Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Belinda Chong

Publications and source records attributed to Belinda Chong.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Increased yield of genetic diagnoses in inherited heart diseases using expanded genome and RNA-splicing analyses.

PURPOSE: The Australian Genomics Cardiovascular Disorders Flagship investigated genome sequencing as a first-line genetic test in 600 individuals with cardiomyopathy, primary arrhythmia syndromes, or congenital heart disease. Analysis of disease-specific virtual gene panels achieved a genetic diagnosis in 38% of participants. We sought to increase genetic diagnosis yields by analyzing lesser-evidenced disease genes, the mitochondrial genome, and by functional analysis of predicted splice-altering variants. METHODS: Genome sequences of 520 participants with cardiomyopathy or primary arrhythmia syndromes were reanalyzed in 572 cardiac genes and the mitochondrial genome. Participants with congenital heart disease were excluded. Variants predicted in silico to disrupt splicing were assessed with blood RNA and minigenes. RESULTS: A new genetic diagnosis was achieved in 4% (19/520) of participants, including deep intronic and mitochondrial genome variants. Ten participants had diagnostic variants in lesser evidenced disease genes; 9 had splicing variant pathogenicity functionally validated. Eleven participants had a newly identified variant of uncertain significance with high suspicion of pathogenicity, warranting clinical review. Our data supported the gene-disease association of 1 new cardiomyopathy gene, TBX20. CONCLUSION: Identifying new gene-disease relationships, maintaining contemporary gene panels, and integrating functional studies to refine splicing variant classifications increase genetic diagnoses for cardiomyopathies and primary arrhythmia syndromes.

Humans

Offering complex genomic screening in acute pediatric settings: Family decision-making and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Families of children in pediatric acute care who are offered ultrarapid genomic sequencing are making complex decisions during a high-stress period. To reduce complexity for families and clinicians, we offered genomic screening for the child and parents after the completion of diagnostic testing. We evaluated uptake, understanding, and service delivery preferences. METHODS: A cohort of 235 families who had completed ultrarapid diagnostic genomic sequencing at 17 Australian hospitals were offered up to 3 screens on their genomic data: pediatric-onset, adult-onset, and expanded couple carrier screening. We investigated decision making, understanding, and service delivery preferences using surveys at 3 time points (pre counseling, post counseling, and post result) and performed inductive content analysis of pretest genetic counseling transcripts. RESULTS: A total of 119 families (51%) attended genetic counseling with 115 (49%) accepting genomic screening. Survey respondents were more likely to find decisions about couple carrier screening easy (87%) compared with adult (68%; P = .002) or pediatric (71%; P = .01) screening decisions. All respondents with newly detected pathogenic variants accurately recalled this 1 month later. A delayed offer of screening was acceptable to most respondents (78%). CONCLUSION: Separating genomic screening from the stressful diagnostic period is supported by families who demonstrate good knowledge and recall. Our results suggest delaying genomic screening should be trialed more widely.

Humans