Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bruce E Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to Bruce E Johnson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Differential effects of gefitinib and cetuximab on non-small-cell lung cancers bearing epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who achieve radiographic responses to treatment with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib have somatic mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain. However, little is known about the efficacy of cetuximab, an antibody against the EGFR extracellular domain, in EGFR mutant NSCLC. METHODS: NSCLC cell lines carrying wild-type EGFR (A549, H441, and H1666) or mutant EGFR (H3255, DFCILU-011, PC-9, and HCC827) were treated with various dilutions of gefitinib or cetuximab relative to maximal achievable serum concentration. Cell growth was analyzed by the MTS assay, with differences between dose-response curves analyzed nonparametrically. Apoptosis was analyzed by propidium iodide staining and immunoblotting for PARP. Phosphorylation of EGFR and the downstream signaling components ERK1/2 and Akt were analyzed by immunoblotting. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Growth of NSCLC lines with wild-type EGFR was slightly (A549 and H441) or moderately (H1666) inhibited by gefitinib and cetuximab, and the effects of the two agents were similar. Both agents also induced no (H441) or moderate (H1666) apoptosis in NSCLC cells with wild-type EGFR. By contrast, gefitinib was statistically significantly more effective than cetuximab at inhibiting growth of EGFR mutant cells (H3255: P = .003, DFCILU-011: P = .011, and PC-9: P = .003), and gefitinib-treated EGFR mutant cells had higher levels of apoptosis than cetuximab-treated cells (mean fold increase in apoptosis by 1 microM of gefitinib and 10 microg/mL of cetuximab relative to control, H3255: 8.3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 4.8 to 11.8] and 2.1 [95% CI = 2.0 to 2.2], respectively, P = .025; DFCILU-011: 5.7 [95% CI = 5.1 to 6.3] and. 0.9 [95% CI = 0.3 to 1.5], respectively, P < .001). Gefitinib treatment decreased EGFR, ERK1/2, and Akt phosphorylation in EGFR mutant cell lines whereas cetuximab had relatively little effect. Both gefitinib and cetuximab inhibited the growth of HCC827 cells, but gefitinib inhibited growth to a greater extent (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutations in NSCLC cells are associated with sensitivity to gefitinib but not to cetuximab.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

TRIBUTE: a phase III trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSI-774) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Erlotinib is a potent reversible HER1/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor with single-agent activity in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib was combined with chemotherapy to determine if it could improve the outcome of patients with NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TRIBUTE randomly assigned patients with good performance status and previously untreated advanced (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC to erlotinib 150 mg/d or placebo combined with up to six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by maintenance monotherapy with erlotinib. Random assignment was stratified by stage, weight loss in the previous 6 months, measurable disease, and treatment center. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), objective response (OR), and duration of response. RESULTS: There were 1,059 assessable patients (526 erlotinib; 533 placebo). Median survival for patients treated with erlotinib was 10.6 v 10.5 months for placebo (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.16; P = .95). There was no difference in OR or median TTP. Patients who reported never smoking (72 erlotinib; 44 placebo) experienced improved OS in the erlotinib arm (22.5 v 10.1 months for placebo), though no other prespecified factors showed an advantage in OS with erlotinib. Erlotinib and placebo arms were equivalent in adverse events (except rash and diarrhea). CONCLUSION: Erlotinib with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel did not confer a survival advantage over carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC. Never smokers treated with erlotinib and chemotherapy seemed to experience an improvement in survival and will undergo further investigation in future randomized trials.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have been associated with tumor response to treatment with single-agent EGFR inhibitors in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The implications of EGFR mutations in patients treated with EGFR inhibitors plus first-line chemotherapy are unknown. KRAS is frequently activated in NSCLC. The relationship of KRAS mutations to outcome after EGFR inhibitor treatment has not been described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC in the phase III TRIBUTE study who were randomly assigned to carboplatin and paclitaxel with erlotinib or placebo were assessed for survival, response, and time to progression (TTP). EGFR exons 18 through 21 and KRAS exon 2 were sequenced in tumors from 274 patients. Outcomes were correlated with EGFR and KRAS mutations in retrospective subset analyses. RESULTS: EGFR mutations were detected in 13% of tumors and were associated with longer survival, irrespective of treatment (P < .001). Among erlotinib-treated patients, EGFR mutations were associated with improved response rate (P < .05) and there was a trend toward an erlotinib benefit on TTP (P = .092), but not improved survival (P = .96). KRAS mutations (21% of tumors) were associated with significantly decreased TTP and survival in erlotinib plus chemotherapy-treated patients. CONCLUSION: EGFR mutations may be a positive prognostic factor for survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy with or without erlotinib, and may predict greater likelihood of response. Patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC showed poorer clinical outcomes when treated with erlotinib and chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings of this retrospective subset analysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Therapeutic targeting of multiple signaling pathways in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

