Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B K Ballmer-Weber

Publications and source records attributed to B K Ballmer-Weber.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Cutaneous symptoms after ingestion of pollen-associated foodstuffs].

The molecular basis of pollen-related food allergy is the marked similarity in sequence and structure of allergenic proteins in pollens and food plants. In affected patients, specific IgE antibodies are primarily directed against pollen allergens but then recognize homologous allergens in plant food. In Central and Northern Europe up to 80% of birch pollen allergic subjects suffer from a food allergy, in particular to stone- and pip fruits, nuts and vegetables. The main clinical manifestation of pollen-related food allergy is the oral allergy syndrome (OAS), a contact urticaria of the oral mucosa. Other features include contact urticaria of the hands in those handling the foods, as well as generalized urticaria and angioedema following ingestion. The impact of pollen-related food allergy on the severity and course of atopic eczema remain to be elucidated.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

A critical assessment of allergen component-based in vitro diagnosis in cherry allergy across Europe.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy to cherry occurs throughout Europe, typically with restricted oral reactions in the central and northern parts but with frequent systemic reactions in the Mediterranean region. Previous studies have demonstrated insufficient sensitivity of commercially available cherry extract reagents in the diagnosis of cherry allergy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of specific IgE tests based on recombinant cherry allergens in comparison with an extract-based assay and to skin prick test (SPT). A secondary objective was to analyse the frequency of systemic reactions in cherry-allergic subjects across Europe, including the largest population of LTP-sensitized subjects from central Europe studied to date. METHODS: A total of 186 subjects from central Europe and Spain were studied. Serum IgE was analysed with ImmunoCAP tests carrying rPru av 1, 3 and 4, combined and separately, and cherry extract. RESULTS: Among the central European cherry allergics, the mix of rPru av 1, 3 and 4 had a sensitivity of 95%, compared with 65% for cherry extract, and the IgE binding capacity of the recombinant mix was considerably higher. The sensitivity of the two tests was more comparable in the Spanish population, 95% and 86%, respectively. The recombinant allergen ImmunoCAP equalled SPT in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Consistent with previous reports, major geographic differences in sensitization pattern and prevalence of systemic reactions were found. A significantly higher rate of systemic reactions was found in Spanish patients sensitized to Pru av 3 whereas German patients sensitized to LTP only had oral allergy syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The recombinant cherry allergen ImmunoCAP is a highly sensitive diagnostic tool, clearly superior to any diagnostic method based on cherry extract. Three cherry allergens are sufficient for detecting sensitization in 95% of cherry-allergic subjects. Systemic reactions are common in LTP-sensitized individuals but seem to require at least one additional causative factor.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Screening the allergenic repertoires of wheat and maize with sera from double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge positive patients.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy to wheat and maize is an increasing factor of deterioration of life quality, especially childhood and can, in rare cases, even induce anaphylaxis. Although omega-5 gliadin from wheat and maize lipid transfer protein have been characterized as major cereal allergens on the molecular level, the list of food allergens is far to be complete. METHODS: To identify the IgE-binding repertoires of wheat and maize we screened respective cDNA libraries displayed on phage surface with sera from patients with a confirmed food allergy. The study included six patients with a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to wheat, nine patients with a positive DBPCFC to maize, and six patients with anaphylactic reactions after ingestion of wheat. RESULTS: The enriched sequences encoding IgE-binding proteins showed heterogeneous repertoires for both, wheat and maize. The selected wheat repertoire yielded 12, the maize repertoire 11 open reading frames. Among these we identified allergens belonging to already characterized allergens families, such as gliadin, profilin and beta-expansin. Besides, we found novel proteins with high cross-reactive potential, such as thioredoxins, as well as sequences that had so far not been related to cereal allergy at all. The IgE-binding capacity of some selected proteins was evaluated in vitro and cross-reactivity was demonstrated by competition ELISA. CONCLUSION: With regard to the heterogeneity of the characterized sequences as well as to the biochemical nature of the new allergens detected we conclude that wheat and maize-related food allergy is more complex than so far anticipated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Safety of specific immunotherapy using a four-hour ultra-rush induction scheme in bee and wasp allergy.

