Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Combe

Publications and source records attributed to B Combe.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Radiological damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on sustained remission.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the radiological damage progression in patients with recent rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission. METHODS: A cohort of 191 patients with active early (<1 year) rheumatoid arthritis was prospectively assessed at baseline, 3 and 5 years by the Disease Activity Score (DAS) and the Sharp-van der Heijde Score (SHS) for radiographic damage. Patients in remission (DAS<1.6) at the 3-year and 5-year time points were compared with patients with a persistently active rheumatoid arthritis by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS: 57 patients died, were lost to follow-up or had incomplete data; 30 (15.7% of those who completed) patients were in remission at 3 and 5 years. The SHS in these two groups was not significantly different at baseline (p = 0.15), but was lower in the remission group at 5 years (p = 0.0047). The median (IQR) radiographic score increased from 0.5 (0-7) at baseline to 2.5 (0-14) after 5 years for the remission group (p = 0.18) and from 2 (0-7) to 13 (3-29) in the group with active rheumatoid arthritis (p<0.001). 5 (16.7%) patients in remission had relevant progression of radiographic damage (ie, progression >4.1 points) and 6 (20%) presented new erosions in a previously unaffected joint between the third and the fifth years. CONCLUSION: Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission did not present statistically significant radiographic degradation at the group level; nevertheless, 16.7% of these patients did present degradation. Absence of progression should be part of the remission definition in rheumatoid arthritis.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Etanercept and sulfasalazine, alone and combined, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite receiving sulfasalazine: a double-blind comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of etanercept and sulfasalazine, alone and in combination, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite sulfasalazine treatment. METHODS: A double-blind, randomised study in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable sulfasalazine (2-3 g/day) treatment. The primary end point was a 20% response by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 24 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, the three treatment groups (sulfasalazine, n = 50; etanercept, n = 103; etanercept and sulfasalazine, n = 101) were comparable for demographic variables and disease activity. Lack of efficacy was the primary reason for discontinuation (sulfasalazine, n = 12; etanercept, n = 1; etanercept and sulfasalazine, n = 4; p<0.001). Significantly more patients receiving etanercept, alone or in combination (74% for each), achieved ACR 20 responses at 24 weeks than those receiving sulfasalazine (28%; p<0.01). Similarly, more patients in the etanercept groups achieved ACR 50 and ACR 70 responses than those in the sulfasalazine group (p<0.01). In the groups receiving etanercept, significant differences in the ACR core components were observed by week 2 compared with those receiving sulfasalazine alone (p<0.01). The incidences of several common adverse events (headache, nausea, asthenia) were lower with etanercept alone than with the combination (p<0.05), but infections and injection site reactions were higher with etanercept alone (p<0.05). The safety profiles of both etanercept treatment groups were comparable with previous experience of etanercept. CONCLUSIONS: For all efficacy variables assessed, etanercept alone or in combination with sulfasalazine resulted in substantial and similar improvement in disease activity from baseline to week 24 compared with sulfasalazine alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite their sulfasalazine treatment. All three treatments were generally well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