The majority of malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) aberrantly express the epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB1). We examined the efficacy of GW572016 (lapatinib), a dual inhibitor of ErbB1/ErbB2 with a panel of 10 MPM cell lines. Two of the 10 MPM cell lines, H2373 and H2452, underwent G1/S cell cycle arrest and growth inhibition with an IC(50) of 1 muM and 0.8 muM, respectively. There was no relationship between the presence or the amount of ErbB1, phospho-ErbB1, phospho-ErbB2, ErbB3, ErbB4, phospho-Akt, and Akt or the ability of lapatinib to inhibit phospho-ErbB1 in these cell lines compared to those that did not respond to lapatinib. The sensitive cell lines had a time-dependent decrease in phospho-Akt and/or ERK1/2, and an increase in p27 and when treated with lapatinib. The combination of lapatinib with U0126, LY294002 or rapamycin caused greater growth inhibition than either drug alone in the sensitive cell lines while this did not occur in the resistant cell lines. Our findings suggest that ErbB1 alone is a therapeutic target for the minority of mesotheliomas and that combining ErbB1 inhibitors with signal transduction inhibitors in mesothelioma will enhance their effectiveness. Furthermore, combinations of growth factor and signal transduction inhibitors may be needed to inhibit the growth of the majority of MPM cell lines, and therefore patients with MPM.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2005

Patient subsets benefiting from adjuvant therapy following surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of therapy for some patients with stages I, II, and III breast and colon cancer. The therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgical resection of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been less clear. A meta-analysis was reported in 1995 of patients who underwent surgical resection for early stage NSCLC and were then randomized to either observation or chemotherapy. This meta-analysis showed a 13% reduction in the hazard ratio of death, leading to a 5% absolute improvement in survival 5 years after the start of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy treatment compared with observation only. Multiple prospective randomized trials for patients with NSCLC were planned and undertaken to attempt to validate the observations of the meta-analysis. Six trials with > or =150 patients with early stage NSCLC (stages I-IIIA) on each arm have been reported in the last 2 years. Four of the six trials show a survival advantage for the patients with early stage NSCLC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those who underwent observation. The survival benefit in these four studies varies from a 4% to a 16% survival advantage at 4 to 5 years after the start of chemotherapy. The hazard ratio of death for the patients treated with chemotherapy ranged from 0.61 to 0.86 compared with patients on observation. Thus, the information available at the current time supports the administration of chemotherapy for patients with stages IB and II NSCLC. Further research will be needed to define the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and its use in conjunction with chest radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with resected stages IA and IIIA NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Immunization with mutant p53- and K-ras-derived peptides in cancer patients: immune response and clinical outcome.

