Biomedical subjects

Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier

Publications and source records attributed to Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Rapid decrease in plasma D-lactate as an early potential predictor of diminished 28-day mortality in critically ill septic shock patients.

BACKGROUND: Splanchnic ischemia plays a major role in the development of organ failure during septic shock. Plasma D-lactate has been proposed as a better marker of splanchnic hypoperfusion than L-lactate. We studied the prognostic ability of plasma D- and L-lactate levels. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in an intensive care unit and included patients with septic shock. Two samples for plasma D- and L-lactate determination were collected: the first within 6 h after the patient met the criteria for septic shock (day 1) and the second 24 h later (day 2). RESULTS: In univariate analysis, day 1 plasma D- and L-lactate values were associated with 28-day mortality. For plasma D- and L- lactate, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68+/-0.09 and 0.84+/-0.07 on day 1 (p=0.09), and 0.74+/-0.10 and 0.90+/-0.07 on day 2 (p=0.06), respectively. In survivors, D-lactate levels decreased between day 1 and day 2 (p=0.03), but L-lactate did not (p=0.29). In septic shock patients, plasma D- and L-lactate levels reliably discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. The prognostic ability of plasma L-lactate was better than that of plasma D-lactate. CONCLUSION: A rapid decrease in plasma D-lactate during the course of septic shock could indicate reduced 28-day mortality.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Clinical features and outcome of chronic dialysis patients admitted to an intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Information about chronic dialysis (CD) patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) is scant. This study sought to determine the epidemiology and outcome of CD patients in an ICU setting and to test the performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) to predict hospital mortality in this population. METHODS: All consecutive CD patients admitted to an adult, 10 bed medical/surgical ICU at a university hospital between January 1996 and December 1999 were included in this prospective observational study. Demographics, characteristics of the underlying renal disease, admission diagnosis, the number of organ system failures (OSFs) excluding renal failure and SAPS II, both calculated 24 h after admission, the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU survival and survival status at hospital discharge and 6 months after discharge were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 92 CD patients, 16 on peritoneal dialysis and 76 on haemodialysis, were included. The main reason for ICU admission was sepsis and the mean ICU length of stay 6.2+/-9.9 days. ICU mortality was 26/92 (28.3%) and was associated in multivariate analysis with SAPS II (P<0.001), duration of mechanical ventilation (P<0.01) and abnormal values of serum phosphorus (high or low; P<0.05). Hospital mortality was 35/92 (38.0%) and was accurately predicted by SAPS II [receiver operating characteristics curve: 0.86+/-0.04; goodness-of-fit test: C = 6.86, 5 degrees of freedom (df), P = 0.23 and H = 4.78, 5 df, P = 0.44]. The 6 month survival rate was 48/92 (52.2%). CONCLUSIONS: CD patients admitted to the ICU are a subgroup of patients with high mortality and SAPS II can be used to assess their probability of hospital mortality. The severity of the acute illness responsible for ICU admission and an abnormal value of serum phosphorus are determinants for ICU mortality.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Validity of the CAGE questionnaire in hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The CAGE questionnaire is considered a useful screening and case-finding tool for alcohol use disorders in clinical populations. Our objectives were to validate the French version of the CAGE against DSM-IV criteria and to assess performance of each item of the scale. METHOD: Data were extracted from a hospital morbidity study conducted in central France. It concerned 5452 patients-48.5% men-in short and medium-stay units. Patients answered the CAGE questionnaire as a past-year assessment. The alcohol use disorders were diagnosed by the physicians using DSM-IV alcohol abuse or dependency criteria. RESULTS: The CAGE questionnaire for a cut-off of 2 had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 94%. The CAGE test was more sensitive for patients diagnosed as alcohol-dependent than for alcohol abusers (61% vs. 84%) with the same specificity (94%). These values are close to those for the English-language CAGE. The first three items (CAG) were very similar, with sensitivity 70% and specificity 94%. The eye-opening question (E) differentiated sharply between abuse and dependency, with sensitivities of 18% and 46%, respectively. A questionnaire comprising only the CAG questions of the CAGE had properties similar to the full questionnaire. CONCLUSION: CAGE is a good screening tool for alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency. Given the frequent-and insufficiently diagnosed-alcohol problems among inpatients, CAGE is indicated as a first-line tool for screening for the most severe alcohol use disorders in hospital. It should ideally be used systematically. A positive reply to any of the first three items should alert the clinician and prompt further investigation.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Medical practices and expectations of general practitioners in relation to hepatitis C virus infection in the Auvergne region].

AIMS: To determine the medical practices and expectations of general practitioners concerning screening and management of hepatitis C in the Auvergne region. METHODS: A survey was sent by mail to 250 general practitioners. They were then contacted by telephone interviews. RESULTS: 94% of general practitioners answered the survey. Each physician diagnosed an average of 0.6 new cases of hepatitis C in 1999, and had a mean of 3.2 patients with HCV in their practice. Screening was performed by 91% of general practitioners if there was a history of blood transfusion, by 87% if there was a history of intravenous drug use, by 92% in case of increased serum amino transferase levels. Screening was less frequent in case of household contact and was only performed by 68% general practitioners or of asthenia by 52% of general practitioners. Liver biopsy seems to be the main obstacle for the management of hepatitis C patients which is due to a refusal of liver biopsy by the patient according to 55% of general practitioners, a fear of complications according to 25% of general practitioners. Sixty percent of general practitioners considered that liver biopsy was performed in less than 50% of patients with hepatitis C. Fifty three percent of general practitioner thought that hepatitis C network could be useful for increasing their knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Liver biopsy refusal by the patient restricts the management and therapy of patients with hepatitis C infection. Increase formation still requisite by 60 percent of general practitioner.

Adult↗