Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B L Finley

Publications and source records attributed to B L Finley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of the physical hazards associated with two remedial alternatives at a Superfund site.

This study presents an evaluation of the risks due to the physical hazards associated with two remedial alternatives for a former chemical manufacturing facility in New Jersey. Both the on-site and off-site risk of work-related fatalities during remedy implementation and the risks of accident or accident-related fatalities during the off-site transport of site-related materials were evaluated. The two remedial alternatives evaluated were on-site containment and excavation with off-site incineration. The risk of at least one fatality due to a work-related accident was estimated for on-site activities associated with each remedial alternative, and for off-site incineration. The risks of at least one accident and of one accident-related fatality were calculated with accident and fatality data from the U.S. Department of Transportation. In addition, the risk of at least one accident that might potentially affect a natural resource (e.g., river, lake, or national park) was evaluated. This evaluation indicates that the risk of a work-related fatality is over an order of magnitude higher, and the risk of an accident or accident-related fatality is over three orders of magnitude higher, for the excavation/off-site incineration remedial alternative than for the on-site containment alternative. Overall, this study indicates that the physical hazards associated with excavation and off-site incineration are much greater than those associated with on-site containment for this site. Therefore, if a choice between the two remedial alternatives were to be made based solely on physical hazards and accident risk, the on-site containment alternative would be more protective of human health and the environment than the excavation/off-site incineration alternative.

Accidents, Occupational↗

An environmental hazard assessment of low-level dermal exposure to hexavalent chromium in solution among chromium-sensitized volunteers.

To evaluate the potential for elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis from contact with standing water in the environment, 26 persons known to be allergic to hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] were exposed to 25 to 29 mg/L Cr(VI) by immersion of one arm for 30 minutes per day on 3 consecutive days in a potassium dichromate bath. Sixteen of the 26 volunteers demonstrated either no or an equivocal response to the Cr(VI) challenge. Ten of the volunteers developed a few papules or vesicles (1 to approximately 15), mild redness, and pruritus on the Cr(VI)-challenged arm. Histopathological examination of the papules revealed spongiosis and perieccrine and perivascular inflammation. The responses were diagnosed as acute perieccrine reactions. It was concluded that exposure to similar concentrations of Cr(VI) in the environment does not pose an allergic contact dermatitis hazard, even to Cr-sensitized persons.

Biopsy↗

In vitro reduction kinetics of hexavalent chromium in human blood.

This study examines time- and concentration-dependent changes in distribution of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] and total chromium [Cr-(TOT)] in reconstituted human blood following addition of potassium dichromate. Fresh human blood stabilized with EDTA was obtained from human volunteers soon after meal ingestion and at 2.5 h after a light meal (herein defined as "2.5-h fasted" conditions). Cr(VI) spiked into plasma under 2.5-h fasting conditions at 3.0-12.5 micrograms/L was stable for several hours, indicating a lack of appreciable reductive capacity in isolated plasma. Spiked plasma following a recent meal exhibited immediate but variable reduction of Cr(VI) up to 300 micrograms/L. When the spiked plasma was recombined with the red blood cell (RBC) fraction, rapid reduction occurred in both the plasma and the RBC fractions based on measurement of Cr(VI) and Cr(TOT). The data indicate that plasma reduction capacity is enhanced by a recent meal, but may be overwhelmed at Cr(VI) concentrations between 2000 and 10,000 micrograms/L. These data also suggest that the RBC fraction apparently has the capacity to reduce Cr(VI) at concentrations in blood up to 15,000 micrograms/L, and that the rate of Cr(VI) uptake into RBCs may not exceed the rate of intracellular reduction at these concentrations.

Chromates↗

The prevalence of chromium allergy in the United States and its implications for setting soil cleanup: a cost-effectiveness case study.

