Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Winikoff

Publications and source records attributed to B Winikoff.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Is medical abortion acceptable to all American women: the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the acceptability of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion is more acceptable to some American women than to others. METHODS: Using previously reported acceptability data from a large US multicenter study (n = 2121), we conducted a more detailed analysis to test whether characteristics such as race/ethnicity, education, age, gestational age, and geographic location affect acceptability. RESULTS: In the United States, Asian women were more than twice as likely as other women to choose this method because they believed it was safer, while white women were twice as likely to select it because they considered it more natural. More educated women were likely to select this method to show support for greater choice and were more pleased about being able to avoid surgery. Particular features of the protocol also appealed to different women. White and African-American women as well as women with more education would feel significantly more comfortable taking one or both of the drugs at home than they would in the clinic. Nearly all groups of women were equally satisfied with this method and found it highly acceptable. The data showed surprisingly few differences among women's overall satisfaction level, their willingness to choose the method again, or to recommend it to others. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion has widespread appeal to a broad range of women, but different women choose and prefer this method for different reasons.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗

Misoprostol alone--a new method of medical abortion?

Misoprostol shows promise for early termination of pregnancy. The drug is widely available, inexpensive, and easy to administer. Current evidence on the efficacy of potential regimens for early abortion, though, is hard to decipher and often contradictory. Research on a safe, effective, acceptable regimen of misoprostol alone for early abortion is underway. Available data show a wide range in efficacy of various regimens, and additional research is needed to understand this variability. A framework for additional research on misoprostol alone for medical abortion is presented with a focus on the need to evaluate benefits and risks of new regimens in the context of women's options for termination of pregnancy. We discuss the potential usefulness of a regimen with less efficacy than approved medical abortifacients. Research is needed as well on women's ability to self-diagnose incomplete abortion or ongoing pregnancy and the potential for misoprostol to be used as treatment for incomplete abortion in order to evaluate the benefits and risks of misoprostol-alone regimens.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗

Side effects of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion versus surgical abortion. Data from a trial in China, Cuba, and India.

Although serious adverse events of early abortion have been studied, little attention has been paid to the more common side effects experienced by early medical or surgical abortion clients. Using data from a multicenter comparative trial of women < or = 56 days' gestation in China, Cuba, and India (n = 1373), side effects experienced by mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion and surgical abortion clients were analyzed at the different stages of their abortions. Data on side effects came from women's reports at each clinic visit, providers' observations during the clinic visits, and symptom diaries maintained during the study period. Medical abortion clients at all sites experienced more side effects than their surgical counterparts. The disparity between the two groups was particularly pronounced for bleeding and pain. Despite more reports of side effects among medical abortion clients, however, assessments of well-being and reports of satisfaction at the exit interview were similar in both treatment groups.

Abortifacient Agents↗

Misoprostol used alone for the termination of early pregnancy. A review of the evidence.

Increased access to medical methods of abortion could significantly reduce maternal mortality, especially in developing countries. In light of the political and commercial difficulties in distributing the abortifacient mifepristone, the widely studied mifepristone-misoprostol regimen may not be sufficiently available in the near future. Thus, researchers have begun to look for alternative regimens, including regimens using misoprostol alone. This article reviews the current available evidence on the potential of a misoprostol-alone regimen for medical abortion. Although the data are varied and difficult to compare, recent studies indicate that a misoprostol-alone regimen could be safe and effective as a method of medical abortion. Misoprostol is widely marketed around the world for its other indications and is inexpensive, stable in tropical climates, easy to transport, and simple to administer. A misoprostol-alone regimen of medical abortion could thus greatly improve the access to safe medical abortion services by women in developing countries.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗

Providing mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion: the view from the clinic.

In order to gather information about the practical aspects of offering medical abortion, we conducted focus group discussions at each of 17 sites participating in the first large-scale, multi-center trial of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion in the United States. The sites were chosen to represent diverse practice settings (Planned Parenthood affiliates, university research clinics, private practices, and feminist health centers) and geographical regions. Seventy-seven clinic staff members (including counselors, administrators, physicians and other health workers) participated. They discussed the impact of adding a medical method to their clinic structure, their own preferences about offering the method, and their perceptions of women's preferences. Staffing a medical abortion service requires different skills and temperament than those needed for a surgical service. Nearly all participants were eager to begin offering the medical method, and they perceived a strong demand for it on the part of women. They had mixed feelings about the type of provider who should offer the method, but nearly all felt that the regimen could be greatly simplified from the three-visit regimen tested in the trial.

Abortifacient Agents↗

Blood loss with mifepristone--misoprostol abortion: measures from a trial in China, Cuba and India.

