Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bertil B Fredholm

Publications and source records attributed to Bertil B Fredholm.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Toxic effects of cobalt in primary cultures of mouse astrocytes. Similarities with hypoxia and role of HIF-1alpha.

Cobalt is suspected to cause memory deficit in humans and was reported to induce neurotoxicity in animal models. We have studied the effects of cobalt in primary cultures of mouse astrocytes. CoCl(2) (0.2-0.8mM) caused dose-dependent ATP depletion, apoptosis (cell shrinkage, phosphatidylserine externalization and chromatin rearrangements) and secondary necrosis. The mitochondria appeared to be a main target of cobalt toxicity, as shown by the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsi(m)) and release from the mitochondria of apoptogenic factors, e.g. apoptosis inducing factor (AIF). Pre-treatment with bongkrekic acid reduced ATP depletion, implicating the involvement of the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pore. Cobalt increased the generation of oxygen radicals, but antioxidants did not prevent toxicity. There was also an impaired response to ATP stimulation, evaluated as a lower raise in intracellular calcium. Similarly to hypoxia and dymethyloxallyl glycine (DMOG), cobalt triggered stabilization of the alpha-subunit of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1 (HIF-1alpha). This early event was followed by an increased expression of HIF-1 regulated genes, e.g. stress protein HO-1, pro-apoptotic factor Nip3 and iNOS. Although all of the three stimuli activated the HIF-1alpha pathway and decreased ATP levels, the downstream effects were different. DMOG only inhibited cell proliferation, whereas the other two conditions caused cell death by apoptosis and necrosis. This points to cobalt and hypoxia not only inducing HIF-1alpha regulated genes but also affecting similarly other cellular functions, including metabolism.

Amino Acids, Dicarboxylic↗
PubMed2006

Adenosine A1 receptors are crucial in keeping an epileptic focus localized.

Adenosine is an endogenous neuromodulator with anticonvulsant and neuroprotective properties presumably mediated by activation of adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs). To study the involvement of A1Rs in neuroprotection during epileptogenesis, we induced status epilepticus by a unilateral intrahippocampal kainic acid (KA) injection (1 nmol) in wild-type C57BL/6 and homozygous adenosine A1R knock out (A1R-KO) mice of the same genetic background. Whereas the KA injection caused non-convulsive status epilepticus in wild-type mice, in A1R-KO mice KA induced status epilepticus with severe convulsions and subsequent death of the animals within 5 days. 24 h after KA injection, brains from wild-type C57BL/6 mice were characterized by slight neuronal cell loss confined to the immediate location of the KA injection. In contrast, KA-injected A1R-KO mice displayed massive neuronal cell loss in the ipsilateral hippocampus, and, importantly, the contralateral hippocampus was also affected with significant cell loss in the hilus and in the CA1 region of the pyramidal cell layer. We conclude that activation of A1 receptors by ambient adenosine is crucial in keeping epileptic foci localized. These results open up a new dimension of the A1 receptor's role in controlling excitotoxic cell death and further demonstrate its importance in preventing the progression of status epilepticus to lethal consequences.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

NMDA depresses glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the striatum through the activation of adenosine A1 receptors: evidence from knockout mice.

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors play several essential roles in the physiology and pathophysiology of the brain. Their activation results in long-term changes in glutamatergic synaptic transmission in several brain areas, but excessive activation of these receptors induces neurotoxicity. Some of NMDA-mediated actions are critically dependent on functional interactions with the neuromodulator adenosine. In the present study, we have examined whether pharmacological activation of NMDA receptors induces long-term changes in synaptic strength in the striatum. We found that NMDA depressed the amplitude of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential/population spike (fEPSP/PS) recorded in corticostriatal mouse brain slices in a concentration-dependent manner. Inhibition of synaptic transmission was more pronounced at room temperature (22 degrees C) than at 32 degrees C and long lasting (> 2 h) depression of the fEPSP/PS was observed only at room temperature. NMDA-induced depression of the fEPSP/PS was reduced or abolished in the presence of an A1 receptor antagonist and in A1 receptor knockout mice. In addition, exogenous application of adenosine depressed fEPSP/PS amplitude in wild-type mice, but not in A1 receptor knockout mice, in a concentration-dependent manner. Our results demonstrate that NMDA depresses synaptic transmission in a concentration- and temperature-dependent manner via release of adenosine and activation of adenosine A1 receptors.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Effect of acute and chronic administration of caffeine on pain-like behaviors in rats with partial sciatic nerve injury.

