Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B M Peterlin

Publications and source records attributed to B M Peterlin.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Effects of human chromosome 12 on interactions between Tat and TAR of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Rates of transcriptions of the human immunodeficiency virus are greatly increased by the viral trans activator Tat. In vitro, Tat binds to the 5' bulge of the trans-activation response (TAR) RNA stem-loop, which is present in all viral transcripts. In human cells, the central loop in TAR and its cellular RNA-binding proteins are also critical for the function of Tat. Previously, we demonstrated that in rodent cells (CHO cells), but not in those which contain the human chromosome 12 (CHO12 cells), Tat-TAR interactions are compromised. In this study, we examined the roles of the bulge and loop in TAR in Tat trans activation in these cells. Whereas low levels of trans activation depended solely on interactions between Tat and the bulge in CHO cells, high levels of trans activation depended also on interactions between Tat and the loop in CHO12 cells. Since the TAR loop binding proteins in these two cell lines were identical and different from their human counterpart, the human chromosome 12 does not encode TAR loop binding proteins. In vivo binding competition studies with TAR decoys confirmed that the binding of Tat to TAR is more efficient in CHO12 cells. Thus, the protein(s) encoded on human chromosome 12 helps to tether Tat to TAR via its loop, which results in high levels of trans activation.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Cellular protein modulates effects of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev.

Replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 requires expression of the viral trans activator Rev. Rev binds to a highly structured RNA, the Rev response element, which is present in singly spliced and unspliced genomic viral RNAs. Although Rev helps to transport these transcripts from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, the mechanism(s) involved is not fully understood. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we isolated a murine protein (YL2) that interacts with the basic domain of Rev, which is essential for the function of Rev in vivo and for the inhibitory splicing activity of Rev in vitro. YL2 has 92% identity to a human 32-kDa protein (p32), which copurifies with alternative splicing factor SF2/ASF. Furthermore, we found that whereas expression of YL2 greatly potentiated the activity of Rev, antisense YL2 transcripts blocked the effects of Rev in mammalian cells. YL2 also increased the activities of Rex on the Rex response element and of hybrid Rev proteins fused to Tat and the coat protein of bacteriophage MS2 on their respective RNAs. Thus, YL2 or p32 is a cellular protein that modulates the function of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Ets-1 activates the DRA promoter in B cells.

The X box in promoters of class II major histocompatibility complex genes plays a crucial role in the B-cell-specific and gamma interferon-inducible expression of these genes. The sequence TTCC is located in the pyrimidine tract which extends 5' to and partially overlaps the X box of the DRA promoter. This sequence resembles the core binding site for the Ets family of DNA-binding proteins. In this study, we demonstrate that mutations within the pyrimidine tract which change the TTCC motif, but do not affect the binding of regulatory factor X to the X box, decrease the activity of the DRA promoter in B cells. Furthermore, using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and cotransfection experiments, we demonstrate that Ets-1, but not Ets-2 or PU.1, functionally interacts with the pyrimidine tract and activates the DRA promoter.

B-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed1993

Synergism between Tat and VP16 in trans-activation of HIV-1 LTR.

When tethered to heterologous DNA both Tat and VP16 can activate transcription from the HIV-1 LTR. To determine if they act by similar mechanisms, we constructed several hybrid effectors between Tat or VP16 and DNA-binding domains of GAL4 or LexA proteins. We tested these effectors on substituted reporter targets, which contained one to six GAL4 or LexA DNA-binding sites placed upstream of the HIV-1 promoter. Whereas Tat acted very inefficiently via DNA even with five DNA-binding sites, effects of VP16 were observed with a single DNA-binding site and increased with increasing number of sites. More importantly, effects of VP16 via DNA were synergistic with those of Tat via TAR RNA when both proteins were expressed simultaneously. We next created a tripartite fusion protein, which contained the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and activation domains of both Tat and VP16, which could be targeted to the HIV-1 LTR either via DNA or RNA. By introducing individual deleterious mutations into either Tat or VP16, we confirmed that effects of VP16 predominated via DNA whereas Tat but not VP16 acted via TAR RNA. Thus, Tat and VP16 act at different steps of the transcription process and increase expression from the HIV-1 LTR by different mechanisms.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1993

Mapping cis-acting defects in promoters of transcriptionally silent DQA2, DQB2, and DOB genes.

