Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Szabo

Publications and source records attributed to B Szabo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of cannabinoids on neurotransmission.

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous system. Within the neuron, the CB1 receptor is often localised in axon terminals, and its activation leads to inhibition of transmitter release. The consequence is inhibition of neurotransmission via a presynaptic mechanism. Inhibition of glutamatergic, GABAergic, glycinergic, cholinergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission has been observed in many regions of the central nervous system. In the peripheral nervous system, CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of adrenergic, cholinergic and sensory neuroeffector transmission has been frequently observed. It is characteristic for the ubiquitous operation of CB1 receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition that antagonistic components of functional systems (for example, the excitatory and inhibitory inputs of the same neuron) are simultaneously inhibited by cannabinoids. Inhibition of voltage-dependent calcium channels, activation of potassium channels and direct interference with the synaptic vesicle release mechanism are all implicated in the cannabinoid-evoked inhibition of transmitter release. Many presynaptic CB1 receptors are subject to an endogenous tone, i.e. they are constitutively active and/or are continuously activated by endocannabinoids. Compared with the abundant data on presynaptic inhibition by cannabinoids, there are only a few examples for cannabinoid action on the somadendritic parts of neurons in situ.

Acetylcholine↗

Cannabinoids depress excitatory neurotransmission between the subthalamic nucleus and the globus pallidus.

The globus pallidus receives its major glutamatergic input from the subthalamic nucleus and subthalamic nucleus neurons synthesize CB1 cannabinoid receptors. The hypothesis of the present work was that CB1 receptors are localized in terminals of subthalamo-pallidal glutamatergic axons and that their activation leads to presynaptic modulation of neurotransmission between these axons and globus pallidus neurons. Patch-clamp studies were carried out on oblique-sagittal mouse brain slices. The subthalamic nucleus was stimulated electrically and the resulting excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were recorded in globus pallidus neurons. The mixed CB1/CB2 receptor agonist R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate (WIN55212-2; 3 x 10(-7) M) had no effect on EPSCs. WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) decreased the amplitude of EPSCs by 44+/-8%. The inhibition by WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) was prevented by the CB1 antagonist N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazolecarboxamide (10(-6) M). WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) did not change the amplitude of spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSCs) recorded in globus pallidus neurons but lowered their frequency. Moreover, WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) had no effect on currents elicited by direct activation of postsynaptic receptors on globus pallidus neurons by glutamate (10(-3) M) ejected from a pipette. In a final series of experiments, the firing of subthalamic nucleus neurons was recorded; WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) did not change the firing of these neurons. The results show that activation of CB1 receptors inhibits glutamatergic neurotransmission between the subthalamic nucleus and the globus pallidus. Lack of effect of cannabinoids on the amplitude of sEPSCs and on currents evoked by direct stimulation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors indicates that the mechanism is presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release from axon terminals. Cannabinoids seem to act preferentially presynaptically: in contrast to their action on axon terminals, they have no effect on somadendritic receptors regulating firing rate. Cannabinoids elicit catalepsy in vivo. The observed inhibition of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the globus pallidus would favor catalepsy.

Animals↗

Modulation of electrically evoked acetylcholine release through cannabinoid CB1 receptors: evidence for an endocannabinoid tone in the human neocortex.

Cannabinoids are known to inhibit neurotransmitter release in the CNS through CB1 receptors. The present study compares the effects of synthetic cannabinoids on acetylcholine (ACh) release in human and mice neocortex. We further investigated a possible endocannabinoid tone on CB1 receptors in human neocortex caused by endogenous agonists like anandamide or 2-arachidonylglycerol. Brain slices, incubated with [3H]-choline, were superfused and stimulated electrically under autoinhibition-free conditions to evoke tritium overflow assumed to represent ACh release. The first series of experiments was performed with 26 pulses, 60 mA, at 0.1 Hz. In mice neocortical slices, the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 decreased ACh release (pIC50=6.68, I(max)=67%). In the human neocortex the concentration-response curve of WIN55212-2 was bell-shaped and flat (I(max observed) approximately 30%). The estimated maximum possible inhibition, however, was much larger: I(max derived)=79%. Lec, the negative logarithm (lg) of the biophase concentration of endocannabinoids in 'WIN55212-2 units,' was -6.52, the pKd of WIN55212-2 was 7.47. The CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716 enhanced ACh release in the human neocortex (by 38%) and prevented the inhibitory effect of WIN55212-2. The concentration-response curve of WIN55212-2 was changed in its shape including a shift to the right due to the presence of SR141716. A pA2 of this antagonist between 11.60 and 11.18 was obtained. SR141716 alone had no effect in mice neocortical slices. A partial agonist without inverse agonistic activity, O-1184, enhanced ACh release in the human neocortex. The endocannabinoid uptake-inhibitor AM404 decreased ACh release in human, but not in mice, neocortical slices. Change of the stimulation parameters (eight trains of pseudo-one-pulse bursts (4 pulses, 76 mA, 100 Hz), spaced by 45 s intervals) led to a stronger inhibitory effect of WIN55212-2, and abolished the disinhibitory effect of SR141716 and O-1184. The results show that activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors leads to inhibition of ACh release in the human and mouse neocortex. The endocannabinoid tone is high in the human, but not in the mouse neocortex and is dependent on neuronal activity. SR141716 acts as a competitive CB1 receptor antagonist.

