Biomedical subjects

Barden B Stagner

Publications and source records attributed to Barden B Stagner.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) can be obtained in a variety of laboratory animals and humans by sweeping the frequencies and levels of a third tone (f(3)) around a set of f(1) and f(2) primaries. In small laboratory animals, it was previously observed that, when the suppressor tone (f(3)) is above f(2), substantial suppression and or enhancement (suppression/enhancement) could be obtained. In the present study, it was of interest to determine if similar suppression/enhancement phenomena could be observed in humans and to what extent this might influence the interpretation of STC results reported in the literature. To this end, STCs were measured for DPOAEs at 2f(1)-f(2) and 2f(2)-f(1) in human subjects at geometric-mean frequencies (GM) of 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz, and primary-tone equilevels of 80/80 and 75/75 dB SPL and unequal levels of 65/55 dB SPL. Overall, STC parameters were found to be comparable to those reported in the literature. For the 2f(1)-f(2) DPOAE, STC tip frequencies tuned to the region of the primaries, and tip frequencies were slightly influenced by primary-tone level. STC tip thresholds were typically within 10 dB of the level of L(2), and Q(10dB) values ranged from 1.0 to 2.5, which was consistent with the higher-level primaries employed. The 2f(1)-f(2) DPOAE showed consistent regions of suppression that were approximately an octave above the GM for the 1-kHz, 65/55-dB SPL condition. The 2f(2)-f(1) DPOAE tuned to its characteristic place above f(2) and showed reliable enhancement above the STC tip region for the 1-kHz, 75/75-dB SPL primaries. Overall, the results clearly revealed that human ears also display suppression/enhancement phenomena when f(3) reaches frequencies considerably above f(2). If suppression/enhancement phenomena reflect secondary DPOAE sources, then these sources are present in the ear-canal signal from humans as well as small laboratory animals.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits.

Psychophysical, basilar-membrane (BM), and single nerve-fiber tuning curves, as well as suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), all give rise to frequency tuning patterns with stereotypical features. Similarities and differences between the behaviors of these tuning functions, both in normal conditions and following various cochlear insults, have been documented. While neural tuning curves (NTCs) and BM tuning curves behave similarly both before and after cochlear insults known to disrupt frequency selectivity, DPOAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) do not necessarily mirror these responses following either administration of ototoxins [Martin et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 972-983 (1998)] or exposure to temporarily damaging noise [Howard et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 285-296 (2002)]. However, changes in STC parameters may be predictive of other changes in cochlear function such as cochlear immaturity in neonatal humans [Abdala, Hear. Res. 121, 125-138 (1998)]. To determine the effects of noise-induced permanent auditory dysfunction on STC parameters, rabbits were exposed to high-level noise that led to permanent reductions in DPOAE level, and comparisons between pre- and postexposure DPOAE levels and STCs were made. Statistical comparisons of pre- and postexposure STC values at CF revealed consistent basal shifts in the frequency region of greatest cochlear damage, whereas thresholds, Q10dB, and tip-to-tail gain values were not reliably altered. Additionally, a large percentage of high-frequency lobes associated with third tone interference phenomena, that were exhibited in some data sets, were dramatically reduced following noise exposure. Thus, previously described areas of DPOAE interference above f2 may also be studied using this type of experimental manipulation [Martin et al., Hear. Res. 136, 105-123 (1999); Mills, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 2586-2602 (2002)].

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.

A test based on measures of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) was developed in lightly anesthetized guinea pigs and alert rabbits to assess the effective activation or functional "strength" of the cochlear efferent system. The multifrequency method described here used the DP-gram frequency function to evaluate the fast component of the olivocochlear adaptive effect on DPOAE levels over a 2-octave frequency range. An estimate of any concurrent muscle activation was also determined over the identical frequency range by monitoring the levels of the eliciting f1 primary tone throughout its duration. The acoustic reflex, as measured by this f1 level constancy test, did not appear to contribute to the average efferent strength of sedated guinea pigs, but the acoustic reflex did contribute to the average "efferent" strength of awake rabbits. Hence, the average efferent effect in alert rabbits is contaminated by the acoustic reflex, which confounds its interpretation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 2f1-f2 can be suppressed by the introduction of a third "suppressor" tone. Plotting the suppression of the DPOAE level against the changing frequency and level of the suppressor produces frequency-tuning functions referred to as suppression tuning curves (STCs). The dominant features of STCs, including their shape, are similar to the features of neural tuning curves (NTCs) recorded from single auditory nerve fibers. However, recent findings using reversible diuretics suggest that STCs do not provide the same measure of cochlear frequency selectivity as provided by NTCs. To determine if STCs are also insensitive to the adverse effects of excessive sounds, the present study exposed rabbits to a moderate-level noise that produced temporary threshold shift-like (TTS) effects on DPOAEs, and examined the influence of such exposures on STCs. DPOAEs were produced using primary tones with geometric-mean frequencies centered at 2.8 or 4 kHz, and with L1 and L2 values of 45/45, 50/35, 50/50, and 55/45 dB SPL. STCs were obtained before and during recovery for a period of approximately 2 h immediately following, and at 1, 2, 3, and 7 d post-exposure to a 2 kHz octave band noise, at levels and durations sufficient to cause significant but reversible reductions in DPOAE levels. STC data included tip center frequency, tip threshold, and Q10dB measures of tuning for suppression criteria of 3, 6, 9, and 12 dB. Recovery was variable between animals, but all rabbits recovered fully by 7 d post-exposure. STC center frequencies measured during the TTS typically tuned to a slightly higher frequency, while tip thresholds tended to decrease and Q10dB increase. Together, the results indicate that, despite similarities in the general properties of STCs and NTCs, these two types of tuning curves are affected differently following reversible cochlear insult.

Animals↗