Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Fredman

Publications and source records attributed to B Fredman.

50 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol.

Three different anesthetic techniques were compared in 146 healthy outpatients undergoing ambulatory surgery. In Groups I and II, anesthesia was induced with propofol (1.5-2.0 mg/kg, intravenously [iv]) and maintained with nitrous oxide (N2O) 60% in oxygen and either a propofol infusion, 75-160 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 IV, or sevoflurane, 1%-2% end-tidal, respectively. In Group III, anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane, 1%-4% end-tidal and N2O 60% in oxygen. In addition to 60% N2O in oxygen at a total gas flow of 3 L/min, all patients received fentanyl, 2-3 micrograms/kg IV, and vecuronium, 0.1 mg/kg IV. IV induction of anesthesia with propofol (90 +/- 53 s and 94 +/- 48 s in Groups I and II, respectively) was significantly faster than inhalation induction with sevoflurane (153 +/- 100 s). There were no significant differences in the incidence of coughing, airway irritation, or laryngospasm during induction of anesthesia. Although the mean arterial blood pressure values were similar in all three groups, the use of sevoflurane was associated with consistently lower heart rate values during the early maintenance period. Early and intermediate recovery times were the same in all three treatment groups. The use of sevoflurane for induction and/or maintenance of anesthesia was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative emetic sequelae compared with propofol. Finally, the times at which patients were considered "fit for discharge" and the actual discharge times were similar in all three groups. Sevoflurane is an acceptable alternative to propofol for induction and maintenance of outpatient anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Sevoflurane versus desflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison of maintenance and recovery profiles.

The recovery characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane were compared when used for maintenance of ambulatory anesthesia. After obtaining informed consent, 42 healthy, unpremedicated women undergoing laparoscopic sterilization procedures were studied. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and maintained with either desflurane 3%-6% (n = 21) or sevoflurane 1%-2% (n = 21) with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Intraoperative analgesia and neuromuscular block was achieved using fentanyl and vecuronium, respectively. The inhaled anesthetics were titrated to achieve an adequate clinical "depth of anesthesia" and to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 20% of the preinduction baseline values. Visual analog scales (VAS) and the digit-symbol substitution test (DSST) were performed preoperatively and at 30-min intervals during the recovery period. There were no differences between the two groups in the total doses of propofol, fentanyl, or vecuronium. Heart rate (HR) values were lower in the sevoflurane group during the induction-to-incision period. However, HR and MAP were otherwise similar during the maintenance and recovery periods. Use of desflurane led to a more rapid emergence (4.8 +/- 2.4 vs 7.8 +/- 3.8 min) and shorter time to extubation (5.1 +/- 2.2 vs 8.2 +/- 4.2 min) compared to sevoflurane (mean values +/- SD). Intermediate recovery times, postoperative VAS and DSST scores, and side effects were similar in the two treatment groups. Although sevoflurane was associated with a slower emergence from anesthesia than desflurane after laparoscopic surgery, recovery of cognitive function and discharge times were similar in the two anesthetic groups. Thus, it would appear that sevoflurane is an acceptable alternative to desflurane for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

A comparative study of ketorolac and diclofenac on post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to assess the post-operative analgesic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ketorolac and diclofenac 60 ASA I and II patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. Prior to concluding the operative procedure, an injection (i.m.) of an equal volume of either saline 3 mL, ketorolac 60 mg, or diclofenac 75 mg was administered. All patients received intravenous morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia device (PCA). Post-operative pain intensity was assessed hourly for 4 h, by recording visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, PCA demands and actual morphine administered. PCA demands (mean +/- SD) were greater in the saline treatment group (115 +/- 90) when compared with both the ketorolac (42 +/- 44) and diclofenac groups (74 +/- 77). Furthermore, the saline treatment group received significantly (P < 0.05) more PCA morphine compared with both the ketorolac and diclofenac groups (12.2 mg +/- 5.0 vs. 8.6 mg +/- 5.2 vs. 8.9 mg +/- 4.8). Improved pain scores were demonstrated in both the ketorolac and diclofenac groups compared with the saline group. PCA demands and post-operative morphine requirements were similar in the ketorolac and diclofenac groups. Diclofenac has the added advantage, in our institution, of being 60% less expensive than ketorolac. We conclude that both ketorolac and diclofenac are effective post-operative analgesic drugs. However, economic considerations may favour diclofenac administration.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Use of mivacurium during laparoscopic surgery: effect of reversal drugs on postoperative recovery.

