Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B L Weber

Publications and source records attributed to B L Weber.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Developing strategies for intervention and prevention in hereditary breast cancer.

Prophylactic mastectomy, intensified breast cancer screening, and the use of chemopreventive agents have all been recommended to reduce breast cancer risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Yet, little is currently known about the efficacy of these approaches in reducing breast cancer mortality. The recent identification of BRCA1 and the localization of BRCA2 lend urgency to the need to assess breast cancer intervention and prevention strategies for women likely to carry germline mutations at these loci. At present, families with a history consistent with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation should be tested within the confines of a research protocol and encouraged to participate in intervention and prevention trials. Both retrospective studies and prospective clinical trials are critically needed. While randomized clinical trials would be the optimal mechanism to assess the relative efficacy of these potential interventions, no consensus was obtained as to whether such a trial would be feasible because of strong patient preference for intervention type. It is likely that optimal intervention and prevention strategies will consist of a combined approach to risk reduction. Participants must be appropriately informed of the potential risks as well as the potential benefits of such testing. The potential risks of testing for genetic susceptibility include not only potential psychosocial harm that may result from learning one's carrier status, but also the potential for altered family relationships and insurance and job discrimination. Participants and their family members must be counseled concerning the implication of their test results.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Familial breast cancer. Approaching the isolation of a susceptibility gene.

Family history is recognized widely as a significant risk factor for the development of breast cancer. A gene (BRCA1), mutations in which confer susceptibility to early-onset breast and ovarian cancer, has been mapped to chromosome 17q12-21. An intensive search for this gene is currently underway in a number of laboratories. Recent data support the hypothesis that BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene that may be important in the development of both inherited and sporadic breast and ovarian cancers. Genetic and physical maps of the BRCA1 candidate region largely have been completed and efforts are being directed at identification of candidate genes from within this region. A small number of families recently have received results of genetic-linkage testing, indicating which family members likely are to be carriers of a germline BRCA1 mutation, and, therefore, have a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of approximately 85%. The imminent isolation of BRCA1 will make predictive testing for breast cancer a reality for many women and likely will pave the way for novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the future.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Localization of the gene for ATP citrate lyase (ACLY) distal to gastrin(GAS) and proximal to D17S856 on chromosome 17q12-q21.

The gene encoding ATP-citrate lyase, designated ACLY, was mapped to human chromosome 17q12-q21 by PCR on a panel of human/rodent somatic cell hybrids and localized to 17q21.1 by PCR on a panel of radiation hybrids. The radiation hybrid panel indicates that the most likely position of ACLY on 17q21.1 is between gastrin (GAS) and D17S856 at a distance of 170-290 kb from the GAS locus.

ATP Citrate (pro-S)-Lyase↗

Characterization of 10 new polymorphic dinucleotide repeats and generation of a high-density microsatellite-based physical map of the BRCA1 region of chromosome 17q21.

A familial early onset breast cancer gene (BRCA1) has been localized to chromosome 17q21. To aid in the identification of this gene a number of new microsatellite markers from the D17S857 to D17S78 region were isolated and characterized. These markers, along with previously published markers from the region, were localized on a physical map by STS content mapping of cosmids from the BRCA1 interval. This high-density STS map of the BRCA1 region will be useful for linkage studies of families with apparent inherited breast cancer and for loss of heterozygosity analysis of breast tumor DNAs.

Alleles↗

The biology of breast cancer.

The progression from normal breast epithelium to metastatic breast cancer is a complex, multistep process. Initially, genetic alterations are thought to confer a growth advantage to individual cells by decreasing tumor-suppressor gene activity or increasing oncogene activity, or both. Further alterations result in the development of cell clones that have the ability to invade adjacent tissue, establish metastatic deposits, and evade immune surveillance. At some point in this process, these malignant cell clones also lose the normal ability to respond to hormonal growth regulatory signals. Recent advances in understanding the genetic alterations, the loss of normal growth regulation, and the development of metastatic potential in breast cancer are reviewed. Factors related to the immunobiology of breast cancer are also discussed.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Progress toward isolation of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1.