PURPOSE: To determine the ability to induce tumor-specific immunity with individual mutant K-ras-or p53-derived peptides and to monitor clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in varying stages of disease underwent genetic analysis for mutations in K-ras and p53. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Seventeen-mer peptides were custom synthesized to the corresponding mutation. Baseline immunity was assessed for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) release from mutant peptide-primed lymphocytes. Patients' peripheral-blood mononuclear cells were pulsed with the corresponding peptide, irradiated, and applied intravenously. Patients were observed for CTL, IFN-gamma, interleukin (IL) -2, IL-5, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor responses, for treatment-related toxicity, and for tumor response. RESULTS: No toxicity was observed. Ten (26%) of 38 patients had detectable CTL against mutant p53 or K-ras, and two patients were positive for CTL at baseline. Positive IFN-gamma responses occurred in 16 patients (42%) after vaccination, whereas four patients had positive IFN-gamma reaction before vaccination. Of 29 patients with evident disease, five experienced a period of stable disease. Favorable prognostic markers were detectable CTL activity and a positive IFN-gamma reaction but not IL-5 release. Median survival times of 393 v 98 days for a positive versus negative CTL response (P = .04), respectively, and of 470 v 88 days for a positive versus negative IFN-gamma response (P = .02), respectively, were detected. CONCLUSION: Custom-made peptide vaccination is feasible without any toxicity. CTL and cytokine responses specific to a given mutation can be induced or enhanced with peptide vaccines. Cellular immunity to mutant p53 and K-ras oncopeptides is associated with longer survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for treatment and tumor biology.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite its almost universal presence in NSCLC tumors, therapeutic inhibition of EGFR has resulted in significant tumor regressions in only 10% to 20% of patients. Several investigations over the last 12 months have uncovered somatic mutations in EGFR that underlie the sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors. NSCLC tumors and cell lines with EGFR mutations are exquisitely sensitive to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), erlotinib and gefitinib, and are biologically distinct from other forms of NSCLC. Somatic mutations in EGFR are found more frequently in patients with adenocarcinomas, nonsmokers, patients of Asian ethnicity, and in females. EGFR mutation detection is now becoming clinically available and is being incorporated into clinical treatment decisions and into the design of future clinical trials. Mutations in K-ras, a mediator of EGFR signaling, are mutually exclusive with EGFR mutations, and are associated with resistance to EGFR TKIs. In addition, secondary mutations, conferring resistance to EGFR TKIs, in patients with primary EGFR mutations once sensitive to EGFR TKIs, are beginning to be identified. The frequency of EGFR mutations, their impact on NSCLC biology, clinical treatment, and clinical trial design, as well as methods and limitations for mutation detection, will be reviewed.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2005

Evolving concepts in the pathology and computed tomography imaging of lung adenocarcinoma and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To review recent advances in pathology and computed tomography (CT) of lung adenocarcinoma and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC). METHODS: A pathology/CT review panel of pathologists and radiologists met during a November 2004 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus workshop in New York. The purpose was to determine if existing data was sufficient to propose modification of criteria for adenocarcinoma and BAC as newly published in the 2004 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors, and to address the pathologic/radiologic concept of diffuse/multicentric BAC. RESULTS: Solitary small, peripheral BACs have an excellent prognosis. Most lung adenocarcinomas with a BAC pattern are not pure BAC, but rather adenocarcinoma, mixed subtype with invasive patterns. This applies to tumors presenting with a diffuse/multinodular as well as solitary nodule pattern. The percent of BAC versus invasive components in lung adenocarcinomas appears to be prognostically important. However, a consensus definition of "minimally invasive" BAC with a favorable prognosis could not be achieved. While recognition of a BAC component is possible, the diagnosis of BAC with exclusion of invasive adenocarcinoma cannot be made by small biopsy or cytology specimens. CONCLUSION: There is a need to work toward a mutual understanding and consensus between pathologists, clinicians, and researchers with the use of the term BAC versus adenocarcinoma. Future studies should make some attempt to quantitate these components and/or other features such as size of scar, size of invasive component, or pattern of invasion. Hopefully, this work will allow definition of a category of adenocarcinoma, mixed subtype with predominant BAC/minimal invasion and a favorable prognosis.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Phase I trial of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Marimastat is an orally bioavailable inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases. A phase I study was initiated to determine whether conventional doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel are tolerated when combined with marimastat and to assess the influence of marimastat on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three dose levels were evaluated. Marimastat (10 or 20 mg oral administration b.i.d.) was administered continuously with paclitaxel (175 or 200 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour i.v. infusion) and carboplatin (at a dose providing an area under the free drug plasma concentration-time curve of 7 mg min/mL) administered each 3 weeks. Toxicity and response were evaluated throughout the intended four cycles of combined therapy. The plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel was determined in each patient both without concurrent marimastat and after receiving marimastat for 1 week. RESULTS: Twenty-two chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIb (27%) or stage IV (73%) non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled. Their median age was 56 years (range, 39-73 years), 50% were female, and their performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) ranged from 0 to 2. Treatment was well tolerated, as 18 (82%) of the patients completed all four cycles of chemotherapy without dose-limiting toxicity. Grade 2 musculoskeletal toxicities were reported in 3 of 12 patients receiving marimastat (20 mg b.i.d.). Nine patients required dose reductions, predominantly related to low-grade myelosuppression. Partial responses occurred in 12 of 21 (57%) evaluable patients with disease stabilization in another 5 (19%). Marimastat had no effect on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of marimastat (10 mg b.i.d.) with paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin at an area under the free drug plasma concentration-time curve of 7 mg min/mL was well tolerated with no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction. Study of this drug combination in the adjuvant setting should be considered if tissue inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase activity can first be shown.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Differential effects of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor ZD6474 on circulating endothelial progenitors and mature circulating endothelial cells: implications for use as a surrogate marker of antiangiogenic activity.