BACKGROUND: Ultra-rush induction of immunotherapy with Hymenoptera venom is a reliable and efficacious alternative to the rush induction protocol, though not widely used in European countries yet. Its safety, however, has been intensively discussed over the last few years. The aim of this retrospective case study was to examine the rate of allergic side-effects during our four-hour ultra-rush hymenoptera venom induction regimen. We evaluated risk factors for observed side-effects such as age, gender, severity of previous insect sting reactions according to the H.L. Mueller classification, concentration of venom inducing positive skin tests, level of specific IgE, serum tryptase concentration, and hymenoptera venom used for treatment. METHODS: 67 outpatients with Hymenoptera venom allergy received 80 courses of ultra-rush immunotherapy. Diagnosis and selection of patients for venom immunotherapy were carried out according to the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. We applied a four-hour regimen, and local or systemic reactions were documented. RESULTS: In 78 courses (97.5%) the maintenance dose of 111.1 microg was reached within 4 hours and it was tolerated in 82.5% without any hypersensitivity reaction. Allergic side-effects were observed in only 17.5% (n=14): four severe local reactions (5%), eight grade I (10%) and two grade II (2.5%) systemic reactions. There was no significant difference in the number of systemic reactions comparing patients receiving wasp or honeybee venom extract. The number of systemic reactions was neither higher in patients with a severe prior insect sting reaction (grade III or IV) nor dependent on age, gender, skin test reaction, level of specific IgE or tryptase. Epinephrine as rescue medication was never needed. Interestingly, patients with a severe prior wasp sting reaction showed a significantly lower incidence of allergic side-effects during ultra-rush immunotheraphy with wasp venom extract as compared to grade III or IV honeybee venom allergic patients. CONCLUSION: Our ultra-rush immunotherapy induction regimen shows a low incidence of systemic reactions. It proved to be safe and convenient for the patient, as it could be applied in a four-hour outpatient regimen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Component-resolved in vitro diagnosis in carrot allergy: does the use of recombinant carrot allergens improve the reliability of the diagnostic procedure?

BACKGROUND: In Europe, pollen-related food allergy is the most frequent form of food allergy in adults. Reliability of current diagnostic procedures, however, is poor and therapeutic options are not available. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we created a panel of recombinant allergens from carrot and evaluated its potential in component-resolved in vitro diagnosis of carrot allergy. METHODS: Recombinant (r) Dau c 1.0104, Dau c 1.0201 and Dau c 4 were cloned by a polymerase chain reaction strategy, expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. Carrot lipid transfer protein (LTP) was expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Sera from 40 carrot-allergic patients were investigated. Twenty-one birch pollen-allergic subjects with negative open provocation to carrot and 20 non-allergic subjects were included as controls. IgE binding to recombinant allergens as well as to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD) was measured by ELISA. Cross-reactivity between Dau c 1 isoforms and Bet v 1 was assayed by ELISA inhibition. Biological activity of the recombinant carrot allergens was assessed by histamine release assay and peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulation. RESULTS: Ninety-eight percent of the carrot-allergic patients were positive to at least one recombinant allergen; 98% reacted to rDau c 1.0104, 65% to rDau c 1.0201, 38% to rDau c 4 and 20% had IgE against CCD. Specificity using the recombinant allergens was high when compared with non-allergic controls, but low compared with birch-sensitized subjects without carrot allergy. Sensitization to Dau c 1.0201, however, proved to be highly specific for clinically relevant sensitization. Inhibition assays indicated the absence of LTP in carrot root extract, and epitope diversity between Dau c 1.0104, Dau c 1.0201 and Bet v 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our panel of recombinant allergens from carrot can provide a standardized tool for in vitro diagnosis of carrot allergy, and for epitope studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Birch pollen-related food allergy to legumes: identification and characterization of the Bet v 1 homologue in mungbean (Vigna radiata), Vig r 1.

