Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Fowble

Publications and source records attributed to B Fowble.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Second cancers after conservative surgery and radiation for stages I-II breast cancer: identifying a subset of women at increased risk.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk and patterns of second malignancy in a group of women treated with conservative surgery and radiation in a relatively contemporary manner for early-stage invasive breast cancer, and to identify a subgroup of these women at increased risk for a second cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1978 to 1994, 1,253 women with unilateral Stage I-II breast cancer underwent wide excision, axillary dissection, and radiation. The median follow-up was 8.9 years, with 446 patients followed for >or= 10 years. The median age was 55 years. Sixty-eight percent had T1 tumors and 74% were axillary-node negative. Radiation was directed to the breast only in 78%. Adjuvant therapy consisted of chemotherapy in 19%, tamoxifen in 19%, and both in 8%. Factors analyzed for their association with the cumulative incidence of all second malignancies, contralateral breast cancer, and non-breast cancer malignancy were: age, menopausal status, race, family history, obesity, smoking, tumor size, location, histology, pathologic nodal status, region(s) treated with radiation, and the use and type of adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six women developed a second malignancy (87 contralateral breast cancers at a median interval of 5.8 years, and 98 non-breast cancer malignancies at a median interval of 7.2 years). Nine women had both a contralateral breast cancer and non-breast cancer second malignancy. The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences of a second malignancy were 5% and 16% for all cancers, 3% and 7% for contralateral breast cancer, 3% and 8%, for all second non-breast cancer malignancies, and 1% and 5%, respectively, for second non-breast cancer malignancies, excluding skin cancers. Patient age was a significant factor for contralateral breast cancer and non-breast cancer second malignancy. Young age was associated with an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer, while older age was associated with an increased the risk of a second non-breast cancer second malignancy. A positive family history increased the risk of contralateral breast cancer, but not non-breast cancer malignancies. The risk of a contralateral breast cancer increased as the number of affected relatives increased. Tamoxifen resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in contralateral breast cancer and an increase in non-breast cancer second malignancies. The 5-and 10-year cumulative incidences for leukemia and lung cancer were 0.08% and 0.2%, and 0.8% and 1%, respectively. There was no significant effect of chemotherapy or the regions treated with radiation on contralateral breast cancer or non-breast cancer second malignancy. The most common types of second non-breast cancer malignancies were skin cancers, followed by gynecologic malignancies (endometrial), and gastrointestinal malignancies (colorectal and pancreas). CONCLUSION: The 10-years cumulative incidence of a second cancer in this study was 16%. Young age and family history predicted for an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer, and older age predicted for an increased risk of non-breast cancer malignancy. The majority of patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation with or without adjuvant systemic therapy will not develop a second cancer. Long-term follow-up is important to document the risk and patterns of second cancer, and knowledge of this risk and the patterns will influence surveillance and prevention strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Lobular carcinoma in situ increases the risk of local recurrence in selected patients with stages I and II breast carcinoma treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

BACKGROUND: Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a known risk factor for the development of invasive breast carcinoma. However, little is known regarding the impact of LCIS in association with an invasive carcinoma on the risk of an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients who are treated with conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of LCIS on the local recurrence rate in patients with early stage breast carcinoma after breast-conserving therapy. METHODS: Between 1979 and 1995, 1274 patients with Stage I or Stage II invasive breast carcinoma were treated with CS and RT. The median follow-up time was 6.3 years. RESULTS: LCIS was present in 65 of 1274 patients (5%) in the study population. LCIS was more likely to be associated with an invasive lobular carcinoma (30 of 59 patients; 51%) than with invasive ductal carcinoma (26 of 1125 patients; 2%). Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) occurred in 57 of 1209 patients (5%) without LCIS compared with 10 of 65 patients (15%) with LCIS (P = 0.001). The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of IBTR was 6% in women without LCIS compared with 29% in women with LCIS (P = 0.0003). In both groups, the majority of recurrences were invasive. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of IBTR in patients who received tamoxifen was 8% when LCIS was present compared with 6% when LCIS was absent (P = 0.46). Subsets of patients in which the presence of LCIS was associated with an increased risk of breast recurrence included tumor size < 2 cm (T1), age < 50 years, invasive ductal carcinoma, negative lymph node status, and the absence of any adjuvant systemic treatment (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) (P < 0.001). LCIS margin status, invasive lobular carcinoma histology, T2 tumor size, and positive axillary lymph nodes were not associated with an increased risk of breast recurrence in these women. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that the presence of LCIS significantly increases the risk of an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in certain subsets of patients who are treated with breast-conserving therapy. The risk of local recurrence appears to be modified by the use of tamoxifen. Further studies are needed to address this issue.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Accuracy of the extent of axillary nodal positivity related to primary tumor size, number of involved nodes, and number of nodes examined.

