Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Gillam

Publications and source records attributed to B Gillam.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Panum's limiting case: double fusion, convergence error, or 'da Vinci stereopsis'.

Panum's limiting case--a perceived depth difference between two lines in one eye combined with only one in the other eye--has long been considered weak or reversible. In the last few years this has led to strong promotion of the view that Panum's case is not based on a stereoscopic process involving double fusion, that only one line is fused, with the depth of the other one attributable either to fixation disparity or to occlusion cues. This view is refuted in two ways. First it is shown that when the separation of the two lines, considered as a disparity, is within the range of 'patent stereopsis', depth is perceived with a precision and accuracy indistinguishable from regular stereopsis. The predictions of nonstereoscopic theories concerning the effects of fixation are not borne out at small disparities. Second, very compelling Panum versions of orientation and curvature disparity are introduced, which are difficult to account for except by a process of double fusion. Finally it is shown that at large disparities the depth in Panum's case deviates from prediction more frequently than does regular stereoscopic depth.

Convergence, Ocular↗
PubMed1994

Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes.

The way in which a planar surface is defined or configured may affect its apparent slant about a given axis, and the magnitude of slant-axis anisotropies. The authors have previously suggested that (i) these within-axis and between-axis configuration effects may be attributable, in part at least, to the perspective-disparity conflict generated when geometrically frontoparallel configured surfaces are slanted stereoscopically; and (ii) that implicit contours, defined by line endings or conjunctions, may have effects analogous to those seen with explicit contours. These possibilities were directly examined in two experiments. In experiment 1, slant-axis anisotropy was progressively induced by adding horizontal lines to a vertical-line (zero anisotropy) grid under conditions of cue conflict; slants about the vertical (but not the horizontal) were attenuated-demonstrating a clear and systematic nexus between surface configuration and slant-axis anisotropy. The presence of regular implicit horizontals similarly and selectively attenuated the slant perceived about the vertical. In experiment 2, cue conflict was seen to exacerbate slant-axis anisotropy, but clearly could not fully account for it. There was an axis asymmetry in the effect of degrading implicit contours: degradation had a marked impact on perceived slant about the horizontal but not the vertical axis.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

A proximity-contingent stereoscopic depth aftereffect: evidence for adaptation to disparity gradients.

Prolonged inspection of a surface slanted in the third dimension of visual space typically results in a negative aftereffect such that, after adaptation, a surface in the fronto-parallel plane will appear slanted in the opposite direction. Binocular disparity is not necessary to generate such effects, since they can be obtained monocularly, presumably via adaptation to texture gradient. Six experiments demonstrated durable stereoscopic depth aftereffects in the absence of a texture gradient--by using discrete disparate objects rather than slanted surfaces--and demonstrated that adaptation was to the interobject disparity gradient rather than to the relative disparity of the objects per se. The disparity required to null the obtained aftereffects was inversely proportional to the horizontal separation of elements, for a constant disparity, and directly proportional to the separation of subsequently presented probes. When elements differed in depth (disparity), but were not laterally separated, nulling disparity was significant but invariant with changes in the horizontal separation of probe elements. In that case, adaptation was (i) either to the disparity gradient generated by the vertical separation of probe elements (of which the relative disparity component was tapped); or (ii) to relative disparity per se.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Stereoscopic slant reversals: a new kind of 'induced' effect.

Data are presented from three experiments confirming an earlier finding that the stereoscopic slant perceived may be opposite to the geometrically predicted direction of slant (Gillam 1967). The stimulus for stereoscopic slant was created by imposing a disparity gradient on a frontal plane surface. Reversals are shown to occur readily for slants around a vertical axis but rarely for slant around a horizontal axis. Reversal frequency is greater for surfaces which have a regular pattern, providing good perspective information about slant. Cue conflict cannot explain reversals because adherence to perspective information predicts a perception of zero slant rather than reverse slant. A new explanation has been proposed attributing reversals to the ambiguity of horizontal disparity gradients and disambiguation of the disparity gradient by its relationship to the perspective gradient. It is shown that for any given disparity gradient there is a physical surface which would give rise to a slant reversed with respect to that normally predicted. Such a surface is eccentric in the field of view, with eccentricity given by the difference between the slants signalled by the disparity gradient and the perspective gradient. This explains why reversal responses to disparity gradients occur in the presence of perspective. It is proposed, on the basis of this analysis and the fact that reversals occur, that, like convergence and vertical disparity, perspective is a factor contributing to the correct scaling of disparity gradients in the horizontal meridian with respect to surface eccentricity.

Attention↗
PubMed1992

Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception.

