Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Brian F Hutton

Publications and source records attributed to Brian F Hutton.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy.

Image registration is finding increased clinical use both in aiding diagnosis and guiding therapy. There are numerous algorithms for registration, which all involve maximizing a measure of similarity between a transformed floating image and a fixed reference image. The choice of the similarity measure depends, to some extent, on the application. Methods based on the use of the joint intensity histogram have become popular because of their flexibility and robustness. A distinction is made between rigid-body and non-rigid transformations. The latter are needed for inter-subject registration or intra-subject registration in cases where the region of the body of interest is not considered rigid. Non-rigid transformation is normally achieved using a global model of the deformation but can also be defined by a set of locally rigid transformations, each constrained to a small block in the image. There is scope for further research on the incorporation of appropriate constraints, especially for the application of non-rigid transformations to nuclear medicine studies. Most of the initial practical concerns regarding image registration have been overcome and there is increasing availability of commercial software. There are several approaches to the validation of registration software, with validation of non-rigid algorithms being particularly difficult. Studies have demonstrated the accuracy on the order of half a pixel for both intra- and inter-modality registration (typically 2 to 3 mm). Although hardware-based registration has now become possible by using dual-modality instruments, software-based registration will continue to play an important role in nuclear medicine.

Algorithms↗

Practical aspects of a data-driven motion correction approach for brain SPECT.

UNLABELLED: Patient motion can cause image artifacts in single photon emission computed tomography despite restraining measures. Data-driven detection and correction of motion can be achieved by comparison of acquired data with the forward projections. This enables the brain locations to be estimated and data to be correctly incorporated in a three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction algorithm. Digital and physical phantom experiments were performed to explore practical aspects of this approach. METHODS: Noisy simulation data modeling multiple 3-D patient head movements were constructed by projecting the digital Hoffman brain phantom at various orientations. Hoffman physical phantom data incorporating deliberate movements were also gathered. Motion correction was applied to these data using various regimes to determine the importance of attenuation and successive iterations. Studies were assessed visually for artifact reduction, and analyzed quantitatively via a mean registration error (MRE) and mean square difference measure (MSD). RESULTS: Artifacts and distortion in the motion corrupted data were reduced to a large extent by application of this algorithm. MRE values were mostly well within 1 pixel (4.4 mm) for the simulated data. Significant MSD improvements (>2) were common. Inclusion of attenuation was unnecessary to accurately estimate motion, doubling the efficiency and simplifying implementation. Moreover, most motion-related errors were removed using a single iteration. The improvement for the physical phantom data was smaller, though this may be due to object symmetry. CONCLUSION: These results provide the basis of an implementation protocol for clinical validation of the technique.

Algorithms↗

Image registration: an essential tool for nuclear medicine.

There is increasing interest in being able to automatically register medical images from either the same or different modalities. Registered images are proving useful in a range of applications, not only providing more correlative information to aid in diagnosis, but also assisting with the planning and monitoring of therapy, both surgery and radiotherapy. The practising nuclear medicine specialist is faced with a dilemma in choosing an appropriate method since the literature in the field is extensive, with conflicting evidence as to what methods are optimal. Although most barriers to implementing registration in routine practice have been removed, there remains a lack of commercial, validated software. The alternative is to install a dual-modality instrument. The objective of this review is to present a general overview of medical image registration with emphasis on the application and issues relevant to nuclear medicine.

Algorithms↗