BACKGROUND: Recently allergic reactions to legumes mediated by Bet v 1-homologous food allergens were described for soy and peanut. In this study we assessed allergic reactions to another legume, to mungbean seedlings, and identified its Bet v 1-homologous allergen Vig r 1. METHODS: Ten patients were selected who had a history of allergic reactions to mungbean seedlings and a respiratory allergy to birch pollen. The Bet v 1 homologue in mungbean seedlings, Vig r 1, was cloned by a PCR strategy, expressed in Escherichia coli, and purified by preparative SDS-PAGE. In all sera, specific IgE against birch pollen, Bet v 1, Bet v 2, Vig r 1, and the Bet v 1 homologues in soy (Gly m 4) and cherry (Pru av 1) was determined by CAP-FEIA. Cross-reactivity of specific IgE with Vig r 1, Bet v 1, Gly m 4, and Pru av 1 was assessed by immunoblot inhibition. Expression of Vig r 1 during development of mungbean seedlings and under wounding stress was analysed by immunoblotting. The Vig r 1 double band was analysed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). RESULTS: All patients were sensitized to birch pollen and Bet v 1, 20% to Bet v 2, and 90% to Gly m 4. Seventy percent of the patients showed IgE binding to a double band at 15 kDa in mungbean extract that was inhibited after pre-incubation of sera with rBet v 1. PCR cloning revealed that the mungbean homologue of Bet v 1 had a molecular weight of 16.2 kDa, a calculated pI of 4.6% and 42.8% amino acid sequence identity with Bet v 1. MS analysis confirmed similarity of the double band with the deduced Vig r 1 sequence, but also indicated the existence of other Vig r 1 isoforms. ImmunoCAP analysis detected IgE against Vig r 1 in 80% of the sera. IgE binding to Vig r 1 was inhibited with Gly m 4 in six of six and with rPru av 1 in four of six patients. Vig r 1 expression occurred during development of seedlings and was increased by wounding stress. CONCLUSIONS: Food allergy to mungbean seedlings can be caused by primary sensitization to birch pollen and is mediated by Vig r 1 in the majority of the patients with birch pollen-related allergy to mungbean seedlings.

Allergens↗
PubMed2003

Molecular cloning and immunological characterisation of potential allergens from the mould Fusarium culmorum.

BACKGROUND: High quality and stability are essential requirements of commercial allergen preparations. Recently we have demonstrated the very low stability of protein allergens in an extract of the ubiquitous mould Fusarium culmorum. OBJECTIVE: The present study was performed to identify, isolate and characterise allergens of F. culmorum as a basis for a stable allergenic reference material. In addition, the significance of IgE binding to carbohydrate structures in the natural allergen source was investigated. METHODS: Sera of 52 subjects with suspected mould allergy were used to determine the IgE binding capacity of a commercial F. culmorum extract and an in-house extract by immunoblotting and enzyme allergo sorbent test (EAST). Binding of IgE-antibodies to putative carbohydrate structures located on glycoproteins was verified by periodate treatment of blot strips prior to immunodetection. A complementary (c)DNA expression library of F. culmorum was prepared and screened for IgE-binding clones using sera from F. culmorum-sensitive individuals. Positive clones were isolated, and the open reading frames were subcloned into expression vectors to produce recombinant proteins in E. coli. The recombinant proteins were tested for their IgE reactivity by immunoblotting and EAST. RESULTS: Using the in-house extract for EAST and immunoblot experiments 44% (23/52) of the sera were found to contain F. culmorum-specific IgE antibodies. Compared to the in-house extract, nearly all IgE-reactivties in the range of 15-30kD were lacking in the commercial preparation as examined by immunoblot analysis and only 10% (5/52) of the sera were found to contain F. culmorum-specific IgE by EAST. IgE binding to putative carbohydrate structures was observed in the high molecular weight range in approximately 50% (12/23) of the IgE-positive sera by both extracts. Three IgE binding clones were isolated from the cDNA-library. One clone (Fus c 1) is homologous to the highly conserved 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2 described as minor allergen in other moulds. The second (Fus c 2) shows high similarity (64%) to a respiratory allergen from the basidiomycete Coprinus comatus (Cop c 2). The third clone (Fus c 3) was not related to known proteins. With sera from 26 individuals sensitised to F. culmorum the IgE prevalence of recombinant proteins rFus c 1, rFus c 2 and rFus c 3 was found to be 35, 50, and 15%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: F. culmorum may represent an underestimated source of aeroallergens. In contrast to highly labile and poorly standardised F. culmorum extracts, the new recombinant allergens may serve as stable allergenic reference material. A combination of rFus c 1 and rFus c 2 is suitable to diagnose 81% of F. culmorum-sensitised subjects. IgE reactivity to putative carbohydrate structures is relatively frequent, and can not be detected by these allergens.

