Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B C van Jaarsveld

Publications and source records attributed to B C van Jaarsveld.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The effect of treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with hypertension and renal artery stenosis.

The quality of life in patients with hypertension is considered to be impaired mainly by side effects of antihypertensive drug therapy. Since balloon angioplasty for renal artery stenosis has a medication-sparing effect, it may lead to an improvement in quality of life. The objective of the study is to compare the effect of antihypertensive drug therapy and balloon angioplasty on quality of life in patients with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. We compared the quality of life in 56 patients randomised to balloon angioplasty to that in 50 patients randomised to antihypertensive drug therapy after 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Quality of life was measured using a questionnaire on physical symptoms associated with hypertension and antihypertensive drugs, and two generic health questionnaires (MOS Survey and EuroQol instrument). After follow-up, the patients who underwent angioplasty used less antihypertensive drugs than the patients who were treated with antihypertensive drugs only (mean+/-s.d., 1.9+/-0.9 vs 2.5+/-1.0 drugs after 3 months, P=0.002). They reported similar physical complaints, however, and a similar quality of life. The results after 12 months of follow-up were the same. In conclusion, for patients with hypertension and renal artery stenosis, the decrease in antihypertensive medication after intervention is too small to lead to a detectable improvement in quality of life.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Long-term blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic findings in patients with end-stage renal disease: reverse epidemiology explained?

BACKGROUND: In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hypertension is common and often leads to left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction, but hypotension at the onset of dialysis is associated with increased mortality. We studied blood pressure data over longer periods of time in patients on haemodialysis and related them to echocardiographic outcome, in order to elucidate these contradictory findings. METHODS: In 50 haemodialysis patients mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP) were calculated in the first three months of haemodialysis, the complete period from the start of haemodialysis until echocardiography and the last three months of haemodialysis before echocardiography. Hypertension load, pulse pressure and interdialytic weight gain were quantified and related to echocardiography. RESULTS: LV mass index was associated with MAP in all three periods, and also with the hypertension load, PP and PP load. In patients with LV dilatation, MAP and PP averaged over the complete period of dialysis were 5 to 7 mmHg higher than in patients without LV dilatation. Blood pressure parameters were the same in patients with or without LV diastolic dysfunction or systolic dysfunction. Systolic dysfunction was more frequent in patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis treatment. Interdialytic weight gain was not associated with any of the echocardiographic variables. CONCLUSION: When long-term blood pressure values are considered, hypertension is associated with parameters of early cardiac damage such as increased LV mass index and not with parameters of advanced heart failure such as systolic dysfunction. This supports the hypothesis that the presence of advanced heart failure reciprocally influences blood pressure in a negative way, thereby explaining the 'reverse epidemiology' of blood pressure and mortality in ESRD.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Which patients with hypertension and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis benefit from immediate intervention?