The high incidence of breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer in some families appears to be due to germ-line mutations in BRCA1. Genetic analysis of such families suggests that the BRCA1 candidate region lies between D17S857 and D17S78 on chromosome 17q21 (Kelsell et al. 1993; Simard et al. 1993). To identify and isolate BRCA1, we have used linkage and meiotic recombination analysis, characterized regions displaying LOH in tumor DNA from BRCA1-linked families, performed YAC and cosmid clone isolation and ordering, and used three complementary transcript-searching strategies. We have identified as many as 28 genes from the BRCA1 candidate region, and we are searching for constitutive mutations in these candidate genes by several methods in an attempt to identify BRCA1.

BRCA1 Protein↗

Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

Efforts are under way to isolate a gene (BRCA1) on chromosome 17q12-21. Mutations in this gene predispose women to breast and ovarian cancer. Women with germline mutations in BRCA1 are estimated to have an 85% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer and an increased but as yet undetermined risk of ovarian cancer. It is estimated that one in 200 to 400 American women may be carriers of BRCA1 mutations. We have identified several families that show linkage between breast and/or ovarian cancer and genetic markers that flank BRCA1. It is now possible, within these linked families, to prospectively identify family members likely to be carrying BRCA1 mutations. Because of profound and immediate clinical ramifications, we offered to provide this information to one such extended family. To provide information to this family, we developed a protocol to address the many issues that arise in the delivery of these services. Although testing for BRCA1 mutation carriers is currently limited to very rare families being analyzed for research purposes, this experience presages the complexities of the much larger scale availability of population screening for BRCA1 mutations, which is likely to become a reality in the next few years.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Differential isolation of normal luminal mammary epithelial cells and breast cancer cells from primary and metastatic sites using selective media.

The present studies were aimed at determining if the use of a cell culture medium that supports proliferation of human mammary epithelial cells of the luminal lineage would allow routine isolation of breast cancer cells from primary and metastatic tumor specimens. Results obtained with mammary epithelial cells derived from reduction mammoplasty specimens and primary breast carcinomas indicated that growth of cells on type I collagen-coated dishes in Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with insulin, hydrocortisone, epidermal growth factor, cholera toxin, and 5% fetal bovine serum resulted in the growth and serial passage of cells that stained positively for the luminal cell marker cytokeratin 19. By contrast, growth of mammary epithelial cells in a growth factor-supplemented serum-free medium resulted in the emergence of mammary epithelial cell colonies that were uniformly negative for keratin 19. Filter isolation methods were used to isolate individual keratin-19-positive colonies from primary cultures derived from breast cancer specimens. All of the luminal mammary epithelial cells isolated from breast cancer tissues expressed characteristics of normal cells. Keratin-19-positive colonies isolated from several different tumors all grew rapidly for 30 to 60 days in culture and then senesced. Cells were isolated from one tumor that was known to have undergone a loss of heterozygosity at a specific locus in the p53 gene. All colonies isolated from this specimen contained both p53 alleles, which was consistent with their origin from normal luminal cells. Cells were also isolated from one tumor in which the c-erbB2 protein was drastically overexpressed in the neoplastic cells. Once again, keratin-19-positive colonies isolated from this tumor did not overexpress the c-erbB-2 protein. Experiments were then performed with cells derived from pleural effusions and metastatic lymph nodes. Results obtained with these specimens indicated that the growth conditions that support the growth of normal luminal mammary epithelial cells do not support the growth of neoplastic cells. However, the omission of cholera toxin, epidermal growth factor, and type I collagen substratum resulted in the isolation of two long-term cell lines. Both cell lines have population doubling times of approximately 100 h, are hyperdiploid, and stain positively for cytokeratin 19. Thus, culture conditions that support the growth of normal luminal mammary epithelial cells do not, in general, support the growth of breast cancer cells.

Base Sequence↗

Selection criteria for breast cancer chemoprevention subjects.