Allergens↗
PubMed2003

Roasted hazelnuts--allergenic activity evaluated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to hazelnuts is a common example of birch pollen related food allergy. Symptoms upon ingestion are often confined to the mouth and throat, but severe systemic reactions have been described in some patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the reduction in allergenicity by roasting of the nuts. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) with roasted hazelnuts (140 degrees C, 40 min) were performed in 17 birch pollen allergic patients with DBPCFC-confirmed food allergy to raw hazelnuts. The effect of roasting was further evaluated by skin prick test (SPT), histamine release (HR), measurement of specific IgE, and IgE-inhibition experiments. RESULTS: In 5/17 patients the DBPCFC with the roasted nuts were positive. The symptoms were generally mild and included OAS (oral allergy syndrome) in all patients. Roasting of the nuts significantly reduced the allergenic activity evaluated by SPT, HR, specific IgE, and IgE-inhibition. Immunoblotting experiments with recombinant hazelnut allergens showed sensitization against Cor a 1.04 in 16/17 patients and against Cor a 2 in 7/17 patients. None of the patients were sensitized to Cor a 8. Challenge-positive patients did not differ from the rest in IgE-binding pattern. CONCLUSIONS: All the applied methods indicated that roasting of hazelnuts reduces the allergenicity, but since 5/17 birch pollen allergic patients were DBPCFC-positive to the roasted nuts, ingestion of roasted hazelnuts or products containing roasted hazelnuts can not be considered safe for a number of hazelnut allergic consumers. For patients with a history of severe allergic symptoms upon ingestion of hazelnuts, thorough and conscientious food labelling of hazelnuts and hazelnut residues is essential.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Cloning and molecular and immunological characterisation of two new food allergens, Cap a 2 and Lyc e 1, profilins from bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) and Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).