Caffeine, used in many pain medications as an adjuvant analgesic, is an adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonist. Here we examined the effects of acute or chronic caffeine administration in rats after partial sciatic nerve injury. The hindpaw response to mechanical or cold stimulation was assessed following photochemically induced sciatic nerve injury which leads to hypersensitivity to these stimuli. Caffeine was administered i.p. acutely or in the drinking water chronically. The mechanical and cold hypersensitivity of sciatic nerve-injured rats was dose-dependently alleviated by acute systemic administration of caffeine (10-80 mg/kg). The effect of caffeine was, however, associated with side effects including locomotor stimulation or depression. Chronic oral administration (average daily doses 27.5 mg/kg/day or 61.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) of caffeine starting at the time of nerve injury did not significantly affect the development of pain-like behaviors. Thus, acute, but not long term, caffeine intake reduced neuropathic pain state in nerve-injured rats, but only at very high doses. The potential hyperalgesic effect of chronic A1 adenosine receptor blockade may have been compensated for by an antinociceptive effect of caffeine through antagonism of A2A receptors and tolerance development.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Activation and inhibition of human muscular and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by succinylcholine.

BACKGROUND: Succinylcholine is one of the most widely used muscle relaxants in clinical anesthesia and emergency medicine. Although the clinical advantages and cardiovascular side effects are well known, its mechanism of action within the human nicotinic cholinergic receptor system remains to be understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of succinylcholine on human muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes. METHODS: Xenopus laevis oocytes were injected with human messenger RNA for muscle and neuronal nAChR subunits. Receptor activation, desensitization, and inhibition induced by the natural ligand acetylcholine or by succinylcholine was studied using a multichannel two-electrode voltage clamp setup. Responses were measured as peak current and net charge. RESULTS: Succinylcholine concentration-dependently activated the muscle-type nAChR with an EC50 value of 10.8 microm (95% confidence interval, 9.8-11.9 microm), and after the initial activation, succinylcholine desensitized the muscle-type nAChR. Succinylcholine did not activate the neuronal nAChR subtypes alpha3beta2, alpha3beta4, alpha4beta2, or alpha7 at concentrations up to 1 mm and was a poor inhibitor at these receptor subtypes, with IC50 values above 100 microm. CONCLUSION: Succinylcholine activates the muscle-type nAChR followed by desensitization. The observation that succinylcholine does not inhibit the presynaptic alpha3beta2 autoreceptor at clinically relevant concentrations provides a possible mechanistic explanation for the typical lack of tetanic fade in succinylcholine-induced neuromuscular blockade. Finally, cardiovascular side effects (e.g., tachyarrhythmias) of succinylcholine are not mediated via direct activation of the autonomic ganglionic alpha3beta4 subtype because succinylcholine does not activate the neuronal nAChRs.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2005

Influence of the adenosine A1 receptor on blood pressure regulation and renin release.

