Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C A Coltman

Publications and source records attributed to C A Coltman.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Design of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

The PCPT is a chemoprevention trial of finasteride with a primary endpoint of biopsy-proven presence or absence of prostate cancer. A total of 18,000 healthy men, aged 55 years and older, will be randomized. Half will receive finasteride (5 mg/day) and half will receive placebo (one matching tablet per day) for 7 years. The trial is designed to have 92% power to detect a 25% reduction in period prevalence of biopsy-proven disease using a two-sided test with alpha = 0.05. The trial is complicated by the known impact of finasteride on the major screening test for prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen (PSA). This paper describes the PCPT design with reference to alternatives that were considered. The chosen design depends on five critical assumptions that must be monitored closely throughout the 9-year trial.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Low-dose involved field radiation after chemotherapy in advanced Hodgkin disease. A Southwest Oncology Group randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if low-dose involved field radiation after complete remission induction with chemotherapy is effective in preventing relapse and improving survival in patients with stage III or IV Hodgkin disease. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial with a median follow-up time of 8.1 years. SETTING: A Southwest Oncology Group multi-institutional study. Patients were entered from university- and community-based practices. PATIENTS: 278 adults with clinical or pathologic stage III or IV Hodgkin disease, who achieved complete responses after 6 cycles of MOP-BAP (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin, doxorubicin, and procarbazine) and who agreed to be randomly assigned to either radiation or no further treatment. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to either no further treatment or low-dose radiation to all initially involved sites (radiation dose, 2000 cGy to lymph node areas and 1000 to 1500 cGy to other involved organ sites). MEASUREMENTS: Differences in remission duration, relapse-free survival, and survival. RESULTS: Remission duration, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were similar for the two groups (P = 0.09, P > 0.2, and P = 0.14, respectively). Factors that predicted shorter remission duration in a multivariate analysis were nodular sclerosis histology, bulky disease, and receipt of less than 85% of planned chemotherapy. Low-dose radiation improved remission duration in the subgroups of patients with nodular sclerosis and bulky disease. For the 169 patients with nodular sclerosis, the 5-year remission-duration estimate was 82% for the low-dose radiation group and 60% for the no further treatment group (P = 0.002). For all patients with bulky disease, the 5-year remission-duration estimate was 75% for the low-dose radiation group and 57% for the no further treatment group (P = 0.05). No difference in overall survival was noted between low-dose radiation and no further treatment in all patients or major subgroups. The 5-year survival was 86% for all patients who had a complete response as well as for patients in the nodular sclerosis subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose involved field radiation after MOP-BAP chemotherapy in patients with stage III or IV Hodgkin disease did not prolong remission duration or overall survival in randomized patients. However, remission duration was prolonged in several subgroups of patients, most prominently in those with nodular sclerosis histology.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study.

BACKGROUND: CHOP is a four-drug, first-generation combination chemotherapy regimen that has cured approximately 30% of all patients with advanced stages of intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in national cooperative group trials. Initial single-institution studies of third-generation regimens such as m-BACOD, ProMACE-CytaBOM, and MACOP-B suggested that 55%-60% of these patients might be cured. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to make a valid comparison between these regimens, the Southwest Oncology Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group initiated a randomized phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B. Endpoints of the study were response rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and severe or life-threatening toxicity. Received dose intensity calculations and subset analyses were also performed. RESULTS: 1138 patients were registered on this clinical trial. Each treatment arm contained between 218 and 233 eligible patients. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed. The initial results of this study were recently published. There were no significant differences in either the partial or complete response rates between treatment arms. Now after a median follow-up of 49 months and a maximum follow-up of 84 months, there is still no difference in time to treatment failure (p = 0.40) or overall survival (p = 0.68). No subset of patients was found to have significantly improved survival with the third-generation regimens. The received dose intensity data were comparable to previously published data for these regimens. Fatal toxicity was 1% for CHOP, 3% for ProMACE-CytaBOM, 5% for m-BACOD, and 6% for MACOP-B. CONCLUSION: Based on similar failure-free and overall survival with lower cost and lower severe toxicity, CHOP remains the standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage, intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. New treatment strategies need to be developed to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Vinorelbine (Navelbine)--a new agent for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a summary.

A large body of preclinical and clinical data concerning the new semisynthetic vinca alkaloid vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) are now available. At both the cellular and clinical levels, this drug shows reduced neurotoxicity compared with other vinca alkaloids. In phase III clinical trials of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment with the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin resulted in survival advantages greater than those achieved by vindesine plus cisplatin. The median survival durations of patients receiving single-agent vinorelbine were comparable with those of patients treated with vindesine plus cisplatin, and greater than those of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. The dose-limiting toxicity of vinorelbine, granulocytopenia, was transient and seldom resulted in hospitalization. Treatment with vinorelbine did not result in negative effects on patient quality of life. Vinorelbine is now being actively investigated in combination and multimodality regimens in patients with various stages of NSCLC. New strategies to avoid vinorelbine-related granulocytopenia are also being developed. Vinorelbine-containing regimens hold the promise of providing effective, well-tolerated treatment for patients with NSCLC.