Acetylcholine↗

Effects of epidural anaesthesia on intestinal oxygenation in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative intestinal hypoperfusion is a major contributing factor leading to organ dysfunction. It can be caused by stress as a result of surgical manipulation or hypoxia. Additionally, anaesthesia can affect intestinal oxygenation. This animal study was designed to assess the effects of reduced regional sympathetic nervous activity induced by thoracic epidural anaesthesia on intestinal oxygenation. METHODS: After ethical approval, 16 anaesthetized and acutely instrumented pigs were randomly assigned to two groups (epidural anaesthesia alone vs epidural anaesthesia plus volume loading). The epidural anaesthesia aimed for a T5-T12 block. Measurements were at baseline and after 1 and 2 h. RESULTS: Epidural anaesthesia was associated with a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure and pronounced mesenteric vasodilatation. Mesenteric blood flow did not change. Intestinal oxygen uptake, mucosal tissue oxygen partial pressure and tissue carbon dioxide partial pressure remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Despite marked systemic hypotension, epidural anaesthesia did not affect intestinal oxygenation. There was no benefit obtained from volume loading.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗

Cannabinoids inhibit striatonigral GABAergic neurotransmission in the mouse.

The substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) belongs to the brain regions with the highest density of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors. Anatomical studies indicate that the great majority of CB(1) receptors in the SNR are localized on terminals of GABAergic axons arriving from the caudate-putamen (striatonigral axons). The aim of the present experiments was to clarify the role of CB(1) receptors on terminals of striatonigral axons. Oblique sagittal slices, including the caudate-putamen and the substantia nigra, were prepared from brains of young mice. Electrical stimulation in the caudate-putamen elicited GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in the SNR, which were studied by patch-clamp techniques. The long latency of IPSCs (14+/-1 ms) suggests that striatonigral axons were indeed activated within the caudate-putamen. The synthetic CB(1)/CB(2) cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 (R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate; 10(-5) M) decreased the amplitude of IPSCs by 93+/-1%. CP55940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol; 10(-5) M), another CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist, also reduced IPSC amplitude, by 76+/-4%. The CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-carboxamide; 10(-6) M) prevented the inhibition produced by WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M). Depolarization of SNR neurons led to suppression of IPSCs; this suppression was prevented by SR141716A (10(-6) M). Three observations indicate that the agonists inhibited neurotransmission presynaptically. (1) CP55940 (10(-5) M) enhanced the ratio of amplitudes of two IPSCs which were elicited by two electrical stimuli 100 ms apart (paired pulses). (2) WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) did not change the amplitude of miniature IPSCs recorded in the presence of tetrodotoxin. (3) WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) also had no effect on currents elicited in SNR neurons by ejection of the GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol from a pipet. In summary, we have established a method which allows selective examination of GABAergic neurotransmission between striatonigral axons and SNR neurons. Using this method, the function of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors on terminals of striatonigral axons was unequivocally clarified. Activation of these receptors causes strong presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic neurotransmission between striatonigral axons and SNR neurons. This effect may be one explanation of the catalepsy observed in animals after cannabinoid administration. Endocannabinoids released from SNR neurons can modulate striatonigral neurotransmission by inhibiting GABA release from terminals of striatonigral axons.

