Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B M Paterson

Publications and source records attributed to B M Paterson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The role of protein kinase C-alpha (PKC-alpha) in malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract.

Drugs specifically designed to block cellular signalling proteins are currently evaluated as a new way to treat gastrointestinal tumours. One such "new targeted agent" is aprinocarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide that specifically blocks the mRNA of protein kinase C-alpha (PKC-alpha). Blocking PKC-alpha, an important cellular signalling molecule associated with tumour growth, is anticipated to result in tumour cell arrest and achieve clinical benefits. However, it is not known which patients may benefit most from a specific inhibition of PKC-alpha. Past experience with other novel targeted agents suggests that expression of the target molecule is an important factor for the success of such a specific therapy. Therefore, reviewing the specific role of PKC-alpha in various gastrointestinal tumours may contribute to focus the clinical development of selective or specific PKC-alpha inhibitors, such as aprinocarsen, on those patients with a distinctive PKC-alpha expression pattern.

Enzyme Inhibitors↗

RNAi as random degradative PCR: siRNA primers convert mRNA into dsRNAs that are degraded to generate new siRNAs.

In posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS), "quelling," and RNA interference (RNAi), 21-25 nucleotide RNA fragments are produced from the initiating dsRNA. These short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) mediate RNAi by an unknown mechanism. Here, we show that GFP and Pp-Luc siRNAs, isolated from a protein complex in Drosophila embryo extract, target mRNA degradation in vitro. Most importantly, these siRNAs, as well as a synthetic 21-nucleotide duplex GFP siRNA, serve as primers to transform the target mRNA into dsRNA. The nascent dsRNA is degraded to eliminate the incorporated target mRNA while generating new siRNAs in a cycle of dsRNA synthesis and degradation. Evidence is presented that mRNA-dependent siRNA incorporation to form dsRNA is carried out by an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity (RdRP).

Animals↗

Regulation of MyoD function in the dividing myoblast.

Proliferating myoblasts express MyoD, yet no phenotypic markers are activated as long as mitogen levels are sufficient to keep the cells dividing. Depending upon mitogen levels, a decision is made in G1 that commits the myoblast to either continue to divide or to exit from the cell cycle and activate terminal differentiation. Ectopic expression of MyoD under the control of the RSV or CMV promoters causes 10T1/2 cells to rapidly exit the cell cycle and differentiate as single myocytes, even in growth medium, whereas expression of MyoD under the weaker SV40 promoter is compatible with proliferation. Co-expression of MyoD and cyclin D1, but not cyclins A, B, E or D3, blocks transactivation of a MyoD responsive reporter. Similarly, transfection of myoblasts with the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitors p16 and p21 supports some muscle-specific gene expression even in growth medium. Taken altogether, these results suggest cell cycle progression negatively regulates myocyte differentiation, possibly through a mechanism involving the D1 responsive cdks. We review evidence coupling growth status, the cell cycle and myogenesis. We describe a novel mitogen-sensitive mechanism that involves the cyclin D1-dependent direct interaction between the G1 cdks and MyoD in the dividing myoblast, which regulates MyoD function in a mitogen-sensitive manner.

Animals↗

MyoD and myogenin expression patterns in cultures of fetal and adult chicken myoblasts.

Isolated chicken myoblasts had previously been utilized in many studies aiming at understanding the emergence and regulation of the adult myogenic precursors (satellite cells). However, in recent years only a small number of chicken satellite cell studies have been published compared to the increasing number of studies with rodent satellite cells. In large part this is due to the lack of markers for tracing avian myogenic cells before they become terminally differentiated and express muscle-specific structural proteins. We previously demonstrated that myoblasts isolated from fetal and adult chicken muscle display distinct schedules of myosin heavy-chain isoform expression in culture. We further showed that myoblasts isolated from newly hatched and young chickens already possess the adult myoblast phenotype. In this article, we report on the use of polyclonal antibodies against the chicken myogenic regulatory factor proteins MyoD and myogenin for monitoring fetal and adult chicken myoblasts as they progress from proliferation to differentiation in culture. Fetal-type myoblasts were isolated from 11-day-old embryos and adult-type myoblasts were isolated from 3-week-old chickens. We conclude that fetal myoblasts express both MyoD and myogenin within the first day in culture and rapidly transit into the differentiated myosin-expressing state. In contrast, adult myoblasts are essentially negative for MyoD and myogenin by culture Day 1 and subsequently express first MyoD and then myogenin before expressing sarcomeric myosin. The delayed MyoD-to-myogenin transition in adult myoblasts is accompanied by a lag in the fusion into myotubes, compared to fetal myoblasts. We also report on the use of a commercial antibody against the myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A) to detect terminally differentiated chicken myoblasts by their MEF2+ nuclei. Collectively, the results support the hypothesis that fetal and adult myoblasts represent different phenotypic populations. The fetal myoblasts may already be destined for terminal differentiation at the time of their isolation, and the adult myoblasts may represent progenitors that reside in an earlier compartment of the myogenic lineage.