The objective was to identify subgroups of patients with hypertension and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis who may benefit from immediate intervention. In the DRASTIC study, patients with hypertension, significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, and a normal or mildly impaired renal function were randomized between immediate balloon angioplasty (PTRA; n=56) and drug therapy followed by angioplasty after 3 months, if needed (Med-PTRA; n=50). In this secondary analysis of the data, changes in the renal function and blood pressure after 1 year were studied by analysis of covariance in the following subgroups: patients with positive captopril-renin challenge test, abnormal captopril renogram, recently developed hypertension, bilateral stenosis, and severe stenosis. We found a benefit of immediate angioplasty only for patients with bilateral stenosis. Their creatinine clearance had decreased (mean+/-s.d.: -4.2+/-13.5 ml/min) in the Med-PTRA group, whereas it had improved substantially (+10.0+/-15.7 ml/min) in the PTRA group (P=0.02). For patients with unilateral stenosis, the change in creatinine clearance did not differ between PTRA and Med-PTRA (+4.3+/-15.5 and +1.3+/-12.5 ml/min, respectively). The patients with bilateral stenosis also seemed to benefit most from immediate intervention with regard to blood pressure control. None of the other subgroups had a clear benefit of immediate intervention regarding renal function or blood pressure control. In conclusion, intervention should not be postponed in patients with bilateral stenosis, even if renal function is normal. Other hypertensive patients with atherosclerotic renal artery disease could initially well be treated by aggressive multidrug therapy alone unless hypertension persists or renal function deteriorates.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Resistance to antihypertensive medication as predictor of renal artery stenosis: comparison of two drug regimens.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis is among the most common curable causes of hypertension. The definitive diagnosis is made by renal angiography, an invasive and costly procedure. The prevalence of renal artery stenosis is less than 1% in non-selected hypertensive patients but is higher when hypertension is resistant to drugs. OBJECTIVE: To study the usefulness of standardised two-drug regimens for identifying drug-resistant hypertension as a predictor of renal artery stenosis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study carried out in 26 hospitals in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients had been referred for analysis of possible secondary hypertension or because hypertension was difficult to treat. Patients < or =40 years of age were assigned to either amlodipine 10 mg or enalapril 20 mg, and patients >40 years to either amlodipine 10 mg combined with atenolol 50 mg or to enalapril 20 mg combined with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. Renal angiography was performed: (1) if hypertension was drug-resistant, ie if diastolic pressure remained > or =95 mm Hg at three visits 1-3 weeks apart or an extra drug was required, and/or (2) if serum creatinine rose by > or =20 micromol/L (> or =0.23 mg/dL) during ACE inhibitor treatment. RESULTS: Of the 1106 patients with complete follow-up, 1022 had been assigned to either the amlodipine- or enalapril-based regimens, 772 by randomisation. Drug-resistant hypertension, as defined above, was identified in 41% of the patients, and 20% of these had renal artery stenosis. Renal function impairment was observed in 8% of the patients on ACE inhibitor, and this was associated with a 46% prevalence of renal artery stenosis. In the randomised patients, the prevalence of renal artery stenosis did not differ between the amlodipine- and enalapril-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnostic work-up for renovascular hypertension the use of standardised medication regimens of maximally two drugs, to identify patients with drug-resistant hypertension, is a rational first step to increase the a priori chance of renal artery stenosis. Amlodipine- or enalapril-based regimens are equally effective for this purpose.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation and treatment of renal artery stenosis: impact on blood pressure and renal function.

The conventional non-invasive tests to diagnose renal artery stenosis in a general hypertensive population are not accurate enough for screening purposes. Magnetic resonance angiography might become the new gold standard, with the advantages of the absence of contrast toxicity, good accuracy, and information on flow characteristics. With regard to the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, intervention is advised only when blood pressure cannot be controlled by at least three antihypertensive drugs. Patency after stenting is superior to angioplasty, although its clinical benefit has not been proved. As for renal function, evidence - although from uncontrolled studies - for the preservation of renal function by intervention is accumulating, especially in those patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2000

The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertension and renal-artery stenosis are often treated with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. However, the long-term effects of this procedure on blood pressure are not well understood. METHODS: We randomly assigned 106 patients with hypertension who had atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis (defined as a decrease in luminal diameter of 50 percent or more) and a serum creatinine concentration of 2.3 mg per deciliter (200 micromol per liter) or less to undergo percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty or to receive drug therapy. To be included, patients also had to have a diastolic blood pressure of 95 mm Hg or higher despite treatment with two antihypertensive drugs or an increase of at least 0.2 mg per deciliter (20 micromol per liter) in the serum creatinine concentration during treatment with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor. Blood pressure, doses of antihypertensive drugs, and renal function were assessed at 3 and 12 months, and patency of the renal artery was assessed at 12 months. RESULTS: At base line, the mean (+/-SD) systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 179+/-25 and 104+/-10 mm Hg, respectively, in the angioplasty group and 180+/-23 and 103+/-8 mm Hg, respectively, in the drug-therapy group. At three months, the blood pressures were similar in the two groups (169+/-28 and 99+/-12 mm Hg, respectively, in the 56 patients in the angioplasty group and 176+/-31 and 101+/-14 mm Hg, respectively, in the 50 patients in the drug-therapy group; P=0.25 for the comparison of systolic pressure and P=0.36 for the comparison of diastolic pressure between the two groups); at the time, patients in the angioplasty group were taking 2.1+/-1.3 defined daily doses of medication and those in the drug-therapy group were taking 3.2+/-1.5 daily doses (P<0.001). In the drug-therapy group, 22 patients underwent balloon angioplasty after three months because of persistent hypertension despite treatment with three or more drugs or because of a deterioration in renal function. According to intention-to-treat analysis, at 12 months, there were no significant differences between the angioplasty and drug-therapy groups in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, daily drug doses, or renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of patients with hypertension and renal-artery stenosis, angioplasty has little advantage over antihypertensive-drug therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Stent placement for renal arterial stenosis: where do we stand? A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of renal arterial stent placement in comparison with renal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with renal arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies dealing with renal arterial stent placement (14 articles; 678 patients) and renal PTA (10 articles; 644 patients) published up to August 1998 were selected. A random-effects model was used to pool the data. RESULTS: Renal arterial stent placement proved highly successful, with an initial adequate performance in 98% and major complications in 11%. The overall cure rate for hypertension was 20%, whereas hypertension was improved in 49%. Renal function improved in 30% and stabilized in 38% of patients. The restenosis rate at follow-up of 6-29 months was 17%. Stent placement had a higher technical success rate and a lower restenosis rate than did renal PTA (98% vs 77% and 17% vs 26%, respectively; P <.001). The complication rate was not different between the two treatments. The cure rate for hypertension was higher and the improvement rate for renal function was lower after stent placement than after renal PTA (20% vs 10% and 30% vs 38%, respectively; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Renal arterial stent placement is technically superior and clinically comparable to renal PTA alone.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Prospective studies of diagnosis and intervention: the Dutch experience.