OBJECTIVE: To formulate EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis. METHODS: In accordance with EULAR's "standardised operating procedures", the task force pursued an evidence based approach and an approach based on expert opinion. A steering group comprised of 14 rheumatologists representing 10 European countries. The group defined the focus of the process, the target population, and formulated an operational definition of "management". Each participant was invited to propose issues of interest regarding the management of early arthritis or early rheumatoid arthritis. Fifteen issues for further research were selected by use of a modified Delphi technique. A systematic literature search was carried out. Evidence was categorised according to usual guidelines. A set of draft recommendations was proposed on the basis of the research questions and the results of the literature search.. The strength of the recommendations was based on the category of evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: 15 research questions, covering the entire spectrum of "management of early arthritis", were formulated for further research; and 284 studies were identified and evaluated. Twelve recommendations for the management of early arthritis were selected and presented with short sentences. The selected statements included recognition of arthritis, referral, diagnosis, prognosis, classification, and treatment of early arthritis (information, education, non-pharmacological interventions, pharmacological treatments, and monitoring of the disease process). On the basis of expert opinion, 11 items were identified as being important for future research. CONCLUSIONS: 12 key recommendations for the management of early arthritis or early rheumatoid arthritis were developed, based on evidence in the literature and expert consensus.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Safety of the selective costimulation modulator abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving background biologic and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A one-year randomized, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been receiving > or =1 traditional nonbiologic and/or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) approved for the treatment of RA for at least 3 months prior to entry into the study. METHODS: This was a 1-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive abatacept at a fixed dose approximating 10 mg/kg by weight range, or placebo. RESULTS: The abatacept and placebo groups exhibited similar frequencies of adverse events (90% and 87%, respectively), serious adverse events (13% and 12%, respectively), and discontinuations due to adverse events (5% and 4%, respectively). Five patients (0.5%) in the abatacept group and 4 patients (0.8%) in the placebo group died during the study. Serious infections were more frequent in the abatacept group than in the placebo group (2.9% versus 1.9%). Fewer than 4% of patients in either group experienced a severe or very severe infection. The incidence of neoplasms was 3.5% in both groups. When evaluated according to background therapy, serious adverse events occurred more frequently in the subgroup receiving abatacept plus a biologic agent (22.3%) than in the other subgroups (11.7-12.5%). CONCLUSION: Abatacept in combination with synthetic DMARDs was well tolerated and improved physical function and physician- and patient-reported disease outcomes. However, abatacept in combination with biologic background therapies was associated with an increase in the rate of serious adverse events. Therefore, abatacept is not recommended for use in combination with biologic therapy.

Abatacept↗
PubMed2005

Clinical practice decision tree for the choice of the first disease modifying antirheumatic drug for very early rheumatoid arthritis: a 2004 proposal of the French Society of Rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE: To elaborate a clinical practice decision tree for the choice of the first disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for untreated rheumatoid arthritis of less than six months' duration. METHODS: Four steps were employed: (1) review of published reports on DMARD efficacy against rheumatoid arthritis; (2) inventory of the information available to guide DMARD choice; (3) selection of the most pertinent information by 12 experts using a Delphi method; and (4) choice of DMARDs in 12 clinical situations defined by items selected in step 3 (28 joint disease activity score (DAS 28): < or =3.2; >3.2 and < or =5.1; >5.1; rheumatoid factor status (positive/negative); structural damage (with/without)-that is, 3 x 2 x 2). Thus, multiplied by all the possible treatment pairs, 180 scenarios were obtained and presented to 36 experts, who ranked treatment choices according to the Thurstone pairwise method. RESULTS: Among the 77 items identified, 41 were selected as pertinent to guide the DMARD choice. They were reorganised into five domains: rheumatoid arthritis activity, factors predictive of structural damage; patient characteristics; DMARD characteristics; physician characteristics. In the majority of situations, the two top ranking DMARD choices were methotrexate and leflunomide. Etanercept was an alternative for these agents when high disease activity was associated with poor structural prognosis and rheumatoid factor positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Starting with simple scenarios and using the pairwise method, a clinical decision tree could be devised for the choice of the first DMARD to treat very early rheumatoid arthritis.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2005

How to predict prognosis in early rheumatoid arthritis.

In early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the objectives of therapeutic strategies are to obtain remission and prevent joint destruction as early as possible. These goals may be reached with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or with biological agents. In clinical practice, initial treatments are usually chosen according to the degree of disease activity at baseline, and adapted according to a step-up strategy. A more elegant therapeutic approach would be to choose the most appropriate treatment based on the prognosis of RA. Therefore, prognostic stratification could improve the relative roles and benefits of initial DMARD or biological therapy for early RA. For RA with a severe prognosis, a combination of DMARDs or biologicals could be initiated as the first-line therapy. However, we need to know how to predict outcome in early RA for this type of strategy. This review attempts to answer this question by reporting the most reliable prognostic factors and some predictive models proposed for classification into benign, mild and severe RA.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2005

