Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Benjamin Blankertz

Publications and source records attributed to Benjamin Blankertz.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A data analysis competition to evaluate machine learning algorithms for use in brain-computer interfaces.

We present three datasets that were used to conduct an open competition for evaluating the performance of various machine-learning algorithms used in brain-computer interfaces. The datasets were collected for tasks that included: 1) detecting explicit left/right (L/R) button press; 2) predicting imagined L/R button press; and 3) vertical cursor control. A total of ten entries were submitted to the competition, with winning results reported for two of the three datasets.

Algorithms↗

Boosting bit rates and error detection for the classification of fast-paced motor commands based on single-trial EEG analysis.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) involve two coupled adapting systems--the human subject and the computer. In developing our BCI, our goal was to minimize the need for subject training and to impose the major learning load on the computer. To this end, we use behavioral paradigms that exploit single-trial EEG potentials preceding voluntary finger movements. Here, we report recent results on the basic physiology of such premovement event-related potentials (ERP). 1) We predict the laterality of imminent left- versus right-hand finger movements in a natural keyboard typing condition and demonstrate that a single-trial classification based on the lateralized Bereitschaftspotential (BP) achieves good accuracies even at a pace as fast as 2 taps/s. Results for four out of eight subjects reached a peak information transfer rate of more than 15 b/min; the four other subjects reached 6-10 b/min. 2) We detect cerebral error potentials from single false-response trials in a forced-choice task, reflecting the subject's recognition of an erroneous response. Based on a specifically tailored classification procedure that limits the rate of false positives at, e.g., 2%, the algorithm manages to detect 85% of error trials in seven out of eight subjects. Thus, concatenating a primary single-trial BP-paradigm involving finger classification feedback with such secondary error detection could serve as an efficient online confirmation/correction tool for improvement of bit rates in a future BCI setting. As the present variant of the Berlin BCI is designed to achieve fast classifications in normally behaving subjects, it opens a new perspective for assistance of action control in time-critical behavioral contexts; the potential transfer to paralyzed patients will require further study.

Algorithms↗