PURPOSE: While a number of studies have evaluated the minimum number of axillary nodes that need to be examined to accurately determine nodal positivity or negativity, there is little information on the number of nodes which must be examined to determine the extent of nodal positivity. This study attempts to determine for patients with 1-3 positive nodes the probability that the number of positive nodes reported is the true number of positive nodes as well as the probability that 4 or more nodes could be positive based on primary tumor size and number of nodes examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1979 to 1998, 1652 women with Stages I-II invasive breast cancer underwent an axillary dissection as part of their breast conservation therapy and had more than 10 lymph nodes examined. The mean and median number of nodes identified in the dissection was 19 and 17 (range, 11-75). The median age was 55 years. A total of 1155 women had T1 tumors and 497 had T2 tumors. Of the 459 node-positive women, 72% had 1-3 positive nodes, 18% had 4-9 positive nodes, and 10% had 10 or more positive nodes. A mathematical model based on tumor size and number of nodes examined was created using the hypergeometric distribution and Bayes Theorem. The resulting model was used to estimate the accuracy of the reported number of positive nodes and the probability of 4 or more positive nodes based on various observed sampling combinations. RESULTS: For patients with T1 tumors and 1, 2, or 3 positive nodes, the minimum number of nodes examined needed for a 90% probability of accuracy is 19, 20, and 20. For T2 tumors and 1, 2, or 3 positive nodes, a minimum of 20 nodes is required. The probability of 4 or more positive nodes increases as tumor size and the number of reported positive nodes increase and as the number of examined nodes decreases. For a 10% or less probability of 4 or more positive nodes, a patient with a T1 tumor and 1, 2, or 3 observed positive nodes would require a minimum of 8, 15, and 20 nodes removed. For a T2 tumor and 1, 2, or 3 observed positive nodes, the corresponding numbers are 10, 16, and 20. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the extent of axillary nodal positivity is influenced by the number of observed positive nodes, tumor size, and the number of nodes examined. Underestimation of the number of positive nodes will result in errors in the assessment of an individual's risk for locoregional recurrence, distant disease, and breast cancer death and will adversely impact on treatment recommendations. This model provides the clinician with a means for assessing the accuracy of the number of positive nodes reported in patients with 1-3 positive nodes.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Internal mammary node irradiation neither decreases distant metastases nor improves survival in stage I and II breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare outcome for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), or regional node recurrence, initial and subsequent distant metastases, and overall and cause-specific survival in women treated with conservative surgery and radiation based on whether or not radiation was targeted to the internal mammary nodes (IMN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1979-1994, 1383 women with Stage I-II breast cancer underwent wide excision, axillary node dissection with >/=10 nodes removed, and radiation. Median follow-up was 6 years; median age was 55 years. A total of 114 women had radiation targeted to the IMN with deep tangents and 1269 did not. Women who received IMN treatment were more often axillary node-positive (40% vs. 25%, p = 0. 002), had central or inner quadrant tumors (61% vs. 40%, p = 0.001), and had T2 tumors (47% vs. 31%, p = 0.001). All axillary node-positive women received adjuvant chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen. For axillary node-negative women, 13% of the IMN treatment group received adjuvant systemic therapy compared to 37% of the no treatment group (p = 0.001). Radiation was directed to the breast only in 97% of the axillary node-negative women who had IMN treatment and 99% of the no IMN treatment group. For axillary node-positive women, 98% of the IMN-treated group had radiation to the breast and supraclavicular nodes +/- a posterior axillary field compared to 77% of the no IMN treatment group (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups for median age, menopausal status, histology, final surgical margin, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, or the number of positive nodes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of an IBTR, regional node recurrence, initial or total distant metastases for the two groups. Similarly 5- and 10-year actuarial overall and cause-specific survival were not significantly different. However, subset analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in initial (29% vs. 15% at 10 yr, p = 0.002) and total (30% vs. 17% at 10 yr, p = 0.01) distant metastases and a significant decrease in cause-specific survival (76% vs. 89% at 10 yr, p = 0.02) for postmenopausal women who received IMN treatment. These findings could not be attributed to differences in the use of systemic therapy or the number of positive nodes. Axillary node-positive patients did not experience a significant decrease in initial (36% vs. 22% at 10 yr, p = 0.21) or total distant metastases (37% vs. 28% at 10 yr, p = 0.62) or a significant improvement in cause-specific survival (72% vs. 76% at 10 yr, p = 0.76) with IMN treatment regardless of whether the tumor was lateral or medial/central in location. IMN treatment was not associated with an increase in non-breast cancer deaths during this period of observation. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective series was unable to identify a significant benefit for IMN irradiation in terms of distant metastases or cause-specific survival for the entire patient population, and in particular, for patients with positive axillary nodes and medially located lesions. The results of the proposed or ongoing prospective randomized trials will further address this controversial issue.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Microinvasive breast carcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of a single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Microinvasive breast carcinoma (MIC) has a good prognosis but specific definitions have varied in the past, making the clinical significance of MIC a subject of debate. METHODS: Microscopic slides of 59 cases of breast carcinoma originally diagnosed as MIC were reviewed retrospectively. Histologic parameters were correlated with clinical findings and outcome to define diagnostic criteria better. RESULTS: On review, the 59 cases were recategorized as follows: pure DCIS (N = 16), DCIS with foci equivocal for microinvasion (N = 7), DCIS with > or =1 focus of microinvasion (N = 11), T1 invasive carcinomas with > or =90% DCIS (N = 18), and T1 tumors with <90% DCIS (N = 7). The MIC cases in the current study averaged 3 separate foci of early infiltration outside the basement membrane, each one not >1.0 mm. The mean follow-up was 95 months. Six patients (10%) had only local recurrence: 1 case each in patients with equivocal microinvasion, microinvasion, and T1 tumors with <90% DCIS and 3 cases among the patients with T1 tumors with > or = 90% DCIS. Four patients, all with T1 tumors with > or =90% DCIS, had distant failure (7%). In the MIC group, only one patient developed a local recurrence after breast conservation. No patient had axillary lymph node metastasis. For the entire series, factors associated with local recurrence were younger age, breast conservation versus mastectomy, and close surgical margins. The only factor associated with distant failure was the size of the DCIS component. Seven patients with T1 tumors with > or =90% DCIS experienced local or distant failure and 5 of these (71%) developed progressive disease or died of disease. All other patients who developed a recurrence were disease free at last follow-up. In a retrospective series, poorer outcome in carcinomas with > or =90% DCIS may be related to the greater likelihood of missed larger areas of invasive carcinoma. Therefore, meticulous and extensive sampling of these carcinomas is required. CONCLUSIONS: MIC as defined has a good prognosis. It has a different biology than T1 invasive carcinoma with > or =90% DCIS, which may progress and cause death. Large tumors with multiple foci of microinvasion may have metastatic potential.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy.

PURPOSE: The association between a positive resection margin and the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after conservative surgery and radiation is controversial. The width of the resection margin that minimizes the risk of IBTR is unknown. While adjuvant systemic therapy may decrease the risk of an IBTR in all patients, its impact on patients with positive or close margins is largely unknown. This study examines the interaction between margin status, margin width, and adjuvant systemic therapy on the 5- and 10-year risk of IBTR after conservative surgery and radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A series of 1,262 patients with clinical Stage I or II breast cancer were treated by breast-conserving surgery, axillary node dissection, and radiation between March 1979 and December 1992. The median follow-up was 6.3 years (range 0.1-15.6). The median age was 55 years (range 24-89). Clinical size was T1 in 66% and T2 in 34%. Seventy-three percent of patients were node-negative. Only 5 % of patients had tumors that were EIC-positive. Forty-one percent had a single excision, and 59% had a reexcision. The final margins were negative in 77%, positive in 12%, and close (< or = 2 mm) in 11%. The median total dose to the tumor bed was 60 Gy with negative margins, 64 Gy with close margins, and 66 Gy with positive margins. Chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen was used in 28%, tamoxifen alone in 20%, and no adjuvant systemic therapy in 52%. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative incidence (CI) of IBTR was not significantly different between patients with negative (4%), positive (5%), or close (7%) margins. However, by 10 years, a significant difference in IBTR became apparent (negative 7%, positive 12%, close 14%, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in IBTR when a close or positive margin was involved by invasive tumor or DCIS. Reexcision diminished the IBTR rate to 7% at 10 years if the final margin was negative; however, the highest risk was observed in patients with persistently positive (13%) or close (21%) (p = 0.02) margins. The median interval to failure was 3.7 years after no adjuvant systemic therapy, 5.0 years after chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen, and 6.7 years after tamoxifen alone. This delay to IBTR was observed in patients with close or positive margins, with little impact on the time to failure in patients with negative margins. The 5-year CI of IBTR in patients with close or positive margins was 1% with adjuvant systemic therapy and 13% with no adjuvant therapy. However, by 10 years, the CI of IBTR was similar (18% vs. 14%) due to more late failures in the patients who received adjuvant systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: A negative margin (> 2 mm) identifies patients with a very low risk of IBTR (7% at 10 years) after conservative surgery and radiation. Patients with a close margin (< or = 2 mm) are at an equal or greater risk of IBTR as with a positive margin, especially following a reexcision. A margin involved by DCIS or invasive tumor has the same increased risk of IBTR. A reexcision of an initially close or positive margin that results in a negative final margin reduces the risk of IBTR to that of an initially negative margin. A close or positive margin is associated with an increased risk of IBTR even in patients who are EIC-negative or receiving higher boost doses of radiation. The median time to IBTR is delayed; however, the CI is not significantly decreased by adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with close or positive margins-the 5 year results in these patients underestimate their ultimate risk of recurrence.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Postmastectomy radiation in patients with one to three positive axillary nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: An unresolved issue.

The rationale for postmastectomy radiation is based on the prevention of locoregional recurrence in the chest wall, regional lymphatics, or both. The randomized trials of postmastectomy radiation in patients with one to three positive nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy have shown a proportional reduction in locoregional recurrence rates of two thirds. The absolute benefit, however, varies with the magnitude of the risk in patients who do not receive radiation. The survival benefit from radiation is best explained by the prevention of an isolated locoregional recurrence, which could serve as a source of fatal distant metastases and parallels the difference in the total incidence of distant metastases. The current dilemma is to identify patients with one to three positive nodes who have had an adequate axillary dissection and remain at substantial risk for a locoregional recurrence despite adjuvant chemotherapy. The routine use of postmastectomy radiation in all axillary node-positive patients requires further evaluation.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1999

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for early-stage invasive cancer.

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) following conservative surgery and radiation for early stage invasive cancer occurs in approximately 15% of all patients at 10 years and is diminished with surgical excisions which achieve negative margins. Treatment strategies of breast-conserving surgery with or without radiation that result in IBTR rates of 30 40% will impact negatively on survival and the magnitude of this effect will be influenced by the predominant pattern of local failure as well as initial and subsequent distant metastases. Optimal local control in early-stage invasive breast cancer is important to minimize the risk of a salvage mastectomy and maximize the potential for long-term survival.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: effect on diagnosis and outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

PURPOSE: To compare the pretreatment characteristics and outcome of postmenopausal women with stage I-II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation who had a history of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with those who had never received HRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1979 to 1993, 485 postmenopausal women underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and radiation for stage I-II breast cancer. The median follow-up was 5.9 years. One hundred forty-one patients reported a history of HRT. The median length of use was 5 years. Three hundred forty-four patients reported no history of HRT. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed for median age (HRT 60 years v no HRT 64 years; P =.0009), median weight (HRT 142 lbs v no HRT 152 lbs; P =.004), clinical tumor size < or = 2 cm (HRT 77% v no HRT 66%; P =.02), and the use of re-excision (HRT 62% v no HRT 49%; P =.01). The method of detection by mammogram only (HRT 52% v no HRT 42%; P =.06) was of borderline statistical significance. The HRT patients had a statistically significant increased cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (8% v 2%; P =.02), a statistically significant decreased cumulative incidence of distant metastases (HRT 6% v no HRT 17%; P =.01), and a borderline statistically significant improvement in cause-specific survival at 10 years (HRT 92% v no HRT 86%; P =.07). Postmenopausal women with a history of HRT did not have an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast cancer malignancy. CONCLUSION: This study failed to identify an adverse effect of HRT on breast cancer mortality in patients with stage I-II disease treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The presence of proliferative breast disease with atypia does not significantly influence outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the benign background breast-tissue change of atypical hyperplasia (AH) on outcome in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and sixty women with Stage I--II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation from 1982-1994 had pathologic assessment of their background adjacent benign breast tissue. The median follow-up was 5.6 years (range 0.1-15). The median age was 55 years (range 24-88). Of these, 23% had positive axillary nodes; 25% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF or CAF) with (9%) or without (17%) tamoxifen. Of the total, 24% received adjuvant tamoxifen alone. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 131 patients with atypical hyperplasia (ductal, 99 patients; lobular, 20 pts; and type not specified, 12 pts), and 329 patients with no proliferative changes or proliferative changes without atypia. RESULT: A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for method of detection, primary tumor size, presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), pathologic nodal status, region(s) treated with radiation, and type of adjuvant therapy. Patients with atypical hyperplasia (AH) had smaller primary tumors (T1 80% vs. 70%) more often detected solely by mammography (51% vs. 36%) with negative axillary nodes (87% vs. 73%) and radiation treatment to the breast only (93% vs. 78%). LCIS was observed in 9% of the patients with AH and 3% of those without AH. Patients with AH more often received tamoxifen alone (32% vs. 21%), rather than chemotherapy (15% vs. 29%). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for race, age, menopausal status, family history, histology, histologic subtype DCIS when present, the presence or absence of an extensive intraductal component, final margin status, estrogen or progesterone receptor status, use of re-excision, or total radiation dose to the primary. The 5- and 10-year actuarial ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates were 2% and 12% for patients with AH and 4% and 8% for those without AH (p=0.44). Younger women or those with a positive family history of breast cancer with AH did not have an increased rate of breast failure when compared to similar patients without AH. There were no significant differences in the 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of distant metastases (AH 5- and 10-year 7% and 7%, no AH 5- and 10-year 8% and 16%,p=0.31), regional node recurrence (AH 1% and 1%, no AH 1% and 1%,p=0.71), contralateral breast cancer (AH 3% and 3%, no AH 3% and 8%,p=0.71), overall survival (AH 95% and 86%, no AH 95% and 89%, p=0.79), or cause-specific survival (AH 98% and 95%, no AH 96% and 91%,p=0.27). Subset analysis for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, distant metastases, overall, and cause-specific survival for T1 vs. T2 tumors and path node-negative vs. path node-positive patients revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: AH was not associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or contralateral breast cancer in this study of patients with invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. Therefore, the presence of proliferative changes with atypia in background benign breast tissue should not be a contraindication to breast-conservation therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Lung and heart dose volume analyses with CT simulator in radiation treatment of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Radiation pneumonitis and cardiac effects are directly related to the irradiated lung and heart volumes in the treatment fields. The central lung distance (CLD) from a tangential breast radiograph is shown to be a significant indicator of ipsilateral irradiated lung volume. Retrospective analysis of the pattern of dose volume of lung and heart with actual volume data from a CT simulator in the treatment of breast cancer is presented with respect to CLD. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The heart and lung volumes in the tangential treatment fields were analyzed in 108 consecutive cases (52 left and 56 right breast) referred for CT simulation. All patients in this study were immobilized and placed on an inclined breast board in actual treatment setup. Both arms were stretched over head to avoid collision with the scanner aperture. Radiopaque marks were placed on the medial and lateral borders of the tangential fields. All patients were scanned in spiral mode with slice width and thickness of 3 mm each, respectively. The lung and heart structures as well as irradiated areas were delineated on each slice and respective volumes were accurately measured. The treatment beam parameters were recorded and the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were generated for the measurement of the CLD and analysis. RESULTS: Using CT data the mean volume and standard deviation of left and right lungs were 1307.7+/-297.7 cm3 and 1529.6+/-298.5 cm3, respectively. The magnitude of irradiated volume in left and right lung is nearly equal for the same CLD that produces different percent irradiated volumes (PIV). The left and right PIV lungs are 8.3+/-4.7% and 6.6+/-3.7%, respectively. The PIV data have shown to correlate with CLD with second- and third-degree polynomials; however, in this study a simple straight line regression is used to provide better confidence than the higher order polynomials. The regression lines for the left and right breasts are very different based on actual CT data. The slopes of regression lines for the left and right lung are 0.6%/mm and 0.5%/mm, respectively which is statistically different with thep value of 0.01. A maximum heart PIV of >3.0% is observed in 80% of the patients. The heart PIV is inversely correlated with gantry angle and weakly correlated with CLD. CONCLUSIONS: The CT-simulator provides accurate volumetric information of the heart and lungs in the treatment fields. The lung PIV is directly correlated to the CLD (0.6%/mm and 0.5%/mm for the left and right lungs). Left and right lungs have different volumes and hence, different regression lines are recommended. An additional 12% lung volume could be irradiated in the supraclavicular field. Heart volume is not correlated with the CLD. The heart PIV is associated to the beam angle. Heart volume may not be accurately visualized in a tangential radiograph; however, this can be easily seen in a DRR with contour delineation and can be minimized with proper beam parameters iteratively with a virtual simulator. Lung and heart PIV along with dose volume histograms (DVH) are essential in reducing pulmonary and cardiac complications.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Use of the prone position in radiation treatment for women with early stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The prone position has been advocated for women with large pendulous breasts undergoing breast-conserving treatment with radiation therapy. However, there is no information in the literature regarding the coverage of the target volume with this technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the prone treatment position in including at least the biopsy cavity with a 2-cm margin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven consecutive patients who underwent CT simulation in the prone position were included in this study. Patients underwent CT simulation in the prone position using a flat platform containing an aperture for the breast to hang through in a dependent fashion. CT slices were 5-mm thick taken at 3-mm intervals. The biopsy cavity was localized and outlined on sequential CT images using the surgical clips (when present) as well as the residual seroma. A 2-cm margin was included around the biopsy cavity to define the minimal target volume (mTV). Lateral fields were used for treatment planning. The beam arrangements were considered adequate if the mTV was totally included in the lateral fields. RESULTS: Median age of the patient population was 55 years. Bra sizes ranged from 36A-44DD. The majority of patients had mammographically detected T1 lesions. Median volume of the biopsy cavity was 48 cm3. Five of 11 (45%) patients underwent reexcision of the biopsy cavity, and 6 of 11 (55%) had surgical clips placed in the biopsy cavity. Overall, 8 of 11 (73%) patients did not have the entire mTV included in the lateral opposed tangential fields in the prone position. This was especially true in patients whose biopsy cavity extended down to the chest wall. There were no other clinical factors that could predict for the adequacy of coverage in the prone position. CONCLUSION: Special attention must be paid to the location of the surgical clips to determine the proximity of the biopsy cavity to the chest wall, or CT simulation should be performed to determine the exact location of the biopsy cavity prior to selecting patients with large pendulous breasts for treatment in the prone position.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Results of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

PURPOSE: The role of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial. In particular, there is little data for outcome with radiation in a group of patients comparable to those treated with local excision and surveillance (mammographic calcifications < or = 2.5 cm, negative resection margins, negative postbiopsy mammogram). This study reports outcome of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected DCIS with an emphasis on results in patients considered candidates for excision alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1983 to 1992, 110 women with mammographically detected DCIS (77% calcifications +/- mass) and no prior history of breast cancer underwent needle localization and biopsy with (55%) or without a reexcision and radiation. Final margins of resection were negative in 62%, positive 7%, close 11%, and unknown 20%. The median patient age was 56 