Defects in promoters of the nonexpressed DQA2, DQB2, and DOB genes from the class II major histo-compatibility complex were mapped by placing Z and X boxes of these silent genes into a synthetic DRA promoter. These conserved upstream sequences confer B-cell-specific and gamma-interferon-inducible expression to the DRA gene. Since DRA promoters containing the X box from the DQA2 gene and Z boxes from DQA2, DQB2, and DOB genes were neither expressed constitutively in B cells nor inducible by gamma interferon in fibroblastic cells, these conserved upstream sequences are implicated in the transcriptional defects of these silent genes.

B-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed1993

Second exon of Tat of HIV-2 is required for optimal trans-activation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 LTRs.

To determine conditions for optimal trans-activation by Tat of HIV-2, genomic DNAs and cDNAs encoding Tat of HIV-2 were tested on their homologous (HIV-2) and heterologous (HIV-1) long terminal repeats (LTRs). It has been previously reported that Tat of HIV-2 could efficiently trans-activate only its own LTR but not that of HIV-1. The inefficient trans-activation of HIV-1 is due, in part, to an acidic residue in the basic, RNA-binding domain of Tat of HIV-2. Here we demonstrate that inefficient trans-activation of HIV-1 LTR is observed only with plasmids that express exon 1 and genomic forms of tat of HIV-2. Expression of both exons of Tat of HIV-2 from cDNA results in trans-activation of HIV-1 that is equivalent to the effect of Tat of HIV-1. In addition, the cDNA form of tat of HIV-2 trans-activates the HIV-2 LTR more efficiently than exon 1 and genomic forms of tat of HIV-2. We conclude that exon 2 of Tat of HIV-2 is important for optimal interactions with the trans-acting responsive regions (TARs) of HIV-1 and HIV-2 and that differential expression of short and full-length Tats of HIV-2 during the viral life cycle might affect viral latency, levels of viral replication, and cellular cytopathology.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat specifies two different transcription complexes, only one of which is regulated by Tat.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat sets up two different transcription complexes, which have been called processive and nonprocessive complexes. By mutating and substituting cis-acting sequences, we mapped elements of the human immunodeficiency virus long terminal repeat that are responsible for creating each transcription complex. Whereas processive complexes are efficiently assembled by upstream promoter elements in the absence of the TATA box, nonprocessive complexes absolutely require the TATA box. Moreover, the TATA box alone can set up these nonprocessive complexes, and nonprocessive but not processive complexes are trans activated by Tat. Finally, a strong DNA-binding site between the TATA box and trans-activation-responsive region interferes with either the assembly or movement of these nonprocessive complexes and diminishes the effects of Tat. Thus, Tat affects a critical step in the formation of elongation-competent transcription complexes.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Juxtaposition between activation and basic domains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat is required for optimal interactions between Tat and TAR.

trans activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat requires that the viral trans activator Tat interact with the trans-acting responsive region (TAR) RNA. Although the N-terminal 47 amino acids represent an independent activation domain that functions via heterologous nucleic acid-binding proteins, sequences of Tat that are required for interactions between Tat and TAR in cells have not been defined. Although in vitro binding studies suggested that the nine basic amino acids from positions 48 to 57 in Tat bind efficiently to the 5' bulge in the TAR RNA stem-loop, by creating several mutants of Tat and new hybrid proteins between Tat and the coat protein of bacteriophage R17, we determined that this arginine-rich domain is not sufficient for interactions between Tat and TAR in vivo. Rather, the activation domain is also required and must be juxtaposed to the basic domain. Thus, in vitro TAR RNA binding does not translate to function in vivo, which suggests that other proteins are important for specific and productive interactions between Tat and TAR.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Functional analysis of interactions between Tat and the trans-activation response element of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in cells.

Transcriptional trans-activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat requires that the virally encoded Tat effector interacts with its target trans-activation response element (TAR) RNA stem-loop. Although the arginine-rich region of Tat from amino acids 49 to 59 is sufficient to bind to TAR RNA in vitro, the RNA-binding domain of Tat has not been defined in vivo. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 also encodes the Rev protein, which acts through an RNA stem-loop called the Rev-response element to transport unspliced and singly spliced viral RNA species from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. To map the RNA-binding domain of Tat, we performed assays that relied on Rev function using the heterologous RNA-tethering mechanism of Tat and the TAR. By examining the effects of selected targeted mutations of Tat on the abilities of hybrid Tat/Rev proteins to rescue the expression of unspliced mRNA via the TAR, we demonstrated that residues throughout the N-terminal 59 amino acids of Tat are required for binding of Tat and TAR RNA in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

The major histocompatibility complex class II promoter-binding protein RFX (NF-X) is a methylated DNA-binding protein.

