Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to B Silver.
Advances in ultrasound (US) machine and transducer design have improved the ability of US to guide interventional procedures. Though affording excellent guidance without radiation and at relatively low cost, US remains underutilized because of lack of understanding and experience in this technique. This article illustrates the role that US has in interventional radiology and explains how to place a needle in a target under US guidance.
Real-time ultrasound (US)-guided biopsies and drainage procedures require constant visualization of the needle tip. Ensuring optimum needle tip visualization is paramount to the success of these procedures. The authors have found that pumping the stylet in and out of a stationary needle shaft increases the echo-genicity of the needle shaft and tip, thereby facilitating needle localization. This technique, which we have termed "the pump maneuver," is a quick, useful, and atraumatic adjunct to be considered during US-guided percutaneous needle biopsy and drainage procedures.
Previous studies of patients with infiltrating ductal breast cancer treated with conservative surgery (ie, limited excision) and radiotherapy have indicated that the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC) in the excision specimen is highly associated with subsequent breast recurrence. The reason for this association is not clear, but possible explanations include the presence of more extensive disease in the breast or increased radiation resistance among tumors with an EIC (EIC+) compared with those without (EIC-) tumors. To investigate this association further, we related the presence or absence of an EIC in the primary tumors of 214 women who underwent mastectomy to the likelihood of finding additional foci of cancer in their mastectomy specimens using a correlated pathologic-radiologic mapping technique. Primary tumors that were EIC+ were significantly more likely to have carcinoma in the remainder of the breast than those which were EIC--(74% v 42%; P = .00001). This difference was primarily due to the presence of residual intraductal carcinoma. Seventy-one percent of EIC+ patients had residual intraductal carcinoma compared with 28% of EIC-patients (P less than .00001). In particular, 44% of EIC+ patients had "prominent" residual intraductal carcinoma compared with 3% of EIC-patients (P less than .00001). We conclude that patients whose tumors contain an EIC more frequently have a large subclinical tumor burden in the remainder of the breast compared with patients whose tumors do not contain an EIC. This observation may explain the association between EIC and subsequent breast recurrence when patients are treated with a limited excision before radiotherapy.
Staging laparotomy was performed as part of the routine recommended diagnostic evaluation following clinical staging (CS) in 692 patients presenting with supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease (HD). Various clinical factors were analyzed by multivariate analysis for prediction of abdominal involvement. Factors that were statistically significant for predicting disease below the diaphragm included CS III-IV disease (P less than .001), B symptoms (P less than .001), mixed cellularity (MC) or lymphocytic depletion (LD) histology (P = .017), number of supradiaphragmatic sites greater than or equal to 2 (P = .001), male sex (P = 0.034) and age greater than or equal to 40 years (P = .004). Separate analyses were performed for various subgroups of CS IA-IIA, CS IB-IIB, CS IIIA-IVA, and CS IIIB-IVB patients. Upstaging was seen in 0% to 55% of CS I-II patients based on subgroup. Male sex, B symptoms, and number of sites above the diaphragm greater than or equal to 2 all independently predicted for positive surgical staging in CS I-II patients. Sixty-four percent of CS I-II patients who were upstaged had extensive abdominal disease by positive lower abdominal nodes or multiple splenic nodules (greater than or equal to 5). Downstaging (to pathological stage [PS] I-II) was seen in 9% to 68% of patients with CS III-IV disease based on subgrouping. Age greater than or equal to 40, MC or LD histology, and B symptoms all independently predicted for positive surgical staging in CS III-IV patients. Downstaging was more frequently seen in CS IIIA-IVA patients (55%) than in patients who were CS III-IVB (22%). Four subgroups of patients who had a low probability (less than 10%) of stage or treatment change following laparotomy were identified. These included CS IA female patients, CS IA male patients with lymphocyte predominance histology or high neck presentations, and patients with CS IIIB-IVB disease and account for 21% of the study population. Staging laparotomy altered the stage and treatment of a significant number of the remaining 79% patients and should continue to be recommended for this group of patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To determine the influence of infiltrating lobular histology on local tumor control, the authors studied 49 patients with Stages I and II infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma treated by limited excision of the tumor and radiotherapy between 1968 and 1981 (median follow-up, 75 months). Results were compared with those in 561 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma similarly treated during the same period. The 5-year actuarial risk of local recurrence was similar for patients with infiltrating lobular or ductal carcinoma when the latter was evaluated as a single group (12% versus 11%). However, the 12% 5-year actuarial local recurrence risk for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma was intermediate between that for patients with infiltrating ductal carcinomas with an extensive intraductal component (23%) and those without an extensive intraductal component (5%). The pattern of recurrence in the breast was similar in the infiltrating lobular and ductal groups. All recurrences in patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma and 80% of recurrences in the infiltrating ductal group occurred in the vicinity of the primary tumor (P = not significant). None of the clinical or morphologic features examined significantly influenced the risk of local recurrence in patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma. The authors conclude that combined conservative surgery and radiotherapy appear to be a reasonable treatment option for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma, but further follow-up will be required to confirm these results.
