Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B G Vickrey

Publications and source records attributed to B G Vickrey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Training clinical researchers in neurology: we must do better.

The pace of scientific discoveries, the increasing complexity of managing patients, and the runaway cost of neurological services have created an urgent need for a wide range of clinical research in neurology. Despite increasing recognition of this need and recent increases in funding for training clinical investigators, neurologists conducting cellular and molecular investigations are more likely to join faculties, maintain research careers, and attain academic advancement. Because academic departments of neurology are successful in producing and nurturing basic science researchers, why aren't they just as triumphant in spawning clinical investigators? This crisis in the preparation of clinical investigators has been brought about by many factors: competing time demands for clinical service, lack of methodologically rigorous training in the disciplines necessary to conduct clinical research, and lack of mentorship. Neurology residents contemplating a clinical research career may observe junior faculty who lack career guidance, are ill-prepared as independent investigators, and must juggle patient demands while trying to write a research grant or conduct a study. Already burdened by medical school debts, is it any wonder that our neurology graduates don't leap to a career with a future that seems so insecure? Academic departments of neurology must develop full-scale clinical research training programs if they are to meet the pressing need for clinical research. As a starting point, they must free themselves from their dependence on providing clinical services to generate income. Following the model which has produced successful basic researchers, much greater effort must be given to establishing rigorous methodological training in collaboration with other departments, creating senior role models, and protecting time for clinical investigators to conduct research. Unless we create incentives to careers in clinical research, we will never answer the growing number of clinical research questions we face today.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Neurologists' use of ICD-9CM codes for dementia.

Neurologists' use of ICD-9CM codes in a sample of 181 consecutive, new patients evaluated for dementia by 48 of all 49 neurologists from the Rochester, NY, area over a 1-year period was examined. The specific code for AD, 331.0, was used for only 36.5% of patients judged by the neurologist to have AD as the most likely diagnosis. Other codes used were not inaccurate but would result in lower reimbursement. Variation in coding could affect validity of dementia research using claims data.

Dementia↗
PubMed2001

Development of performance measures for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to develop and rate performance measures for hospital-based acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: A national multidisciplinary panel of 16 individuals (2 stroke specialists, 2 general neurologists, 2 internists, 2 neuroscience nurses, 2 stroke advocacy organization representatives, 1 stroke rehabilitationist, 1 family practitioner, 1 emergency room physician, 1 neuroradiologist, 1 managed care organization director, and 1 hospital association representative) from 10 medical societies or lay organizations assisted in the development of 44 potential stroke performance measures. We developed evidence summaries for each of the performance measures and graded the level of evidence associated with each measure. The panel received a summary of the literature pertaining to each measure and rated the measures by use of a modified Delphi approach for 6 dimensions of quality, including validity of evidence, feasibility, impact on outcomes, room for improvement, plausibility, and an overall rating (little reason to do, could do, should do, and must do). RESULTS: Highly rated and agreed on performance measures for the overall rating include warfarin in atrial fibrillation, antithrombotics on hospital discharge, carotid imaging in appropriate patients, and use of stroke units. Additional measures notable for high agreement were heparins for deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis and use of a stroke protocol. Panelists rated time-related thrombolytic measures such as head CT within 25 minutes highly on the room for improvement dimension but low on the overall dimension. Neurologists tended to rate measures lower than did nonneurologists (P<0.01) for all 9 measures pertaining to thrombolytic management. CONCLUSIONS: Highly rated and agreed on performance measures exist in all domains of hospital-based stroke care.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Factors related to agreement between self-reported and conventional Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores.

