Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Beatriz Carvalho

Publications and source records attributed to Beatriz Carvalho.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

BAC to the future! or oligonucleotides: a perspective for micro array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH).

The array CGH technique (Array Comparative Genome Hybridization) has been developed to detect chromosomal copy number changes on a genome-wide and/or high-resolution scale. It is used in human genetics and oncology, with great promise for clinical application. Until recently primarily PCR amplified bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) or cDNAs have been spotted as elements on the array. The large-scale DNA isolations or PCR amplifications of the large-insert clones necessary for manufacturing the arrays are elaborate and time-consuming. Lack of a high-resolution highly sensitive (commercial) alternative has undoubtedly hindered the implementation of array CGH in research and diagnostics. Recently, synthetic oligonucleotides as arrayed elements have been introduced as an alternative substrate for array CGH, both by academic institutions as well as by commercial providers. Oligonucleotide libraries or ready-made arrays can be bought off-the-shelf saving considerable time and efforts. For RNA expression profiling, we have seen a gradual transition from in-house printed cDNA-based expression arrays to oligonucleotide arrays and we expect a similar transition for array CGH. This review compares the different platforms and will attempt to shine a light on the 'BAC to the future' of the array CGH technique.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

Mixed gastric carcinomas show similar chromosomal aberrations in both their diffuse and glandular components.

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in the world. Nonetheless, the knowledge of the molecular events involved in the development of gastric carcinoma is far from complete. One of the hallmarks of gastric cancer is chromosomal instability resulting in abnormal DNA copy number changes throughout the genome. Mixed gastric carcinomas constitute a rare histological entity, containing the two main histological phenotypes (diffuse and intestinal). Very little is known about the underlying mechanisms of phenotypic divergence in these mixed tumours. To the best of our knowledge only E-Cadherin mutations were implicated so far in the divergence of these tumours and nothing is known about the involvement of chromosome copy number changes in the two divergent histological components. In this study, we compared the DNA copy number changes, in the two different components (diffuse and intestinal) of mixed gastric carcinomas by microarray - comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH). The analysis of 12 mixed gastric carcinomas showed no significant differences in array CGH profiles between the diffuse and intestinal components of mixed carcinomas. This supports the idea that the phenotypic divergence within mixed gastric carcinomas is not caused by DNA chromosomal aberrations.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

Promoter methylation precedes chromosomal alterations in colorectal cancer development.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers are characterized by genetic and epigenetic alterations. This study aimed to explore the timing of promoter methylation and relationship with mutations and chromosomal alterations in colorectal carcinogenesis. METHODS: In a series of 47 nonprogressed adenomas, 41 progressed adenomas (malignant polyps), 38 colorectal carcinomas and 18 paired normal tissues, we evaluated promoter methylation status of hMLH1, O6MGMT, APC, p14ARF, p16INK4A, RASSF1A, GATA-4, GATA-5, and CHFR using methylation-specific PCR. Mutation status of TP53, APC and KRAS were studied by p53 immunohistochemistry and sequencing of the APC and KRAS mutation cluster regions. Chromosomal alterations were evaluated by comparative genomic hybridization. RESULTS: Our data demonstrate that nonprogressed adenomas, progressed adenomas and carcinomas show similar frequencies of promoter methylation for the majority of the genes. Normal tissues showed significantly lower frequencies of promoter methylation of APC, p16INK4A, GATA-4, and GATA-5 (P-values: 0.02, 0.02, 1.1x10(-5) and 0.008 respectively). P53 immunopositivity and chromosomal abnormalities occur predominantly in carcinomas (P values: 1.1x10(-5) and 4.1x10(-10)). CONCLUSIONS: Since promoter methylation was already present in nonprogressed adenomas without chromosomal alterations, we conclude that promoter methylation can be regarded as an early event preceding TP53 mutation and chromosomal abnormalities in colorectal cancer development.

Adenoma↗

Human and mouse oligonucleotide-based array CGH.

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is a high resolution method for measuring chromosomal copy number changes. Here we present a validated protocol using in-house spotted oligonucleotide libraries for array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). This oligo array CGH platform yields reproducible results and is capable of detecting single copy gains, multi-copy amplifications as well as homozygous and heterozygous deletions as small as 100 kb with high resolution. A human oligonucleotide library was printed on amine binding slides. Arrays were hybridized using a hybstation and analysed using BlueFuse feature extraction software, with >95% of spots passing quality control. The protocol allows as little as 300 ng of input DNA and a 90% reduction of Cot-1 DNA without compromising quality. High quality results have also been obtained with DNA from archival tissue. Finally, in addition to human oligo arrays, we have applied the protocol successfully to mouse oligo arrays. We believe that this oligo-based platform using 'off-the-shelf' oligo libraries provides an easy accessible alternative to BAC arrays for CGH, which is cost-effective, available at high resolution and easily implemented for any sequenced organism without compromising the quality of the results.

Animals↗

MBD4 mutations are rare in gastric carcinomas with microsatellite instability.

MBD4 encodes a protein that interacts with the mismatch repair protein hMLH1. Therefore, it has been postulated that mutations in MBD4 may result in mismatch repair deficiency. Furthermore, it was shown that MBD4 is a target gene in mismatch repair-deficient tumors. We searched for mutations of MBD4 in sporadic gastric carcinomas (SGC) and compared them with the MSI status of the tumors by screening a series of 42 SGC [22 high microsatellte instability (MSI-H) and 20 microsatellite stable (MSS)] for mutations in both the poly(A)10 and (A)6 tracts of the gene as well as in its entire coding sequence. Mutations of the poly(A)10 tract of MBD4 were also screened in 126 MSI-H colon carcinomas. One of the 22 MSI-H gastric carcinomas and 12 of 126 MSI-H colon carcinomas showed MBD4 mutations in the poly(A)10 tract of exon 3. In addition, seven sequence variants were found in SGC, all of them having a polymorphic nature. We conclude that MBD4 mutations in the entire coding sequence, including the two poly(A) tracts, are rare in MSI gastric carcinomas. MBD4 is likely to be a bystander target gene in MSI-H tumors.

Adenosine↗