To evaluate the cosmetic outcome of conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT) for early-stage breast cancer and its stability over time, we reviewed the records of 593 patients treated from 1968 to 1981. The breast appearance was scored as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor". Median follow-up was 76 months (range, 37 to 186 months). Cosmetic results were generally excellent or good. The percents of excellent, good, fair, and poor results at three years were 65%, 25%, 7%, and 3%, respectively. Patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely than those receiving chemotherapy to have excellent scores at five years (71% vs 40%). Tumor size also influenced cosmetic outcome: 73% of patients with T1 tumors vs 55% with T2 tumors had excellent scores at five years. Our results were stable over time: of 36 patients assessable at seven years whose cosmetic scores were good or excellent at three years, 34 (94%) continued to have good or excellent scores, and only two (5%) deteriorated to fair. We conclude that the cosmetic results achieved with CS and RT are good to excellent in approximately 90% of patients and that these results remain stable for at least seven years.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Factors which influence patient prognosis following a breast recurrence or regional nodal recurrence after initial treatment of early-stage invasive breast carcinoma with conservative surgery and radiotherapy are not well known. Ninety patients treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy treated from 1968-1981 had a recurrence in the treated breast before (84) or simultaneous with (6) distant metastases. Sixty-five patients had salvage mastectomy (median subsequent follow-up in patients without further disease, 32 months; range, 1-123 months). The five-year rate of further recurrence in this group was 37%. The most important variable associated with subsequent outcome was the histology of the recurrent tumor. There were no further recurrences among 10 patients with purely non-invasive cancer or 10 patients with predominantly non-invasive disease and only focal areas of invasion. In contrast, 17/45 patients (38%) with predominantly infiltrating tumors suffered further local-regional recurrences (6) or distant metastases (11) following mastectomy (5-year actuarial rate, 55%) (p less than 0.05). Ten patients developed regional nodal failures without evidence of simultaneous breast recurrence (1 internal mammary, 3 supraclavicular, 1 both supraclavicular and axillary, and 5 axillary). Only 3 of these 10 (all with axillary node failures) did not have simultaneous distant metastases; they remain alive without evidence of further distant or local-regional recurrence following salvage treatment 1, 59, and 87 months after recurrence. We conclude that the great majority of the patients (88% in this series) who have a breast recurrence following initial conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early stage breast carcinoma will have disease limited to the breast clinically and tumors amenable to salvage mastectomy. Salvage mastectomy appears to be effective treatment for patients with an isolated breast recurrence, especially if the recurrence is predominantly or wholly non-invasive.