years. The most common histologic subtype was comedo (54%), followed by cribriform (22%). The median pathologic tumor size was 8 mm (range 2 mm to 5 cm). Forty-seven percent of patients with calcifications only had a negative postbiopsy mammogram prior to radiation. Radiation consisted of treatment to the entire breast (median 50.00 Gy) and a boost to the primary site (97%) for a median total dose of 60.40 Gy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.3 years, three patients developed a recurrence in the treated breast. The median interval to recurrence was 8.8 years and all were invasive cancers. Two (67%) occurred outside the initial quadrant. The 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of recurrence were 1 and 15%. Cause-specific survival was 100% at 5 and 10 years. Contralateral breast cancer developed in two patients. There were too few failures for statistical significance to be achieved with any of the following factors: patient age, family history, race, mammographic findings, location primary, pathologic size, histologic subtype, reexcision, or final margin status. However, young age, positive or close margins, and the presence of a mass without calcifications had a trend for an increased risk of recurrence. There were no recurrences in the subset of 16 patients who would be candidates for surveillance by Lagios' criteria. CONCLUSION: For selected patients, conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected DCIS results in a low risk of recurrence in the treated breast and 100% 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival. Improved mammographic and pathologic evaluation results in better patient selection and reduces the risk of the subsequent appearance of DCIS in the biopsy site. The identification of risk factors for an ipsilateral invasive breast recurrence is evolving.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Dosimetric comparison of treatment planning systems in irradiation of breast with tangential fields.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study are: (1) to investigate the dosimetric differences of the different treatment planning systems (TPS) in breast irradiation with tangential fields, and (2) to study the effect of beam characteristics on dose distributions in tangential breast irradiation with 6 MV linear accelerators from different manufacturers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine commercial and two university-based TPS are evaluated in this study. The computed tomographic scan of three representative patients, labeled as "small", "medium" and "large" based on their respective chest wall separations in the central axis plane (CAX) were used. For each patient, the tangential fields were set up in each TPS. The CAX distribution was optimized separately with lung correction, for each TPS based on the same set of optimization conditions. The isodose distributions in two other off-axis planes, one 6 cm cephalic and the other 6 cm caudal to the CAX plane were also computed. To investigate the effect of beam characteristics on dose distributions, a three-dimensional TPS was used to calculate the isodose distributions for three different linear accelerators, the Varian Clinac 6/100, the Siemens MD2 and the Philips SL/7 for the three patients. In addition, dose distributions obtained with 6 MV X-rays from two different accelerators, the Varian Clinac 6/100 and the Varian 2100C, were compared. RESULTS: For all TPS, the dose distributions in all three planes agreed qualitatively to within +/- 5% for the "small" and the "medium" patients. For the "large" patient, all TPS agreed to within +/- 4% on the CAX plane. The isodose distributions in the caudal plane differed by +/- 5% among all TPS. In the cephalic plane in which the patient separation is much larger than that in the CAX plane, six TPS correctly calculated the dose distribution showing a cold spot in the center of the breast contour. The other five TPS showed that the center of the breast received adequate dose. Isodose distributions for 6 MV X-rays from three different accelerators differed by about +/- 3% for the "small" patient and more than +/- 5% for the "large" patient. For two different 6 MV machines of the same manufacturer, the isodose distribution agreed to within +/- 2% for all three planes for the "large" patient. CONCLUSION: The differences observed among the various TPS in this study were within +/- 5% for both the "small" and the "medium" patients while doses at the hot spot exhibit a larger variation. The large discrepancy observed in the off-axis plane for the "large" patient is largely due to the inability of most TPS to incorporate the collimator angles in the dose calculation. Only six systems involved agreed to within +/- 5% for all three patients in all calculation planes. The difference in dose distributions obtained with three accelerators from different manufacturers is probably due to the difference in beam profiles. On the other hand, the 6 MV X-rays from two different models of linear accelerators from the same manufacturer have similar beam characteristics and the dose distributions are within +/- 2% of each other throughout the breast volume. In general, multi-institutional breast treatment data can be compared within a +/- 5% accuracy.

