Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Blaise F D Bourgeois

Publications and source records attributed to Blaise F D Bourgeois.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Long-term safety and tolerability of oxcarbazepine in children: a review of clinical experience.

Relatively few well-designed studies have demonstrated the long-term safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in a large group of children. Extensive clinical data from the worldwide Clinical Development Program (CDP) and a compassionate use program on the safety and tolerability of oxcarbazepine in children are presented. Oxcarbazepine is a newer AED that is indicated for use as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in children (United States 4 years of age, Europe 6 years of age) with partial epilepsy. The most common adverse events (10%) in the CDP were headache (32.5%), somnolence (31.5%), vomiting (27.6%), and dizziness (23.1%), whereas in the compassionate use program (clinical practice situation), the most common adverse events (1%) reported were rash (2.7%), fatigue (1.6%), nausea (1.2%), and somnolence (1.2%). These data indicate that oxcarbazepine has a good long-term safety and tolerability profile, whether given as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy, in children with partial seizures.

Adolescent↗

Topiramate in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Topiramate is a broad-spectrum agent effective against primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) as well as partial-onset seizures. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy is one of the most common idiopathic generalized epilepsies, with most patients experiencing PGTCS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate topiramate as add-on therapy in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of a patient subset from 2 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials. SETTING: Eighteen centers in the United States; 10 centers in Europe; 1 center in Costa Rica (primary trials). PATIENTS: A total of 22 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy participating in placebo-controlled trials assessing topiramate (target dose, 400 mg/d in adults) in inadequately controlled PGTCS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reduction of PGTCS. RESULTS: A 50% or more reduction of PGTCS in 8 of 11 topiramate-treated patients (73%) and 2 of 11 placebo-treated patients (18%) (P = .03). Reductions in myoclonic, absence, and total generalized seizures were also observed, although topiramate vs placebo differences did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: As a broad-spectrum agent, topiramate is an effective option for patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Adult↗

Electroencephalography in neonatal seizures: comparison of a reduced and a full 10/20 montage.

This study compares a reduced electrode montage (9 electrodes) with the full 10/20 electrode montage for the ability to detect and characterize neonatal seizures and background electroencephalographic (EEG) characteristics, utilizing new digital technology allowing "remontage" of previously acquired records. A total of 151 neonatal EEG records were retrospectively and blindly analyzed by two readers. Records were first analyzed for seizure number, topography, duration, and characteristics of EEG background using the reduced montage, before reanalysis with the full montage. One hundred eighty-seven seizures were identified in 31 ictal recordings using the full montage. Using the reduced montage, 166 seizures were identified in 30 records. The sensitivity and specificity of the reduced montage for detecting electrographic seizures was 96.8% and 100% respectively. In only one patient's record, the single seizure was missed altogether. For grading background abnormalities, the sensitivity and specificity of reduced montage was 87% and 80%. Although there are inherent weaknesses in reduced montages with respect to both underestimation and overestimation of seizure number, a nine-electrode reduced montage can be a sensitive tool for identification of neonatal seizures and assessment of background characteristics of neonatal electroencephalography.

Brain Mapping↗

Aggravation of epilepsy by antiepileptic drugs.

Antiepileptic drugs may paradoxically worsen seizure frequency or induce new seizure types in some patients with epilepsy. The mechanisms of seizure aggravation by antiepileptic drugs are mostly unknown and may be related to specific pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs. This article provides a review of the various clinical circumstances of seizure exacerbation and aggravation of epilepsy by antiepileptic drugs as well as a discussion of possible mechanisms underlying the occasional paradoxical effect of these drugs. Antiepileptic drug-induced seizure aggravation can occur virtually with all antiepileptic medications. Drugs that aggravate seizures are more likely to have only one or two mechanisms of action, either enhanced gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated transmission or blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Antiepileptic drug-induced seizure exacerbation should be considered and the accuracy of diagnosis of the seizure type should be questioned whenever there is seizure worsening or the appearance of new seizure types after the introduction of any antiepileptic medication.

