Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B T Petersen

Publications and source records attributed to B T Petersen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Germline E-cadherin gene mutations: is prophylactic total gastrectomy indicated?

BACKGROUND: The CDH1 gene encodes E-cadherin, an epithelial cell adhesion molecule. Germline CDH1 mutations recently were identified in families with hereditary diffuse gastric carcinoma in a pattern suggestive of autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance. METHODS: The proband was a woman age 47 years with a strong family history of diffuse gastric carcinoma. A germline E-cadherin gene mutation was identified in this patient, her brother, and three first cousins. All five family members underwent endoscopic evaluations, which were negative for malignancy, and elected to undergo a prophylactic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy. RESULTS: Pathologic examination of the proband's stomach revealed several microscopic foci of intramucosal signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in the cardia and proximal gastric body. Postgastrectomy specimens from the proband's brother and three first cousins all showed intramucosal signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in various regions of the stomach. Immunoperoxidase studies performed on gastric tissue from these five patients demonstrated diminished or absent E-cadherin reactivity in the cancerous mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Although total gastrectomy was performed as a prophylactic intervention, occult gastric carcinoma was discovered in all five patients. Thus, total gastrectomy should be curative for gastric carcinoma in these patients. Based on their successful outcomes and the lack of efficacious surveillance methods for diffuse gastric carcinoma, prophylactic total gastrectomy may be the management of choice for germline E-cadherin gene mutation carriers. However, prophylactic total gastrectomy should be undertaken cautiously because the procedure may be associated with considerable morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Enteroscopy.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2001

Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography in endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in selected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) on endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and to determine patency with fistula dilation and placement of multiple stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1995 and January 1999, 19 patients underwent endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, 17 of whom were assessed by EUS before drainage. Radial EUS scanning was used to detect an optimal site of apposition of pseudocyst and gut wall, free of intervening vessels. A fistula was created with a fistulatome, followed by balloon dilation of the fistula tract. Patency was maintained with multiple double pigtail stents. The primary goal of this retrospective study was to determine whether EUS affected the practice of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. RESULTS: In 3 patients, drainage was not attempted based on EUS findings. In the other 13 patients (14 pseudocysts), creation of a fistula was successful on 13 occasions, and no immediate complications occurred. However, 1 patient subsequently developed sepsis that required surgery. All other patients were treated with balloon dilation, multiple stents, and antibiotics, with no septic complications. Of 14 pseudocysts (in 13 patients), 13 (93%) resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Results of EUS may alter management of patients considered for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Endoscopic ultrasonography was useful for selecting an optimal and safe drainage site. The combination of balloon dilation, multiple stents, and antibiotics appears to resolve pancreatic pseudocysts without septic complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Endoscopic surveillance and ablative therapy for periampullary adenomas.

OBJECTIVES: Periampullary adenomas are an increasingly recognized condition, both in those with familial adenomatous polyposis syndromes (FAP) as well as sporadic cases. Endoscopic management has been advocated for these lesions without differentiating between these two patient groups regarding aim of therapy. The aims of this study were to determine the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance and ablative therapy of periampullary adenomas in patients with both sporadic and FAP-associated lesions. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 59 patients with FAP and 32 with sporadic lesions who were all enrolled in a program of endoscopic surveillance and ablative therapy. Median follow-up was 24 months (range, 1-134 months). RESULTS: Ampullary ablative therapy has resulted in return to normal histology in 44 and 34% of sporadic and FAPassociated lesions, respectively. Complications of endoscopic therapy were mild in 12 patients and severe in 3 patients: the latter category involved one occurrence of asymptomatic duodenal stenosis and one occurrence of postcoagulation syndrome--both after Nd-YAG laser therapy-and necrotizing pancreatitis after ampullary biopsy in one patient. Thirteen patients have been referred for surgical intervention. There has been no mortality and no cases of advanced malignancy missed by endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surveillance and ablative therapy of periampullary lesions is safe and can be effective, although eradication of ampullary tissue requires multiple ablative sessions.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2001

Balloon dilation compared to stenting of dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