Should we eradicate Helicobacter pylori before prescribing an NSAID? Result of a placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection and treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and (2) to estimate the impact of H. pylori eradication on these symptoms. METHODS: This was a multicentric, community-based, randomized, case-control study. Patients presenting with a rheumatic disorder motivating the prescription of an NSAID for at least 2 wks were stratified in two groups (H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative) by a serological doctor test and H. pylori-positive patients divided further into two subgroups, receiving either an eradication treatment (group 1) or a placebo (group 2). The main outcome measure was the prevalence of GI symptoms estimated in groups 1 and 2 and in noninfected patients (group 3) at weeks 2, 6, and 12. RESULTS: Among H. pylori-negative patients (n=145), GI symptoms were present in 42.6%, 21.4%, and 10.0% at weeks 2, 6, and 12, respectively. In groups 1 and 2, GI symptoms were present in 57.7% and 40.7%, respectively, at week 2 (p= 0.03); 24.7% and 23% at week 6 (p= 0.85); and 9.4% and 17.3% at week 12 (p= 0.13). The prevalence of GI symptoms at week 2 was similar in group 2 and in the H. pylori-negative group (p= 0.77). The highest prevalence of symptoms at week 2 in group 1 was essentially due to diarrhea. The prevalence of GI symptoms was the same for groups 1 and 3 at week 12, and higher in group 2, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term (6 wks) GI tolerance of conventional NSAIDs does not differ whether or not the patients are infected by H. pylori. The tendency observed for the medium term (12 wks) deserves to be confirmed.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2004

Tolerance and short term efficacy of rituximab in 43 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerance and efficacy of rituximab in patients with various autoimmune diseases seen in daily rheumatological practice. METHODS: 866 rheumatology and internal medicine practitioners were contacted by e-mail to obtain the files of patients treated with rituximab for systemic autoimmune diseases. Patients with lymphoma were analysed if the evolution of the autoimmune disease could be evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 43 of 49 cases could be analysed, including 14 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 13 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), six with primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS), five with systemic vasculitis, and five with other autoimmune diseases. Rituximab was prescribed for lymphoma in two patients with RA and two with pSS. In the 39 other cases, rituximab was given because of the refractory character of the autoimmune disease. The mean follow up period was 8.3 months (range 2 to 26). There were 11 adverse events in 10 patients and treatment had to be discontinued in six. Efficacy was observed in 30 patients (70%): RA 11, SLE 9, pSS 5, vasculitis 2, antisynthetase syndromes 2, sarcoidosis 1. The mean decrease in corticosteroid intake was 9.5 mg/d (range 0 to 50) in responders. Seven patients experienced relapse after mean 8.1 months (5 to 15). Three patients died because of refractory autoimmune disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite absence of marketing authorisation, rituximab is used to treat various refractory autoimmune diseases in daily rheumatological practice. This study showed good tolerance and short term clinical efficacy, with marked corticosteroid reduction in patients with SLE, pSS, vasculitis, and polymyositis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Tumour necrosis factor alpha blocking agents in refractory adult Still's disease: an observational study of 20 cases.