BACKGROUND: Although the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) remains a widely used scale for evaluating impairments in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), EDSS assessments are infeasible in certain situations. A self-administered version of the EDSS would be potentially useful if it yielded similar results as the conventional physician-based version. METHODS: We developed a self-administered patient questionnaire to obtain ratings of neurologic impairments, and developed algorithms to estimate EDSS scores. We mailed the questionnaires to all new consecutive patients scheduled to be seen at an MS clinic. Questionnaires were completed prior to the visit and traditional EDSS ratings were made by one of two neurologists at the visit. One hundred and forty-six pairs of patient questionnaires and physician EDSS assessments were obtained. RESULTS: Kappa values for agreement between the physician's EDSS scores and the questionnaire-derived scores were 0.13 (for exact agreement), 0.39 (+/-0.5 EDSS steps), and 0.56 (+/-1.0 EDSS steps). A scatterplot showed that agreement was best at EDSS scores <3.0 and >5.0. Better agreement was obtained when patients had a higher level of education, and when the physician was more certain of the diagnosis of MS. CONCLUSIONS: While the self-assessed EDSS scores do not agree highly enough to take the place of conventional EDSS scores, they may be sufficient for MS trial screening or for assessing outcomes across broad categories of disability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke.

The objective of this review was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measures for use with patients with stroke. HR-QOL measures are increasingly used for assessment in many health conditions; these measures may serve an important role in evaluating the impact of stroke and of stroke interventions. HR-QOL measures used in patients with stroke should: (i) cover the domains of HR-QOL that may be affected by stroke; (ii) have administration characteristics suitable for use in patients with stroke; and (iii) have undergone reliability and validity assessment in patients with stroke. The present study evaluates HR-QOL measures with reference to these requirements. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and evaluate HR-QOL measures of potential use in studies of patients with stroke. Identified measures were assessed with regard to stroke-relevant domains covered, measure characteristics (e.g. self-administration versus administration by an interviewer, interviewer time to complete) and psychometric properties of reliability and validity. The measures evaluated vary widely on domains covered, and limited assessment of the performance of HR-QOL measures has been conducted in patients with stroke. No existing measure comprehensively covers all relevant domains or addresses fully the issues of obtaining and combining HR-QOL assessments in patients and proxies in many stroke populations. Additional psychometric testing in stroke populations is needed for existing HR-QOL measures. In addition, stroke-targeted HR-QOL measures need to be developed and evaluated with patients with stroke.

Humans↗
PubMed2000

Management of multiple sclerosis across managed care and fee-for-service systems.

OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare care for adults with MS across managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) health systems. METHODS: The authors sampled adults with MS having physician visits over a 2-year period from a group model health maintenance organization (HMO) in southern California, from a midwestern independent practice association (IPA) model managed care plan, and from the FFS portion of the practices of a random sample of southern California neurologists. The authors mailed surveys to subjects in mid-1996; 930 of 1,164 (80%) of those eligible responded. The authors measured sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, management of recent changes in mobility, bladder control, and fatigue, use of a disease-modifying agent, assessment of general health symptoms and issues, and unmet information needs. The authors adjusted comparisons between systems for comorbidity, disease severity, and disease type. RESULTS: The groups differed on most sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. There were few differences in symptom management; differences that did exist tended toward more referrals or treatment for the FFS group. Access to the disease-modifying agent available at the time of the survey did not differ across systems, although patients' perceptions of the rationale for not using the drug did vary. General health issues and symptoms were more often assessed in the FFS and IPA systems than in the HMO, but improvement was needed across all three systems of care. There were substantial unmet information needs in all groups and especially high ones in the FFS and HMO samples. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to improve care for people with MS should be developed and evaluated, particularly in areas like symptom assessment and meeting patient information needs. Where variations in service delivery exist, longitudinal studies are also needed to evaluate the potential impact on outcomes and to evaluate reasons for variation.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2000