The present study was performed to investigate the role of adenosine A1 receptors in regulating blood pressure in conscious mice. Adenosine A1-receptor knockout (A1R-/-) mice and their wild-type (A1R+/+) littermates were placed on standardized normal-salt (NS), high-salt (HS), or salt-deficient (SD) diets for a minimum of 10 days before telemetric blood pressure and urinary excretion measurements in metabolic cages. On the NS diet, daytime and nighttime mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was 7-10 mmHg higher in A1R-/- than in A1R+/+ mice. HS diet did not affect the MAP in A1R-/- mice, but the daytime and nighttime MAP of the A1R+/+ mice increased by approximately 10 mmHg, to the same level as that in the A1R-/-. On the SD diet, day- and nighttime MAP decreased by approximately 6 mmHg in both A1R-/- and A1R+/+ mice, although the MAP remained higher in A1R-/- than in A1R+/+ mice. Although plasma renin levels decreased with increased salt intake in both genotypes, the A1R-/- mice had an approximately twofold higher plasma renin concentration on all diets compared with A1R+/+ mice. Sodium excretion was elevated in the A1R-/- compared with the A1R+/+ mice on the NS diet. There was no difference in sodium excretion between the two genotypes on the HS diet. Even on the SD diet, A1R-/- mice had an increased sodium excretion compared with A1R+/+ mice. An abolished tubuloglomerular feedback response and reduced tubular reabsorption can account for the elevated salt excretion found in A1R-/- animals. The elevated plasma renin concentrations found in the A1R-/- mice could also result in increased blood pressure. Our results confirm that adenosine, acting through the adenosine A1 receptor, plays an important role in regulating blood pressure, renin release, and sodium excretion.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Effect of modulating cardiac A1 adenosine receptor expression on protection with ischemic preconditioning.

Activation of A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)ARs) may be a crucial step in protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury; however, the use of pharmacological A(1)AR antagonists to inhibit myocardial protection has yielded inconclusive results. In the current study, we have used mice with genetically modified A(1)AR expression to define the role of A(1)AR in intrinsic protection and ischemic preconditioning (IPC) against I/R injury. Normal wild-type (WT) mice, knockout mice with deleted (A(1)KO(-/-)) or single-copy (A(1)KO(+/-)) A(1)AR, and transgenic mice (A(1)TG) with increased cardiac A(1)AR expression underwent 45 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion, followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Subsets of each group were preconditioned with short durations of ischemia (3 cycles of 5 min of occlusion and 5 min of reperfusion) before index ischemia. Infarct size (IF) in WT, A(1)KO(+/-), and A(1)KO(-/-) mice was (in % of risk region) 58 +/- 3, 60 +/- 4, and 61 +/- 2, respectively, and was less in A(1)TG mice (39 +/- 4, P < 0.05). A strong correlation was observed between A(1)AR expression level and response to IPC. IF was significantly reduced by IPC in WT mice (35 +/- 3, P < 0.05 vs. WT), A(1)KO(+/-) + IPC (48 +/- 4, P < 0.05 vs. A(1)KO(+/-)), and A(1)TG + IPC mice (24 +/- 2, P < 0.05 vs. A(1)TG). However, IPC did not decrease IF in A(1)KO(-/-) + IPC mice (63 +/- 2). In addition, A(1)KO(-/-) hearts subjected to global I/R injury demonstrated diminished recovery of developed pressure and diastolic function compared with WT controls. These findings demonstrate that A(1)ARs are critical for protection from myocardial I/R injury and that cardioprotection with IPC is relative to the level of A(1)AR gene expression.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Cannabinoid action depends on phosphorylation of dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa at the protein kinase A site in striatal projection neurons.

