Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Gottschalk

Publications and source records attributed to B Gottschalk.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[Experiences with oral N-acetyl-cysteine treatment in children suffering from cystic fibrosis (author's transl)].

A clinical test with the oral use of Fluimucil was performed by ourselves: Forty-two children, who had been in stable condition for 8--10 years under inhalation therapy with Mucosolvin, were treated for a period of 6 months with Fluimucil used orally. We compared the clinical, bronchoscopic and lung function finding s before and after the 6-month period. In the case of 7 children the oral treatment had to be discontinued and replaced by a resumption of inhalation therapy after 6 to 12 weeks on an account of an exacerbation of the lungstate. The bronchoscopic studies showed results worse in 44% of the cases, unchanged in 22%, and improved in 34%. For lung-function the figures were 31%, 51% and 18% respectively. We can conclude from our results that it is not possible to replace inhalation therapy by an oral treatment for all children with cystic fibrosis. We can, however, surmise that such a treatment will be possible for 50--60% of the children and this must be considered as a significant step forward in the care of these children.

Acetylcysteine↗

[Fundamental investigations for the deposition of aerosols from radioactive solutions in the upper and lower airways (author's transl)].

By means of 99mtechnetium diphosphonate and a scintillation camera we measured the deposition of aerosols. During normal breathing rhythm and without leading the aerosol by valves the retention in the lower airways was on an average of 5.6%, that is 0.07 ml/min. By installation of suitable valves for in- and expiration and mouth tubes, deep and complete expiration with breath holding the retention of the aerosol increases to 17.3-13.8% (0.22-0.17 ml/min); with normal breathing the deposition was only 9%. In the upper airways we found the following deposition rates: Nose/hypopharynx (inhalation via mask) 2.6%; Mouth and pharynx (after rinsing) 1.6%; Larynx 0.1%. A considerable part remains in the inhalation system; by special variations we were able to reduce this portion of the aerosol. After inhaling electro-aerosols (4 kv) the deposition in the lungs was 5.6%; the more the charge was reduced the more the deposition of the aerosol in the lung increased.

Aerosols↗

[Deposition of aerosols into the airways (author's transl)].

The rate of powder absorbed in the lung greatly depends on the particle diameter, and amounts to 40--50% for 1 micrometer particles and 15--20% for 5 micrometer particles. Of importance for therapy was the information that single breath will deposit in the lung 15% of a powder aerosol of 2 micrometer diameter. The liquid aerosols as prevalently used in the therapy, were retained in the lung at a rate of 15% of the original amount when using ultrasonic apparatus. If calculated per minute of inhalation time, the amount absorbed by the lung amounted to 0.2 ml and that by the upper respiratory tract to 0.06 ml. Best deposition in the lung was obtained when inhaling in a closed system with valve-controlled aerosol stream, when using a mouthpiece, and when the test person inhaled with low respiratory rate, deep inspirations, short respiratory pause and complete exspiration. Mark inhalation with closed mouth gave only one tenth of the lung deposition reached with the breathing method described. The use of a mask showed good results, however, when the test person was breathing with open mouth. Only 0.07 ml/min were retained with jet nebulizer and mouth respiration. Combination with intermittent pressure respiration showed no convincing results.

Aerosols↗

The jamming avoidance response in Rhamphichthys rostratus: an alternative principle of time domain analysis in electric fish.

A Jamming Avoidance Response was found in the weakly electric fish Rhamphichthys rostratus, a South American pulse-Gymnotid. The analysis of the response suggests that it requires a key stimulus which is fundamentally different from that in previously described harmonic Gymnotids. It relies on a sensitivity for the direction of phase shifts of stimulus pulses relative to the fish's own electric organ discharge rather than on a sensitivity for beating frequencies.

Animals↗