Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Kleinman

Publications and source records attributed to B Kleinman.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

The relative increase in skin temperature after stellate ganglion block is predictive of a complete sympathectomy of the hand.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although an increase in skin temperature of the hand implies sympathetic block after stellate ganglion block (SGB), it does not indicate complete sympathetic block unless accompanied by an absence of sweating because skin temperature may increase even with a partial sympathetic block. This study examined the efficacy of the SGB to block sweating in the hand and to determine if the magnitude of temperature change in the hand is predictive of a negative sweat test. METHODS: Fifty-nine SGBs were performed in 30 patients (15 women and 15 men) for diagnostic or therapeutic indications. Stellate ganglion block was performed via an anterior paratracheal approach at C6 using 15 mL 0.25% bupivacaine. Skin temperature was measured bilaterally on the index finger. A cobalt blue sweat test was performed bilaterally pre- and post-SGB on the middle finger. Successful sympathetic block after SGB was considered present when: (a) (change in ipsilateral temperature (postblock-preblock)] (Di)-[change in contralateral temperature] (Dc) > or = 1.5 degrees C; (b) Horner's syndrome present; and (c) sweat test changed from positive to negative. Logistical regression was applied to determine what value of Di - Dc could be used to predict a negative sweat test. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent (21/59) of blocks met all three criteria. Of the blocks where Di - Dc > or = 1.5 degrees C, 72% (21/29) had a negative sweat test post-SGB. Of the blocks where Di - Dc < 1.5 degrees C, 37% (11/30) had a negative sweat test postblock. If Di - Dc > or = 2.0 degrees C, a negative sweat test could be predicted with 69 +/- 12% sensitivity and 85 +/- 10% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Stellate ganglion block often fails to increase skin temperature in the ipsilateral more than the contralateral hand. A value of Di - Dc > or = 2.0 degrees C was a good predictor of a sympathetic block, but was not sufficient to guarantee a complete sympathetic block of the hand after SGB in all cases. An apparently successful SGB as measured by "usual" clinical criteria may not result in a complete sympathectomy of the hand as is often assumed. Therefore, if obtaining a sympathectomy is important for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, performing a sweat test provides important confirmatory evidence of the genuine success of the sympathetic block.

Adolescent↗

The recovery profile of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia with lidocaine, tetracaine, and bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical procedures previously considered too lengthy for the ambulatory surgery setting are now being performed during spinal anesthesia. The complete recovery profile of tetracaine and bupivacaine are now of interest but are not available in the literature. This study was conducted to compare times to ambulation, voiding, and complete block resolution, as well as the incidence of back and radicular pain, after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine. METHODS: Twelve adult volunteers underwent spinal anesthesia on three separate occasions with three local anesthetics (lidocaine 100 mg, bupivacaine 15 mg, and tetracaine 15 mg in hyperbaric solutions) in random order and in a double-blind fashion. A 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle was placed at the L2-3 interspace. The level of analgesia to pinprick was determined moving cephalad in the midclavicular line until a dermatome was reached at which the prick felt as sharp as over an unblocked dermatome. One dermatome caudad to this point was recorded every 5 minutes as the level of analgesia. We also recorded the times to voiding, unassisted ambulation, and complete resolution of sacral anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no difference between tetracaine and bupivacaine in time taken for two- and four-segment regression of the analgesia level. However, times to ambulation and complete resolution of the block were significantly shorter with bupivacaine then with tetracaine. With lidocaine, times to four-segment regression, ambulation, voiding, and complete regression of the block were significantly shorter than with bupivacaine and tetracaine. Time to two-segment regression did not differ among local anesthetics. Back and radicular pain symptoms were reported by three subjects after lidocaine subarachnoid block but not after tetracaine or bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: Among individual subjects, lidocaine exhibited the shortest recovery profile. However, the recovery profiles of the three anesthetics were very variable between subjects. Time to meeting discharge criteria after bupivacaine or tetracaine was faster in a few subjects than that after lidocaine in other subjects. For ambulatory anesthesia, times to two- and four-segment regression do not accurately predict time to readiness for discharge after spinal anesthesia.

Adult↗