Animals↗

Effects of imidazoline antihypertensive drugs on sympathetic tone and noradrenaline release in the prefrontal cortex.

1. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of the centrally acting antihypertensive drugs rilmenidine, moxonidine, clonidine and guanabenz on sympathetic tone with their effects on noradrenaline release in the cerebral cortex. In particular, the hypothesis was tested that rilmenidine and moxonidine, due to their high affinity for sympatho-inhibitory imidazoline I(1) receptors and low affinity for alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, lower sympathetic tone without causing an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated inhibition of cerebrocortical noradrenaline release. 2. In rats anaesthetized with urethane, blood pressure and heart rate were measured and the concentration of noradrenaline in arterial blood plasma was determined. The release of noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex was estimated by microdialysis. Intravenous administration of rilmenidine (30, 100, 300 and 1000 microg kg(-1)), moxonidine (10, 30, 100 and 300 microg kg(-1)), clonidine (1, 3, 10 and 30 microg kg(-1)) and guanabenz (1, 3, 10 and 30 microg kg(-1)) led to dose-dependent hypotension and bradycardia; the plasma noradrenaline concentration also decreased. After the two highest doses, all four drugs lowered noradrenaline release in the prefrontal cortex. At doses eliciting equal hypotensive and sympatho-inhibitory responses, rilmenidine and moxonidine inhibited cerebral cortical noradrenaline release at least as much as clonidine and guanabenz. 3. The results show that rilmenidine and moxonidine lower cerebrocortical noradrenaline release at doses similar to those which cause sympatho-inhibition. This effect was probably due to an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated inhibition of the firing of locus coeruleus neurons and, in addition, to presynaptic inhibition of noradrenaline release at the level of the axon terminals in the cortex. The results argue against the hypothesis that rilmenidine and moxonidine, due to their selectivity for sympatho-inhibitory I(1) imidazoline receptors, do not suppress noradrenergic neurons in the central nervous system.

Animals↗

Effects of cannabinoids on adrenaline release from adrenal medullary cells.

1. The objective of the present study was to analyse the peripheral effects of cannabinoids on adrenaline release from adrenal chromaffin cells. 2. In pithed rabbits with electrically stimulated sympathetic outflow, intravenous injection of the cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN55212-2 and CP55940 (5, 50 and 500 microg x kg(-1)) markedly lowered the plasma adrenaline concentration. The effect of WIN55212-2 was attenuated by the selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (500 microg x kg(-1)). WIN55212-3 (same doses as WIN55212-2), the enantiomer of WIN55212-2 lacking affinity for cannabinoid receptors, had no effect on the plasma adrenaline concentration. 3. In rabbit isolated adrenal glands, the release of adrenaline elicited by electrical stimulation was measured by fast cyclic voltammetry. Electrically-evoked adrenaline release was inhibited by WIN55212-2 (0.3, 1, 3 and 10 microM) and this effect was antagonized by SR141716A (1 microM). The non-cholinergic component of adrenaline release observed after blockade of nicotinic (by hexamethonium 100 microM) and muscarinic (by atropine 0.5 microM) acetylcholine receptors was not depressed by WIN55212-2. WIN55212-3 (10 microM) had no effect on adrenaline release. 4. No detectable specific CB1 receptor binding and mRNA expression were found in rabbit adrenal glands with autoradiography and in situ hybridization. 5. The results show that cannabinoids inhibit adrenaline secretion in rabbit isolated adrenal glands; the likely mechanism is a presynaptic CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of acetylcholine release from preganglionic sympathetic neurons. The inhibition of adrenaline secretion in adrenal glands most probably accounts for the decrease in the plasma adrenaline concentration observed after cannabinoid administration in pithed rabbits.

Adrenal Glands↗

Effects of cannabinoids on sympathetic and parasympathetic neuroeffector transmission in the rabbit heart.