Animals↗

RNA interference demonstrates a role for nautilus in the myogenic conversion of Schneider cells by daughterless.

Schneider SL2 cells activate the myogenic program in response to the ectopic expression of daughterless alone, as indicated by exit from the cell cycle, syncytia formation, and the presence of muscle myosin fibrils. Myogenic conversion can be potentiated by the coexpression of DMEF2 and nautilus with daughterless. In RT-PCR assays Schneider cells express two mesodermal markers, nautilus and DMEF2 mRNAs, as well as very low levels of daughterless mRNA but no twist. Full-length RT-PCR products for nautilus and DMEF2 encode immunoprecipitable proteins. We used RNA-i to demonstrate that both endogenous nautilus expression and DMEF2 expression are required for the myogenic conversion of Schneider cells by daughterless. Coexpression of twist blocks conversion by daughterless but twist dsRNA has no effect. Our results indicate that Schneider cells are of mesodermal origin and that myogenic conversion with ectopic expression of daughterless occurs by raising the levels of daughterless protein sufficiently to allow the formation of nautilus/daughterless heterodimers. The effectiveness of RNA-i is dependent upon protein half-life. Genes encoding proteins with relatively short half-lives (10 h), such as nautilus or HSF, are efficiently silenced, whereas more stable proteins, such as cytoplasmic actin or beta-galactosidase, are less amenable to the application of RNA-i. These results support the conclusion that nautilus is a myogenic factor in Drosophila tissue culture cells with a functional role similar to that of vertebrate MyoD. This is discussed with regard to the in vivo functions of nautilus.

Animals↗

Direct inhibition of G(1) cdk kinase activity by MyoD promotes myoblast cell cycle withdrawal and terminal differentiation.

MyoD has been proposed to facilitate terminal myoblast differentiation by binding to and inhibiting phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb). Here we show that MyoD can interact with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4) through a conserved 15 amino acid (aa) domain in the C-terminus of MyoD. MyoD, its C-terminus lacking the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain, or the 15 aa cdk4-binding domain all inhibit the cdk4-dependent phosphorylation of pRb in vitro. Cellular expression of full-length MyoD or fusion proteins containing either the C-terminus or just the 15 aa cdk4-binding domain of MyoD inhibit cell growth and pRb phosphorylation in vivo. The minimal cdk4-binding domain of MyoD fused to GFP can also induce differentiation of C2C12 muscle cells in growth medium. The defective myogenic phenotype in MyoD-negative BC3H1 cells can be rescued completely only when MyoD contains the cdk4-binding domain. We propose that a regulatory checkpoint in the terminal cell cycle arrest of the myoblast during differentiation involves the modulation of the cyclin D cdk-dependent phosphorylation of pRb through the opposing effects of cyclin D1 and MyoD.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Evolutionary conservation of MyoD function and differential utilization of E proteins.

The formation of striated muscle in both vertebrates and invertebrates involves the activity of the MyoD family of basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors. The high degree of evolutionary conservation of MyoD-related proteins, both in the sequence of their bHLH domains and in their general developmental expression patterns, suggests that these factors are also conserved at the level of function. We have addressed this directly using MyoD and E protein factors from vertebrates, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans. Various MyoD and E factor combinations were tested for their ability to interact in vitro and to function in vivo in the myogenic conversion of 10T12 mouse fibroblasts. We found that the ability of different homo- and heterodimers to bind DNA in vitro was an accurate measure of biological activity in vivo. A second assessment of conserved function comes from the ability of these factors to rescue a C. elegans hlh-1 (CeMyoD) null mutation. We found that both Drosophila and chicken MyoD-related factors were able to rescue a C. elegans CeMyoD loss-of-function mutation. These results demonstrate a remarkable degree of functional conservation of these myogenic factors despite differences in E-protein interactions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Targeted disruption of gene function in Drosophila by RNA interference (RNA-i): a role for nautilus in embryonic somatic muscle formation.