Systematic review of clinical prediction rules for neuroimaging in the evaluation of dementia.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines for dementia do not recommend routine neuroimaging but vary in their recommended clinical prediction rules to identify patients who should undergo neuroimaging for potentially reversible causes of dementia. METHODS: Using a MEDLINE search supplemented by other strategies, we identified studies from January 1, 1983, through December 31, 1998, that evaluated the diagnostic performance of a clinical prediction rule. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each rule, then evaluated their diagnostic performance in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients with dementia, varying the prevalence of potentially reversible dementia from 1% to 15%. RESULTS: We identified 7 studies that evaluated at least 1 of 6 different clinical prediction rules. Only one rule consistently had high sensitivity (>85%) across all studies; none consistently had high specificity (>85%). Six of the 7 studies included less than 15 cases of potentially reversible dementia; thus the sensitivity and specificity for each rule had relatively wide confidence intervals. At a 5% prevalence of potentially reversible dementia, all rules had low positive predictive value (<15%) in our hypothetical cohort. Depending on the rule, our analysis predicts 6 to 44 of the 50 patients with potentially reversible dementia (5% prevalence in cohort of 1000 patients) would not undergo imaging. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable uncertainty in the evidence underlying clinical prediction rules to identify which patients with dementia should undergo neuroimaging. Application of these rules may miss patients with potentially reversible causes of dementia.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Quality of life measures in epilepsy: how well can they detect change over time?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures to detect change over time in persons with epilepsy. BACKGROUND: The application of HRQOL measures in clinical trials has been limited by a dearth of information regarding their abilities to measure change over time (i.e., their responsiveness). To calculate responsiveness, one must categorize subjects as "changed" or "unchanged" by a priori criteria. METHODS: The authors analyzed data collected at baseline and at 28-week follow-up from an antiepileptic drug trial. Two different criteria for classifying subjects as changed or unchanged-one based on seizure frequency (where changed = attainment of seizure freedom) and one based on self-reported overall condition (where changed = improvement in overall condition)-were used. We compared responsiveness indices for two generic (Short Form [SF]-36 and SF-12) and two epilepsy-targeted (Quality of Life in Epilepsy [QOLIE]-89 and QOLIE-31) HRQOL measures. Two scoring procedures for the SF-36, one based on classic test theory and the other on item response theory (IRT), were compared. RESULTS: Effect sizes of the most responsive HRQOL measures were medium to large. The shorter epilepsy-targeted measure had similar responsiveness indices to those of the longer measure. Epilepsy-targeted measures were consistently more responsive than generic measures under the overall condition criterion, but for the seizure freedom criterion, IRT scoring of the SF-36 yielded responsiveness indices comparable to those of the epilepsy-targeted measures. CONCLUSION: Epilepsy-targeted health-related quality of life measures may be preferable to generic ones in longitudinal studies. Selection of a shorter epilepsy-targeted measure does not compromise responsiveness. Item response theory scoring should be applied to epilepsy-targeted HRQOL measures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Driving in adults with refractory localization-related epilepsy. Multi-Center Study of Epilepsy Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency of driving an automobile and characteristics associated with driving in individuals with refractory localization-related epilepsy. BACKGROUND: Driving is generally restricted and monitored in people with epilepsy. Little is known about the frequency of driving and subsequent accidents specifically in individuals with uncontrolled epilepsy. METHODS: In an ongoing, prospective, multicenter study of resective epilepsy surgery, individuals were interviewed when they presented for surgical evaluation. Analyses were conducted using chi-square, t-tests, and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 367 eligible participants, 115 (31.3%) had driven in the last year, most on at least a weekly basis. In a multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increased likelihood of driving were having a current license (OR = 10.71, p < 0.001) and ever having had a license (OR = 3.86, p = 0.003). Younger individuals were also more likely to drive. Lower levels of driving were found in women (OR = 0.31, p < 0.001), individuals who were self-described as disabled (OR = 0.20, p < 0.001), and those who were employed full-time (OR = 0.43, p = 0.03) or part-time (OR = 0.15, p = 0.005). At some point in the past, 144 individuals experienced one or more seizures while driving, and 98 experienced at least one accident because of a seizure. Of those who had accidents, 94% reported property damage, 32% had an injury, and 20% caused injury to others. CONCLUSION: Despite restrictions, almost one third of individuals with refractory epilepsy drive. Understanding why they do may help identify means of modifying this behavior or identifying services that, if provided, would help people with uncontrolled epilepsy forego driving.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Training the future neurology workforce.