Stereoscopic depth estimates are not predictable from the geometry of point disparities. The configural properties of surfaces (surface contours) may play an important role in determining, for example, slant responses to a disparity gradient, and the marked anisotropy in favour of slant around a horizontal axis. It has been argued that variation in slant magnitude are attributable to the degree of perspective conflict present and that anisotropy is attributable to orientation disparity, which varies with the axis of slant. Three experiments were conducted in which configural properties were varied to try and tease apart the respective roles of orientation disparity and conflicting perspective in determining stereoscopic slant perception and slant axis anisotropy. The results could not be accounted for by the magnitude of the orientation disparities present. Conflicting perspective cues appeared to play a role but only for slant around a vertical axis. It was concluded that there are important configural effects in stereopsis attributable neither to orientation disparity nor to perspective.

Anisotropy↗
PubMed1991

Orientation disparity, deformation, and stereoscopic slant perception.

Koenderink and van Doorn's theory, that the basis of stereoscopic slant perception is the deformation component of the disparity, field, was tested for slant around a horizontal axis, which produces images with a vertical ramp of horizontal disparity (horizontal shear) characterised by a global orientation disparity at the vertical meridian. The disparity field in this case can be parsed into two components, deformation and curl, which each contribute half of the orientation disparity. This case was compared with similar random-dot stimuli in which the deformation component was doubled and the curl component eliminated or vice versa. All three types of stimuli had identical orientation disparity at the vertical meridian. A condition in which there was no such orientation disparity, but deformation was present, was also included. It was found that perceived slant was not related to the deformation present, as Koenderink and van Doorn's theory would predict, but was predictable from the orientation disparity at the vertical meridian per se.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1991

Motion capture by a frame: global or local processing?

The possibility that frames serve to capture lines within them so that they appear on a coplanar surface was investigated, using coherence in direction of rotary motion (Gillam, 1972) as a quantitative measure of the coplanarity of frame and internal lines. It was found that perceptual coherence between a pair of lines was greatly increased by surrounding them with a frame, if the frame was perspectivally consistent with the lines. A second experiment showed that this grouping can be attributed to a global effect of the frame and cannot be accounted for by local grouping of the internal lines with components of the frame.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1988

Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis.

Random dot stereograms of slanted surfaces were constructed, each representing one or two slanted surfaces in different relative arrangements and with different axes. Latency to fusion and from fusion to stereoscopic resolution was measured for each stimulus. It was found that latency to fusion was always very brief but that latency to stereoscopic resolution varied markedly, depending upon the orientation and arrangement of the stereoscopic surfaces. A gradient of discontinuities at a surface boundary produced an instant slant response for that surface, whereas a gradient of absolute disparities across the surface did not, except under conditions where vertical declination (a form of orientation disparity) was present. We conclude that stereopsis is not based on the primitives used in matching the images for fusion and that it is, at least initially, a response to disparity discontinuities which play no role in the fusion process. We also conclude that vertical declination is responded to globally as a slant around a horizontal axis but that other forms of orientation disparity are ineffective. The evidence from our experiments does not support the existence of a stereoscopic ability to respond globally to differences in magnification (or spatial frequency). It is suggested that stereoscopic perception of slant around a vertical axis is slow because it results from the integration of local processes.

Attention↗
PubMed1988

The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays.

Random-dot stereograms of an object standing out from a background always contain a monocular region at the side of the foreground object. This is equivalent to the monocularly occluded part of the background in the real-life viewing of one object in front of another. The role of these monocular regions in the stereoscopic process has not been investigated previously, although it is generally assumed that they are a source of difficulty in stereoscopic resolution because of the unmatchable texture within them. The basis of the present study was a prediction that the presence of texture within these regions would facilitate rather than retard stereoscopic processing. This prediction follows from a hypothesis that stereoscopic processing is initially located at disparity discontinuities. Unmatched regions are only found at such discontinuities, and could serve to locate them.

Attention↗
PubMed1984

Aggregation and unit formation in the perception of moving collinear lines.

The degree to which collinear lines are treated as a unit in resolving rotary motion in depth was investigated with the use of parallel projection to make direction of motion ambiguous. The proportion of time that the collinear lines appeared to rotate in the same direction was used as an index of their perceptual coherence. When the gap between the lines was small, there was strong grouping of the lines with respect to direction of motion as well as appearance of rigidity for the configuration. For larger gaps the grouping for direction of motion was maintained, but the lines appeared to have different axes of rotation leading to an appearance of nonrigidity. It is concluded that line elements can be aggregated for the resolution of certain properties without constituting a unit in any general sense.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1981

Separation relative to length determines the organization of two lines into a unit.

The probability that two lines will form a perceptual unit, in the sense of reversing together under conditions of depth ambiguity, decreases as their separation is increased. In these studies, the critical separation for perceptual grouping is shown to be neither the retinal nor distal separation, but the ratio of separation to line length.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1981

False perspectives.

Textbook accounts of perception frequently contain grossly wrong perspective drawings and/or statements about perspective which misrepresent the available monocular information about distance and size, as well as giving the unfortunate impression that perspective alone elicits only a weak impression of recession. An early example of such a false perspective is the 'Ames window', which is not a correct rendering of a slanted window.

Depth Perception↗