The expression of the MyoD gene homolog, nautilus (nau), in the Drosophila embryo defines a subset of mesodermal cells known as the muscle "pioneer" or "founder" cells. These cells are thought to establish the future muscle pattern in each hemisegment. Founders appear to recruit fusion-competent mesodermal cells to establish a particular muscle fiber type. In support of this concept every somatic muscle in the embryo is associated with one or more nautilus-positive cells. However, because of the lack of known (isolated) nautilus mutations, no direct test of the founder cell hypothesis has been possible. We now have utilized toxin ablation and genetic interference by double-stranded RNA (RNA interference or RNA-i) to determine both the role of the nautilus-expressing cells and the nautilus gene, respectively, in embryonic muscle formation. In the absence of nautilus-expressing cells muscle formation is severely disrupted or absent. A similar phenotype is observed with the elimination of the nautilus gene product by genetic interference upon injection of nautilus double-stranded RNA. These results define a crucial role for nautilus in embryonic muscle formation. The application of RNA interference to a variety of known Drosophila mutations as controls gave phenotypes essentially indistinguishable from the original mutation. RNA-i provides a powerful approach for the targeted disruption of a given genetic function in Drosophila.

Animals↗

Coupling of the cell cycle and myogenesis through the cyclin D1-dependent interaction of MyoD with cdk4.

Proliferating myoblasts express the muscle determination factor, MyoD, throughout the cell cycle in the absence of differentiation. Here we show that a mitogen-sensitive mechanism, involving the direct interaction between MyoD and cdk4, restricts myoblast differentiation to cells that have entered into the G0 phase of the cell cycle under mitogen withdrawal. Interaction between MyoD and cdk4 disrupts MyoD DNA-binding, muscle-specific gene activation and myogenic conversion of 10T1/2 cells independently of cyclin D1 and the CAK activation of cdk4. Forced induction of cyclin D1 in myotubes results in the cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation of cdk4. The specific MyoD-cdk4 interaction in dividing myoblasts, coupled with the cyclin D1-dependent nuclear targeting of cdk4, suggests a mitogen-sensitive mechanism whereby cyclin D1 can regulate MyoD function and the onset of myogenesis by controlling the cellular location of cdk4 rather than the phosphorylation status of MyoD.

Animals↗

The E12 inhibitory domain prevents homodimer formation and facilitates selective heterodimerization with the MyoD family of gene regulatory factors.

Although the ubiquitous helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein E12 does not homodimerize efficiently, the myogenic factor MyoD forms an avid DNA-binding heterodimer with E12 through the conserved HLH dimerization domain. However, the mechanism which ensures this selective dimerization is not understood at present. In our functional studies of various amino acid changes in the E12 HLH domain, we found that a single substitution in E12 helix 1 can abolish the effect of the E12 inhibitory domain and results in the efficient DNA binding of the E12 homodimer. Competition experiments revealed that the inhibitory domain, in fact, blocks the dimerization of E12 rather than DNA binding. MyoD contains two glutamic residues in helix 2 that are required for efficient dimerization with E12. More importantly, these residues were not essential for dimerization with E12 mutants in which the dimerization inhibitory domain had been relaxed, or for dimerization with E47 which does not contain the inhibitory domain owing to the use of an alternative exon. The positions of these glutamic residues are conserved among the four myogenic factors. Thus, members of the MyoD family of gene regulatory proteins can overcome the E12 dimerization inhibitory domain through a mechanism involving, in part, the negatively charged amino acid residues in helix 2. This result describes a novel mechanism facilitating the selective formation of the MyoD(MRF)-E12 heterodimer that enhances dimerization specificity and may apply to other members of the E-protein family.

3T3 Cells↗

Requirement of MADS domain transcription factor D-MEF2 for muscle formation in Drosophila.

Members of the myocyte enhancer binding factor-2 (MEF2) family of MADS (MCM1, agamous, deficiens, and serum response factor) box transcription factors are expressed in the skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle lineages of vertebrate and Drosophila embryos. These factors bind an adenine-thymidine-rich DNA sequence associated with muscle-specific genes. The function of MEF2 was determined by generating a loss-of-function of the single mef2 gene in Drosophila (D-mef2). In loss-of-function embryos, somatic, cardiac, and visceral muscle cells did not differentiate, but myoblasts were normally specified and positioned. These results demonstrate that different muscle cell types share a common myogenic differentiation program controlled by MEF2.