A small number of patients with early stage breast cancer are found on presentation to have two or more separate carcinomas within the breast. To assess the effectiveness of conservative surgery and radiation therapy in these patients we compared treatment outcome among 10 patients with multiple lesions (21 cancers) and 707 patients with single lesions, treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy between 1968-1981. Median follow-up was 64 months and 75 months for the multiple and single lesion groups, respectively. In each patient with multiple lesions, both (or all 3) lesions had similar histologic features. Eight of these ten patients (80%) had an infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) compared to 72% of patients with single lesions. Six of these 8 patients with IDC had at least 1 lesion with an extensive intraductal component (EIC), compared to a 33% incidence of an EIC in solitary lesions. All lesions were grossly excised. Radiotherapy was given to the entire breast in all patients, with the majority also receiving a boost dose to the tumor bed site. Four of the 10 patients with multiple lesions recurred in the treated breast (40%) compared to 77 of the 707 patients (11%) with single lesions (p = 0.019, Fisher exact test). In the six patients with multiple lesions who had an EIC, three developed a local failure. In comparison, 43 of 167 patients (26%) with a single lesion with EIC developed a local failure. In patients with multiple lesions, 0 of 2 with IDC without an EIC, and 1 of 2 with histologies other than IDC had recurrence in the treated breast compared to 19 of the 342 (6%) and 15 of the 198 (8%) patients with single lesions with similar histologic features, respectively (p = NS). These results suggest that the presence of 2 or more separate primary tumors in the breast is associated with a high likelihood of local recurrence after treatment with conservative surgery and radiation therapy, even when all identified tumors are grossly resected. This may reflect the common finding of an EIC in these tumors. We conclude that the use of conservative surgery and radiation therapy for patients with more than one primary cancer in the breast should be considered with caution.
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with positive nodes is now routine, but the optimal local treatment of these patients is uncertain. To determine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the likelihood of local recurrence as the first site of failure in premenopausal patients treated with conservative surgery (CS) and radiotherapy (RT), we examined the outcome of 74 patients treated with CS, RT, and adjuvant chemotherapy and compared it to the outcome in 192 patients treated with CS and RT alone. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of four or more cycles of either a doxorubicin-containing regimen or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil. All patients were less than 50 years old, had UICC-AJCC Stage I or II breast cancer treated between 1968 and 1981, had gross excision of the primary tumor, and had a total radiation dose to the primary tumor bed of greater than or equal to 6000 cGy. Factors predicting for local recurrence, such as extensive intraductal carcinoma and age less than 35, were equivalent in the two groups. Women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly worse T- and N-stages than women treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy alone: 61% versus 36% had T2 tumors (p = 0.0003), 34% versus 6% had clinically positive nodes (p less than 0.0001), and 97% versus 4% had pathologically positive nodes (p less than 0.0001). Despite the poorer prognosis of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, within 5 years of diagnosis, 4% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had their initial relapse in the breast and 24% had initial failure elsewhere, compared with 15% local failure first and 14% failure elsewhere first for those treated without chemotherapy (p = 0.01). We conclude that premenopausal patients with positive nodes treated with combined modality therapy (conservative surgery, radiation therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy) have a low risk of local recurrence as a first site of failure. These results suggest a possible interaction between radiation therapy and chemotherapy in their effects on local tumor control.
Although the majority of patients with early breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy have acceptable cosmetic outcomes, the specific causes of a less-than-acceptable result are not well known. To assess the technical factors associated with late cosmetic failure, we reviewed the records of 593 patients treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Boston, between 1968 and 1981. Median follow-up was 76 months with a range of 37-186 months. Using a 4-point scoring system (excellent, good, fair, poor) patients were noted to have cosmetic "failure" if scored as either fair or poor. Cosmetic results were similar at 3, 5, and 7 years with excellent or good scores seen in 88%, 90%, and 78% of patients, respectively. Three technical factors were associated with a significant worsening of the cosmetic results. The resection of 70 cm3 or more of breast tissue was more common among the failed patients than among matched patients with good or excellent results (p = 0.03). Eighty-nine percent of patients treated with a tangent pair technique had excellent results at 5 years compared to 69% of patients treated with a three-field technique (p = 0.004). The use of a larger volume implant was associated with a greater risk of a fair or poor cosmetic result compared to the use of a smaller volume implant. We conclude that overall cosmesis has been acceptable in this series, but there are technical (surgery and radiotherapy) factors which can be modified to optimize the cosmetic result without compromising local tumor control.
