Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Brian D Stemper

Publications and source records attributed to Brian D Stemper.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Influence of muscle contraction on whiplash kinematics.

It is unclear whether reflexive muscle contraction in unaware occupants can alter spinal kinematics to mitigate injury in the unaware occupant subjected to whiplash loading. Whiplash injury likely occurs during the non-physiologic S-curvature phase of spinal kinematics, present during the first 100 msec after the initiation of T1 acceleration. Experimental investigations using human volunteers have reported 45 to 60 msec delays prior to electrical activity of the sternocleidomastoid. The effects of reflexive contraction of the neck muscles were investigated using a validated head-neck computational model consisting of head, cervical spine, and first thoracic vertebra. Intervertebral discs. spinal ligaments, and facet joints were modeled using discrete elements. Passive and active musculature were incorporated using the Hill-type muscle model. The computational model was subjected to 2.6 m/sec rear impact velocity, applied to T1. Reflexive muscle contraction in the unaware occupant model was incorporated using a 54-msec muscle delay, 13-msec electromechanical delay, and an 81-msec muscle rise time. Results of the unaware occupant model were compared to the model exercised without muscle contraction. Reflexive muscle contraction altered segmental angulations by less than 10% and facet joint capsular ligament distractions by less than 16% during the time of maximum S-curvature. At the C5-C6 and C6-C7 levels, muscle contraction increased capsular ligament distractions. Due to the nominal affect of reflexive muscle contraction on segmental angulations and facet joint capsular ligament distractions during S-curvature, it is unlikely that this contraction can alter the cervical kinematics responsible for whiplash injury.

Acceleration↗

Response corridors of the human head-neck complex in rear impact.

In recent years, anatomically accurate dummies were developed to produce a more biofidelic response to rear impacts. The detailed dummy geometry permits more comprehensive kinematic validation, which is typically accomplished through response corridors developed using human volunteers and cadavers. In the present investigation, ten intact head-neck cadaver specimens were subjected to 1.8 and 2.6 m/s rear impacts. Response corridors were developed for overall head to T1 angulation, head retraction, and segmental angulations from C2-C3 through C6-C7 levels. The corridors were developed to emphasize the detailed validation of dummy response during initial stages of whiplash loading.

Accidents, Traffic↗

Gender dependent cervical spine segmental kinematics during whiplash.

Clinical and epidemiological studies have frequently reported that female occupants sustain whiplash injuries more often than males. The current study was based on the hypothesis that segmental level-by-level cervical intervertebral motions in females are greater than in males during rear impact. The hypothesis was tested by subjecting 10 intact human cadaver head-neck complexes (five males, five females) to rear impact loading. Intervertebral kinematics were analyzed as a function of spinal level at the time of maximum cervical S-curve, which occurred during the loading phase. Segmental angles were significantly greater (p<0.05) in female specimens at C2-C3, C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 levels. Because greater angulations are associated with stretch in the innervated components of the cervical spinal column, these findings may offer a biomechanical explanation for the higher incidence of whiplash-related complaints in female patients secondary to rear impact acceleration.

Adult↗

Kinetics of the head-neck complex in low-speed rear impact.

A comprehensive characterization of the biomechanics of the cervical spine in rear impact will lead to an understanding of the mechanisms of whiplash injury. Cervical kinematics have been experimentally described using human volunteers, full-body cadaver specimens, and isolated and intact head-neck specimens. However, forces and moments at the cervico-thoracic junction have not been clearly delineated. An experimental investigation was performed using ten intact head-neck complexes to delineate the loading at the base of the cervical spine and angular acceleration of the head in whiplash. A pendulum-minisled apparatus was used to simulate whiplash acceleration of the thorax at four impact severities. Lower neck loads were measured using a six-axis load cell attached between the minisled and head-neck specimens, and head angular motion was measured with an angular rate sensor attached to the lateral side of the head. Shear and axial force, extension moment, and head angular acceleration increased with impact severity. Shear force was significantly larger than axial force (p < 0.0001). Shear force reached its maximum value at 46 msec. Maximum extension moment occurred between 7 and 22 msec after maximum shear force. Maximum angular acceleration of the head occurred 2 to 18 msec later. Maximum axial force occurred last (106 msec). All four kinetic components reached maximum values during cervical S-curvature, with maximum shear force and extension moment occurring before the attainment of maximum S-curvature. Results of the present investigation indicate that shear force and extension moment at the cervico-thoracic junction drive the non-physiologic cervical S-curvature responsible for whiplash injury and underscore the importance of understanding cervical kinematics and the underlying kinetics.

Acceleration↗

Intervertebral rotations as a function of rear impact loading.

Rear impact loading of the cervical spine results in a complicated biomechanical problem due to the complex geometry and viscoclastic material properties of this anatomy. Although a number of investigations have been performed to understand the biomechanics of rear impact, the dependence of segmental kinematics on cervical level and input velocity has not been clearly outlined. An experimental investigation was performed for this purpose using 10 isolated head-neck specimens. Segmental motions of the cervical spine were obtained for levels C2-C3 to C6-C7 at rear impact velocities of 2.1, 4.6, 6.6, and 9.3 km/h. Increases in segmental motion from baseline kinematics were compared for the three higher velocity tests. Results indicated greater increase in magnitude of segmental motion for levels C5-C6 and C6-C7 at higher input velocities than all other investigated levels. This finding helps to define the kinematics of the cervical spine leading to whiplash injury.

Analysis of Variance↗