Early phase chemoprevention trials differ from standard therapeutic clinical trials because asymptomatic, healthy people are treated with a potentially toxic intervention for a prolonged period of time. Current subject selection protocols have relied upon epidemiological methods to identify high-risk individuals. Most available data provide risk estimates for various individual risk factors, but few have reported risk estimates for combinations of risk factors. Selection criteria for the large tamoxifen intervention trial (NSABP P1) were developed from the work of Gail et al. [1]. The Gail model takes into account non-genetic factors (e.g., nulliparity, age at menarche, preexisting pathological conditions) and genetic factors (family history). Using a lifetime risk of 10% of developing breast cancer as a standard to intervene, NSABP P1 uses the Gail algorithm to select pre- and postmenopausal women for a primary intervention trial. This approach has been criticized for being insufficiently selective (i.e., all women > or = 60 yrs), but appears to be the best available method to select subjects for a chemoprevention trial. Other approaches have been based on identification of very high-risk women with acknowledged pathologic conditions [lobular carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)]. Attempting to use these proliferative lesions as pathologic endpoints for drug effect has not been attempted. DCIS as a risk factor for tamoxifen intervention was excluded because of controversies over its management and because of frequent difficulties in distinguishing microinvasive from non-invasive lesions. Women treated for early stage breast cancer (Stage I) may be subjects for early stage chemopreventive interventions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Age Factors↗

Multicolor FISH mapping with Alu-PCR-amplified YAC clone DNA determines the order of markers in the BRCA1 region on chromosome 17q12-q21.

A gene designated BRCA1, implicated in the susceptibility to early-onset familial breast cancer, has recently been localized to chromosome 17q12-q21. To date, the order of DNA markers mapped within this region has been based on genetic linkage analysis. We report the use of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization to establish a physically based map of five polymorphic DNA markers and 10 cloned genes spanning this region. Three cosmid clones and Alu-PCR-generated products derived from 12 yeast artificial chromosome clones representing each of these markers were used in two-color mapping experiments to determine an initial proximity of markers relative to each other on metaphase chromosomes. Interphase mapping was then employed to determine the order and orientation of closely spaced loci by direct visualization of fluorescent signals following hybridization of three probes, each detected in a different color. Statistical analysis of the combined data suggests that the order of markers in the BRCA1 region is cen-THRA1-TOP2-GAS-OF2-17HSD-248yg9-RNU 2-OF3-PPY/p131-EPB3-Mfd188- WNT3-HOX2-GP3A-tel. This map is consistent with that determined by radiation-reduced hybrid mapping and will facilitate positional cloning strategies in efforts to isolate and characterize the BRCA1 gene.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Isolation and characterization of somatic cell hybrids with breakpoints spanning 17q22-->q24.

Somatic cell hybrid mapping panels have previously been constructed to assist in the regional assignment of anonymous DNA probes and cloned genes to human chromosome 17. While a substantial number of hybrids are available that subdivide the short arm of this chromosome and the proximal portion of its long arm into specific regions, relatively few exist with breakpoints in the distal portion of the long arm. To increase the resolution of this region, four additional human x rodent somatic cell hybrids have been constructed that include breakpoints spanning the region 17q22-->q24. Hybrid clones carrying the long-arm derivative of chromosome 17 were initially identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hybrids were subsequently screened using the polymerase chain reaction with primer sets representing DNA markers previously mapped to chromosome 17. These hybrids expand the existing somatic cell hybrid panel for the distal portion of the long arm of chromosome 17.

Animals↗

c-myb effects on kinetic events during MEL cell differentiation.

During dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)-induced differentiation of Friend mouse erythroleukemia (MEL) cells there is a biphasic fall in c-myb mRNA levels. We have previously shown that constitutive expression of c-myb blocks differentiation. To delineate more accurately the point at which Myb blocks differentiation, MEL cells were transfected with a human c-myb construct under the control of the beta-globin promoter and enhancers. In concert with endogenous DMSO-induced globin transcription during MEL cell differentiation, the beta-globin c-myb transcription unit of the transfected plasmid is activated after 3-5 days of culture in media containing DMSO. Here we describe c-myb-transformed MEL clones which undergo delayed expression of the exogenous c-myb following 3-5 days of culture in DMSO. In contrast to wild-type MEL cells, both clones failed to display phenotypic markers of differentiation and continued to proliferate for up to 10 days of culture. These data suggest that the late fall in c-myb levels may be required in order for differentiation to occur. Additionally, we suggest that constitutive expression of c-myb does not block early commitment events such as activation of histone Hl', subsequent chromatin condensation, and alteration of proliferation-related gene expression. Taken together, these results show that c-myb acts very late in the process of differentiation.