Cannabinoids elicit marked cardiovascular responses. It is not clear how peripheral effects on the autonomic nervous system contribute to these responses. The aim of the present study was to characterize the peripheral actions of cannabinoids on the autonomic innervation of the heart. Experiments were carried out on pithed rabbits. In the first series of experiments, postganglionic sympathetic cardioaccelerator fibers were stimulated electrically. The synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN55212-2 (0.005, 0.05, 0.5, and 1.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) and CP55940 (0.003, 0.03, 0.3, and 1 mg kg(-1) i.v.) dose dependently inhibited the electrically evoked cardioacceleration. The inhibition by WIN55212-2 (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) was prevented by the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.). WIN55212-2 (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) did not change the increase in heart rate evoked by injection of isoprenaline. In the second series of experiments, preganglionic vagal fibers were stimulated electrically. WIN55212-2 (0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) and CP55940 (0.003, 0.03, and 0.3 mg kg(-1) i.v.) dose dependently inhibited the stimulation-evoked decrease in heart rate. The inhibition produced by WIN55212-2 (0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) was antagonized by SR141716A (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.). The results indicate that cannabinoids, by activating CB(1) cannabinoid receptors, inhibit sympathetic and vagal neuroeffector transmission in the heart. The mechanism of the sympathoinhibition is probably presynaptic inhibition of noradrenaline release from postganglionic sympathetic neurons. The mechanism of the inhibition of vagal activity was not clarified: cannabinoids may have an inhibitory action on both pre- and postganglionic vagal neurons.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Cannabinoids inhibit excitatory neurotransmission in the substantia nigra pars reticulata.

The substantia nigra pars reticulata belongs to the brain regions with the highest density of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors. Since the level of CB(1) receptor messenger RNA is very low in the pars reticulata, most of the receptors are probably localized on terminals of afferent axons. The hypothesis was tested that terminals of glutamatergic afferents of substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons possess CB(1) cannnabinoid receptors, the activation of which presynaptically modulates neurotransmission. Rat midbrain slices were superfused and the electrophysiological properties of substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons were studied with the patch-clamp technique. Focal electrical stimulation in the presence of bicuculline evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents mediated by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA)/kainate glutamate receptors. The excitatory postsynaptic currents were reduced by the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist (+/-)-1-aminocyclopentane-trans-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (trans-ACPD; 10(-4)M). The mixed CB(1)/CB(2) cannabinoid receptor agonists R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2, 3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone (WIN55212-2; 10(-8)-10(-5)M) and (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1, 1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP55940; 10(-6)M) also produced inhibition. The maximal inhibition by WIN55212-2 was 54+/-6%. The CB(1) cannabinoid antagonist N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-carboxamide (SR141716A; 10(-6)M) prevented the effect of WIN55212-2, but had no effect when superfused alone. WIN55212-2 (10(-6)M) increased the amplitude ratio of two excitatory postsynaptic currents evoked with an interstimulus interval of 100ms. Currents evoked by short ejection of glutamate on to the surface of the slices were not changed by WIN55212-2. The results show that activation of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors inhibits glutamatergic synaptic transmission between afferent axons and neurons in the substantia nigra pars reticulata. The lack of effect of the cannabinoids on glutamate-evoked currents and the increase of the paired-pulse ratio indicate that the mechanism of action is presynaptic inhibition of transmitter release.

Animals↗

Conditioning of beta(1)-adrenoceptor effect via beta(2)-subtype on L-type Ca(2+) current in canine ventricular myocytes.

We investigated the roles of beta(1)- and beta(2)-receptors (beta-AR) in adrenergic enhancement of L-type Ca(2+) current (I(CaL)) in canine ventricular myocytes. Isoproterenol and l-norepinephrine produced a monophasic and a biphasic concentration-I(CaL) relationship (CR), respectively. alpha(1)-AR inhibition with prazosin and beta(2)-AR stimulation with zinterol or l-epinephrine shifted the CR of l-norepinephrine leftward. Zinterol (50 nM) and l-epinephrine (10 nM), but not prazosin, altered the biphasic CR of l-norepinephrine to a monophasic CR. Zinterol and l-epinephrine applied after l-norepinephrine had no effect on I(CaL). beta(2)-AR inhibition with ICI-118551 reduced the E(max) of isoproterenol and l-norepinephrine by 60% and abolished the augmentation of l-norepinephrine by zinterol and l-epinephrine. Carbachol (100 nM) modestly reduced the I(CaL) response to beta(1)-AR stimulation but abolished the enhancement via beta(2)-AR. Zinterol augmented the enhancement of I(CaL) by forskolin, IBMX, and theophylline, but not in the presence of CGP-20712A. We conclude that selective beta(2)-AR stimulation does not increase I(CaL) but enhances adenylyl cyclase activity when stimulated via beta(1)-AR and with forskolin. beta(2)-AR activity preconditions adenylyl cyclase for beta(1)-AR stimulation.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

Cannabinoids cause central sympathoexcitation and bradycardia in rabbits.