Although previous studies have indicated that the predictors of local recurrence following conservative surgery (CS) and radiotherapy (RT) are not the same as those following mastectomy, it remains unclear whether the predictors of distant relapse differ by local treatment modality. Clinical and pathologic features predictive of distant relapse for patients treated with mastectomy have been well established and include lymph node involvement, histologic grade, and peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI). To study the influence of these and other factors on the rate of distant relapse in patients treated with CS and RT, we have identified a group of 438 patients treated between 1968 and 1981 who met the following criteria: primary tumor size less than or equal to 5 cm, excision of the primary tumor, infiltrating ductal carcinoma as the most aggressive histologic subtype, histology evaluable for the presence of an extensive intraductal component, and a dose to the primary site greater than or equal to 60 Gy. Estrogen receptor status was available in 58% of cases, 76% had an axillary dissection, and 23% were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 89 months, 107 patients (24%) developed a distant relapse. The 5-year actuarial freedom from distant relapse (FDR) was 80%. Stepdown Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified several factors associated with a significantly (p less than 0.01) increased risk for distant relapse: positive lymph nodes, histologic grade, necrosis, and lymphatic vessel invasion. The magnitude of each effect was then examined with a lifetable calculation. Five-year freedom from distant relapse was 86% for the node-negative subgroup, 78% for patients with one to three positive nodes, and 45% for patients with four or more positive nodes. For histologic grades I, II, and III, 5-year freedom from distant relapse was 96%, 97%, and 75%, respectively. For necrosis scored as absent, scant, moderate, or marked, 5-year freedom from distant relapse was 90%, 78%, 77%, and 66%, respectively. For lymphatic vessel invasion scored as absent or present, 5-year freedom from distant relapse was 85% and 63%, respectively. We conclude that the clinico-pathologic predictors for distant relapse following conservative surgery and radiotherapy appear to be the same as those following mastectomy. This observation is consistent with the notion that distant relapse is caused by the presence of micrometastases at the time of initial patient sentation and is not greatly influenced by selection of local treatment.
There is no single correct approach to evaluate aortic aneurysm. Variations in individual cases, equipment availability, technical expertise, and surgeons' preference frequently dictate the workup. Sonography is optimal for screening and follow-up in uncomplicated cases. CT is excellent in preoperative and postoperative evaluation of aneurysms and their potential complications. Angiography is used to determine visceral-branch involvement and define variations in vascular anatomy, although its routine preoperative use is controversial. MR imaging has emerged as a powerful tool to visualize and stage aneurysms.
Prognostic factors for local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for patients with early breast cancer have not been fully established. To evaluate the importance of young age as a prognostic factor for local recurrence, we reviewed the results of treatment of 597 patients with 607 UICC-AJCC Stage I or II breast cancers, 47 of which were diagnosed when the patient was less than 35 years old. All were treated with excisional biopsy and a total dose to the site of the primary tumor of 60 Gy or more. The median follow-up in survivors was 63 months. Patient age and the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC) were both highly associated with the likelihood of tumor recurrence in the treated breast. Patients under 35 had an actuarial 5-year recurrence rate of 26%, compared to 10% for older patients (p = 0.002). Patients with an EIC had a breast recurrence rate of 25%, compared to 5% when EIC was absent (p less than 0.0001). Although the incidence of an EIC was higher in the younger subgroup (44% vs. 31%), this alone did not account for the difference in in breast recurrence rates, since younger patients had a higher recurrence rate than older patients even when an EIC was absent (22% vs. 3%, p = 0.0003). We conclude that the age of the patient is an important prognostic factor for local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation therapy. This finding is in part attributed to the observation that younger women are more likely to have tumors with an EIC than older women, but even when an EIC is absent, they may be at an increased risk of local recurrence. However, caution is required in interpreting these findings with regard to selecting among treatment options until further data are available comparing the results of conservative surgery and radiation therapy to those of mastectomy in younger patients.
