Biomedical subjects

Brendan K Tao

Publications and source records attributed to Brendan K Tao.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Association Between Statin Use and Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

TOPIC: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the literature-pooled association between statins and dry eye disease (DED). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Statins, a common treatment modality for dyslipidemia, have been proposed as a potential contributor to DED via their activity in meibomian gland epithelial cells. However, single studies show mixed evidence, and there remains an unmet clinical need to clarify whether statin exposure is associated with DED. METHODS: This review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (PRISMA) 2020 statement and was registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD420251238004). Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and the reference lists of relevant reviews were searched from inception to November 2025 for studies reporting the association between statin use and DED. Random-effects meta-analysis using inverse-variance weighting was conducted to pool effect estimates as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study risk of bias was appraised using the ROBINS-E tool, and the certainty of the evidence was reported using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Six observational studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 560,821; 356,012/559,141 [63.7%] statin users). The pooled analysis revealed a significant positive association between statins and DED (odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13, P < .001), with an absolute risk difference of 10.2 more DED cases per 1000 (95% CI 5.5 more to 15.2 more). This result was derived from very low-certainty evidence given limitations in study design and serious inconsistency. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses for risk of bias (P = .123), method of outcome ascertainment (P = .737), type of effect estimate (P = .496), and leave-one-out analyses showed no evidence of effect modification and demonstrated consistent direction of association across studies. CONCLUSION: Statin use was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in DED, limited by very low-certainty evidence. Physicians should monitor for and educate patients on ocular surface symptoms in patients using statins with pre-existing DED risk factors. Future studies should use standardized DED diagnostic criteria to investigate the impact of statin dose, type, and duration to better characterize this potential association.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Association of hydroxyurea use and sickle cell retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hydroxyurea (HU) is prescribed to reduce systemic complications of sickle cell disease; however, its association with sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) remains unclear. This meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251079006) evaluates the pooled association between HU use and SCR. In the primary analysis, HU use was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in SCR (OR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.41, 1.97], p = 0.79; I² = 77%). In a prespecified leave-one-out analysis, exclusion of the outlier study did not produce a statistically significant association, although the estimate shifted toward a stronger protective effect with reduced heterogeneity (OR = 0.70, 95% CI [0.39, 1.27], p = 0.25; I² = 67%). In a subgroup analysis excluding high-risk-of-bias studies, HU use was also not associated with a statistically significant reduction in SCR (OR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.39, 1.82], p = 0.66; I² = 77%). In post hoc analyses, HU use was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in SCR in non-adult populations (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [0.43, 3.05], p = 0.79; I² = 81%) or genotype-restricted analyses (OR = 1.22, 95% CI [0.81, 1.84], p = 0.35; I² = 0%). In post hoc analyses restricting studies to retinopathy phenotype, however, HU was associated with statistically significant lower odds of non-proliferative SCR (OR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.54, 0.98], p = 0.04; I² = 0%) and proliferative SCR (OR = 0.24, 95% CI [0.09, 0.60], p = 0.002; I² = 12%). Very low-certainty evidence suggests mixed associations between HU and SCR. Prospective studies are needed to clarify its role in SCR prevention.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The role of adjunctive aqueous suppressants for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A systematic review.

Our goal is to determine whether adjunctive aqueous suppressants (topical β-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, or oral acetazolamide) enhance outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), focusing on retinal thickness, visual acuity, injection burden, intraocular pressure (IOP), and safety. DME, RVO, and nAMD are leading causes of vision loss treated with repeated intravitreal injections, yet many eyes show persistent fluid. Aqueous suppressants are inexpensive and widely available, with potential to prolong intravitreal drug residence and improve outcomes, but their clinical value remains uncertain. Following a registered protocol, we searched 4 databases (January, 2000 toMay, 2025) for randomized and comparative studies evaluating adjunct aqueous suppressants with anti-VEGF therapy. Primary outcome was change in retinal thickness; secondary outcomes included visual acuity, injection burden, IOP, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed and findings synthesized narratively. Twelve studies (7 randomized trials; 495 eyes) met inclusion criteria. In DME, 3 of 4 trials showed greater thickness reduction with adjunctive dorzolamide (±timolol), although visual gains were inconsistent. In RVO, 1 trial suggested transient anatomical benefit, whereas oral acetazolamide showed no added effect. In nAMD, adjunctive dorzolamide-timolol reduced residual fluid in refractory cases without visual or treatment-sparing benefit. Topical therapy produced modest IOP reductions without serious adverse events. Adjunct aqueous suppressants may provide limited short-term anatomical benefit, particularly in DME and refractory nAMD, but consistent functional or durability effects are not found in this study. Larger, longer-term randomized studies are needed.

Humans↗