Anticonvulsants↗

A distinct asymmetrical pattern of cortical malformation: large unilateral malformation of cortical development with contralateral periventricular nodular heterotopia in three pediatric cases.

PURPOSE: To describe a distinct asymmetrical pattern of cortical malformation with large focal malformations of cortical development (MCDs) and contralateral periventricular nodular heterotopia (PNH). METHODS: We identified three patients with epilepsy and focal EEG abnormalities. Each patient underwent 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to obtain sagittal T1-weighted, axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted, and coronal fast spin-echo inversion recovery (FSEIR) T2-weighted images; coronal spoiled gradient recalled (SPGR) T1-weighted images were obtained in two cases. RESULTS: Patient 1, an 18-year-old right-handed man, had a 4-year history of intractable seizures. MRI revealed a right frontal subcortical heterotopia (SH) and a single left anterior PNH. Patient 2, a 10-year-old left-handed boy, had a 4-year history of epilepsy. MRI revealed a large region of SH in the left temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes and three right-sided PNH. Patient 3, a 16-month-old girl, had medically refractory infantile spasms. MRI revealed a large MCD in the left parietal lobe with contiguous underlying periventricular heterotopia as well as a small contralateral PNH. CONCLUSIONS: These cases together illustrate a distinct asymmetrical pattern of a large focal MCD with small contralateral PNH. The asymmetrical involvement of the two hemispheres suggests that the stage of maximal disruption of cortical development may differ between the two hemispheres. Further study into the mechanisms underlying such asymmetrical patterns of cortical malformation should enhance our understanding of cortical development as well as hemispheric lateralization.

Adolescent↗

Determining the effects of antiepileptic drugs on cognitive function in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

The majority of children with epilepsy are of normal intelligence; however, a significant subset suffers from temporary or permanent cognitive impairment. Factors that affect cognitive function are myriad and include the neuropathology underlying the epilepsy, seizures, epileptiform activity, psychosocial problems, and antiepileptic drug side effects. Although cognitive impairment is often wrongly attributed to the effects of antiepileptic drugs, antiepileptic drugs do impair cognition in some children. Clinicians should be aware of the differential cognitive effects of antiepileptic drugs and should monitor cognitive function closely when adding or changing therapy. Based on published data from prospective, chronic dosing studies, phenobarbital and topiramate have the highest potential for causing cognitive dysfunction.

Anticonvulsants↗

Choosing antiepileptic drugs for developmentally normal children with specific epilepsy syndromes and behavioral disorders.

Antiepileptic drugs are often used for the treatment of both epilepsy and a wide range of behavioral and psychiatric disorders. The treatment of patients with epilepsy has been the proving ground for antiepileptic drugs, not only with respect to their efficacy in the treatment of seizures but also for clarifying their dose-related and idiosyncratic adverse events. This information has been useful in treating patients with behavioral and psychiatric disorders. Indeed, the number of prescriptions written for many antiepileptic drugs for nonepileptic uses far exceeds those written for the same drugs for epilepsy. Because patients with chronic epilepsy have a higher incidence of axis I psychiatric disorders, physicians can choose an antiepileptic drug to treat both the epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidity in selected patients. Guided by the principles of evidence-based medicine as outlined by the American Academy of Neurology and the American Academy of Pediatrics, this article reviews the application of antiepileptic drugs for epilepsy and behavioral and psychiatric disorders in children.

Anticonvulsants↗

Chronic management of seizures in the syndromes of idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

As a group, idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) have the highest rates of complete seizure control with medication. However, there are little evidence-based data to guide drug choice for treatment. Examples of IGE include absence epilepsy, generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Generalized epilepsies seem to be particularly vulnerable to seizure aggravation, and medications that are primarily effective against partial seizures are more commonly involved in seizure aggravation than other medications. A review of current research has shown that only a few medications can control IGE without potentially causing seizure aggravation. Broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs such as valproate (VPA), lamotrigine, and topiramate are extremely effective at controlling a variety of seizures without causing excessive seizure aggravation. Among these drugs, VPA has the longest clinical experience history and the largest body of published data.