BACKGROUND: Consensus is lacking on treatment for corticosteroid resistant adult onset Still's disease (ASD). OBJECTIVE: To assess anti-TNFalpha efficacy and tolerance in refractory ASD. METHODS: All departments of rheumatology and internal medicine in France were contacted by mail to identify cases of refractory ASD for which anti-TNFalpha had been used. Medical information was collected using a standardised questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 20 patients with mean age 40.7 years (range 18-74) at treatment start and mean disease duration 8.5 years (range 2-21), the clinical expression of ASD was predominantly systemic in five patients and polyarticular in 15. Response to corticosteroids and methotrexate had been considered inadequate in all patients. Infliximab was used to treat 15 patients, and etanercept used for 10; five had received both drugs consecutively. Steroids were concurrently used in 18 patients and an immunosuppressant in 17. At a mean (SD) follow up of 13 (14) months, complete remission had occurred in five cases (of 25 treatment sequences): one receiving etanercept and four infliximab. Partial response was observed in 16 cases (seven etanercept and nine infliximab). Treatment failed in four cases (two with each anti-TNFalpha). At the last visit, anti-TNFalpha therapy was discontinued in 17 cases, 11 times because of lack (or loss) of efficacy, four times because of a side effect, and twice for other reasons. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNFalpha therapy may be helpful for some patients with refractory ASD. However, most patients achieve only partial remission. Additional information is thus needed to evaluate more precisely the risk-benefit ratio of this treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multiparameter prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 191 patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose disease duration was less than one year were followed up prospectively for five years. Remission, defined by a disease activity score (DAS) of <1.6, was used as the outcome measure. Baseline clinical, laboratory, genetic, and radiographic data (with radiographic scores determined by Sharp's method, modified by van der Heijde) were obtained. RESULTS: 48 patients (25.1%) fulfilled the remission criteria at the three year follow up visit, and 30 (15.7%) at three and five years. On univariate analysis by Fisher's exact test, remission at three years and persistent remission at five years were closely correlated with baseline DAS values, C reactive protein level, Ritchie score, health assessment questionnaire score, duration of morning stiffness, and to a lesser extent baseline total radiological scores and rheumatoid factor negativity. No significant correlation was found with sex, age, extra-articular manifestations, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies, anti-keratin antibodies, anti-HSP 90, anticalpastatin antibodies, antinuclear antibodies, or HLA-DRB1* genotypes. Logistic regression analysis showed that the baseline independent variables predictive of remission were low DAS, Ritchie score, morning stiffness duration, and total radiographic score. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis were mainly clinical markers of disease activity and radiological scores.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2004

HLA-DMA*0103 and HLA-DMB*0104 alleles as novel prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HLA-DM alleles as markers for disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two distinct cohorts of patients with RA were oligotyped for HLA-DB1 and HLA-DM genes using PCR amplified genomic DNA with sequence specific oligonucleotide probes. Cohort 1 comprised 199 unselected patients with RA (mean (SD) age 45.5 (13.5) years; disease duration 11.9(8.8) years), whose disease severity was assessed using Larsen score on hand and foot radiographs. Cohort 2 comprised 95 patients with severe RA and 70 patients with benign RA according to the Larsen method. RESULTS: In cohort 1, after stratification according to DRB1 genotypes, patients positive for HLA-DMA*0103 and negative for HLA-DRB1*04 tended to have greater articular damage on hands and wrists (p = 0.07 by Mann-Whitney U test) and reached statistical significance for the Larsen score per year (p = 0.05). This association between HLA-DMA*0103 and articular damage was especially observed in patients with HLA-DRB1*01. Similarly, HLA-DMB*0104 positive patients had higher Larsen score on hands and wrists (p = 0.02). This association was even stronger in DRB1*04 positive patients (p = 0.005). In cohort 2, HLA-DMA*0103 was associated with severe RA in patients negative for HLA-DRB1*04 (OD = 5.4; p = 0.014). HLA-DMB*0104 allele frequency tended to be higher in patients with severe RA but without reaching significance. CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating the role of HLA-DM genes in the severity of RA. Our results suggest that HLA-DMA*0103 and HLA-DMB*0104 alleles may represent new genetic markers of RA severity. The HLA-DMA*0103 allele tends to be associated with patients with RA negative for DRB1*04 and could predict a more severe form of disease especially in HLA-DRB1*01 positive patients. The HLA-DMB*0104 allele could have an additive effect in HLA-DRB1*04 patients. Combined determination of HLA-DM and HLA-DRB1 alleles could facilitate identification of patients likely to have a poor disease course.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[French translation and cultural adaptation of the "Back Book"].