We studied the influence of mivacurium on the recovery profile following outpatient laparoscopic tubal ligation in 60 healthy, nonpregnant women. After administration of midazolam 2 mg intravenously (IV), anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, 2 micrograms/kg, and thiopental, 4 mg/kg, IV. When the patient became unresponsive (loss of eyelid reflex), either succinylcholine 1 mg/kg, IV (Group I), or mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg, IV (Groups II and III), was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (0.5%-2% inspired concentration) in combination with 67% N2O in oxygen. Muscle relaxation was maintained in all three groups with intermittent bolus doses of mivacurium, 2-4 mg, IV. In Group III, residual neuromuscular block was reversed with a combination of neostigmine, 2.5 mg, and glycopyrrolate, 0.5 mg, IV, at the end of the operation. In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), patients in Group III had a significantly increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to Group II. The use of succinylcholine (versus mivacurium) was also associated with more frequent postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, these emetic sequelae did not delay postoperative recovery times. In addition, a comparable number of patients in each treatment group required analgesic medication for postoperative pain. Although patients who received succinylcholine complained of significantly more neck pain during the 24-h period after discharge, nausea, vomiting, and shoulder pain were similar in all three groups during this period. We conclude that neostigmine and glycopyrrolate may contribute to the development of postoperative emesis when used for reversal of residual neuromuscular block.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy: use of propofol revisited.

In three clinically depressed patients undergoing repeated electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with either propofol or methohexitone, dose-dependent decreases in the duration of motor and EEG seizure activity were noted. Use of a 'minimally' hypnotic dose of propofol (0.75-1.0 mg kg-1) was associated with a seizure duration which was comparable to standard hypnotic doses of methohexitone. We conclude that doses of propofol < 1.5 mg kg-1 are associated with a clinically acceptable duration of EEG seizure activity (> 30 s) during ECT.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Residual pneumoperitoneum: a cause of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, residual gas is inevitably retained in the peritoneal cavity. An active attempt is not always made to remove it. Using a double-blind prospective protocol in 40 healthy patients, we evaluated the effect of residual pneumoperitoneum on post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain intensity. On completion of surgery, prior to removal of the surgical instruments, the patients were randomly divided into two groups: in the active aspiration (AA) group an active attempt was made to remove as much gas as possible from the peritoneal cavity, while in the nonactive aspiration (NAA) group no such effort was made. Postoperative pain was assessed hourly over a 4-h period with a visual analog scale (VAS) and a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. During the first postoperative hour, the NAA patients made significantly (P < 0.05) more demands (mean +/- SD) for morphine than those in the AA group (31.3 +/- 26.2 vs 15.3 +/- 15.7) and also received a borderline significantly (P = 0.056) larger dose (mean +/- SD) of PCA morphine (3.9 +/- 1.9 mg vs 2.7 +/- 1.3 mg). The VAS scores (mean +/- SD) over the 4-h study period were similar in both groups, being high during the first postoperative hour (AA = 5.1 +/- 2.1 vs NAA = 6.1 +/- 2.2) and then decreasing. We conclude that residual pneumoperitoneum is a contributing factor in the etiology of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
PubMed1994

Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy: effects of propofol and methohexital on seizure activity and recovery.

The influence of methohexital and propofol on seizure activity and recovery profiles was assessed in a randomized, crossover study involving 13 adult outpatients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, and electroencephalogram (EEG) activity were monitored during the ECT procedure. After premedication with glycopyrrolate, 0.2 mg intravenously (i.v.), and labetalol 20-30 mg i.v. hypnosis was induced with a bolus injection of either methohexital or propofol, 0.75 mg/kg. Muscle paralysis was achieved by administering succinylcholine, 1.4 mg/kg i.v. Ventilation was assisted using a face mask while administering 100% oxygen. Thereafter, an electrical stimulus was administered and the length of the resulting motor and EEG seizures was measured. Mood level and cognitive function were assessed prior to induction of anesthesia and after ECT. A total of 72 treatment sessions were evaluated. Each patient underwent a minimum of four treatments and received both induction drugs equally. Although the use of propofol was associated with significantly shorter motor and EEG seizure durations (mean +/- SEM) compared with methohexital (34 +/- 1.6 s and 52 +/- 2.9 s vs 39 +/- 1.5 s and 61 +/- 3.0 s, respectively), this difference was not clinically significant because the durations exceeded 30 s in both groups. Although awakening times were similar, both hemodynamic stability and cognitive recovery were more favorable after propofol. Compared with methohexital, the use of propofol was associated with a clinically insignificant decrease in seizure duration. However, propofol was associated with improved hemodynamic stability and an earlier return of cognitive function after ECT.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed1993

Use of ketorolac and fentanyl during outpatient gynecologic surgery.

In healthy outpatients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery, the analgesic efficacy of ketorolac was compared to fentanyl and to a combination of the two analgesics. One hundred and nine patients were randomly selected to receive fentanyl 50-100 micrograms, ketorolac 30-60 mg, or a combination of fentanyl 50-100 micrograms and ketorolac 30-60 mg, intravenously (IV). Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 2 mg IV and propofol 1 mg/kg, IV, and maintained with propofol, 50-160 micrograms.kg-1.min-1, IV, and nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen via a face mask. Intraoperative anesthetic conditions, recovery times, and postoperative pain and side effects were evaluated. In the ketorolac group, 75% of patients required supplemental fentanyl intraoperatively (mean dose +/- SD, 47 +/- 54 micrograms), compared to only 19% (13 +/- 30 micrograms) and 18% (6 +/- 15 micrograms) of patients in the fentanyl and combination groups, respectively. In the ketorolac group, 74% of patients moved in response to surgical stimulation compared to only 16% and 19% of patients in the fentanyl and combination groups, respectively. Although there were no significant differences in intraoperative mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin values among the three treatment groups, the ketorolac group manifested significantly more rapid respiratory rates throughout the procedure compared with the fentanyl and combination groups. Recovery times, postoperative side effects, and pain scores, as well as postoperative analgesic and antiemetic requirements, were similar in all three treatment groups. However, the ketorolac group reported significantly higher pain scores in the early postoperative period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Intertwining and knotting of a guidewire with a central venous catheter.