OBJECTIVE: To address training demands on future neurologists, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) surveyed its US members as to their views about training the future neurology workforce. METHODS: The survey was mailed to 575 US neurologists and 425 residents/fellows. Respondents (54%) were asked about their perceptions of current and future educational programs and settings needed to improve practice competence; issues related to subspecialization; and the role of non-neurologists in providing neurologic care. Views of neurologists were compared with those of neurology residents/fellows. RESULTS: Most respondents support additional training in outpatient, community, and staff model health maintenance organization settings. The majority of respondents oppose a required fifth year of training or a yearly competency examination, but neurologists who have a subspecialty interest and residents/fellows favor elective certification and higher fees by subspecialists. General neurologists oppose these ideas. Most neurologists feel that primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants can manage uncomplicated neurologic problems, although residents/fellows are less willing to accept the role of nonphysician providers for neurologic services. CONCLUSIONS: Neurology educational programs should consider addressing deficiencies that today's practitioners perceive. Increasing subspecialization, although favored by most neurologists, creates a challenge for the neurologic community as neurologists without subspecialty training see this trend as a threat to their livelihood.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

The impact of epilepsy from the patient's perspective I. Descriptions and subjective perceptions.

This study surveyed the perceptions about and subjective experience of 1023 people with epilepsy in two community-based samples: one from a national postal survey; the other callers to the Epilepsy Foundation. Response to a mail survey was 49%. In comparison with US Census Bureau norms, respondents had received less education, were less likely to be employed or married, and came from lower income households. Complex partial seizures were the most prevalent seizure type, but a convulsion had occurred in 61%. Fifty percent of respondents reported incomplete control of their seizure disorder, although 25% of these had a seizure in the prior year. Thirteen percent had a longest inter-seizure interval of a year or greater, 37% of 3 months, 22% of 1 month, 10% of 1 week and 4% of 1 day. Respondents listed uncertainty and fear of having a seizure as the worst thing about having epilepsy. Lifestyle, school, driving, and employment limits were also listed as major problems. When asked to rank a list of potential problems, cognitive impairment was ranked highest. These data indicate that ongoing medical and psychosocial problems continue for those with epilepsy in the view of those questioned and their families, even in a sample where the majority report good control of their epilepsy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The impact of epilepsy from the patient's perspective II: views about therapy and health care.

A national survey of 1023 people with epilepsy in the US assessed their attitudes about their therapies. Subjects were drawn from responders to a previous national survey of US households or from those who phoned the Epilepsy Foundation. Overall response rate was 49%. Approximately 90% of the respondents were taking medications for their epilepsy. Only 56% were on monotherapy, while 26% were taking two, 6% three, and 2% four medications. Only 68% of respondents were very satisfied with their current seizure medications. When asked to rank five areas of importance regarding their seizure medication, the rank order (highest to lowest) was seizure control, fewer side effects, convenient dosing regimens and cost. Adverse medication events were listed in descending rank order as problems with cognition, energy level, school performance, childbearing, coordination, and sexual function. Inter-individual differences in side effects of concern were listed, suggesting medication choices should be individualized according to potential side effects. Twenty percent of 920 respondents adjusted their medications on their own, by adjusting amount (62%), dosing schedule (31%), or both (3%). Eighty percent of respondents were satisfied with their medical care systems. In this group, 82% had health insurance that covered epilepsy. The large majority (94%) of respondents had seen a neurologist. Subjects expressed dissatisfaction about time limits and lack of accessible information about epilepsy. People with epilepsy are generally satisfied with efforts to treat their disorder, but adverse events are of concern. Many patients requested more information about epilepsy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Relationships between seizure severity and health-related quality of life in refractory localization-related epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate relationships between self-report measures of seizure severity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with refractory localization-related epilepsy. METHODS: A sample of 340 adults enrolled in a seven-center, prospective study of resective epilepsy surgery completed baseline questionnaires that included the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE)-89 and a seven-item adaptation of the National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale. Associations between QOLIE-89 summary measures and both the total seizure severity scale score and individual seizure severity items were assessed, after adjustment for seizure frequency. RESULTS: The seizure severity measure had adequate scale score variability and reliability in this sample. Correlations between individual items in the scale did not exceed 0. 43. Product-moment partial correlations between the seizure severity scale and QOLIE-89 summary measures ranged from -0.17 to -0.29 (all p values <0.01). Of the seven seizure severity items, the average time before individuals perceived they were "really back to normal" after their seizures was broadly related to all domains of HRQOL (r values ranged from -0.16 to -0.30; p values <0.01). Severity of injury during seizures was the only other item having more than minimal associations with HRQOL, and it was selectively related to the physical health measure. Higher frequency of falls during seizures was modestly related to less employment. CONCLUSIONS: This seizure severity measure assesses constructs that are generally distinct from HRQOL, except for moderate and broad associations between HRQOL and patient's perceptions of the average duration of recovery time after seizures. Recovery time may potentially be a useful clinical indicator of seizure severity that reflects meaningful impairment of HRQOL in adults with frequent seizures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