A mammalian protein called RFX or NF-X binds to the X box (or X1 box) in the promoters of a number of major histocompatibility (MHC) class II genes. In this study, RFX was shown to have the same DNA-binding specificity as methylated DNA-binding protein (MDBP), and its own cDNA was found to contain a binding site for MDBP in the leader region. MDBP is a ubiquitous mammalian protein that binds to certain DNA sequences preferentially when they are CpG methylated and to other related sequences, like the X box, irrespective of DNA methylation. MDBP from HeLa and Raji cells formed DNA-protein complexes with X-box oligonucleotides that coelectrophoresed with those containing standard MDBP sites. Furthermore, MDBP and X-box oligonucleotides cross-competed for the formation of these DNA-protein complexes. DNA-protein complexes obtained with MDBP sites displayed the same partial supershifting with an antiserum directed to the N terminus of RFX seen for complexes containing an X-box oligonucleotide. Also, the in vitro-transcribed-translated product of a recombinant RFX cDNA bound specifically to MDBP ligands and displayed the DNA methylation-dependent binding of MDBP. RFX therefore contains MDBP activity and thereby also EF-C, EP, and MIF activities that are indistinguishable from MDBP and that bind to methylation-independent sites in the transcriptional enhancers of polyomavirus and hepatitis B virus and to an intron of c-myc.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat activity by coexpression of heterologous trans activators.

We examined the mechanism of Tat-mediated trans activation through competition experiments employing Tat proteins of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV). EIAV Tat, as well as chimeric EIAV/HIV-1 Tat proteins, inhibited HIV-1 Tat-mediated trans activation in a cell-type-dependent fashion. Furthermore, these proteins inhibited trans activation by Tat-bacteriophage R17 coat protein chimeras. Inhibition resulted from competition between activation domains of effectors and competitors for a limiting cellular cofactor. The context in which competitor activation domains were expressed contributed to the extent of inhibition. In transfected cells, EIAV Tat and all chimeric competitors were located primarily in the cytoplasm, whereas HIV-1 Tat was primarily located in the nucleus. These data are consistent with a model for trans activation in which the activation domain of Tat associates with and conveys a cellular factor to the transcription complex via the trans-acting-responsive element (TAR).

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Human chromosome 12 is required for optimal interactions between Tat and TAR of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in rodent cells.

Levels of trans activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat (HIV-1 LTR) by the virally encoded transactivator Tat show marked species-specific differences. For example, levels of transactivation observed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) rodent cells are 10-fold lower than those in human cells or in CHO cells that contain the human chromosome 12. Thus, the human chromosome 12 codes for a protein or proteins that are required for optimal Tat activity. Here, the function of these cellular proteins was analyzed by using a number of modified HIV-1 LTRs and Tats. Neither DNA-binding proteins that bind to the HIV-1 LTR nor proteins that interact with the activation domain of Tat could be implicated in this defect. However, since species-specific differences were no longer observed with hybrid proteins that contain the activation domain of Tat fused to heterologous RNA-binding proteins, optimal interactions between Tat and the trans-acting responsive RNA (TAR) must depend on this factor(s).

Animals↗
PubMed1992

B-cell factor 1 is required for optimal expression of the DRA promoter in B cells.

The X box in the DRA promoter of the human histocompatibility complex is required for expression of the DRA gene in B cells. We show that a B-cell factor binds to a sequence that is clearly distinguishable from binding sites for the previously described X box binding nuclear proteins RF-X, NF-X, NF-Xc, NF-S, hXBP, and AP-1. Mutations in the DRA X box that disrupt the binding of this factor result in a lower level of gene expression, as does the presence of Id (a trans-dominant regulatory protein that negatively regulates helix-loop-helix proteins). Furthermore, this factor is recognized by antibodies directed against the helix-loop-helix protein A1, a mouse homolog of the immunoglobulin enhancer binding proteins E12/E47, and it binds to sequences in other genes that were previously shown to bind these proteins. By these criteria, this factor is BCF-1.