Herbal cannabis, smoked in the form of marihuana or hashish, is the most common illicit drug consumed in the Western world. In the brain, cannabinoids interact with neuronal CB1 receptors, thereby producing a marked reduction of motor activity. Here, we report that the motor depressant effect produced by the cannabinoid receptor agonist (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP55,940) is attenuated by genetic inactivation of the dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa (DARPP-32), which is abundantly expressed in the medium spiny neurons of the striatum. Point mutation of Thr34, the protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation site of DARPP-32, produces a similar reduction in the effect of the CB1 agonist. In contrast, point mutation of Thr75, a site on DARPP-32 specifically phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinase 5, does not affect the behavioral response to CP55,940. Activation of CB1 receptors, either by an agonist or by inhibition of reuptake of endogenous cannabinoids, stimulates phosphorylation at Thr34, thereby converting DARPP-32 into an inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1. Genetic inactivation either of dopamine D2 receptors or of adenosine A2A receptors reduces the phosphorylation of DARPP-32 at Thr34 and the motor depression produced by CP55,940. Our data indicate that a considerable proportion of the psychomotor effect of cannabinoids can be accounted for by a signaling cascade in striatal projection neurons involving PKA-dependent phosphorylation of DARPP-32, achieved via modulation of dopamine D2 and adenosine A2A transmission.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Evidence against adenosine analogues being agonists at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor.

Adenosine and adenosine analogues have been reported to act as agonists or partial agonists at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a). We have re-examined this question. A concentration-dependent increase in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) was observed in GHSR1a transfected HEK 293-EBNA cells stimulated with adenosine (EC50: 0.2 microM) or 2-chloroadenosine (EC50: 1.1 microM) but also in untransfected HEK 293-EBNA cells stimulated with 2-chloroadenosine (EC50: 0.67 microM) or 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) (EC50: 0.045 microM). These findings support endogenous expression of adenosine receptors, presumably A(2B) receptors in HEK 293-EBNA cells. In GHSR1a transfected CHO cells, lacking adenosine receptors, the GHSR1a agonist hGhrelin (EC50: 2.4 nM) increased [Ca(2+)](i), but no effects of adenosine, 2-chloroadenosine or NECA were detected. An inverse agonist of GHSR1a, [d-Arg-1, d-Phe-5, d-Trp-7, 9, Leu-11] substance P, reduced hGhrelin effects but adenosine, 2-chloroadenosine or 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) did not. NECA increased the [Ca(2+)](i) in co-transfected (GHSR1a and A(2B) receptor) CHO cells (EC50: 0.053 microM), but no additive or synergistic effects on [Ca(2+)](i) or cAMP formation were observed after stimulation with NECA in the absence or in the presence of hGhrelin. In binding studies on GHSR1a transfected CHO cell membranes, [(125)I]-hGhrelin binding could be displaced by the GHSR1a agonist MK-0677 (IC50: 0.34 nM), hGhrelin (IC50: 1.5 nM), and the substance P analogue (IC50: 0.64 microM) but not by adenosine or 2-chloroadenosine. We conclude that adenosine and analogues do not act as agonists or partial agonists at the GHSR1a and that cross-talk between the GHSR1a and A(2B) receptors is limited.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

Combination of adenosine A1 and A2A receptor blocking agents induces caffeine-like locomotor stimulation in mice.

The spontaneous locomotor activity of C57BL/6J mice was examined, using an automated detection system based on infra-red beams, after administration of caffeine (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.), the adenosine A(2A) receptor selective antagonist SCH 58261 (0.312-2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the A(1) selective antagonist DPCPX (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.). SCH 58261 failed to influence motor activity in mice habituated to the test environment. DPCPX produced a small increase in motility and locomotion (significant at the dose of 5.0 mg/kg), much weaker than that produced by caffeine. Combined administration of DPCPX (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) and SCH 58261 (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) produced stimulation of motility and locomotion comparable with the effect of caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). In contrast to motility and locomotion, rearing counts were not significantly influenced by DPCPX, SCH 58261, their combination, or by caffeine. Caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) caused an increase in NGFI-A mRNA (an immediate early gene was chosen as an index of neuronal activation) in the piriform cortex 4 h after injection. This effect was reproduced by the combination of A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonist. It is hypothesised that the stimulatory effect of low doses of caffeine in C57BL/6J mice is due to concomitant blockade of both A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

The role of extracellular adenosine in regulating mossy fiber synaptic plasticity.