OBJECTIVES: To develop an information booklet for French speaking low back pain patients, promoting staying active as a single treatment for low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A four-step procedure was used to obtain the information booklet. Selection of a booklet using a literature search and pre-defined criterias. Translation/back-translation technique with a method used for health-related quality of life cross-cultural adaptation method. Content validity assessment by a knowledge questionnaire submitted to 32 low back pain patients hospitalized for treatment and a review by two independent MD. Check accordance of the translated document with original authors and editor guidelines. RESULTS: The use of a standardized translation/back-translation procedure permitted to obtain a translation of the back book suitable for French patients. The significant improvement (P = 10(-6)) in patients' knowledge confirmed the quality of the translation. CONCLUSIONS: Translation and cultural adaptation of an information booklet should allow cross-cultural studies in the field of information for low back pain patients.

Cultural Characteristics↗
PubMed2003

Anticitrullinated protein/peptide antibody assays in early rheumatoid arthritis for predicting five year radiographic damage.

OBJECTIVE: To study the value of antibodies to citrullinated proteins/peptides for predicting joint outcomes in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: 191 patients with RA onset within the past year were followed up prospectively for five years. Serum samples obtained from 145 patients at baseline before disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment were examined using three anticitrullinated protein/peptide antibody assays: antiperinuclear factor (APF) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), antikeratin antibodies (AKA) by IIF, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Radiographs of the hands and feet taken at baseline and after three and five years were evaluated using Sharp scores modified by van der Heijde. RESULTS: Anti-CCP ELISA was positive in 58.9% of patients. APF/anti-CCP agreement was 77%. The likelihood of a total Sharp score increase after five years was significantly greater among patients with anti-CCP antibodies (67%; odds ratio (OR) 2.5; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.2 to 5.0) or APF (57%; OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.9) but not rheumatoid factor (RF; OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3 to 1.5). Mean values for radiographic damage, erosion, and joint narrowing scores at the three times were significantly higher in patients with anti-CCP or APF than in those without. AKA did not significantly predict radiographic damage. In separate analyses of patients with and without RF, anti-CCP or APF was better than RF for predicting total joint damage and joint damage progression after five years. CONCLUSION: Antibodies to citrullinated proteins/peptides determined early in the course of RA by APF IIF or anti-CCP ELISA are good predictors of radiographic joint damage. Further studies of clinical, laboratory, and genetic parameters are needed to improve RA outcome prediction in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Long term structural effects of combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: five year follow up of a prospective double blind controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early combined therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) during the first year in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) induces long term beneficial effects, compared with monotherapy, when the further treatment strategy is a free choice. METHODS STUDY DESIGN: five year multicentre prospective longitudinal trial. PARTICIPANTS: 146/205 patients with RA previously included in a one year prospective randomised trial comparing the effects of treatment with MTX, SSZ, or a combination of both. Criteria for inclusion: patients with early RA (< or =1 year duration). Follow up: between the end of years 1 and 5, patients were followed up and treated by their own rheumatologist, who was allowed to indicate any treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: disease activity score (DAS), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and Sharp/van der Heijde radiological score at baseline and after five years of follow up. ANALYSIS: comparison of the five year follow up DAS, HAQ, and radiological scores in patients given combined and single treatment during the first year. RESULTS: At the end of the five years of follow up, the patients primarily receiving single or combined treatment had similar mean DAS, HAQ, and radiographic scores. CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with early RA using combined therapy with MTX and SSZ during the first year did not influence the long term inflammatory status, or disability, or structural changes, compared with single disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Specific overexpression of rheumatoid arthritis-associated HLA-DR alleles and presentation of low-affinity peptides.

OBJECTIVE: To compare levels of HLA-DR expression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and healthy controls for whom an ordered expression according to the DR alleles is demonstrated and to test the functional consequences of this expression on peptide presentation. METHODS: Using monoclonal antibodies that recognize different DRB1 alleles, DR molecules were quantitated at the surface of the peripheral blood B cells of 23 RA patients and 17 healthy subjects. The functional consequences of the level of DR surface expression was tested using a universal model of antigen presentation and mutated peptides with variable affinities for the T cell receptor. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, surface HLA-DR molecules were expressed at different levels according to allele (DR53, DR4, and DR11 less than DR1 less than DR7 less than DR15). In RA patients, this hierarchy was not conserved and, furthermore, the density of RA-associated DR4 and DR1 molecules was enhanced in patients compared with the basal density in healthy individuals. We demonstrated that an increased expression of DR molecules at the surface of antigen-presenting cells allowed a noteworthy presentation of low-affinity peptides that under normal conditions are not efficient in generating a T cell response at physiologic surface density of the DR molecules. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the specific overexpression of RA-associated HLA molecules could be responsible for the presentation of low-affinity autopeptides and therefore the activation of peripheral autoreactive T cells.