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] elicits allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) among previously sensitized individuals, and some regulatory agencies have suggested the need for Cr(VI) soil standards that are protective of this health end point. To assess the cost effectiveness of implementing ACD-based standards, it is necessary to understand the prevalence of Cr(VI) sensitivity in the general population. More than 30 published studies from 1950 to 1997 were reviewed to determine the prevalence of Cr(VI) sensitivity. No random survey of the general United States (U.S.) population has been performed to date, but the prevalence of Cr(VI) sensitization among North American clinical cohorts (e.g., patients of dermatological clinics) was reported to be 1% in 1996. The prevalence of Cr(VI) sensitivity among the general U.S. population is estimated to be 0.08%. This estimate was calculated by dividing the current U.S. clinical prevalence estimate (1%) by the ratio of Cr(VI) sensitization in clinical vs general populations in The Netherlands (12). A retrospective cost/benefit analysis for sites in Jersey City, New Jersey, suggests that remediation of soils to protect against elicitation of ACD in sensitized individuals is not a cost-effective use of public health resources.

Carcinogens, Environmental↗

Preliminary assessment of PCB risks to human and ecological health in the lower Passaic River.

Concentrations of Aroclor mixtures and specific polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners were measured in surface sediments and aquatic biota (striped bass fillet, mummichog, and blue crab muscle and hepatopancreas) collected from the lower Passaic River. Several of the 47 surface sediment samples contained Aroclor concentrations that exceeded a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) benchmark level for "total PCBs" (22.7 micrograms/kg). Each of the 18 PCB congeners analyzed in aquatic biota was detected in one or more tissue samples, and numerous congeners were detected in every sample (IUPAC numbers 77, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 156, 157, 167, and 189). PCB congener concentrations were similar to those that have been reported in fish from other waterways that contain elevated levels of PCBs. Congener 118 was present at the highest concentration in almost all samples, and constituted 14-60% of the total PCB mass (sum of all congener masses) measured in any given tissue sample. In spite of the prevalence of PCB congeners in biota tissues (up to 1314 micrograms/kg total PCBs), Aroclors were not detected in bass or crab samples at a limit of detection of 33-55 micrograms/kg. This anomaly may be due to selective degradation of certain PCB congeners that are used to analytically recognize and quantitate Aroclors. Using the measured sediment concentrations, a food web model accurately predicted blue crab muscle concentrations of individual PCB congeners (typically within a factor of two) and was also fairly accurate for mummichog (typically within an order of magnitude). Concentrations in striped bass fillet were underestimated by factors of approximately 20-140. Increased cancer risk estimates associated with fish and crab consumption were obtained using four different methods. Using Aroclor tissue concentrations (one-half the limit of detection) and an Aroclor slope factor, total risks were 2.6 x 10(-6); using the "total PCB" measurements and an Aroclor slope factor, total risks were 1.9 x 10(-5); the "PCB-TEQ" method yielded total risks of 6.5 x 10(-4); and USEPA's recent suggested approach for evaluating "dioxin-like" and non-"dioxin-like" effects resulted in a total risk of 6.6 x 10(-4). This wide range in risk estimates indicates that it is critical to the risk management decision-making process that data requirements and risk assessment objectives be carefully evaluated early in the investigation process.

Animals↗

Urinary chromium as a biological marker of environmental exposure: what are the limitations?

Public concern has mounted recently about environmental exposures to chromium in soil, tap water, and ambient air. In response, agencies charged with protecting public health have attempted to study exposure by monitoring urinary chromium levels among potentially exposed populations. While urinary biomonitoring of occupationally exposed workers has been successfully used to assess high-level inhalation exposures in the workplace, evaluating low-level environmental exposures has been problematic. Due to these problems, before an extensive biological monitoring study is conducted of those exposed to low levels of environmental chromium, several issues must be resolved. First, exposures to chromium must occur at the same time as sampling, because the biological half-life of chromium in urine is very short (less than 2 days). Second, reduced bioavailability and bioaccessibility via the oral and dermal routes of exposure limit the capacity of urinary monitoring to measure environmental exposures (e.g., systemic dose is too small to be measured). Third, the dose of chromium must be sufficient such that it may be reliably measured above background levels in urine (range of 0.2 to 2 microg/liter) and above the analytical limit of detection (0.2 microg/liter). Fourth, the inter- and intrapersonal variability in background levels of urinary chromium is known to be significant and influenced by food and beverage intake, smoking, and exercise. Thus, the role of each factor must be carefully understood. Finally, it is imperative to have developed a complete understanding of the clinical significance of elevated urinary chromium levels before a study is performed, because higher than background levels, in and of themselves, are not indicative of a significant health concern. The route of exposure, valence of chromium to which people were exposed, exposure time, and duration must all be understood before the biological data can be implemented. We have conducted a total of nine human exposure studies over the past 3 years in an attempt to understand the kinetics of chromium and the impact on urinary, red blood cell (RBC), and plasma biomonitoring programs. The results of these studies are described here and our recommendations are offered for how to design and implement a urinary chromium biomonitoring study. In our view, given some evidence that the dose of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is sufficient to be measurable above background concentrations of total chromium [Cr(III) and Cr(VI)], duplicated measurements of chromium in plasma and RBCs are, in most cases, a more definitive gauge of environmental exposure than urinary biomonitoring.