BACKGROUND: Profilins are recognised by IgE of about 20% of patients allergic to birch pollen and plant foods. They are ubiquitous intracellular proteins highly cross-reactive among plant species. Therefore, they were called panallergens and are made responsible for cross-sensitisation between plant pollen and food. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to clone the cDNAs encoding profilins from bell pepper and tomato, to produce and purify the recombinant proteins and to compare their IgE-binding capacities to those of the natural proteins. METHODS: cDNA clones coding for profilin were obtained by RT-PCR from total RNA of tomato and bell pepper fruits, sequenced and expressed as non-fusion proteins in ESCHERICHIA COLI. The recombinant profilins were subsequently purified and tested for IgE-binding and inhibition capacity with sera from 34 food-allergic patients. Possible oligomerisation of recombinant profilins was investigated by HPLC analysis and its influence on IgE binding assayed by ELISA. RESULTS: The open reading frame from both profilins encompasses 393 bp with a predicted molecular mass of 14,184 kD and a pI of 4.44 for bell pepper profilin (Cap a 2) and 14,257 kD and a pI of 4.46 for the profilin from tomato (Lyc e 1). The two protein sequences display 91% identity, whereas tomato profilin from pollen shares only 75% identity with tomato fruit profilin. Eleven out of 34 food-allergic patients (32%) display IgE binding to both purified profilins. Preincubation of a serum pool with either purified rCap a 2 or rLyc e 1 nearly abolished IgE binding to natural Cap a 2 and Lyc e 1, respectively. In addition, purified recombinant Cap a 2 was able to inhibit IgE-binding to rLyc e 1 by approximately 50%, whereas rLyc e 1 completely blocked IgE-binding to rCap a 2 in cross-inhibition assays. HPLC analysis showed that in solution Cap a 2 and Lyc e 1 can be found predominantly as dimers, which can be partially reduced to monomers by addition of dithiothreitol (DTT). In ELISA DTT-treated Lyc e 1 displayed a clearly lower IgE-binding capacity than untreated profilin. CONCLUSIONS: Purified rCap a 2 and rLyc e 1 proved to be valuable tools for studying cross-reactivity to profilins in patients allergic to pollen and food.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of four variants of a major allergen in hazelnut (Corylus avellana) Cor a 1.04 with the major hazel pollen allergen Cor a 1.01.

The aim of this study was to produce the Bet v 1-related major hazelnut allergen Cor a 1.0401 and variants thereof as recombinant allergens, and to compare their immuno-reactivity with the major hazel pollen allergen using sera of patients whose hazelnut allergy recently was confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) in a multicenter study. Total RNA was isolated from immature hazelnuts and transcribed into cDNA. Full length coding DNA obtained by PCR-strategy was subcloned into pTYB11 vector and expressed in E. coli ER2566 cells. Native non-fusion target proteins were purified by DTT-induced self-cleavage of the intein-tagged N-terminal fusion proteins. IgE reactivity of the recombinant allergens was tested by enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST), EAST-inhibition, immunoblot-inhibition and histamine release assays. Four recombinant allergens were produced showing deduced amino acid sequence identities among each other of 97-99%, and were considered as variants Cor a 1.0401 (GenBank Accession no.: AF136945), Cor a 1.0402 (AF323973), Cor a 1.0403 (AF323974) and Cor a 1.0404 (AF323975). Cor a 1.0402 and 03 only differed in a C4S exchange. Cor a 1.0404 had a unique proline residue in position 99. Surprisingly, only 63% identity was revealed with hazel pollen Cor a 1. EAST with 43 sera of patients with positive DBPCFC to hazelnut indicated IgE reactivity to Cor a 1.0401 in 95% of the sera, to Cor a 1.0402 in 93%, to Cor a 1.0403 in 91%, and in only 74% of the sera to the proline variant Cor a 1.0404. The allergenic activity of the four variants was confirmed by histamine release assays in 15 hazelnut-allergic patients stimulated with the four variants and controls. Eleven sera were positive with extract from native hazelnut, 13 with rCor a 1.0401, 12 with rCor a 1.0402, 11 with rCor a 1.0403, and only two with rCor a 1.0404 containing the proline exchange. The high IgE binding variant Cor a 1.0401 showed only partial IgE cross-reactivity with pollen Cor a 1. IgE-binding and histamine release capacity led to a concordant ranking of the allergenic activity of the recombinant variants: Cor a 1.0401>Cor a 1.0402 and 03>Cor a 1.0404 (the proline variant). Similar results for Cor a 1.0402 and 03 suggest a minor influence in IgE binding of cysteine in position 4, whereas proline in position 99 appears to be responsible for the decrease in IgE reactivity in Cor a 1.0404. It appears that the epitopes of hazelnut Cor a 1.04 are less related to pollen Cor a 1 than to Bet v 1 from birch pollen. Low IgE binding variants or mutants of Cor a 1.04 are candidate compounds for developing a novel and safe approach of specific immunotherapy of hazelnut allergy.