PURPOSE: Circulating endothelial cells (CEC) comprise at least two distinct populations: bone marrow-derived circulating endothelial progenitors (CEP) and mature CECs derived from existing vasculature. We hypothesized that antiangiogenic agents may have differential effects on CEPs and mature CECs and that these changes may serve as a marker of biological activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effect of angiogenesis inhibitors on CECs was evaluated by flow cytometry after vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced mobilization and in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC). Tumor angiogenesis was evaluated in parallel by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In nontumor-bearing mice, VEGF administration increased both mature CECs and CEPs. This increase was inhibited by the VEGF receptor 2 inhibitor ZD6474 as well as the VEGF inhibitor-soluble Flt-1. ZD6474 had no significant effect on CECs in the absence of exogenous VEGF stimulation. In contrast, LLC-bearing mice had an increase in mature CECs but not CEPs after 3 days of treatment with ZD6474. The increase in mature CECs was dose-dependent, accompanied by a decrease in tumor microvessel density, and preceded reduction in tumor volume. Treatment of LLC-bearing mice with the vascular targeting agent ZD6126 also increased mature CECs. CONCLUSIONS: VEGF inhibitors can have differential effects on mature CECs and CEPs, and agents inhibiting tumor angiogenesis may cause a concomitant increase in mature CECs. This increase occurs in tumor-bearing but not in nontumor-bearing mice, suggesting that tumor endothelium is a potential source of mature CECs. Therefore, assessing both mature CECs and CEPs may provide insights into the mechanism of antiangiogenic agents and serve as an early surrogate marker of biological activity.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene have been identified in specimens from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who have a response to anilinoquinazoline EGFR inhibitors. Despite the dramatic responses to such inhibitors, most patients ultimately have a relapse. The mechanism of the drug resistance is unknown. Here we report the case of a patient with EGFR-mutant, gefitinib-responsive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who had a relapse after two years of complete remission during treatment with gefitinib. The DNA sequence of the EGFR gene in his tumor biopsy specimen at relapse revealed the presence of a second point mutation, resulting in threonine-to-methionine amino acid change at position 790 of EGFR. Structural modeling and biochemical studies showed that this second mutation led to gefitinib resistance.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