Biological Availability↗

Human ingestion of chromium (VI) in drinking water: pharmacokinetics following repeated exposure.

Regulatory agencies have established safe drinking water concentrations for hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] based in part on the presumed capability of human gastric juices to rapidly reduce Cr(VI) to nontoxic trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] prior to systemic absorption. This study examines dose-related pharmacokinetics in humans following repeated oral exposure to Cr(VI) in drinking water. In particular, we sought to examine whether plausible drinking water exposures to Cr(VI) caused a sustained increase in red blood cell chromium levels, a specific marker for systemic uptake of Cr(VI). Adult male volunteers ingested a liter (in three volumes of 333 ml, at approximate 6-hr intervals) of deionized water containing Cr(VI) concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10.0 mg/liter. Samples of urine, plasma, and red blood cells were collected and analyzed for chromium. A dose-related increase in urinary chromium excretion was observed in all volunteers. Red blood cell and plasma chromium concentrations became elevated in certain individuals at the highest doses. The RBC chromium profiles suggest that the ingested Cr(VI) was reduced to Cr(III) before entering the bloodstream, since the chromium concentration in the RBCs dropped rapidly postexposure. These findings suggest that the human gastrointestinal tract has the capacity to reduce ingested Cr(VI) following ingestion of up to 1 liter of water containing 10.0 mg/liter of Cr(VI), which is consistent with USEPA's position that the Cr(VI) drinking water standard of 0.10 mg Cr(VI)/liter is below the reductive capacity of the stomach.

Administration, Oral↗

Ingestion of chromium(VI) in drinking water by human volunteers: absorption, distribution, and excretion of single and repeated doses.

This study examines the magnitude of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] absorption, distribution, and excretion following oral exposure to 5 and 10 mg Cr(VI)/L in drinking water administered as a single bolus dose (0.5 L swallowed in 2 min) or for 3 d at a dosage of 1 L/d (3 doses of 0.33 L each day, at 6-h intervals). Adult male volunteers ingested deionized water containing various concentrations of potassium chromate, and samples of urine, plasma, and red blood cells (RBCs) were collected and analyzed for total chromium throughout the studies. In the bolus dose studies, a fairly consistent pattern of urinary chromium excretion was observed, with an average half life of about 39 h. However, 4-d total urinary chromium excretion and peak concentrations in urine and blood varied considerably among the 5 volunteers. Studies of repeated exposure to smaller volumes ingested at a more gradual rate (i.e., 0.33 L over 5-15 min) showed similar urinary chromium excretion patterns but generally lower chromium uptake/excretion. Given that sustained elevations in RBC chromium levels provide a specific indication of chromium absorption in the hexavalent state, these data suggest that virtually all (> 99.7%) of the ingested Cr(VI) at 5 and 10 mg Cr(VI)/L was reduced to Cr(III) before entering the blood-stream. The interindividual differences in total chromium uptake and excretion are plausibly explained by ingestion of appreciable doses on an empty stomach, which likely results in the formation of well-absorbed Cr(III) organic complexes in gastrointestinal tissues and possibly the blood. The lack of any clinical indications of toxicity in the volunteers and the patterns of blood uptake and urinary excretion of chromium are consistent with a predominant uptake of Cr(III) organic complexes [derived from Cr(VI)] that are excreted more slowly than inorganic forms of Cr(III). Therefore, it appears that the endogenous reducing agents within the upper gastrointestinal tract and the blood provide sufficient reducing potential to prevent any substantial systemic uptake of Cr(VI) following drinking-water exposures at 5-10 mg Cr(VI)/L. Based on these data, the chemical environment in the gastrointestinal tract and the blood is effective even under relative fasting conditions in reducing Cr(VI) to one or more forms of Cr(III).