General neurologist and subspecialist care for multiple sclerosis: patients' perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare general neurologists and MS specialists on patients' clinical characteristics and MS care as perceived by patients with MS. METHODS: We sampled all adult patients with MS having physician visits over a 2-year period from a Midwestern managed-care organization and from the fee-for-service portion of 23 randomly selected California neurologists' practices. In mid-1996, 694 subjects were mailed questionnaires; 532 (77%) responded. Sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, recent utilization of services/treatments, unmet needs, symptom care, and research participation were measured. Of 502 subjects (94%) who indicated their usual physician providing MS care was a neurologist, 217 (43%) reported having a general neurologist and 285 (57%) reported having an MS specialist. Comparisons between these two groups were adjusted for comorbidity and disease severity. RESULTS: General neurologist and MS specialist patient groups did not differ on any sociodemographic or clinical characteristic except age (p<0.05). Although health care utilization generally was similar, higher proportions of the MS specialist group were aware of or had discussed interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) with their physician (p<0.05) and were currently taking it (p<0.05); a smaller proportion of the MS specialist group reported stopping it because of side effects (p<0.01). Overall, levels of unmet need and care for recent symptoms were similar, but the MS specialist group reported more confidence in their physician/carefulness in listening (p<0.05). Twice as many MS specialist subjects had participated in nondrug research (p<0.05); drug study participation was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions of their care were similar in most ways for those who designated their main MS provider as a general neurologist compared to an MS specialist; however, care differed in potentially important areas. Prospective, longitudinal studies are needed to measure and relate neurologists' training, experience, knowledge, and MS patient volume with both process and outcome measures of quality of MS care.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Improving adherence to dementia guidelines through education and opinion leaders. A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Educational methods that encourage physicians to adopt practice guidelines are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an educational strategy to increase neurologists' adherence to specialty society-endorsed practice recommendations. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Six urban regions in New York State. PARTICIPANTS: 417 neurologists. INTERVENTION: The educational strategy promoted six recommendations for evaluation and management of dementia. It included a mailed American Academy of Neurology continuing medical education course, practice-based tools, an interactive evidence-based American Academy of Neurology-sponsored seminar led by local opinion leaders, and follow-up mailings. MEASUREMENTS: Neurologists' adherence to guidelines was measured by using detailed clinical scenarios mailed to a baseline group 3 months before the intervention and to intervention and control groups 6 months after the intervention. In one region, patients' medical records were reviewed to determine concordance between neurologists' scenario responses and their actual care. RESULTS: Compared with neurologists in the baseline and control groups, neurologists in the intervention group were more adherent to three of the six recommendations: neuroimaging for patients with dementia only when certain criteria are present (odds ratio, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.9 to 8.9]), referral of all patients with dementia and their families to the Alzheimer's Association (odds ratio, 2.8 [CI, 1.7 to 4.8]), and encouragement of all patients and their families to enroll in the Alzheimer's Association Safe Return Program (odds ratio, 10.8 [CI, 3.5 to 33.2]). For the other three recommendations, adherence did not differ between the intervention and the nonintervention groups. Agreement between scenario responses and actual care ranged from 27% to 99% for the six recommendations and was 95% or more for three of the recommendations. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted educational program can improve physician adoption of practice guidelines.