Body Constitution↗
PubMed1997

Dose estimation to critical organs from vertex field treatment of brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Radiation management of intracranial tumors may require a noncoplanar vertex field that often irradiates the entire length of the body. In view of radiation related risks to the normal tissues dose estimation to the extracranial organs such as the thyroid gland, spinal cord, heart, and genitalia is performed for a vertex field. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A vertex field used clinically was reproduced on an anthropomorphic Rando phantom to measure radiation dose to various organs in the primary beam. Three photon beams (4, 6, and 10 MV), and two high energy electron beams (16 and 20 MeV) were used. Dosimetry was performed with an ion chamber sandwiched between phantom slices at the appropriate positions. All doses were normalized to the target dose at a depth of 5 cm. The effect of the head position was studied by rotating the gantry angle up to +/-20 degrees to mimic the extension and flexion of the head. Theoretical calculation was performed using an exponential best fit to the depth dose table to estimate the dose to various points and compare with the measured dose. RESULTS: The measured normalized dose to the cervical cord, thyroid, heart, and female and male gonads are 60, 36, 16, 2.5, and 1.6%, respectively, for a 6 MV photon beam. The dose from 4 MV and 10 MV are slightly lower and higher, respectively. Doses from electron beams are about a factor of 4-10 lower than those of the photon beams. The measured gonadal dose from the primary beam is <5% of the target dose for all energies used in the study. The actual value, however, is dependent on the body structure, length, and the posture of the patient. A +5 degree head flexion had little effect on the dose to the various parts of the body. The head rotations greater than +/-10 degrees produced relatively lower doses by a factor of 10(-2) to the organs at distances greater than 40 cm from the prescription point. The radiation doses to the different critical organs estimated from the fitted curves are lower than the measured doses up to 35%. CONCLUSIONS: When a vertex field is used for the treatment of the brain tumors, the entire axial length of the body is irradiated which adds to the integral dose. Unlike the scattered and leakage radiation, the primary dose to extracranial critical organs is greater for higher energies. For a 10 MV beam the ovary and testis at a distance of 80 cm and 90 cm may receive a dose of 4.2 and 3%, respectively, of the target dose. The gonadal dose could be quite significant if the entire treatment is delivered using a vertex field. For pediatric and smaller patients, dose to the critical organs at known distances could be estimated from the empirical equation obtained from the measured data. While the risk-benefit ratio is often evaluated and acceptable for treating malignant tumors, the long-term complications need thorough assessment in younger and curable patients. In view of radiation carcinogenesis and genetic burden, dose reduction to critical organs should be considered using a 3D planning system to arrange beams in other nonaxial planes and by considering electron beams for the vertex field.

Brain Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Effect of low-density lateral interfaces on soft-tissue doses.

PURPOSE: Doses at the interface between tissue and low-density inhomogeneities with the interface positioned perpendicular to the beam direction have been well studied. When the inhomogeneity lies parallel to the beam direction (i.e., a lateral interface), the resulting dose distribution is not as well known. Lateral lung-soft-tissue interfaces are common in many fields used to treat malignancies in the thorax region including tangential breast fields and anteroposterior fields for lung and esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose distribution along lateral interfaces and to determine the implications for treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A polystyrene and cork slab phantom was irradiated from the side to simulate treatment fields with lateral lung-soft-tissue interfaces. The beam was positioned with the isocenter in polystyrene and the field edge in cork. Cork slabs (0.6-2.5 cm) were used to simulate different thicknesses of lung between the field edge and the target volume. Measurements were made using a parallel plate ionization chamber. With the chamber position held constant, polystyrene slabs were added between the cork and the chamber to study the dose distribution in the interface region. Interface doses were studied as a function of the amount of cork in the field, field size, beam energy (6-18 MV), and depth. RESULTS: Doses in the interface region were lower by as much as 10% compared to doses in a homogeneous phantom. For a given cork width and field size, the magnitude of the underdose increased by several percent as the x-ray energy increased from 6 to 18 MV. The underdose at the interface was 5% for 6 MV and 8% for 18 MV X-rays with a 1-cm cork width. For a 2.5-cm cork width, underdoses of 2.5% and 3% at distances up to 2.5 and 4 mm lateral to the interface were observed for 6- and 18-MV X-rays, respectively. However, doses right at the interface were 1% greater for 6 MV and 3% less for 18 MV than doses in a homogeneous phantom. For a given cork width, the interface doses were not significantly dependent on field width but decreased by an additional 2-3% as the length decreased to 4 cm. Additional decreases were also observed when the measurement depth decreased to 3 cm. With a 1-cm width of cork in the field, a lateral distance of 3-4 mm from the interface was necessary to ensure doses of at least 98% of the homogenous dose with 6-MV X-rays. A lateral distance of 6-7 mm was necessary for 10- and 18-MV X-rays. CONCLUSION: Underdosing will occur in the soft tissues adjacent to low-density inhomogeneities. The magnitude depends primarily on the width of the inhomogeneity seen in the treatment field, but also on field size, depth, and beam energy. For treatment fields with a lateral lung interface, a segment of tissue approximately 3-4 mm thick for 6 MV and 6-7 mm thick for higher-energy beams may be underdosed. Lung widths of > or = 1.75 cm as observed on film will generally guarantee doses of at least 96% of those calculated with no inhomogeneity corrections. High-energy beams are often used to treat sites in the thorax or breast to improve dose homogeneity throughout the treatment volume. Potential underdosing due to the presence of lung should be considered and may require a decrease in beam energy or an increase in the margin between the target volume and the field edge to ensure adequate treatment.

Connective Tissue↗