Agranulocytosis↗
PubMed1994

Organizations and structures that facilitate community research.

The Southwest Oncology Group has become a model for other oncology organizations in the way it facilitates participation of community physicians and their cancer patients in clinical trials. The Southwest Oncology Group accomplishes this through its Community Clinical Oncology Program and Cooperative Group Outreach Program. The Community Clinical Oncology Program brings state-of-the-art cancer treatment, prevention, and control research to the community hospital setting, where most cancer patients receive treatment. The Cooperative Group Outreach Program broadens community participation in clinical trials beyond the extent achievable through Community Clinical Oncology Program. Together, these programs have succeeded in increasing community physician participation in clinical trials and have shown that community physicians are capable of submitting data comparable in quality to those obtained in the academic setting.

Cancer Care Facilities↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: CHOP is a first-generation, combination-chemotherapy regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone that has cured approximately 30 percent of patients with advanced stages of intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in national cooperative-group trials. However, studies at single institutions have suggested that 55 to 65 percent of such patients might be cured by third-generation regimens such as ones consisting of low-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone (m-BACOD); prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide, followed by cytarabine, bleomycin, vincristine, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (ProMACE-CytaBOM); and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (MACOP-B). METHODS: To make a valid comparison of these regimens, the Southwest Oncology Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group initiated a prospective, randomized phase III trial. The study end points were the response rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and incidence of severe or life-threatening toxicity. Dose intensity was calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 1138 patients registered for the trial, 899 were eligible. Each treatment group contained at least 218 patients. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed among the groups. There were no significant differences among the groups in the rates of partial and complete response. At three years, 44 percent of all patients were alive without disease; there were no significant differences between the groups (41 percent in the CHOP and MACOP-B groups and 46 percent in the m-BACOD and ProMACE-CytaBOM groups; P = 0.35). Overall survival at three years was 52 percent (50 percent in the ProMACE-CytaBOM and MACOP-B groups, 52 percent in the m-BACOD group, and 54 percent in the CHOP group; P = 0.90). There was no subgroup of patients in which survival was improved by a third-generation regimen. Fatal toxic reactions occurred in 1 percent of the CHOP group, 3 percent of the ProMACE-CytaBOM group, 5 percent of the m-BACOD group, and 6 percent of the MACOP-B group (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: CHOP remains the best available treatment for patients with advanced-stage intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Doxorubicin, mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of hormone refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

In a Southwest Oncology Group phase II clinical trial, 68 patients with hormone refractory carcinoma of the prostate were treated with a combination of doxorubicin, mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil. Of the patients 11 were classified as good risk and 57 as poor risk. There were 1 complete and 10 partial remissions for a response rate of 16.2% (exact 95% confidence interval 8.4 to 27.1%). Median survival was 9 months (maximum 14) for good risk patients and 10 months (maximum 42) for poor risk patients. Toxicity was significant with leukopenia identified as dose limiting. Because of the low rate of response and significant toxicity, this regimen cannot be recommended as standard therapy for metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in granulocytopenic patients with acute leukemia: evaluation of serum antibiotic levels in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.

Despite widespread use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) for prophylaxis in neutropenic patients, questions remain regarding its efficacy, toxicity, the risk of selection of resistant isolates, and the relation of its activity to selective decolonization vs. the attainment of direct inhibitory levels within blood and tissues. We evaluated the effect of TMP-SMZ (160/800 mg orally every 12 hours) in 42 adult granulocytopenic patients (< 100 absolute neutrophils/mm3, mean duration 13.3 days) undergoing chemotherapy for acute leukemia at 11 participating Veterans Administration Medical Centers in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. No significant differences in survival, frequency of bacteremia, overall infections, use of systemic antimicrobial therapy, or adverse effects, including myelosuppression, were observed between patients receiving TMP-SMZ vs. those receiving placebo. All patients acquired trimethoprim-resistant organisms. Concentrations of trimethoprim in serum were significantly lower before febrile episodes than when patients were afebrile. These results suggest that the purported activity of TMP-SMZ may be related to the serum concentration achieved. Moreover, the results highlight the need for additional study of the value of antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

Late intensification with POMP chemotherapy prolongs survival in acute myelogenous leukemia--results of a Southwest Oncology Group study of rubidazone versus adriamycin for remission induction, prophylactic intrathecal therapy, late intensification, and levamisole maintenance.

