PubMed1976
Twenty cases of immature teratoma of the ovary with a neural component are analyzed. A plea is made for use of the nomenclature adopted from the new World Health Organization classification of ovarian tumors, the past confusion over terminology and histogenesis of this rare tumor is discussed. All the primary tumors in the present series contained at least some immature tissues (predominantly of neural origin) and were thus graded from 1 to 3 according to the criteria of Thurlbeck and Scully. No grade 0 tumors ("benign solid teratomas") were identified. We believe that thorough sectioning almost always insures the identification of immature elements. The prognosis was closely related to the histologic grade, but correlated poorly withthe clinical stage, the latter being influenced by the common finding (25 per cent of the cases in this series) of peritoneal implants composed exclusively of mature glial tissue, which is associated with a benign clinical evolution. This phenomenon of maturation or differentiation appears to be the rule rather than the exception in this tumor, since implants are usually of better or equal differentiation when compared with their primary tumors and older patients tend to have lower grade tumors than younger patients. Since the majority of patients with this tumor are young, primary surgical therapy should be conservative, unilateral salpingooophorectomy often being sufficient. Spontaneous or operative rupture of the tumor capsule carries an increased risk of subsequent dissemination. We have noted impressive clinical responses in patients with disseminated tumors of a high histologic grade after treatment with triple chemotherapy (vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide) but do not recommend adjuvant therapy in patients with only grade 0 implants.