B-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed1991

A minimal lentivirus Tat.

Transcriptional regulatory mechanisms found in lentiviruses employ RNA enhancer elements called trans-activation responsive (TAR) elements. These nascent RNA stem-loops are cis-acting targets of virally encoded Tat effectors. Interactions between Tat and TAR increase the processivity of transcription complexes and lead to efficient copying of viral genomes. To study essential elements of this trans activation, peptide motifs from Tats of two distantly related lentiviruses, equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), were fused to the coat protein of bacteriophage R17 and tested on the long terminal repeat of EIAV, where TAR was replaced by the R17 operator, the target of the coat protein. This independent RNA-tethering mechanism mapped activation domains of Tats from HIV-1 and EIAV to 47 and 15 amino acids and RNA-binding domains to 10 and 26 amino acids, respectively. Thus, a minimal lentivirus Tat consists of 25 amino acids, of which 15 modify viral transcription and 10 bind to the target RNA stem-loop.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat does not transactivate mature trans-acting responsive region RNA species in the nucleus or cytoplasm of primate cells.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-encoded transactivator Tat is essential for viral gene expression and replication. By interacting with a nascent RNA stem-loop called the trans-acting responsive region (TAR). Tat increases rates of initiation and/or elongation of HIV transcription. Several reports have also suggested that Tat has additional effects on mature HIV RNA species including modification of primary transcripts in the nucleus and their increased translation in the cytoplasm. These posttranscriptional effects are most pronounced in the Xenopus oocyte. To investigate directly whether Tat has similar effects on viral transcripts in cells that are permissive for HIV replication, we cotransfected and microinjected human and monkey cells with Tat and TAR in the form of DNA or RNA. Whereas Tat transactivated TAR DNA targets, it did not transactivate TAR RNA targets in the nucleus of microinjected cells or in the cytoplasm of transfected cells. We conclude that in cells permissive for viral replication, Tat exerts its effect primarily at the level of HIV transcription.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Differences in transcriptional enhancers of HIV-1 and HIV-2. Response to T cell activation signals.

T cell activation results in high levels of HIV replication and is thought to be one mechanism leading to the conversion from latent to active viral infection. In HIV-1, the sequences that respond to these signaling events are found in the long terminal repeat (LTR) and comprise the transcriptional enhancer, which contains two conserved binding sites for the nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B). The corresponding region in the second AIDS retrovirus, HIV-2, contains a conserved and a divergent NF kappa B binding site. We demonstrate that the HIV-1 LTR responds better than the HIV-2 LTR to T cell activation signals. These qualitative differences in the response to T cell activation are reproduced not only when HIV-1 or HIV-2 enhancers are placed upstream of a heterologous promoter but also when these enhancers are switched between their respective LTR. In electrophoretic mobility shift assays, NF kappa B binds to both conserved sites in the HIV-1 transcriptional enhancer and only to the single conserved site in the HIV-2 transcriptional enhancer. Instead of NF kappa B, the activator protein 3 binds to the divergent site in HIV-2. In conclusion, HIV-1 and HIV-2 are differentially regulated by T cell activation signals, and this difference may account for the longer period of viral latency observed with HIV-2 than with HIV-1 infection.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1990

NF-X2 that binds to the DRA X2-box is activator protein 1. Expression cloning of c-Jun.

Human class II MHC Ag are a family of cell surface glycoproteins. Their constitutive expression is limited to B lymphocytes and thymic epithelial cells. In many other cells their expression can be induced by IFN-gamma. Conserved upstream promoter sequences regulate this tissue-specific expression of class II genes. In the DRA promoter, one of these cis-acting regulatory motifs is the X2-box to which nuclear factor X2 (NF-X2) binds. Here, we present the isolation and characterization of the full-length cDNA clone encoding NF-X2. This cDNA clone was isolated by expression cDNA cloning, and encodes the human c-Jun protein, which together with c-Fos forms the heterodimeric activator protein-1 transcription complex. Whereas c-Fos/c-Jun heterodimers do not exist in B cells, they form and bind to the X2-box in class II nonexpressing cells. Thus, c-Fos/c-Jun heterodimers might contribute to the repression of DRA gene expression.

B-Lymphocytes↗