Allergens↗
PubMed2002

Influence of food processing on the allergenicity of celery: DBPCFC with celery spice and cooked celery in patients with celery allergy.

BACKGROUND: Celery root is often consumed in a processed form as a cooked vegetable or as a spice. So far, however, there has been no information about the allergenicity of processed celery in celery-allergic patients. METHODS: In 12 patients with a history of allergic reactions to raw or raw and cooked celery, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) with raw celery (n = 10), cooked celery (110 degrees C/15 min; n = 11), and celery spice (n = 5) were performed. Nine patients underwent an open mucosal challenge with four samples of canned celery retorted at Co-values (cooking effect) of 7.45-76.07 (corresponding to the time periods in minutes at a thermal influence of 100 degrees C). IgE immunoblot analysis of celery extract was performed with sera of all challenged patients. The thermal stability of celery allergen was investigated by enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST) inhibition. Furthermore, intraperitoneal immunization of mice followed by a rat basophil leukemia (RBL) cell mediator release assay was used as a biological in vitro model to assess the allergenicity of processed celery. RESULTS: Six out of 11 patients showed a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery and five out of five patients to celery spice. Allergenicity of celery was preserved in four patients with a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery even if celery was treated at a Co-value of 76.07. Patients with positive DBPCFC to cooked celery reacted to known celery allergens (Api g 1, Api g 4, cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants CCD). EAST inhibition showed that heat resistance of celery allergens decreases in the following order: CCD > Api g 4 > Api g 1. Accordingly, five of six patients with a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery were sensitized to profilin and/or CCD. The murine model reflected the reactivity of patients sensitized to the major allergen Api g 1. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In a subset of patients with a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery, celery remains allergenic even after extended thermal treatment (76.07 min/100 degrees C). 2) Celery spice is allergenic for patients with an allergy to raw celery. 3) RBL cells sensitized with mouse IgE to raw celery may serve as a useful tool for screening the potential allergenicity of heat-processed products containing celery.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Allergens in celery and zucchini.

The aim of this study was to confirm allergy to celery tuber and to zucchini, for the first time, by DBPCFC, and to identify the allergens recognized by IgE from DBPCFC-positive patients. Therefore, raw vegetables were hidden in a broccoli drink, and a DBPCFC-procedure was developed that consisted of a spit and swallow protocol, making sure that the procedure was safe for the patients and that reactions strictly localized to the oral cavity as well as systemic reactions could be reproduced by DBPCFC. The allergens in celery and zucchini extract were identified by immunoblot inhibition using allergen extracts, recombinant allergens and purified N-glycans as inhibitors. Celery allergy was confirmed in 69% (22/32) of subjects with a positive case history. Four subjects with a history of allergic reactions to zucchini had a positive DBPCFC to this vegetable. During DBPCFC, systemic reactions were provoked in 50% (11/22) of the patients to celery, and in 3/4 of the zucchini-allergic patients. The Bet v 1-related major celery allergen was detected by IgE of 59% (13/22) of the patients. Cross-reactive carbohydrate epitopes (CCD) bound IgE of 55% (12/22) of the celery-allergic patients and in 2/4 of the subjects with zucchini allergy. Profilin was a food allergen in celery in 23% (5/22) and in zucchini in 2/4 of the cases. A zucchini-specific allergen was detected by IgE from one patient. We conclude that ubiquitous cross-reactive structures are important in allergy to both, celery and zucchini, and that a specific association to birch pollen allergy exists in allergy to celery (mediated by Api g 1), but not in zucchini allergy.

Allergens↗
PubMed2001

[Foods as allergy inducers].

Small children are usually sensitized through the gastrointestinal tract to chemically stable food proteins such as milk, eggs, fish and soy. In adults, however, food allergy is mostly mediated by a primary inhalatory sensitization and because of IgE-crossreactivity by a secondary allergy to food allergens. Thus, in adults a completely different pattern of predominant food allergens is encountered. The leading food allergens are fruits and vegetable as a consequence of pollen associated food allergy. This article summarizes clinically relevant information about the most important food allergens. Furthermore the issue of hidden food allergens is stressed.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Food-induced anaphylaxis.