Absorption↗

Background air concentrations of Cr(VI) in Hudson County, New Jersey: implications for setting health-based standards for Cr(VI) in soil.

An accurate measure of "background" airborne Cr(VI) concentrations will be necessary to derive site-specific health-based Cr(VI) soil concentrations at sites containing chromite ore processing residues (COPR) in Hudson County, NJ. To date, no such data have been collected in New Jersey. This paper describes an air sampling program designed to measure background concentrations of Cr(VI) in Hudson County and compare those concentrations with the air sampling results obtained previously at 30 COPR sites in Hudson County. Background airborne Cr(VI) concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 3.8 ng/m3 with an arithmetic mean of 1.2 ng/m3. Comparisons of the airborne Cr(VI) concentrations previously measured at 30 COPR sites indicated that more than two-thirds of the sites had mean airborne Cr(VI) concentrations that were not statistically significantly greater than background. Our findings suggest that, in general, vehicle disturbance is required for significant soil suspension to occur at these sites. Since airborne Cr(VI) concentrations at many of these sites are close to background, it is critical that background airborne Cr(VI) levels be considered when deriving health-based soil standards at the COPR sites.

Air Pollution↗

Identification of an accurate soil suspension/dispersion modeling method for use in estimating health-based soil cleanup levels of hexavalent chromium in chromite ore processing residues.

The primary health concern associated with chromite ore processing residues (COPR) at sites in Hudson County, NJ, is the inhalation of Cr(VI) suspended from surface soils. Since health-based soil standards for Cr(VI) will be derived using the inhalation pathway, soil suspension modeling will be necessary to estimate site-specific, health-based soil cleanup levels (HBSCLs). The purpose of this study was to identify the most appropriate particulate emission and air dispersion models for estimating soil suspension at these sites based on their theoretical underpinnings, scientific acceptability, and past performance. The identified modeling approach, the AP-42 particulate emission model and the fugitive dust model (FDM), was used to calculate concentrations of airborne Cr(VI) and TSP at two COPR sites. These estimated concentrations were then compared to concentrations measured at each site. The TSP concentrations calculated using the AP-42/FDM soil suspension modeling approach were all within a factor of 3 of the measured concentrations. The majority of the estimated air concentrations were greater than the measured, indicating that the AP-42/FDM approach tends to overestimate on-site concentrations. The site-specific Cr(VI) HBSCLs for these two sites calculated using this conservative soil suspension modeling approach ranged from 190 to 420 mg/kg.

Chromium↗

Urinary chromium concentrations in humans following ingestion of safe doses of hexavalent and trivalent chromium: implications for biomonitoring.

In this study, we evaluate the significance of increased urinary chromium concentrations as a marker of chromium exposure and potential health risk. Six human volunteers ingested trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] and hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] at doses that are known to be safe but are much higher than typical dietary levels. The following dosing regimen was used: d 1-7, 200 micrograms/d chromium picolinate (a dietary supplement); d 8-10, Cr(VI) ingestion at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reference dose (RfD) of 0.005 mg/kg/d; d 11-13, no dose; d 14-16, Cr(III) ingestion at the U.S. EPA RfD of 1.0 mg/ kg/d; and d 17-18, postdose. Urine voids were collected throughout the dosing periods and analyzed for chromium. Our findings are as follows: (1) ingestion of 200 micrograms/d of chromium picolinate yielded significantly elevated urine concentrations such that each participant routinely exceeded background, (2) ingestion of the Cr(VI) RfD (0.005 mg/kg/d) yielded individual mean urinary chromium levels (1.2-23 micrograms/L) and a pooled mean urinary chromium level (2.4 micrograms/L) that significantly exceeded background, and (3) ingestion of the Cr(III) RfD yielded no significant increase in urinary chromium concentrations, indicating that little, if any, absorption occurred. Our work identified three critical issues that need to be accounted for in any future studies that will use urinary chromium as a marker of exposure. First, a minimum urinary chromium concentration of approximately 2 micrograms/L should be used as a screening level to critically identify individuals who may have experienced elevated exposures to chromium. Second, if Cr(III) levels in soils are known to be less than 80,000 ppm and the Cr(III) is insoluble, urinary chromium concentrations are not an appropriate marker of exposure. Third, newer forms of chromium supplements that contain organic forms of Cr(III) must be considered potential confounders and their contribution to residential chromium uptake must be carefully evaluated.