Systemically administered cannabinoids elicit marked cardiovascular effects, and the role of the central and the peripheral nervous system in these effects is not clarified. The aim of this study was to characterize the actions of cannabinoids on cardiovascular regulatory centers in conscious rabbits. A catheter for administration of drugs into the cisterna cerebellomedullaris and an electrode for recording renal sympathetic nerve activity were implanted under halothane anesthesia. Experiments were carried out later in conscious animals. Two cannabinoid receptor agonists were injected intracisternally: the aminoalkylindole WIN55212-2 (0.1, 1, and 10 microg kg(-1)) and the bicyclic Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol analog CP55940 (0.1, 1, and 10 microg kg(-1)). WIN55212-2 and CP55940 dose dependently increased renal sympathetic nerve activity and the plasma noradrenaline concentration and also lowered the heart rate. The highest doses of WIN55212-2 and CP55940 increased blood pressure. In contrast, intracisternal injection of WIN55212-3 (0.1, 1, and 10 microg kg(-1)), an enantiomer of WIN55212-2 with very low affinity for cannabinoid binding sites, had no effects. The CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (0.5 mg kg(-1), i.v. ) attenuated the effects of intracisternally administered WIN55212-2 (0.1, 1, and 10 microg kg(-1)). The results indicate that cannabinoids, acting directly on cardiovascular regulatory centers, elicit sympathoactivation and bradycardia. These effects were likely mediated by CB(1) cannabinoid receptors, because they were elicited by two cannabinoid agonists belonging to different chemical classes (WIN55212-2 and CP55940), but not by the inactive enantiomer WIN55212-3, and because they were attenuated by the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A.

Animals↗

Mechanism of the sympathoinhibition produced by the clonidine-like drugs rilmenidine and moxonidine.

The mechanism of the sympathoinhibition produced by two new derivatives of clonidine, rilmenidine and moxonidine, was studied. One aim was to determine the receptor responsible for the central sympathoinhibition by these drugs. Rilmenidine and moxonidine were injected into the cisterna cerebellomedullaris. They decreased blood pressure and the plasma noradrenaline concentration. After rilmenidine and moxonidine, two selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists (devoid of affinity for I1 binding sites), yohimbine and SK&F86466, were given intracisternally. They completely counteracted the hypotensive effects of rilmenidine and moxonidine, indicating that alpha 2-adrenoceptors are involved in the central sympathoinhibition produced by these drugs. The other aim was to determine if peripheral presynaptic inhibition of noradrenaline release from postganglionic sympathetic neurons contributes to the overall reduction of sympathetic tone. Rilmenidine and moxonidine were injected i.v. in pithed rabbits with electrically stimulated sympathetic outflow. They dose-dependently lowered blood pressure and the plasma noradrenaline concentration and inhibited stimulation-evoked cardioacceleration. Moreover, the doses necessary for these peripheral effects were identical to the doses that reduce the sympathetic nerve firing rate and blood pressure in conscious rabbits. These observations indicate that peripheral presynaptic inhibition of noradrenaline release from postganglionic sympathetic neurons contributes to the overall reduction of sympathetic tone produced by rilmenidine and moxonidine in intact animals.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Analysis of the receptor involved in the central hypotensive effect of rilmenidine and moxonidine.