Animals↗

Foraging and denning patterns of brushtail possums, and their possible relationship to contact with cattle and the transmission of bovine tuberculosis.

Radio-tracking and direct observation were used over 18 months in 1990-92 to investigate both the use of sleeping dens and foraging activity by possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) on a 21 ha site in the Wairarapa used for a longitudinal study of bovine tuberculosis. Males had larger home ranges than females, and both sexes had larger activity areas during the autumn mating season than at other times of the year. Possums typically foraged in only a small area of their home ranges (termed an activity area) on any one night, and the areas used by individuals were commonly very similar over a series of nights. Activity areas overlapped extensively among possums. Possums used a limited number of dens, commonly in a small and in most cases a circumscribed part of their home range. No simultaneous den-sharing was found, with the exception of mother-joey pairs. The mortality of juveniles after independence was 36%. Only two of 25 juveniles under surveillance to detect dispersal dispersed more than 500 m off the study site, and both subsequently died. Grazing patterns of cattle meant that almost all accessible areas of the paddock were covered by at least some grazing cattle, and so all activity areas of possums within the paddock were covered by areas where cattle foraged. However, possums avoided contact with cattle, and when some cattle were excluded from access to the part of the paddock principally used by both tuberculous and healthy possums for denning, transmission of Mycobacterium bovis from possums to these cattle ceased, although there was subsequent transmission to deer. Cattle which grazed the area used principally for possum denning continued to become infected, and these denning areas appeared to be of importance in the transmission of tuberculosis.

Journal Article↗

Interactions between beef cattle and simulated tuberculous possums on pasture.

Brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) were sedated with ketamine and placed within a fenced observation area with 17 Hereford cross steers. The behaviour of the sedated possums simulated that of terminally ill possums. Behavioural analysis was carried out during eight observation periods in which sedated possums were successfully released and interactions occurred. Cattle were attracted from over 50 m away by the movements of the possums, and for 34% of observation time cattle investigated the possums. Inactive animals engendered far less interest, and cattle investigated them for 3% of observation time. An average of seven to eight cattle came in physical contact with the possum in each of the observation periods. Cattle actively investigated the possum while following it as it moved, commonly close enough to be within aerosol transmission distance, and some sniffed the possum, touched it with their noses, and in many cases licked it extensively. All of these activities would expose the cattle to high risk of receiving an infective dose of Mycobacterium bovis, especially via the respiratory route. The type and duration of contact between individual steers and the possum varied between animals and observation period. The cattle exposed themselves to greater risk, overall, during the first week of observations, and there was evidence of habituation with increased contact. Although all 17 steers came within 5 metres of the possum at some point during the observation periods, some individual cattle behaved in ways which would put them at greater risk of contracting tuberculosis than did others. Cattle showed little interest in possum carcasses placed on pasture. These were unlikely to be a significant source of infection for cattle, although they could be for scavenger species.

Journal Article↗

E-box- and MEF-2-independent muscle-specific expression, positive autoregulation, and cross-activation of the chicken MyoD (CMD1) promoter reveal an indirect regulatory pathway.

Members of the MyoD family of gene-regulatory proteins (MyoD, myogenin, myf5, and MRF4) have all been shown not only to regulate the transcription of numerous muscle-specific genes but also to positively autoregulate and cross activate each other's transcription. In the case of muscle-specific genes, this transcriptional regulation can often be correlated with the presence of a DNA consensus in the regulatory region CANNTG, known as an E box. Little is known about the regulatory interactions of the myogenic factors themselves; however, these interactions are thought to be important for the activation and maintenance of the muscle phenotype. We have identified the minimal region in the chicken MyoD (CMD1) promoter necessary for muscle-specific transcription in primary cultures of embryonic chicken skeletal muscle. The CMD1 promoter is silent in primary chick fibroblast cultures and in muscle cell cultures treated with the thymidine analog bromodeoxyuridine. However, CMD1 and chicken myogenin, as well as, to a lesser degree, chicken Myf5 and MRF4, expressed in trans can activate transcription from the minimal CMD1 promoter in these primary fibroblast cultures. Here we show that the CMD1 promoter contains numerous E-box binding sites for CMD1 and the other myogenic factors, as well as a MEF-2 binding site. Surprisingly, neither muscle-specific and the other myogenic factors, as well as a MEF-2 binding site. Surprisingly, neither muscle-specific expression, autoregulation, or cross activation depends upon the presence of of these E-box or MEF-2 binding sites in the CMD1 promoter. These results demonstrate that the autoregulation and cross activation of the chicken MyoD promoter through the putative direct binding of the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix regulatory factors is mediated through an indirect pathway that involves unidentified regulatory elements and/or ancillary factors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Initial steps of myogenesis in somites are independent of influence from axial structures.