Hippocampal mossy fiber synapses show unique molecular features and dynamic range of plasticity. A recent paper proposed that the defining features of mossy fiber synaptic plasticity are caused by a local buildup of extracellular adenosine (Moore et al., 2003). In this study, we reassessed the role of ambient adenosine in regulating mossy fiber synaptic plasticity in mouse and rat hippocampal slices. Synaptic transmission was highly sensitive to activation of presynaptic adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs), which reduced transmitter release by >75%. However, most of A1Rs were not activated by ambient adenosine. Field potentials increased only by 20-30% when A1Rs were fully blocked with the A1R antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) (1 microM). Moreover, blocking A1Rs hardly altered paired-pulse facilitation, frequency facilitation, or posttetanic potentiation. Frequency facilitation was similar in A1R-/- mice and when measured with NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs in CA3 pyramidal cells in the presence of DPCPX. Additional experiments suggested that the results obtained by Moore et al. (2003) can partially be explained by their usage of a submerged recording chamber and elevated divalent cation concentrations. In conclusion, a reduction of the basal release probability by ambient adenosine does not underlie presynaptic forms of plasticity at mossy fiber synapses.

6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione↗
PubMed2005

Luminal adenosine stimulates chloride secretion through A1 receptor in mouse jejunum.

Adenosine is known to stimulate chloride secretion by mouse jejunum. Whereas the receptor on the basolateral side is believed to be A2B, the receptor involved in the luminal effect of adenosine has not been identified. We found that jejuna expressed mRNA for all adenosine receptor subtypes. In this study, we investigated the stimulation of chloride secretion by adenosine in jejuna derived from mice lacking the adenosine receptors of A1 (A1R) and A2A (A(2A)R) or control littermates. The jejunal epithelium was mounted in a Ussing chamber, and a new method on the basis of impedance analysis was used to calculate the short-circuit current (I(sc)) values. Chloride secretion was assessed by the I(sc) after inhibition of the sodium-glucose cotransporter by adding phloridzin to the apical bathing solution. The effect of apical adenosine on chloride secretion was lost in jejuna from mice lacking the A1R. There was no difference in the response to basolaterally applied adenosine or to apical forskolin. Furthermore, in jejuna from control mice, the effect of apical adenosine was also abolished in the presence of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, a specific A1R antagonist. Responses to adenosine were identical in jejuna from control and A(2A)R knockout mice. This study demonstrates that A1R (and not A(2A)R) mediates the enhancement of chloride secretion induced by luminal adenosine in mice jejunum.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

Mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor have normal spatial learning and plasticity in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, but they habituate more slowly.

Using mice with a targeted disruption of the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R), we examined the role of A1Rs in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD), and memory formation. Recordings from the Shaffer collateral-CA1 pathway of hippocampal slices from adult mice showed no differences between theta burst and tetanic stimulation-induced LTP in adenosine A1 receptor knockout (A1R-/-), heterozygote (A1R+/-), and wildtype (A1R+/+) mice. However, paired pulse facilitation was impaired significantly in A1R-/- slices as compared to A1R+/+ slices. LTD in the CA1 region was unaffected by the genetic manipulation. The three genotypes showed similar memory acquisition patterns when assessed for spatial reference and working memory in the Morris water maze tasks at 9 months of age. However, 10 months later A1R-/- mice showed some deficits in the 6-arm radial tunnel maze test. The latter appeared, however, not due to memory deficits but to decreased habituation to the test environment. Taken together, we observe normal spatial learning and memory and hippocampal CA1 synaptic plasticity in adult adenosine A1R knockout mice, but find modifications in arousal-related processes, including habituation, in this knockout model.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Increased nociceptive response in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor.