Between August 1978 and September 1982, 642 patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were entered onto a Southwest Oncology Group Study which addressed four questions. (i) What is the comparative utility of rubidazone versus adriamycin in remission induction? (ii) What is the role of prophylactic intrathecal therapy in AML? (iii) Does late intensification affect treatment outcome? (iv) Does maintenance with levamisole affect disease-free survival or overall survival? Among 611 evaluable patients, 329 (54%) achieved complete remission. There was no difference in the remission rate between those patients receiving rubidazone (54%) and those receiving adriamycin (54%) as part of the induction regimen. Prophylactic intrathecal therapy with cytosine arabinoside had no effect on the incidence of central nervous system disease or survival. After nine months of complete remission, patients were randomized between late intensification with POMP (mercaptopurine + vincristine + methotrexate + prednisone) or continued maintenance with OAP (vincristine + cytosine arabinoside + prednisone). T patients randomized to late intensification had better survival and disease-free survival, compared to those randomized to receive no late intensification (p = 0.027 and 0.030, respectively). At twelve months of remission, surviving patients were randomized to receive levamisole or no further treatment. There was no evidence that levamisole affected survival or disease-free survival.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1991

Alternating weekly doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin followed by weekly doxorubicin and daily cyclophosphamide in stage IV breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Twenty-seven women with metastatic breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) every other week, alternating with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and high-dose calcium leucovorin, for a 12-week induction regimen, followed by weekly doxorubicin and oral daily cyclophosphamide. Twenty-five women were eligible and evaluable. Of these, complete response occurred in two patients (8%) and partial response in six patients (24%), for a total response rate of 32%. Toxicity was similar to that seen in previous Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trials in this patient population. Response rates in this study were inferior, with comparable median survivals to those of previous SWOG studies that are reviewed. Additional, more dose-intensive approaches incorporating newer approaches to the administration of cancer chemotherapeutic agents are planned.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

Randomized trial of doxorubicin, bisantrene, and mitoxantrone in advanced breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Four hundred eleven women with metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin (130 patients), 320 mg/m2 bisantrene (146 patients), or 14 mg/m2 mitoxantrone (135 patients). The doses were given intravenously every 3 weeks with a cross-over design to determine their relative efficacy and toxicity. To be eligible, patients must have had one previous chemotherapy regimen, and patients who were estrogen receptor positive must have failed endocrine therapy. There were 365 patients assessable for response and 399 assessable for toxic effects. The median age was 57 years; 18% were premenopausal or perimenopausal. Visceral dominant disease was present in 66% of the patients. Ninety-seven percent of the patients had a disease-free interval from diagnosis to first recurrence of less than 1 year. The response rate was 28% with doxorubicin, 13% with bisantrene, and 14% with mitoxantrone (P = .004). Median time to treatment failure was 133 days with doxorubicin, 66 days with bisantrene, and 68 days with mitoxantrone (logrank P = .06). The median survival was 315 days for doxorubicin, 290 days for bisantrene, and 177 days for mitoxantrone (logrank P = .04), although survival at 2 years was similar for all three agents. There were five responses in the 66 patients crossed over to doxorubicin and one response each for patients crossed over to bisantrene (39 patients) or mitoxantrone (63 patients). Toxicity leading to discontinuance of therapy was more common with doxorubicin, and discontinuance of therapy was due primarily to patient's request or cardiotoxicity. The major dose-limiting toxic effect for all three agents was leukopenia. Nausea and vomiting, mucositis, and alopecia were more severe with doxorubicin. Congestive heart failure developed in nine patients treated with doxorubicin, zero patients treated with bisantrene, and two patients treated with mitoxantrone. A decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction, as defined by moderate to severe Alexander grade changes, was more common in patients treated with doxorubicin (doxorubicin-treated patients = 20%, bisantrene-treated patients = 5%, and mitoxantrone-treated patients = 10%). This study demonstrates that bisantrene and mitoxantrone have only modest activity in metastatic breast carcinoma. The activity of doxorubicin is greater than that of the other two agents, but at a cost of increased toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

A randomized trial of five cisplatin-containing treatments in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Six hundred eighty assessable patients with measureable stage III M1, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized to one of five treatment arms including cisplatin, etoposide (VP-16) +/- methylglyoxal bisguanylhydrazone (MGBG; PVp, PVpM); cisplatin, vinblastine (PVe); or PVe alternating with vinblastine, mitomycin (PVeMi); or fluorouracil, vincristine, mitomycin/cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin (FOMi/CAP). The overall response rate was 20% with 3% complete responses and 17% partial remissions. The duration of these responses was not statistically different by treatment regimen and varied from 2.7 months to 5.0 months. The overall median survival for all patients was 5.3 months and is not different by treatment. Toxicity was greater in PVpM. The similarity of results for response, duration of response, and survival does not establish the superiority of any of these platinum-based regimens for standard clinical usage.

Adult↗