Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Starfield

Publications and source records attributed to B Starfield.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Equity in health.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Global Health↗
PubMed2000

Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care.

OBJECTIVES: To describe how physicians coordinate patient care for specialty referrals and to examine the effects of these activities on referring physicians' satisfaction with the specialty care their patients receive and referral completion. DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective study of a consecutive sample of referrals (N = 963) made from the offices of 122 pediatricians in 85 practices in a national practice-based research network. Data sources included a physician survey completed when the referral was made (response rate, 99%) and a physician survey and medical record review conducted 3 months later (response rate, 85%). Referral completion was defined as receipt of written communication of referral results from the specialist. RESULTS: Pediatricians scheduled appointments with specialists for 39.3% and sent patient information to specialists for 50.8% of referrals. The adjusted odds of referral completion were increased 3-fold for those referrals for which the pediatrician scheduled the appointment and communicated with the specialist compared with those for which neither activity occurred. Referring physicians' satisfaction ratings were significantly increased by any type of specialist feedback and were highest for referrals involving specialist feedback by both telephone and letter. Elements of specialists' letters that significantly increased physician ratings of letter quality included presence of patient history, suggestions for future care, follow-up arrangements, and plans for comanaging care; only the inclusion of plans for comanaging patient care was significantly related to the referring physicians' overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Better coordination between referring physicians and specialists increases physician satisfaction with specialty care and enhances referral completion. Improvements in the referral process may be achieved through better communication and collaboration between primary care physicians and specialists.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The quality of care and influence of double health care coverage in Catalonia (Spain).

AIMS: To analyse inequalities by social class in children's access to and utilisation of health services in Catalonia (Spain), private health insurance coverage, and certain aspects of the quality of care received. DESIGN: Cross sectional study using data from the 1994 Catalan Health Interview Survey. SETTING: Child population of Catalonia. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of non-institutionalised children younger than 15 years (n = 2433). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health services utilisation, perceived health, type of health insurance (only National Health System (NHS) or both NHS and private health insurance), and social class. RESULTS: No inequalities by social class were found for the utilisation of health care services provided by the NHS among children in most need. Double health care coverage does not influence the social pattern of visits. Nevertheless, social inequalities still remain in the use of those health services provided only partially by the NHS (dentist) and when characteristics of the last consultation are taken into account. That is, subjects who paid for a private service waited an average of 14.8 minutes less than those whose visit was paid for by the NHS only. CONCLUSION: Equitable access and use of medical care services in relation to need, regardless of the type of insurance and social class of their children and families, has been achieved in this region of Spain; differences by social class remain for those services incompletely covered by national health insurance and aspects of the quality of care provided.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Evaluating the State Children's Health Insurance Program: critical considerations.

The Balanced Budget Act of August 1997 was intended to improve the insurance coverage of low-income children. Although no specific mandates for evaluation accompanied the legislation, states are expected to assess its impact. Insurance improves access to and use of health services. The extent to which this is associated with better health depends on the kinds of services received. Access to a regular source of care is a critical characteristic. If this source of care provides good primary care, a variety of benefits would be expected to accrue. Thus, evaluation of the benefits of the State Children's Health Insurance Program should address not only improved coverage by health insurance for eligible children, but also the extent to which children receive high-quality primary care, including appropriate referrals when needed. Maternal access to and use of services is also a critical factor. Targets for evaluation include state activities to (a) enroll through outreach, inform through education, and develop information systems for tracking; (b) assess the degree of penetration of insurance among low-income children and their mothers, the availability of health care personnel, and the adequacy of benefits conferred by the insurance, primary-care services, and back-up specialty services; and (c) obtain evidence of improved health status. This article details approaches that can appropriately be used to address each of these aspects of concern.

Child↗
PubMed2000

Primary care, income inequality, and self-rated health in the United States: a mixed-level analysis.

