Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C A Heinrich

Publications and source records attributed to C A Heinrich.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Negative regulation of N-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion by the estrogen receptor signaling pathway in rat pituitary GH3 cells.

The ability of the estrogen receptor signaling pathway to regulate cell-cell adhesion, and N-cadherin and beta-catenin expression was examined in rat somatolactotropic GH3 cells cultured in serum-free, phenol red-free medium (SFM). Estradiol-17beta (E2) promoted a nonadherent phenotype, whereas the steroidal antiestrogen, ICI 182,780, induced the formation of tightly adherent aggregates of cells. The antiestrogen-induced cell-cell adhesion was associated with the presence of adherens junctions, and was Ca2+-dependent. E2 reduced surface N-cadherin protein to barely detectable levels, whereas ICI 182,780-treated cells displayed abundant punctate immunoreactive N-cadherin. Antiestrogen failed to induce adhesion in the presence of a blocking antibody to N-cadherin. ICI 182,780 increased the protein levels for N-cadherin and the cadherin-binding protein, beta-catenin, by twofold over SFM controls or E2-treated samples. ICI 182,780 also increased the mRNA levels for N-cadherin and beta-catenin by two- to fivefold. In GH3 cells cultured in growth medium, ICI 182,780 increased N-cadherin and beta-catenin levels by twofold over untreated controls, and inhibited cell proliferation by 53%. These results provide the first demonstration of the regulation of N-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion by the estrogen receptor (ER) signaling pathway in pituitary somatolactotrophs through the coordinate regulation of N-cadherin and beta-catenin expression. The inverse relationship between ICI 182,780-induced adhesion and proliferation raises the possibility that these two processes are functionally related.

Animals↗

Behavioral modification of colonic function. Can constipation be learned?

We challenged the two hypotheses: first, that defecation can be suppressed for an extended time, and second, if so, that this has an effect on upper colonic motility. Thus we studied 12 male volunteers with conditions of identical nutrition and patterns of physical activity over a two-week period, where one week with normal defecation and one week with voluntary prolonged suppression of defecation followed each other in randomized order. Frequencies of defecation, stool weights, total and segmental colonic transit times (using radiopaque markers) were compared. Frequency of defecations and stool weights were lower during suppressed defecation [8.9 +/- 0.66 vs 3.7 +/- 0.41 (mean +/- SE) bowel movements per week, P = 0.003, and 1.30 +/- 0.09 vs 0.98 +/- 0.13 kg/week, P = 0.01]. Total transit times were increased from 28.8 +/- 4.4 to 53.1 +/- 4.3 hr, P = 0.004. Segmental transit times were increased in the rectosigmoid (from 8.83 +/- 3.6 to 32.1 +/- 5.6 hr, P = 0.04) and right hemicolon (from 14.5 +/- 0.9 hr to 19.7 +/- 1.5 hr, P = 0.02) by suppression of defecation. We conclude that defecation habits may induce changes in colonic function such as those seen in constipation and that functional anorectal outlet obstruction may, probably by reflex mediation, affect the right colon.

Adaptation, Physiological↗