Formation of paraxial muscles in vertebrate embryos depends upon interactions between early somites and the neural tube and notochord. Removal of both axial structures results in a complete loss of epaxial myotomal muscle, whereas hypaxial and limb muscles develop normally. We report that chicken embryos, after surgical removal of the neural tube at the level of the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm, start to develop myotomal cells that express transcripts for the muscle-specific regulators MyoD and myogenin. These cells also make desmin, indicating that the initial steps of axial skeletal muscle formation can occur in the absence of the neural tube. However, a few days following the extirpation, the expression of MyoD and myogenin transcripts gradually disappears, and becomes almost undetectable after 4 days. From these observations we conclude that the neural tube is not required for the generation of the skeletal muscle cell lineage, but may support the survival or maitenance of further differentiation of the myotomal cell compartment. Notochord transplanted medially or laterally to the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm leads to a ventralization of axial structures but does not entirely prevent the early appearance of myoblasts expressing MyoD transcripts. However, the additional notochord inhibits subsequent development and maturation of myotomes. Taken together, our data suggest that neural tube promotes, and notochord inhibits, the process of myogenesis in axial muscles at a developmental step following the initial expression of myogenic bHLH regulators.

Animals↗

Phosphorylation inhibits the DNA-binding activity of MyoD homodimers but not MyoD-E12 heterodimers.

MyoD is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of muscle gene regulatory proteins that includes myogenin, myf-5, and MRF4. These proteins have been shown to heterodimerize with E2A bHLH proteins, E12/E47, and to bind to a consensus sequence known as an E-box, CANNTG, the target for transcriptional activation by these myogenic regulators. MyoD is also a phosphorylated nuclear protein that is present in muscle cells prior to the transcriptional activation of the muscle-specific genes, many of which contain E-box elements in their regulatory regions. Here we report that phosphorylated chicken MyoD, called CMD1, produced in sf9 cells using the baculovirus system, is qualitatively similar to CMD1 isolated by immunoaffinity purification from primary cultures of embryonic chick breast muscle. Functional analysis of phosphorylated and dephosphorylated CMD1 produced in sf9 cells indicates that, in the presence of magnesium, DNA binding of phosphorylated CMD1 is inhibited whereas binding in association with E12 is not affected. However, CMD1 binding alone is equally efficient when either EDTA is added in excess or dephosphorylated or bacterially expressed CMD1 is used in the assay. Our results suggest that cellular phosphorylation changes the CMD1 homodimer-heterodimer equilibrium which, in turn, modulates and/or eliminates binding site competition between CMD1 homodimers and CMD1/E-protein heterodimers in the cell.

Animals↗

Dimerization specificity of myogenic helix-loop-helix DNA-binding factors directed by nonconserved hydrophilic residues.

The myogenic regulatory factor MyoD dimerizes with other positive and negative regulatory factors through a conserved region called the helix-loop-helix (HLH) domain. Using a non-DNA-binding MyoD mutant with a normal HLH domain as a dimerization competitor in gel mobility shift assays in conjunction with various MyoD HLH mutants, nonhydrophobic amino acids were identified in the HLH domain that contribute to dimerization specificity with E12. The assay detected subtle differences in dimerization activity among the mutant MyoD proteins that correlated with their ability to activate transcription in vivo, but this correlation was not apparent in the absence of competitor. The identification of such nonhydrophobic residues enabled us to predict the differences in dimerization affinity among the four vertebrate myogenic factors with E12. The experiments confirmed the prediction. Furthermore, a high-affinity homodimerizing analog of MyoD was designed by a single substitution at one of these residue positions. These experimental results were strengthened when they were analyzed in terms of the crystal structure for the Max bHLHZip domain homodimer. This analysis has allowed us to identify those residues that form charged residue pairs between the two HLH domains of MyoD and E12 and determine the dimerization specificity of the bHLH proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