Animals↗

Differentiation of mouse erythroleukemia cells enhanced by alternatively spliced c-myb mRNA.

C-myb, the normal cellular homolog of the retroviral transforming gene v-myb, encodes a nuclear, transcriptional regulatory protein (p75c-myb). C-myb is involved in regulating normal human hematopoiesis, and inhibits dimethyl sulfoxide-induced differentiation of Friend murine erythroleukemia (F-MEL) cells. An alternately spliced c-myb mRNA encodes a truncated version of p75c-myb (mbm2) that includes the DNA binding region and nuclear localization signal present in the c-myb protein, but does not contain the transcriptional regulatory regions. Constitutive expression of mbm2, in contrast to c-myb, here resulted in enhanced differentiation of F-MEL cells. These data suggest that the c-myb protooncogene encodes alternately spliced mRNA species with opposing effects on differentiation.

Animals↗

Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of macrophage-specific colony stimulating factor gene expression by tumor necrosis factor. Involvement of arachidonic acid metabolites.

The effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) on the regulation of macrophage-specific colony stimulating factor (CSF-1) gene expression have been studied in HL-60 cells during monocytic differentiation. CSF-1 transcripts were undetectable in uninduced HL-60 cells, reached maximal levels by 3 h of exposure to TNF, and returned to that of control cells by 24 h. Transcriptional run-on analysis demonstrated that exposure to TNF stimulated the rate of CSF-1 gene transcription by 6.4-fold. The combination of a protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, and TNF increased levels of CSF-1 mRNA compared with treatment by TNF alone. We also studied the signal transduction mechanisms responsible for regulating TNF-induced CSF-1 mRNA levels. Both 4-bromophenacyl bromide and quinacrine, inhibitors of phospholipase A2 activity, blocked TNF-induced increases in CSF-1 transcripts in a concentration-dependent manner, while caffeic acid and nordihydroguaiaretic acid, inhibitors of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway, had no detectable effect on induction of CSF-1 RNA. PGE2 or dibutyryl cAMP treatment of HL-60 cells in the presence of TNF blocked the expression of CSF-1 mRNA in a dose-dependent manner. These findings suggest that the increase in CSF-1 RNA observed during TNF treatment is regulated, at least in part, by both transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms, and that PGE2 and cAMP regulate transcriptional activation of the CSF-1 gene by TNF.

Acetophenones↗

CSF-1 and C-FMS gene expression in human carcinoma cell lines.

The macrophage-specific colony stimulating factor CSF-1 is required for the growth and differentiation of monocytes. The cell surface receptor for CSF-1 is identical to the product of the c-fms proto-oncogene. The present studies have monitored CSF-1 and c-fms expression in human carcinoma cell lines. Two of three human ovarian carcinoma cell-lines expressed multiple species of CSF-1 mRNA. Furthermore, detection of CSF-1 transcripts was associated with secretion of CSF-1 protein that was increased after phorbol ester treatment. CSF-1 mRNA was also detectable in 4 breast and 2 lung carcinoma cell lines. In contrast, c-fms expression was found only in SK-Br-3 breast carcinoma cells. Similar studies in 2 human choriocarcinoma cell lines demonstrated the presence of c-fms, but not CSF-1, transcripts. While phorbol ester treatment was associated with increased c-fms mRNA levels in choriocarcinoma cells, this agent had no effect on CSF-1 expression. These findings indicate that: 1) CSF-1 expression is frequent in human ovarian, breast and lung carcinoma cells; and 2) coexpression of the CSF-1 and c-fms genes, as found in monocytes is infrequent in malignant epithelial and choriocarcinoma cell lines.

Blotting, Northern↗