Dementia↗
PubMed1999

End-of-life care: a survey of US neurologists' attitudes, behavior, and knowledge.

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) surveyed the attitudes, behavior, and knowledge of its members regarding care at the end of life. Three groups of AAN members were surveyed: neuro-oncologists, ALS specialists, and a representative sample of US neurologists. METHODS: The survey presented two clinical scenarios involving end-of-life care. Neurologists were asked a series of questions to assess their knowledge of existing medical, ethical, and legal guidelines; their willingness to participate in physician-assisted suicide (PAS) or carry out voluntary euthanasia (VE); and their general attitudes regarding end-of-life care. RESULTS: Neurologists support a patient's right to refuse life-sustaining treatment, but many believe that they are killing their patients in supporting such refusals. Thirty-seven percent think it is illegal to administer analgesics in doses that risk respiratory depression to the point of death. Forty percent believe they should obtain legal counsel when considering stopping life-sustaining treatment. One half believe that PAS should be made explicitly legal by statute for terminally ill patients. Under current law, 13% would participate in PAS and 4% would carry out VE; if those procedures were legalized, 44% would participate in PAS and 28% in VE. Approximately one third believe that physicians have the same ethical duty to honor a terminally ill patient's request for PAS as they do to honor a such a patient's refusal of life-sustaining therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap between established medical, legal, and ethical guidelines for the care of dying patients and the beliefs and practices of many neurologists, suggesting a need for graduate and postgraduate education programs in the principles and practices of palliative care medicine. Many neurologists would participate in PAS and carry out VE if legalized.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

US neurologists in the 1990's: trends in practice characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) conducts periodic surveys of its members to profile and monitor changes in the characteristics of US neurologists and their practices. OBJECTIVE: To assess neurologists' characteristics, geographic distribution, practice arrangements, professional activities, practice volume, procedures performed, sources of revenue, involvement with managed care and capitation, and other selected topics. METHODS: The AAN Member Census survey was sent to US neurologists in the fall of 1996 (response rate = 89%), and the Practice Profile survey was sent to a random sample of 1,986 US neurologists in the summer of 1997 (response rate = 55%) who had completed a Member Census survey. The results of the Practice Profile survey were compared with those of two prior surveys conducted in 1991 to 1992 and 1993 to 1994. RESULTS: The mean age of US neurologists is 48 years, 18% are women, 93% are US citizens, and 24% are international medical graduates. The proportion of neurologists in solo practices, group practices, and medical schools/universities has not changed. The weekly hours worked has remained stable (58 hours), but the time spent in administrative activities has increased (p < 0.001). The average number of patient visits per week to neurologists appears to have increased (p < 0.001), as has the proportion of neurologists performing procedures (p < 0.05). The majority of neurologists have contracts with managed care organizations (82%), and a minority (32%) have capitated payment arrangements. Medicare continues to be the largest source of clinical revenue. Nearly 50% of all respondents have experience in developing clinical practice guidelines or critical pathways, and >20% of respondents employed physician extenders to assist in their practices. CONCLUSION: Neurologists are spending more time in administrative activities, are performing or interpreting more procedures, and are seeing more patients. Neurologists' involvement with capitation is comparable with that in a nationally representative sample of physicians, and they are exploring innovative ways, such as developing practice guidelines and using physician extenders, to improve the quality and efficiency of providing neurologic care.

Adult↗