The role of the adenosine A1 receptor in nociception was assessed using mice lacking the A1 receptor (A1R-/-) and in rats. Under normal conditions, the A1R-/- mice exhibited moderate heat hyperalgesia in comparison to the wild-type mice (A1R+/+). The mechanical and cold sensitivity were unchanged. The antinociceptive effect of morphine given intrathecally (i.t.), but not systemically, was reduced in A1R-/- mice and this reduction in the spinal effect of morphine was not associated with a decrease in binding of the mu-opioid ligand DAMGO in the spinal cord. A1R-/- mice also exhibited hypersensitivity to heat, but not mechanical stimuli, after localized inflammation induced by carrageenan. In mice with photochemically induced partial sciatic nerve injury, the neuropathic pain-like behavioral response to heat or cold stimulation were significantly increased in the A1R-/-mice. Peripheral nerve injury did not change the level of adenosine A1 receptor in the dorsal spinal cord in rats and i.t. administration of R-PIA effectively alleviated pain-like behaviors after partial nerve injury in rats and in C57/BL/6 mice. Taken together, these data suggest that the adenosine A1 receptor plays a physiological role in inhibiting nociceptive input at the spinal level in mice. The C-fiber input mediating noxious heat is inhibited more than other inputs. A1 receptors also contribute to the antinociceptive effect of spinal morphine. Selective A1 receptor agonists may be tested clinically as analgesics, particularly under conditions of neuropathic pain.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Adenosine A2A, but not A1, receptors mediate the arousal effect of caffeine.

Caffeine, a component of tea, coffee and cola, induces wakefulness. It binds to adenosine A1 and A2A receptors as an antagonist, but the receptor subtype mediating caffeine-induced wakefulness remains unclear. Here we report that caffeine at 5, 10 and 15 mg kg(-1) increased wakefulness in both wild-type mice and A1 receptor knockout mice, but not in A2A receptor knockout mice. Thus, caffeine-induced wakefulness depends on adenosine A2A receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Actions of adenosine at its receptors in the CNS: insights from knockouts and drugs.

Adenosine and its receptors have been the topic of many recent reviews. These reviews provide a good summary of much of the relevant literature--including the older literature. We have, therefore, chosen to focus the present review on the insights gained from recent studies on genetically modified mice, particularly with respect to the function of adenosine receptors and their potential as therapeutic targets. The information gained from studies of drug effects is discussed in this context, and discrepancies between genetic and pharmacological results are highlighted.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

Susceptibility of the developing brain to acute hypoglycemia involving A1 adenosine receptor activation.

It has been suggested that the developing brain is less vulnerable to the adverse effects of hypoglycemia than the mature brain; however, this issue remains controversial. We also do not know the magnitude or duration of hypoglycemia needed to trigger hypoglycemic brain injury during development. To address this issue a series of in vivo and in vitro studies were performed. First, we established an acute model of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in mice by administering 3 U/kg of neutral-protamine Hagadorn insulin subcutaneously. When we examined degenerating neurons in hippocampus and striatum by TUNEL labeling, injury was observed after 4 h of hypoglycemia in postnatal day (P)7 mice, and we observed more cell injury in animals rendered hypoglycemic at P7 than at P21. Studies of hippocampal slice cultures revealed that reduction in glucose concentration induced more neuronal injury in slices prepared from P3 and P7 than from P14 and P21 mice. Treatment of slices with an adenosine A(1) receptor (A(1)AR) antagonist reduced the hypoglycemic damage, whereas agonists increased damage, particularly in slices prepared from very young pups. This suggests a critically important role for A(1)ARs, which was further demonstrated by the reduction of hypoglycemic damage in hippocampal slices prepared from A(1)AR(-/-) mice. Furthermore, insulin-induced hypoglycemia in P7 A(1)AR(-/-) mice did not increase TUNEL-positive cells, but a major increase was seen in A(1)AR(+/-) mice. These observations show that the developing nervous system is indeed sensitive to acute hypoglycemic injury and that A(1)AR activation contributes to damage induced by hypoglycemia, particularly in immature mouse brain.

Animals↗