To date, there are no population-based epidemiologic studies providing information about the prevalence of food-induced anaphylaxis. However, statistics from the United Kingdom demonstrated an increase of anaphylaxis from 5.6 cases per 100,000 hospital discharges in 1991-92 to 10.2 cases in 1994-95. The increase for the subcategory of food-induced anaphylaxis was above the overall increase in anaphylaxis. In the UK register of fatal anaphylactic reactions, all food-induced fatalities have been accompanied by respiratory problems with respiratory arrest. Atopic individuals with bronchial asthma and prior allergic reactions to the same food are at a particularly high risk. Not only peanuts, seafood and milk can induce severe, potentially lethal, anaphylaxis, but indeed a wide spectrum of foods, according to the different patterns of food sensitivity in different countries. Foods with "hidden" allergens and meals at restaurants are particularly dangerous for patients with food allergies. Similarly, schools, public places and restaurants are the major places of risk. However, the main factor contributing to a fatal outcome is the fact that the victims did not carry their emergency kit with adrenaline (epinephrine) with them. Therefore, we suggest that the pharmaceutical industry should reintroduce an adrenaline inhaler that is more effective, especially in asthmatic reactions.

Anaphylaxis↗
PubMed2001

Carrot allergy: double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge and identification of allergens.

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to carrot affect up to 25% of food-allergic subjects. Clinical manifestations of carrot allergy and IgE responses to carrot proteins, however, have never been studied in subjects with carrot allergy confirmed by means of double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this investigation were to confirm clinically relevant sensitizations to carrot by means of DBPCFC, to validate current diagnostic methods, and to identify IgE-reactive carrot proteins in patients with true allergy. METHODS: DBPCFCs were performed in 26 subjects with histories of allergic reactions to carrot. Patients underwent skin prick tests with carrot extract, fresh carrot, and various pollen extracts. Specific IgE to carrot, celery, birch, and mugwort pollen and to rBet v 1, rBet v 2, and rBet v 6 were measured through use of the CAP method. Carrot allergens were identified by means of immunoblotting and blotting inhibition. RESULTS: Twenty of 26 patients had positive DBPCFC results. The sensitivity of the determination of carrot-specific IgE antibodies through use of the CAP method (> or =0.7 kU/L) was 90%, the sensitivity for skin prick testing with commercial extracts was 26%, and the sensitivity for prick-to-prick tests with raw carrot was 100%. The Bet v 1--related major carrot allergen Dau c 1 was recognized by IgE from 85% of patients; 45% were sensitized to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and 20% to carrot profilin. In 1 subject, a Bet v 6--related carrot allergen was recognized. In 4 patients, IgE binding to Dau c 1 was not inhibited or was weakly inhibited by rBet v 1 or birch pollen extract. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the allergenicity of carrot by means of DBPCFC. DBPCFC-positive patients had exclusively specific IgE antibodies to birch pollen--related carrot allergens, Dau c 1 being the major allergen. The lack of inhibition of IgE binding to Dau c 1 by birch allergens in a subgroup of patients might indicate an secondary immune response to new epitopes on the food allergen that are not cross-reactive with Bet v 1.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Nuts, seeds and grains from an allergist's point of view].

The incidence of allergic reactions to nuts, seeds and grains is increasing. Reactions to nuts are typically observed as part of a pollen-associated food syndrome (oral allergy syndrome). Nevertheless, anaphylactic reactions such as shock with lethal outcome may occur. With the increasing use and consumption of eastern and Asian cuisine, with foodstuffs such as sesame, paranuts or cashew nuts, these allergies are more frequent than they were formerly. Peanut allergy has become an epidemic problem in the United States. In this article allergic reactions to nuts, seeds and grains are discussed. Illustrative cases are presented.

Anaphylaxis↗