A guidewire, inserted into a 65-year-old patient with multisystem organ failure through the left subclavian vein, intertwined and knotted with an existing central venous catheter previously inserted via the right subclavian vein. Both the guidewire and catheter were removed without any harm to the patient.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Recovery following outpatient anesthesia: use of enflurane versus propofol.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoperative conditions and postoperative recovery of patients following the use of either propofol-nitrous oxide (N2O) or enflurane-N2O for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: University hospital outpatient surgery center. PATIENTS: 61 ASA physical status I and II, healthy female outpatients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three anesthetic regimens. Group 1 (control) received thiopental sodium 4 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.), followed by 0.5% to 1.5% enflurane and 67% N2O in oxygen (O2). Group 2 received propofol 2 mg/kg i.v., followed by 0.5% to 1.5% enflurane and 67% N2O in O2. Group 3 received propofol 2 mg/kg i.v., followed by propofol 50 to 160 micrograms/kg/min i.v. and 67% N2O in O2. All patients received succinylcholine 1 mg/kg i.v. to facilitate tracheal intubation and atracurium 10 to 20 mg i.v. to provide adequate relaxation during the maintenance period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Recovery from anesthesia was assessed by a research nurse who was unaware of the anesthetic technique used. The mean +/- SD time to eye opening was significantly longer in the thiopental-enflurane-N2O group (Group 1) than in the propofol-propofol-N2O group (Group 3) (6.1 +/- 2.5 minutes vs. 3.5 +/- 2.8 minutes, respectively). In addition, the mean time to respond to verbal commands was significantly shorter in the propofol induction groups compared with the thiopental induction group. However, the use of enflurane versus propofol for maintenance of anesthesia did not significantly prolong the time from arrival in the recovery room to sitting, tolerating oral fluids, walking, or being judged "fit for discharge." There were no differences among the three groups with respect to postoperative pain or analgesic requirements. Finally, patients who received enflurane for maintenance of anesthesia had a significantly higher frequency of nausea and vomiting than the propofol maintenance group. CONCLUSION: Induction of anesthesia with propofol is associated with a more rapid emergence from anesthesia than induction with thiopental. Maintenance of anesthesia with enflurane did not prolong recovery compared with maintenance with propofol, but enflurane was associated with increased frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opioid-sparing and analgesic effect of diclofenac sodium in ambulatory nonimmersion extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven ASA physical status I and II patients with upper renal tract nephrolithiasis. INTERVENTIONS: ESWL was performed with a sedative-analgesic technique. Diclofenac sodium 75 mg or an equal volume of saline was given intramuscularly 45 minutes prior to the procedure. Fentanyl and midazolam were added to maintain adequate sedation and analgesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographically, both groups were comparable. In the diclofenac sodium group, heart rate was slightly higher, treatment time was shorter, more shock waves were administered (p < 0.02), and less fentanyl was required (p < 0.02). Mean arterial pressure was lower and arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter was higher in the diclofenac sodium group. There were no differences between the groups in voltage, stone size, fragmentation, dose of midazolam administered, or overall assessment by both the doctors and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients administered diclofenac sodium received a greater number of shock waves, required less fentanyl, and showed a marginal improvement in hemodynamic stability and oxygenation during ambulatory nonimmersion ESWL.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 65 years and older.

Spinal stenosis syndrome affects mainly patients at their 5th-6th decades of life. The main goals of surgical treatment in the elderly are to allow the individual to walk longer distances, maintain the activities of daily living (ADL) and social life. Our aim was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients. All patients over 65 years of age who underwent surgery due to spinal stenosis syndrome between 1990 and 1998 were evaluated. There were 29 males and 17 females aged between 65 and 90 years. The clinical presentation included low back pain (89%), intermittent claudication (100%) and neurological involvement (87%). The radiological examination showed a frequent narrowing at the level L4-L5 in 93.5% of the patients. The results of the surgery in a mean follow-up of 22 months were good to excellent in 80% of the patients, fair in 11%, and poor in 9%. An improvement in the intensity of pain and in walking distances was noted in 89 and 85% of the patients, respectively. Improvement was achieved in the level of daily activity and in social lives in 57 and 61%, respectively. Major and minor complication rates were 6.5 and 19.5%, respectively. No mortality was noted in this series. Eighty-seven percent of the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery. We conclude that Surgery for spinal stenosis is a successful and relatively safe procedure, also for patients aged over 65, and should be considered as a treatment option for these patients.

Journal Article↗