The time-course of local failure following conservative surgery and radiotherapy (S+RT) for early breast cancer is not well established. We therefore examined the time-course and patterns of breast recurrence as a first site of treatment failure in a group of 607 AJCC clinical Stage I or II invasive breast carcinomas treated from 1968-81. Sixty-seven patients had a breast failure (11%), corresponding to 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of 10% and 16%. The hazard rate (i.e., the risk per unit time of a failure) for any breast failure increased over the first 2 years, was fairly constant at about 2.5%/year over the period from 2 to 6 years after treatment, and then decreased to about 1%/year at 8 years. The majority of failures were at or near the primary tumor site (33 true recurrences (TR) and 15 marginal misses (MM). In addition there were 12 failures at sites at least several cm from the boosted volume (E), 6 recurrences in the skin without a parenchymal mass (S), and 1 patient with an unclassifiable failure. Recurrences at or near the primary site (TR/MM) occurred earlier (median 38.5 mo, range 12-87 mo) than recurrences at distant sites in the breast (E) (median 64.5 mo, range 26-90). The hazard rate for TR/MM increased over the first 2-1/2 years to reach approximately 2%/year, remained at that level till about 5 years after treatment, and then decreased to about 0.5%/year at 8 years following RT. By contrast, the hazard rate for E increased slowly with time to approximately 1%/year at 5 years, with little change in the rate after that time. We conclude that the time-course of the development of local recurrence after S+RT is protracted. The majority of failures appear at or near the primary tumor site; these are seen mainly in the first 7 years following RT. Recurrences at distant sites in the breast have an even more protracted time-course. Such recurrences are rare in the first 4 years following RT. Our results emphasize the need to obtain long follow-up in these patients, both to detect these recurrences promptly and to properly evaluate the results of S+RT.
Eleven women with a history of infertility and uterine leiomyomas underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pelvis prior to myomectomy. Nine also underwent preoperative pelvic ultrasonography (US), and ten underwent hysterosalpingography. All studies were interpreted prospectively by independent observers. With each imaging modality, the location (one of 11 anatomic segments), size, and appearance of detected uterine leiomyomas were determined and compared with surgical and histologic findings. Among the nine patients who underwent both MR and US, the sensitivity (85%) and accuracy (94%) of MR imaging for abnormal segments was significantly better than that of US (sensitivity = 69%, P = .015; accuracy = 87%, P = .043). For the ten patients who underwent both MR and hysterosalpingography, the sensitivity (91%) and accuracy (96%) of MR imaging was better than that of hysterosalpingography (sensitivity = 18%, P = .0005; accuracy = 72%, P = .0005). The specificities of the three modalities did not significantly differ (100%, 97%, and 98% for MR, US, and hysterosalpingography, respectively). These data suggest that MR imaging is superior to US or hysterosalpingography for preoperatively locating uterine leiomyomas.
Detectability of breast cancer with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging versus xeromammography was quantitatively compared. MR images were obtained of breasts of 120 women who underwent xeromammography. T1 values were determined for masses larger than 2 cm. Cancer was histologically confirmed in 39 breasts and was considered excluded from 81 due to results of biopsy, cyst aspiration, or sonography or absence of change in xeromammographic findings over time. Images were blindly interpreted by three observers, and results were expressed as receiver operating characteristic curves. Detectability of breast cancer was substantially better with xeromammography than with MR imaging for all observers (P less than .03, 10(-6), and .001). On MR images, spiculation of a mass, distorted architecture, skin thickening, and nipple or skin retraction were specific but relatively insensitive indicators of cancer. Masses with smooth, distinct margins and signal intensity greater than that of fat on T2-weighted images were always benign. Other findings and T1 values were not diagnostically useful. The authors conclude that xeromammography is superior to MR imaging in detection of breast cancer.