The aim of this study was to determine whether alpha2-adrenoceptors or imidazoline I1-receptors are responsible for the central sympathoinhibition produced by rilmenidine and moxonidine, two clonidine-like antihypertensive drugs. Rilmenidine and moxonidine were compared with the indirectly acting alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist alpha-methyldopa. Three antagonists were used. Yohimbine and SK&F86466 were used as selective alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists. They were compared with efaroxan which is also an alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, but, in addition, possesses affinity for imidazoline I1-receptors. According to some but not all studies, the affinity of efaroxan for I1-receptors is much higher than its affinity for alpha2-adrenoceptors. Drugs were administered into the cisterna cerebellomedullaris of conscious rabbits by a catheter implanted previously under halothane anaesthesia. Rilmenidine (10 microg kg(-1)), moxonidine (0.3 microg kg(-1)) and alpha-methyldopa (0.4 mg kg(-1)) lowered blood pressure and the plasma noradrenaline concentration; the degree of sympathoinhibition produced by the three agonists was very similar. When injected after the agonists, efaroxan (0.1-14 microg kg(-1); cumulative doses), yohimbine (0.4-14 microg kg(-1)) and SK&F86466 (0.4-44 microg kg(-1)) counteracted the effects of the agonists on blood pressure and the plasma noradrenaline concentration. Efaroxan was about tenfold more potent than yohimbine and SK&F86466 at antagonizing the hypotensive effects of alpha-methyldopa. Similarly, efaroxan was two- to tenfold more potent than yohimbine and SK&F86466 against rilmenidine and moxonidine. Finally, efaroxan was about as potent against alpha-methyldopa as against rilmenidine and moxonidine. The results confirm previous observations that selective alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists are capable of completely antagonizing effects of rilmenidine and moxonidine. The effects of the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist with an additional high affinity for imidazoline I1-receptors, efaroxan, can also be explained by blockade of alpha2-adrenoceptors. Efaroxan was more potent against rilmenidine and moxonidine than the selective alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists. This was probably due to the fact that the affinity of efaroxan for alpha2-adrenoceptors is higher than the affinity of yohimbine and SK&F86466, since efaroxan was also the most potent of the three antagonists against the indirectly acting alpha2adrenoceptor agonist alpha-methyldopa. The observation that efaroxan was equally potent against rilmenidine and moxonidine and against alpha-methyldopa suggests that the same receptors were involved in the effects of the three agonists, alpha2-adrenoceptors; this observation is not compatible with the high I1/alpha2 selectivity of efaroxan and the hypothesis that rilmenidine and moxonidine activate I1-receptors, whereas alpha-methyldopa activates alpha2-adrenoceptors. Thus, the data do not indicate involvement of I1 imidazoline receptors in the central sympathoinhibition elicited by rilmenidine and moxonidine in rabbits. It is likely that rilmenidine and moxonidine produce sympathoinhibition by activating the same receptors which are activated by the indirectly acting catecholamine alpha-methyldopa, namely alpha2-adrenoceptors.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 on sympathetic cardiovascular regulation.

1. The aim of the present study was to analyse the cardiovascular actions of the synthetic CB1/CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2, and specifically to determine its sites of action on sympathetic cardiovascular regulation. 2. Pithed rabbits in which the sympathetic outflow was continuously stimulated electrically or which received a pressor infusion of noradrenaline were used to study peripheral prejunctional and direct vascular effects, respectively. For studying effects on brain stem cardiovascular regulatory centres, drugs were administered into the cisterna cerebellomedullaris in conscious rabbits. Overall cardiovascular effects of the cannabinoid were studied in conscious rabbits with intravenous drug administration. 3. In pithed rabbits in which the sympathetic outflow was continuously electrically stimulated, intravenous injection of WIN55212-2 (5, 50 and 500 microg kg(-1)) markedly reduced blood pressure, the spillover of noradrenaline into plasma and the plasma noradrenaline concentration, and these effects were antagonized by the CB1 cannabinoid receptor-selective antagonist SR141716A. The hypotensive and the sympathoinhibitory effect of WIN55212-2 was shared by CP55940, another mixed CB1/CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist, but not by WIN55212-3, the enantiomer of WIN55212-2, which lacks affinity for cannabinoid binding sites. WIN55212-2 had no effect on vascular tone established by infusion of noradrenaline in pithed rabbits. 4. Intracisternal application of WIN55212-2 (0.1, 1 and 10 microg kg(-1)) in conscious rabbits increased blood pressure and the plasma noradrenaline concentration and elicited bradycardia; this latter effect was antagonized by atropine. 5. In conscious animals, intravenous injection of WIN55212-2 (5 and 50 microg kg(-1)) caused bradycardia, slight hypotension, no change in the plasma noradrenaline concentration, and an increase in renal sympathetic nerve firing. The highest dose of WIN55212-2 (500 microg kg(-1)) elicited hypotension and tachycardia, and sympathetic nerve activity and the plasma noradrenaline concentration declined. 6. The results obtained in pithed rabbits indicate that activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors leads to marked peripheral prejunctional inhibition of noradrenaline release from postganglionic sympathetic axons. Intracisternal application of WIN55212-2 uncovered two effects on brain stem cardiovascular centres: sympathoexcitation and activation of cardiac vagal fibres. The highest dose of systemically administered WIN55212-2 produced central sympathoinhibition; the primary site of this action is not known.

