enhances the susceptibility of TNF, IL-1 alpha, and IL-1 beta mRNAs to ribonucleolytic action. We conclude that IL-10 and TGF-beta induce different phenotypes of macrophage deactivation, and deactivate macrophages by different mechanisms: IL-10 promotes degradation of cytokine mRNA, while TGF-beta primarily suppresses translation.

Animals↗

[Leishmaniasis with multiple cutaneous nodules].

Six weeks after a holiday trip to Yugoslavia, a previously well 48-year-old man developed a reddish-livid, firm nodule, 0.5 cm in diameter, on the proximal joint of the right thumb. A similar nodule appeared nearby, as well as over the left patella. Eleven additional nodules occurred over the next 4 months. His general health remained good and physical examination merely noted the liver edge palpable 3 cm below the costal margin. The histology of one of the nodules showed a tuberculoid, plasma-rich inflammatory reaction reminiscent of leishmaniasis or brucellosis. No organisms were seen. Immunohistochemistry of a frozen section demonstrated Leishmania-associated antigens, and the Western-blot test was characteristic for leishmaniasis. No systemic treatment was undertaken because of likely alcoholic toxic liver damage. On local treatment with paromomycin-containing ointment the cutaneous nodules healed without scar within 3 months.

Animals↗

Acquired resistance and granuloma formation in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Differential T cell and lymphokine roles in initial versus established immunity.

In naive BALB/c mice, acquisition of resistance to Leishmania donovani and formation of antileishmanial tissue granulomas are linked expressions that require both L3T4+ and Lyt 2+ cells as well as both IL-2 and IFN-gamma. To determine the mechanisms of established resistance to L. donovani, rechallenged immune BALB/c mice were treated with T cell- and lymphokine-depleting mAb or cyclosporin A. In the liver, resistance to rechallenge was inhibited by treatment with anti-Lyt 2 but not anti-L3T4 mAb. Resistance was also impaired by anti-IL-2 treatment but not by anti-IFN-gamma mAb. The hepatic granulomatous response to rechallenge, however, was not impaired by either anti-Lyt 2 or anti-IL-2 mAb nor by anti-L3T4 or anti-IFN-gamma treatment. In contrast, cyclosporin A suppressed granuloma formation but not antileishmanial activity. These results indicate a particularly important antileishmanial host defense role for Lyt 2+ cells and IL-2 in sensitized animals, and when compared to prior observations in L. donovani-infected naive mice, suggest that 1) discrete T cell- and lymphokine-dependent mechanisms are involved in initial acquisition of resistance vs established immunity, 2) more than one mechanism can mediate the development of tissue granulomas, and 3) granuloma formation by itself may not be required nor necessarily sufficient to confer antimicrobial activity.

Animals↗