Administration, Oral↗

Absorption and elimination of trivalent and hexavalent chromium in humans following ingestion of a bolus dose in drinking water.

These studies investigate the magnitude and valence state of chromium absorbed following plausible drinking water exposures to chromium(VI). Four adult male volunteers ingested a single dose of 5 mg Cr (in 0.5 liters deionized water) in three choromium mixtures: (1) Cr(III) chloride (CrCl3), (2) potassium dichromate reduced with orange juice (cr(III)-OJ); and (3) potassium dichromate [Cr(VI)]. Blood and urine chromium levels were followed for 1-3 days prior to and up to 12 days after ingestion. The three mixtures showed quite different pharmacokinetic patterns. CrCl3 was poorly absorbed (estimated 0.13% bioavailability) and rapidly eliminated in urine (excretion half-life, approximately 10 hr), whereas Cr(III)-OJ was absorbed more efficiently (0.60% bioavailability) but more slowly (half-life, approximately 17 hr), and Cr(VI) had the highest bioavailability (6.9%) and the longest half-life (approximately 39 hr). All three chromium mixtures caused temporary elevations in red blood cell (RBC) and plasma chromium concentrations, but the magnitude and duration of elevation showed a clear trend (Cr(VI) > Cr(III)-OJ > CrCl3). The data suggest that nearly all the ingested Cr(VI) was reduced to Cr(III) before entering the bloodstream based on comparison to RBC and plasma chromium patterns in animals exposed to high doses of Cr(VI). These findings support our prior work which suggests that water-soluble organic complexes of Cr(III) formed during the reduction of Cr(VI) in vivo explain the patterns of blood uptake and urinary excretion in humans at drinking water concentrations of 10 mg/liter or less.

Administration, Oral↗

Biological relevance and consequences of chemical- or metal-induced DNA cross-linking.

A vast number of chemicals are known to induce mutagenesis and/or carcinogenesis in mammals. Although disruption of cellular nuclear material resulting ultimately in mutagenesis/carcinogenesis can be accomplished by various mechanisms, the search for biomarkers of chemical-induced toxicity continues. This review focuses on the ability of certain metals or chemicals to bind to DNA in a cross-link fashion in whole animal as well as under in vitro conditions. The methodologies currently used to determine DNA cross-linking are described. The biological relevance of the presence of chemical- or metal-induced DNA cross-linking as a measure of carcinogenesis in humans is still under debate, as there is no clear correlation between the disease and the DNA cross-link reaction.

Animals↗

Setting health-protective soil concentrations for dermal contact allergens: a proposed methodology.

Health-based cleanup goals for contaminated soils are typically established to protect potentially exposed individuals from increased incidences of cancer and serious noncancer effects. However, at least one regulatory agency has suggested that, for certain contact allergens such as hexavalent chromium, soil remedial goals should also consider the potential occurrence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in sensitized individuals (NJDEPE, 1992). To date, appropriate risk assessment methods for setting ACD-based soil concentrations have not been addressed in the scientific literature. This paper defines and discusses the three key data needs for establishing ACD-based soil concentrations: (1) dose-response data from human patch-testing studies, in which the patch concentrations are reported in terms of mass of allergen per unit area of skin, (2) accurate estimates of the degree to which soil adheres to skin on a soil mass per unit area of skin basis, and (3) accurate estimates of the degree to which the allergen leaches from soil into human sweat. The requisite basis for each of these factors and suggested methods for obtaining and evaluating the necessary data are presented. In addition, two example calculations are presented for setting ACD-based goals for hexavalent and trivalent chromium in chromite ore-processing residues.

Chromium↗