Analgesics↗

Involvement of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the EDHF-dependent vasorelaxation in rabbits.

1. It was recently suggested that an endogenous cannabinoid could represent an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). The aim of the present study was to clarify whether CB1 cannabinoid receptors are involved in the nitric oxide (NO)- and prostanoid-independent vasodilation produced by acetylcholine in rabbits. 2. Pithed rabbits received indomethacin. Noradrenaline was infused to raise blood pressure, and vasodilation was elicited by bolus injections of acetylcholine. The NO-synthase inhibitor Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methylester inhibited the acetylcholine-evoked vasodilation by about 40%. The remaining vasodilation was unaffected by the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A, but was inhibited by the potassium channel blocker tetraethylammonium. In addition, the mixed CB1/CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 did not elicit vasodilation. 3. No CB1 cannabinoid receptors were involved in the prostanoid- and NO-independent vasodilation produced by acetylcholine. An exogenous cannabinoid also did not cause vasodilation. Therefore, it is unlikely that an endogenous cannabinoid serves as an EDHF acting at smooth muscle CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the rabbit.

Acetylcholine↗

Effects of cannabinoids on dopamine release in the corpus striatum and the nucleus accumbens in vitro.

Cannabinoid receptors are widely distributed in the nuclei of the extrapyramidal motor and mesolimbic reward systems; their exact functions are, however, not known. The aim of the present study was to characterize the effects of cannabinoids on the electrically evoked release of endogenous dopamine in the corpus striatum and the nucleus accumbens. In rat brain slices dopamine release elicited by single electrical pulses was determined by fast cyclic voltammetry. Dopamine release was markedly inhibited by the OP2 opioid receptor agonist U-50488 and the D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist quinpirole, indicating that our method is suitable for studying presynaptic modulation of dopamine release. In contrast, the CB1/CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M) and CP55940 (10(-6)-10(-5) M) and the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (10(-6) M) had no effect on the electrically evoked dopamine release in the corpus striatum and the nucleus accumbens. The lack of a presynaptic effect on terminals of nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons is in accord with the anatomical distribution of cannabinoid receptors: The perikarya of these neurons in the substantia nigra and the ventral tegmental area do not synthesize mRNA, and hence protein, for CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. It is therefore unlikely that presynaptic modulation of dopamine release in the corpus striatum and the nucleus accumbens plays a role in the extrapyramidal motor and rewarding effects of cannabinoids.

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cycloh↗

Canine ventricular myocyte beta2-adrenoceptors are not functionally coupled to L-type calcium current.

INTRODUCTION: To establish the functional coupling of beta adrenoceptor (betaAR) subtypes beta1AR and beta2AR to L-type calcium current (I(CaL)), we investigated the nonselective agonist isoproterenol (ISO) and the relatively selective beta2AR agonists zinterol (ZIN) and salbutamol (SAL) on I(CaL) in isolated canine ventricular myocytes in the presence and absence of CGP 20712A (CGP) and atenolol (AT), selective beta1AR antagonists, and ICI 118,551 (ICI) a selective beta2AR antagonist. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peak I(CaL) was determined using "patch type" microelectrodes and whole cell voltage clamp. ISO (0.5 microM) increased I(CaL) maximally 3.5 +/- 0.67 fold. ZIN (10.0 microM) and SAL (10.0 microM) increased I(CaL) maximally 1.5 +/- 0.2 fold (n = 5) and 1.4 +/- 0.1 fold (n = 5), respectively. These effects were fully inhibited by CGP (0.3 microM) and AT (1.0 microM), which are inhibitors of beta1AR, but not by ICI (0.1 microM), which is a beta2AR inhibitor. ZIN at relatively lower concentrations (< or = 0.1 microM) did not increase I(CaL). CGP (0.3 microM) but not AT and ICI inhibited I(CaL) in the absence of betaAR agonists. CGP inhibition of I(CaL) was absent in the presence of forskolin (1.0 microM), which increases cAMP levels and I(CaL) by directly stimulating the adenylate cyclase. These data indicate that none of the antagonists affect I(CaL) through an action downstream of betaAR. CONCLUSION: Beta-adrenergic agonists increase I(CaL) via beta1AR but not beta2AR in canine ventricular myocytes.

Animals↗