Using the 1996 Community Tracking Study household survey, the authors examined whether income inequality and primary care, measured at the state level, predict individual morbidity as measured by self-rated health status, while adjusting for potentially confounding individual variables. Their results indicate that distributions of income and primary care within states are significantly associated with individuals' self-rated health; that there is a gradient effect of income inequality on self-rated health; and that individuals living in states with a higher ratio of primary care physician to population are more likely to report good health than those living in states with a lower such ratio. From a policy perspective, improvement in individuals' health is likely to require a multi-pronged approach that addresses individual socioeconomic determinants of health, social and economic policies that affect income distribution, and a strengthening of the primary care aspects of health services.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The health profile of incarcerated male youths.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the health needs of adolescent males incarcerated in a juvenile justice facility and to compare their health profiles with those of male adolescents in the community. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted of incarcerated (N = 202) and school (N = 379) samples of male youths. Questionnaires were self-administered and completed before admission health screens (incarcerated youth) or in classrooms (school sample). Health status was assessed by the Child Health and Illness Profile, Adolescent Edition, using scale and item means and by categorizing each youth's pattern of health into 1 of 13 mutually exclusive health profile types. RESULTS: Compared with school counterparts, incarcerated male youths had significantly worse health status as demonstrated by poorer health and functioning scores in perceived well being, self-esteem, physical discomfort, acute, chronic, and psychosocial disorders, family involvement, physical activity, interpersonal problem-solving, risk behaviors, and academic performance. Three profile types-High Risks, High Risks/Low Resilience, and Worst Health-accounted for patterns of health for 69.8% of incarcerated youth versus 37.3% of an age-matched school sample. Just 6.4% of incarcerated males were in the Excellent/Good Health profile types, which contrasted with 34.2% of the age-matched school sample. CONCLUSIONS: The health profiles of incarcerated male youths were worse than those of male youths in school. Our results indicate that rehabilitation programs will need to address incarcerated youth's basic health needs as well as modifying their risk and antisocial behaviors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Measuring consumer experiences with primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the adequacy of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Child Edition (PCAT-CE) for evaluating the attainment of the key characteristics of primary care services for children and youth. DESIGN: Community-based telephone survey. SETTING: Specific political subdivision in Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred fifty parents/guardians of offspring 18 years of age or less. MEASURES: Reliability, validity and principal component analysis of 5 scales representing key aspects of the 4 cardinal domains of primary care included in the PCAT-CE. In addition, 2 subdomains (first contact use and extent of affiliation with a primary care source) were included as indices to describe overall patterns of use and affiliation with the particular source of care. RESULTS: Most scales had adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. The principal components factor analysis yielded 5 separate factors. These corresponded to the subdomains of first contact accessibility; coordination of care; characteristics of the professional-patient relationship over-time; and comprehensiveness (both services available and indicated services received). CONCLUSIONS: Psychometric assessment supported the integrity and general adequacy of the PCAT-CE for assessing the characteristics and quality of primary care for children and youth. Testing of revised versions in a variety of different settings is underway. A major component of this testing is to explore the possibility of reducing the number of items while retaining sufficient detail about each component of primary care to make judgements about people's experiences with that care.

Child↗
PubMed1999

The pediatric primary-specialty care interface: how pediatricians refer children and adolescents to specialty care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how pediatricians refer patients to specialists, including frequency of referral decisions, reasons for referral, and types of referrals. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective study of visits (N = 58 771) made to 142 pediatricians in a national primary care practice-based research network. During 20 consecutive practice days, physicians and parents completed questionnaires for referred patients, and office staff kept logs of all visits. Physicians used medical records to complete questionnaires 3 months after referrals were made. RESULTS: Pediatricians referred patients to specialists during 2.3% of office visits. Referrals made during telephone conversations with parents accounted for 27.5% of all referrals. The most common reason for referral was advice on diagnosis or treatment (74.3%). Referrals were made most commonly to surgical subspecialists (52.3%), followed by medical subspecialists (27.9%), nonphysicians (11.4%), and mental health practitioners (8.4%). Physicians requested a consultation or a referral with shared management in 75% of cases. Otitis media was the condition referred most often (9.2%). Fifty other conditions accounted for 84.3% of all referrals. CONCLUSIONS: About 1 in 40 pediatric visits result in referral. Getting advice from a specialist is the most common reason for referral. Pediatricians desire a collaborative relationship with specialists for most of their referred patients. Physician training to increase clinical competence may be most useful for the 50 most commonly referred conditions. Education concerning the referral process should focus on the respective roles of the referring physician and specialist, particularly as they pertain to successful approaches for comanaging referred patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Gatekeeping and referral of children and adolescents to specialty care.

