Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Brenda Williams

Publications and source records attributed to Brenda Williams.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Assessing the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy in the brain.

The devastating effects of HIV infection have been documented for the last 2 decades. Since the 1980s over 60 million people have been infected and at present 40 million people globally are living with HIV. HIV infects the central nervous system (CNS) early in the disease process. Indeed, numerous studies document the presence of HIV within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Direct infection of the brain by HIV ultimately results in HIV associated dementia (HAD), which (prior to the advent of antiretroviral therapy) affected 20% of patients. An increasing number of drugs have been developed to treat this infection and delay the development of AIDS. Current treatment is aimed at inhibiting viral replication, and thus, lowering the viral load. However a subsequent increase in viral load can occur as patients become resistant to drug therapy. In the era of HAART, the incidence of HAD has been reduced, whereas the prevalence rate is increasing as people with HIV survive longer. However, in a study of initial AIDS defining illnesses, the proportion with HIV related dementia did not decline following introduction of HAART. In a separate study, no decrease was found in the incidence of dementia per se, although there was a decrease in the incidence of all AIDS-defining illnesses during this time period. It is evident from most studies that since the introduction of HAART, its effect on HAD is not entirely clear, although the majority of findings indicate that it is beneficial. Here we will outline the issues relevant to preventing HAD by HAART.

AIDS Dementia Complex↗

Mobilization by either cyclophosphamide or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor transforms the bone marrow into a highly proteolytic environment.

OBJECTIVE: Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells normally reside in the bone marrow but can be mobilized into the peripheral blood following treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Although the number of transplants performed with mobilized blood currently exceeds those performed with bone marrow, little is known of the molecular mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon. We sought to determine whether mobilization induced by G-CSF or chemotherapy was triggered by common or distinct mechanisms. METHODS: Balb/c mice were mobilized with either G-CSF alone, cyclophosphamide alone, or the combination of both agents. Spleens, peripheral blood, bone marrow extracellular fluids, and cells were taken at different time points and analyzed for the expression of VCAM-1, the number of peripheral blood progenitor cells, concentration of neutrophil proteases, and number of granulocytes. RESULTS: Administration of either G-CSF or the myelosuppressive agent cyclophosphamide results in a sharp reduction of VCAM-1/CD106 expression in the bone marrow that coincides with the accumulation of granulocytic precursors and release of active neutrophil proteases neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G that directly cleave VCAM-1/CD106 in vitro. These events follow precisely the kinetics of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization into the peripheral blood. CONCLUSION: We have identified a commonality of events during mobilization induced by either G-CSF or chemotherapy, which include the accumulation in the bone marrow of active neutrophil proteases that directly cleave VCAM-1 and lead to the sharp reduction of VCAM-1 expression in this tissue.

Animals↗