Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B DeForge

Publications and source records attributed to B DeForge.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

Prevalence and characteristics of nursing home-acquired infections in the aged.

OBJECTIVES: This study provides estimates of the prevalence of infections in all patients from a representative sample of 53 Maryland nursing homes; identifies risk factors for these infections; and describes diagnostic procedures carried out. METHODS: The records of 4,259 patients in a stratified random sample of 53 Maryland nursing homes were reviewed for diagnostic procedures, medical, functional, and behavioral status. Infections were identified by signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings. RESULTS: Study patients were characteristic of aged patients in US nursing homes. The prevalence of infections actually acquired in the nursing home (80% of all infections) was 4.4%. Multivariate analysis revealed that skin infections (35% of nursing home-acquired infections) were associated with skin ulcers and inversely with urine incontinence. Fevers of uncertain source (13%) were associated with bladder catheters. Symptomatic urinary infections (12%) and lower respiratory infections (12%) were associated with bedfast status, and the latter with tracheostomy and lung disease. Skin ulcers, urethral catheters, and bedfast status were markers for nursing home-acquired infection. The prevalence of infection in patients with all three markers was 32%; in patients with none, 2%. Fewer than a quarter of the four most common nursing home-acquired infections received an evaluation which met minimal diagnostic criteria established by a panel of infectious disease specialists and geriatricians. Patients with dementia, those in large homes (greater than 150 beds), and those in urban homes were less likely to be evaluated in a manner meeting these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Use of three characteristics (ie skin ulcers, urethral catheters, bedfast status) to identify patients at risk for nursing home-acquired infections may allow targeted infection surveillance and prevention programs. In addition, nursing home-acquired infections are not evaluated uniformly across patients and facilities, suggesting the need to establish, through further study, guidelines for such evaluations.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Smoking status and the practice of other unhealthy behaviors.

This study examined the relationship between smoking behavior and other unhealthy practices in the US. Data from the 1979 National Survey of Personal Health Practices and Consequences were used to compare alcohol use, sleep behavior, overweight status, physical activity, and skipping breakfast with smoking status. Compared with nonsmokers, smokers were more likely to sleep fewer than six hours per night, skip breakfast, not actively exercise, and drink heavily. Smokers were less likely to be significantly overweight than former smokers or those who never smoked. These associations were present for both men and women for sleep behavior, skipping breakfast, overweight status, and alcohol use, but not for physical activity. These findings may assist physicians in understanding the association between smoking and other practices that influence morbidity and mortality.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Treatment of mild to moderate pain of acute soft tissue injury: diflunisal vs acetaminophen with codeine.

Acute soft tissue injuries create pain and limitation of function. Treatment requires analgesia and time for full recovery. Acetaminophen with codeine (650 mg plus 60 mg, respectively, every 4 to 6 hours) is used frequently as the analgesic of choice. Diflunisal (1,000 mg initially then 500 mg twice a day) vs acetaminophen with codeine was prospectively studied in the treatment of acute mild to moderate pain from soft tissue injuries. Thirty-five patients with acute strains, sprains, or low back pain were randomized to treatment (17 acetaminophen with codeine vs 18 diflunisal). Both groups were similar in the amount of pain and type of injury at initiation of therapy. Patient pain rating went from 3.3 +/- 0.6 to 1.6 +/- 1.5 for acetaminophen with codeine and from 3.3 +/- 0.6 to 1.3 +/- 1.1 for diflunisal. However, 65 percent of acetaminophen with codeine patients experienced side effects, with 35 percent of these patients stopping the medication because of intolerable side effects. In the diflunisal group, 28 percent of the patients experienced side effects and 5 percent had to stop the medication early. Diflunisal was found to be an effective analgesic in mild to moderate pain of acute soft tissue injuries, and caused fewer and more tolerable side effects than did acetaminophen with codeine.

Acetaminophen↗