OBJECTIVE: We compared bleeding patterns following early mifepristone-misoprostol abortion with those following early surgical abortions ( < or = 56 days gestation LMP). We analyzed women's reports of their bleeding and clinical measures of blood loss, and modeled the relationships between different bleeding measures and indicators of success and satisfaction. METHOD: Using data from a multicenter trial held in China, Cuba and India, we fit bivariate and multivariate models to analyze bleeding patterns, controlling for a range of demographic, experiential and medical factors (n = 1373). RESULT: Medical abortion patients perceived their bleeding to be heavier than did the surgical patients; however, there were few statistically significant differences in clinical measures of blood loss between the two groups, and blood loss rarely represented a medical problem. Nationality, far more than actual levels of bleeding, influenced women's impressions about blood loss. Although medical abortion patients saw their bleeding as heavier than did the surgical patients, their perceptions of heavier bleeding did not prevent them from having higher satisfaction levels. One exception was that if bleeding exceeded prior expectations, women with the medical method were more likely to be dissatisfied. Pain and cramps, which often accompanied bleeding, were an independently significant factor in predicting satisfaction with the method. CONCLUSION: In order for women to know what to expect with medical abortion, they must be informed beforehand about the level of bleeding that generally accompanies the procedure vs. excessive bleeding that would signal a clinical problem.

Abortifacient Agents↗

Abortion, revised: participants in the U.S. clinical trials evaluate mifepristone.

This paper centers on the questions: How do non-surgical abortion methods affect private experiences of abortions? How might they influence public conceptions of abortion? Drawing on interviews with clients who participated in the 1994-95 U.S. clinical trials of mifepristone at one trial site (conducted during the trials), and focus group interviews conducted with health care workers at all 17 trial sites (after the trials were completed), we examine participants' evaluations of this method of abortion. Surgical abortion functioned as the reference point by which research participants assessed medical abortion. They discussed mifepristone abortion in terms of nature and invasion, privacy and bodily integrity, denial and agency. Clients frequently portrayed mifepristone abortion as a better moral choice than surgical abortion--in some cases even depicting it as not-really-an-abortion but rather as a miscarriage. Clients felt that mifepristone offered them a greater measure of control over their abortion experiences. Health care providers offered critical analysis of their clients' perceptions, yet affirmed the potential of medical abortion to offer women greater variety and latitude in procreative decision-making, and perhaps even to depoliticize the issue of abortion in the U.S. by thwarting the efforts of anti-abortionists to target providers and aborting women.

Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal↗

Should emergency contraceptive pills be available without prescription?

Leading health agencies, including the World Health Organization and the US Food and Drug Administration, consider emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) safe and effective and have called for better access to them. Yet debate about whether ECPs should continue to be available by prescription only has been limited. After measuring the characteristics of ECPs against criteria developed to assess the necessity for prescription status for drugs generally, we argue that ECPs can safely be marketed over the counter. Professional assistance is not necessary since the woman diagnoses her own need for the pills and takes them herself. ECPs do not need to be adjusted for the individual woman and pose no potential threat of overdose or addiction. There are no contraindications except confirmed pregnancy (in which case the therapy will not work), and monitoring is not necessary. We conclude that prescription requirements that keep ECPs from women provide little, if any, benefit.

Contraceptives, Postcoital↗

Safety, efficacy, and acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba, and India: a comparative trial of mifepristone-misoprostol versus surgical abortion.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated safety, efficacy, and acceptability of an oral regimen of medical abortion compared with surgical abortion in three developing countries. STUDY DESIGN: Women (n = 1373) with amenorrhea < or = 56 days chose either surgical abortion (as provided routinely) or 600 mg of mifepristone followed after 48 hours by 400 micrograms of misoprostol. This is the appropriate design for studying safety, efficacy, and acceptability among women selecting medical abortion over available surgical services. RESULTS: The medical regimen had more side effects, particularly bleeding, than did surgical abortion but very few serious side effects. Failure rates for medical abortion, although low, exceeded those for surgical abortion: 8.6% versus 0.4% (China), 16.0% versus 4.0% (Cuba), and 5.2% versus 0% (India). Nearly half of failures among medical clients were not true drug failures, however, but surgical interventions not medically necessary (acceptability failures or misdiagnoses). Women were satisfied with either method, but more preferred medical abortion. CONCLUSION: Medical abortion can be safe, efficacious, and acceptable in developing countries.

Abortifacient Agents↗

Analysis of failure in medical abortion.

Medical abortion opens a new choice to women wishing to terminate a pregnancy. Increasingly, providers in the developing and developed world will begin to offer this option. Yet, the nomenclature and concepts used for measuring failure of surgical abortion are not directly adaptable because of important differences inherent in the method and in the way it is offered in a given setting. We propose that failures in medical abortion should be defined as a surgical intervention (whether vacuum aspiration or dilatation and curettage) performed for any reason. Such instances may be further classified into three types: user choice interventions, provider choice or error interventions, and true drug failures requiring intervention. Further description and examples of each type are given.

Abortifacient Agents↗

Maternal health in the age of AIDS: implications for health services in developing countries.

In developing countries, the HIV/AIDS epidemic will have a major impact on all phases of women's reproductive lives, and will alter many standard approaches to the management of MCH (maternal and child health) services related to fertility regulation, pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period. AIDS-related increased caseloads, occupational risk to health workers and reduced resources will further compromise MCH services. MCH programme managers and service providers need to better understand the nature of both technical and service-related issues intersecting both the MCH and AIDS fields to mitigate this impact.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