Alleles↗
PubMed2001

Prognostic factors for radiographic damage in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multiparameter prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors of radiologic damage and radiologic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A cohort of 191 patients with RA whose disease duration was shorter than 1 year were prospectively followed up for 3 years. Radiologic scores (as determined by Sharp's method, modified by van der Heijde) and radiologic progression were used as outcome measures. Numerous baseline clinical, laboratory, genetic, and radiographic data were obtained. RESULTS: The change in the total radiologic score for the patients followed up over 3 years was a mean +/- SD increase of 6.1 +/- 6.2. Radiologic progression was observed in 71 of the 172 patients for whom there were data at the end of the study. By univariate analysis with Fisher's exact test, radiologic scores and progression at followup were closely correlated with the baseline values of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein level, IgM and IgA rheumatoid factor positivity, antiperinuclear antibody positivity, radiologic scores, duration of morning stiffness, and RA-associated HLA-DRB1*04 genes. No correlation was demonstrated with sex, age, Disease Activity Score, swollen or tender joint counts, extraarticular manifestations, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, Ritchie Articular Index, patient's assessment of pain, positivity for anti-heat-shock protein 90-kd antibodies, anticalpastatin antibodies, anti-RA33 antibodies, antinuclear antibodies, YKL-40, or antikeratin antibodies, and HLA-DRB1*01 genes. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the only baseline values that were predictive of the 3-year radiologic scores were IgM rheumatoid factor positivity, DRB1*04 genes, pain score, and total radiologic score. Progression of joint damage was predicted by the ESR, IgM rheumatoid factor positivity, DRB1*04 genes, and erosions score at baseline. CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors for radiographic damage in early RA were identified. A combination of these baseline values allowed us to draw up a predictive arithmetic score that could be used to predict radiologic damage at 3 years and radiologic progression in individual patients.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind, double-dummy, two-way comparative trial evaluated the overall efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular (im) vs oral meloxicam. SUBJECTS: 346 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). TREATMENT AND METHODS: 173 patients in each group were randomised to receive either im meloxicam (15 mg) plus a placebo tablet, or oral meloxicam (15 mg) plus a placebo injection for 7 days. RESULTS: Significant (p < 0.001) improvements in overall pain and disease activity were observed by patients treated with im and oral meloxicam, with no significant difference between treatments. The im formulation was better than the oral tablet in terms of rapidity of action (p=0.012), global efficacy (p=0.030) and duration of morning stiffness (p=0.026). Local tolerability of im meloxicam was very good and comparable with placebo injections. CONCLUSION: Oral and im meloxicam (15 mg) were both effective and well-tolerated for acute exacerbations of RA. The im formulation had some advantages, such as a faster onset of action.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Meloxicam: a review of its pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerability following intramuscular administration.

This paper reviews published studies on the intramuscular use of meloxicam in acute rheumatic conditions. Data were obtained from 68 healthy volunteers and >800 patients with conditions such as arthritis, sciatica and lumbago who were treated with intramuscular injections of meloxicam compared with oral formulations. Intramuscular meloxicam appears to have a more rapid onset of action than oral meloxicam in acute inflammatory rheumatism. Local tolerance of im meloxicam was consistently good in both volunteers and patients, with respect to creatine phosphokinase levels and local reactions. Meloxicam im was also superior to other drugs such as piroxicam with respect to local tolerance. The incidence of adverse events, including gastrointestinal events, was low. Therefore, im meloxicam is an alternative to achieve rapid relief of acute pain in patients with acute inflammatory rheumatism. However, the recurrent use of im meloxicam is not recommended and patients should be switched to the oral formulation for chronic use.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