OBJECTIVE: In this study we examined how gatekeeping arrangements influence referrals to specialty care for children and adolescents in private and Medicaid insurance plans. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a prospective study of office visits (n = 27 104) made to 142 pediatricians in 94 practices distributed throughout 36 states in a national primary care practice-based research network. During 10 practice-days, physicians and patients completed questionnaires on referred patients, while office staff kept logs of all visits. Physicians used medical records to complete questionnaires for a subset of patients 3 months after their referral was made. RESULTS: Gatekeeping arrangements were common among children and adolescents with private (57.8%) and Medicaid (43.3%) insurance. Patients in gatekeeping plans were more likely to be referred with private (3. 16% vs 1.85% visits referred) and Medicaid (5.39% vs 3.73%) financing. Increased parental requests for specialty care among gatekeeping patients did not explain the increased referral rate. Physicians' reasons for making the referral were similar between the two groups. Physicians were less likely to schedule an appointment or communicate with the specialist for referred patients in gatekeeping plans. However, rates of physician awareness that a specialist visit occurred and specialist communication back to pediatricians did not differ between the two groups 3 months after the referrals were made. CONCLUSIONS: Gatekeeping arrangements are common among insured children and adolescents in the United States. Our study suggests that gatekeeping arrangements increase referrals from pediatricians' offices to specialty care and compromise some aspects of coordination.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

The duration of ambulatory visits to physicians.

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to determine the typical length of ambulatory visits to a nationally representative sample of primary care physicians, and the patient, physician, practice, and visit characteristics affecting duration of visit. METHODS: We used an analysis of cross-sectional survey data to determine duration of visit and the characteristics associated with it. The data sources were a random sample of the 19,192 visits by adults to 686 primary care physicians contained in the 1991-1992 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, and the results of the Physician Induction Interview conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. Duration of visit was defined as the total time spent in face-to-face contact with the physician. RESULTS: Mean duration of visit was 16.3 minutes (standard deviation = 9.7). Multivariate analysis allowed the calculation of the independent effect on visit length of a variety of characteristics of patients, physicians, organizational/practice setting, geographic location, and visit content. Certain patient characteristics (increasing age and the presence of psychosocial problems) were associated with increased duration of visit. Visit content was also associated with increased duration, including ordering or performing 4 or more diagnostic tests (71% increase), Papanicolaou smears (34%), ambulatory surgical procedures (34%), patient admission to the hospital (32%), and 3 preventive screening tests (25%). Reduced duration of visit was associated with availability of non-physician support personnel and health maintenance organization and Medicaid insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors affect duration of visit. Clinicians, policymakers, and health system managers should take these considerations into account in managing physician resources during daily ambulatory practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators.

BACKGROUND: The significant association of income inequality with a variety of health indicators is receiving increasing attention. There has also been increasing evidence of a link between primary care and improved health status. We examined the joint relationship between income inequality, availability of primary care, and various health indicators to determine whether primary care has an impact on health indicators by modifying the adverse effect of income inequality. METHODS: Our ecologic study used the US states as the units of analysis. In analyzing the data, we looked at the associations among income inequality, primary care, specialty care, smoking, and health indicators, using Pearson's correlation coefficients for intercorrelations and the adjusted multiple regression procedure. To examine the effect of inequality and primary care on health outcome indicators, we conducted path analyses according to a causal model in which inequality affects health both directly and indirectly through its impact on primary care. RESULTS: Our study indicates that both primary care and income inequality exerted a strong and significant direct influence on life expectancy and total mortality (P <.01). Primary care also exerted a significant direct influence on stroke and postneonatal mortality (P <.01). Although levels of smoking are also influential, the effect of income inequality and primary care persists after controlling for smoking. Primary care serves as one pathway through which income inequality influences population-level mortality and at least some other health outcome indicators. CONCLUSIONS: It appears possible that a primary care orientation may, in part, overcome the severe adverse effects on health of income inequalities.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