Adult↗

Prognostic value of neonatal discontinuous EEG.

The burst suppression pattern on the neonatal electroencephalogram (EEG) is associated with a poor outcome. However, this serious abnormality constitutes only a small proportion of discontinuous neonatal EEGs. We sought to establish whether any easily measurable parameters among the broad range of excessively discontinuous neonatal EEGs are predictive of outcome. We retrospectively reviewed the EEGs and medical records of 43 term infants with excessively discontinuous EEGs. We quantitated 10 parameters in the bursts and interburst intervals, among them the predominant interburst interval duration (defined as the duration of more than 50% of all interburst intervals of an EEG). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the 10 EEG variables in relation to neurologic outcome and subsequent epilepsy. Based on multivariate analysis, a single easily measurable EEG parameter related significantly to outcome. A predominant interburst interval duration of more than 30 seconds correlated with the occurrence of both unfavorable neurologic outcome and subsequent epilepsy (P = 0.040 and P = 0.033, respectively). In conclusion, a infant whose EEG contains a predominant interburst interval duration of more than 30 seconds has a 100% probability of experiencing severe neurologic disabilities or death and an 86% chance of developing subsequent epilepsy. This easily quantitated EEG parameter could be valuable for the early estimation of neurologic prognosis.

Brain Diseases↗

Reducing overtreatment.

Although treatment of epilepsy easily evolves into a situation of overtreatment, reversing the process can be difficult and time consuming. Benefits of reducing overtreatment may include a decrease in side effects, better seizure control, a simplification in the medication regimen, improved compliance, and reduced costs. The risks include seizure exacerbation due to withdrawal or due to loss of protection. Reversal of pharmacokinetic interactions may also lead to seizure aggravation or to drug toxicity. When reducing overtreatment, there are three main challenges: to select the drugs that should be eliminated, to choose an appropriate rate of reduction, and to anticipate reversible pharmacokinetic interactions that can have clinically significant consequences. Overall, there is a lack of published data to properly support recommendations for implementing reduction of overtreatment. This is particularly the case in the pediatric population and for the newer antiepileptic drugs.

Anticonvulsants↗

Epilepsy surgery: indications, approaches, and results.

The surgical treatment of epilepsy is divided into procedures with curative or palliative goals. Curative procedures are highly effective in rendering the majority of patients seizure free, and palliative procedures often result in marked improvement in seizure frequency, quality of life, or both. This brief overview of epilepsy surgery outlines the goals of surgery, criteria used to determine patient eligibility, the various types of epilepsy surgery, and anticipated outcomes of these approaches. Newer surgical techniques including vagus nerve and deep brain stimulation and gamma knife radiosurgery are also discussed.

Animals↗

Differential cognitive effects of antiepileptic drugs.

As a group, children and adolescents with epilepsy have a higher prevalence of cognitive and behavioral disorders, although many fall within the normal distribution. For those affected, several causes have been identified, some of which may be interrelated. It has proven to be methodologically sound to isolate the role of specific antiepileptic drugs as a cause of cognitive impairment. The large body of literature that has accumulated on this topic is characterized by a relatively high proportion of inconclusive or contradictory observations. This may be due in part to the many methodological pitfalls in this area of research. The emerging picture is that cognitive effects caused by antiepileptic drugs are neither the rule nor the exception. Although certain drugs appear more likely to be involved, no single drug causes problems in every patient, and no drug can be assumed never to cause any cognitive impairment. The subgroup of patients that are at higher risk cannot be easily defined. Early detection of cognitive effects is based on actively eliciting reports of symptoms. This can be complemented by a screening battery in case of suspicion.

Adolescent↗