ErbB-3 mediates phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in gefitinib-sensitive non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Therapies that target the EGF receptor (EGFR), such as gefitinib (IRESSA), are effective in a subset of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The differences in intracellular signaling networks between gefitinib-sensitive and -resistant NSCLCs remain poorly understood. In this study, we observe that gefitinib reduces phospho-Akt levels only in NSCLC cell lines in which it inhibits growth. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this observation, we compared immunoprecipitates of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) between gefitinib-sensitive and -resistant NSCLC cell lines. We observe that PI3K associates with ErbB-3 exclusively in gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cell lines. Gefitinib dissociates this complex, thereby linking EGFR inhibition to decreased Akt activity. In contrast, gefitinib-resistant cells do not use ErbB-3 to activate the PI3K/Akt pathway. In fact, abundant ErbB-3 expression is detected only in gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cell lines. Two gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cell lines with endogenous distinct activating EGFR mutations (L858R and Del747-749), frequently observed in NSCLC patients who respond to gefitinib, also use ErbB-3 to couple to PI3K. Down-regulation of ErbB-3 by means of short hairpin RNA leads to decreased phospho-Akt levels in the gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cell lines, Calu-3 (WT EGFR) and H3255 (L858R EGFR), but has no effect on Akt activation in the gefitinib-resistant cell lines, A549 and H522. We conclude that ErbB-3 is used to couple EGFR to the PI3K/Akt pathway in gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cell lines harboring WT and mutant EGFRs.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The pulmonary status of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer 15 years after treatment with chemotherapy and chest irradiation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe pulmonary symptoms, signs, pulmonary function, and lung imaging studies in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) 2 to 15 years after receiving treatment with chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy. DESIGN: Retrospective review of clinical records and radiographic studies of patients treated in three different prospective combined-modality studies. SETTING: Federal hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-six patients with SCLC who were enrolled between 1974 and 1994. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with limited-stage SCLC treated on prospective therapeutic studies of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy were identified. Pulmonary symptoms, physical findings, pulmonary function tests, arterial blood gas measurements, and chest imaging studies were assessed at baseline, and at 1 to 2 years, at 3 to 5 years, and at > 5 years following the initiation of treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Initial symptoms included cough in 84 (55%), dyspnea in 59 (39%), and sputum production in 26 (17%). Twenty-three patients lived beyond 5 years (15%) without evidence of recurrence. Seven of these 5-year survivors were without pulmonary symptoms. Pulmonary function test results showed no significant changes in percent predicted values for FVC, FEV(1), and FEV(1)/FVC ratio over the time periods reviewed. The percent predicted values for the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide decreased from 71% before the start of treatment to 56% (p < 0.032) at 1 to 2 years. Values improved in most patients beyond 5 years after starting treatment. Radiologist interpretations of chest imaging studies were available for 17 of 23 patients surviving > 5 years. Most patients had minimal to no changes in imaging study findings beyond 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survivors with limited-stage SCLC who were treated with combined chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy have minimal changes in pulmonary symptoms or function from 5 to 15 years after the start of treatment. A concern for late toxicity from combined-modality therapy should not dissuade clinicians from offering therapy with potentially curative result with minimal to no pulmonary dysfunction.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Gefitinib induces apoptosis in the EGFRL858R non-small-cell lung cancer cell line H3255.

Somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have recently been described in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who achieve radiographic regressions to the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib. One of these mutations, L858R (Leu-->Arg), is also found in NSCLC cell line H3255, which is very sensitive to gefitinib treatment. We characterized nine NSCLC cell lines (three isolated from patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and six isolated from patients with adenocarcinoma) for their in vitro sensitivity to gefitinib. Of these, only H3255 (EGFR(L858R)) and H1666 (EGFR(WT)) are sensitive to gefitinib with IC(50) values of 40 nmol/L and 2 micromol/L, respectively. We examined the effects of gefitinib on H3255 and cell lines containing wild-type EGFR that are either sensitive (H1666) or resistant (A549 and H441) to gefitinib exposure in vitro. Gefitinib treatment (1 micromol/L) leads to significant apoptosis accompanied by increased poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage only in the H3255 cell line, leads to G(1)-S arrest in H1666, and has no effects in the A549 and H441 cell lines. Although EGFR and AKT are constitutively phosphorylated in H3255, H1666, and H441 cell lines, AKT is completely inhibited by gefitinib treatment only in the H3255 cell line. These findings further characterize a mechanism by which gefitinib treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR(L858R) leads to a dramatic response to gefitinib.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Farnesyl transferase inhibitors for patients with lung cancer.

The ras family of genes have been identified as potential targets for therapeutic intervention because of somatic mutations in different human cancers. They are mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) approximately 20% of the time. The enzyme farnesyl transferase is involved in posttranslational modification of the ras proteins by covalently linking a farnesyl group to the ras protein. This permits the ras protein to be translocated to the surface membrane, allowing the protein to be involved in signaling for increased proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis. The class of farnesyl transferase inhibitors is designed to block farnesylation and prevent the mature ras signaling and thus inhibit cell proliferation and facilitate apoptosis. Multiple agents that inhibit farnesylation have been developed, and two farnesyl transferase inhibitors have been tested in patients with lung cancer in three Phase II trials. R115777 has been studied in patients with NSCLC and in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) after chemotherapy. There has been a single trial of L-778,123 in patients with untreated NSCLC. No objective tumor responses in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were seen in these studies. There were also no objective responses among the 22 patients with relapsed SCLC treated with R115777. The median survival for the 44 patients with NSCLC treated with R115777 was approximately 8 months, whereas it was 11 months for the 23 patients treated with L-778,123. R115777 and L-778,123 were well tolerated in these studies but showed no significant activity as single-agent therapy in relapsed SCLC or untreated NSLC.

Alkyl and Aryl Transferases↗