OBJECTIVE: In some patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a localized, high-grade (dominant) stricture may be the principal cause of symptoms and hyperbilirubinemia. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the beneficial effects and risk of balloon dilation alone versus dilation followed by stenting in PSC patients with dominant strictures. METHODS: Charts from a group of 1009 patients with PSC seen over 10 yr were reviewed to identify those patients who had undergone endoscopic or percutaneous therapeutic intervention. Procedural and clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 71 PSC patients, median age of 49 yr (range 18-78 yr) were identified. Thirty-four patients were treated with endoscopic balloon dilation alone, and 37 patients were treated with balloon dilation plus stent placement. Stents were placed percutaneously (n = 19), endoscopically (n = 14), or using both interventions (n = 4). Both groups were comparable at baseline with regards to age, symptoms, and bilirubin level. The median duration of follow-up after intervention was similar in both groups. The number of intervention-related complications (30 vs 6, p = 0.001) as well as the incidence of acute cholangitis (p = 0.004) were more common in the stent group compared to the balloon dilation group. There were more complications related to percutaneous stent placement than endoscopic placement (23 vs 7. p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to improving cholestasis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no additional obvious benefit from stenting after balloon dilation in the treatment of dominant strictures in PSC patients. Stenting was associated with more complications, and its role after dilation should be assessed in a randomized trial rather than being accepted as routinely indicated in this setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Endoscopic therapy of anastomotic bile duct strictures occurring after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Optimal therapy for anastomotic biliary strictures occurring after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains to be defined. We reviewed our experience with endoscopic therapy for such strictures and contrasted it with reported data. METHODS: Endoscopic therapy was performed with balloon dilation alone; no patients received an endoprosthesis. Responses were characterized as good if the patient improved clinically and no subsequent procedures were required after one or more dilations within a 3-month period; partial if clinically significant obstruction resolved but cholestasis persisted or there was a need for further endoscopic management beyond the initial 3 months; poor if subsequent surgery or percutaneous procedures were required; and failed if endoscopic access or dilation could not be accomplished. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent 23 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies for post-OLT anastomotic strictures. Postprocedure follow-up averaged 25.2 months. Cholangiography was successful in all 23 procedures; free duct access was achieved in 22 of 23 procedures. The strictures were successfully accessed for dilation in 11 of 15 patients and in 19 of 23 procedures. Outcome was deemed good in 4 (27%), partial in 3 (20%), and poor in 5 (33%) patients. Endoscopic therapy failed in 3 (20%). Poor outcomes were due to the early recognition of severe lesions (2 treated surgically) or to short-term responses to dilation alone (3). The procedural complication rate of 17.4% included 3 episodes of transient cholangitis (i.e., elevation of liver enzymes associated with fever that lasted less than 3 days) and 1 self-limited episode of postsphincterotomy bleeding, which required the transfusion of 2 units packed red blood cells. In published series the combined success rate of balloon dilation alone for treatment of anastomotic strictures is 41%, whereas for dilation plus stent placement it is 75%. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic balloon dilation alone is not a reliable method of therapy for anastomotic strictures occurring after OLT. Dilation followed by short- to intermediate-term stent placement appears to provide a more durable result.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is a non-invasive diagnostic procedure whose role in the management of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of MRC in the evaluation of the biliary tree in patients with suspected biliary disease, and in particular, PSC. METHODS: MRC and invasive cholangiography (ERCP or PTC) were both performed in 73 patients, (33 male, 40 female, mean age 56 years) with clinical and/or biochemical evidence of cholestasis. Images were interpreted by two radiologists unaware of the results of other studies. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (58%) had benign biliary disease, including 23 patients (32%) with PSC; 9 patients (12%) had malignant biliary disease; and 22 patients (30%) had a normal biliary tree. Diagnostic quality images were obtained in 73/73 (100%) of MRC, and in 70/73 (96%) of invasive cholangiography (68 ERCP's, 2 PTC's) procedures. Using ERCP/PTC findings as the reference standard, MRC had an accuracy greater than 90% in the diagnosis of normal bile ducts, biliary dilatation, biliary obstruction, bile duct stones, and PSC. Using the final diagnosis, MRC had an overall diagnostic accuracy of 90% in the detection of biliary disease compared to 97% for invasive cholangiography. Additional diagnostic/therapeutic interventions were performed during ERCP in 73% of patients with PSC and in 43% of patients without PSC (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MRC has excellent diagnostic accuracy in the presence of biliary disease. Because of its noninvasive nature, MRC may have advantages over invasive cholangiography when diagnosis is the major goal of the procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.

Despite the prevailing emphasis on falling reimbursements and cost containment, the use of disposable endoscopic accessories has grown tremendously. They offer simplicity of use, certain sterility, and reduced labor costs in exchange for higher purchase costs per procedure and the burden of waste disposal. Disposable accessories provide greater variety, complexity, and utility. They carry a cost burden that may be acceptable when the devices are difficult to reprocess, when they incorporate features that justify the added cost, or when their unit cost approaches purchase plus reprocessing costs for reusable alternatives, such as for biopsy forceps. Units with small volumes may prefer the ease of disposable accessories independent of relative cost issues, while large high-volume units may need to evaluate cost data more carefully to maintain sustainable practices.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