This prospective multicenter study included 1,205 patients, who were referred for difficult-to-treat hypertension or analysis of possible secondary hypertension. After a standardized selection protocol based on sharply defined drug-resistant hypertension or renal function impairment during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, patients underwent renal scintigraphy and a captopril-renin challenge test. A set of clinical characteristics was also recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of renal scintigraphy for diagnosing renal artery stenosis were 0.72 and 0.90 and of the captopril-renin test 0.77 to 0.91 and 0.69 to 0.75 depending on the criterion used. The clinical characteristics were used to construct a clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis, which had a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.87 at a cut-off level of 30% predicted probability. However, with the prediction rule a sensitivity of 0.90 could be reached by performing arteriography only in patients with a predicted probability of stenosis of > or =10%, resulting in a considerable reduction of the number of arteriograms to be made. A diagnostic strategy is advocated starting with drug-resistant hypertension and continuing to renal arteriography only in patients with increased probability of stenosis. Patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis were then randomized to balloon angioplasty (n = 56) versus antihypertensive medication (n = 50). Three months after randomization 22 patients from the medication group underwent balloon angioplasty in second instance. In an intention-to-treat analysis, no difference in blood pressure was found between the groups after 3 months, nor after 12 months of follow-up, although there was a small medication-sparing effect of balloon angioplasty. The lack of a beneficial effect of balloon angioplasty compared with medication could not be attributed to the high stenosis recurrence rate after angioplasty, nor to the fact that the inclusion criterion was set at a stenosis level of > or =50% so that patients with relatively mild stenosis were also included. Renal function after angioplasty was slightly better in the angioplasty group than in the medication group, and improvement of the renal scintigram occurred more often after angioplasty. Apart from the treatment of patients with specific characteristics, the presented therapeutic approach starts with extending the antihypertensive drug therapy to control blood pressure. Only if blood pressure cannot be controlled or if renal function deteriorates, balloon angioplasty (with stent placement) is indicated.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

In-vitro validation, with histology, of intravascular ultrasound in renal arteries.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of using intravascular ultrasound to characterize normal and diseased renal arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four renal artery specimens from 21 humans, removed at autopsy, were studied with intravascular ultrasound in vitro. From each vascular specimen, two to four sets of corresponding intravascular ultrasound images and histologic sections were subjected to qualitative analysis. The renal arterial wall was considered normal by intravascular ultrasound when the wall thickness (intima and media) was 0.5 mm or less. On intravascular ultrasound imaging, a distinction was made between bright lesions with or without peripheral shadowing (i.e. calcification). Histological sections were examined and fibromuscular lesions were scored with or without calcifications. Quantitative analysis of a multitude of intravascular ultrasound cross-sections (interval 5 mm) included assessment of the lumen area, vessel area, plaque area and percentage area obstructed. The target site (smallest lumen area) was compared with a reference site (largest lumen area before the first major side branch). RESULTS: Of the 130 corresponding intravascular ultrasound images and histologic sections analysed, 55 were normal and 75 presented a bright lesion on ultrasound; in 31 lesions, peripheral shadowing was involved. The sensitivity of the intravascular ultrasound in detecting calcifications was 87%, and the specificity was 89%. Lumen area reduction at the target site was associated with vessel and plaque area enlargement in eight specimens, with plaque area enlargement in 12 specimens and with a vessel area reduction in 21 specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound is a reliable technique for distinguishing renal arteries with or without a lesion. Both plaque development and local vessel narrowing may result in renal artery stenosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Inter-observer variability in the angiographic assessment of renal artery stenosis. DRASTIC study group. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative.

OBJECTIVE: To assess inter-observer agreement in the interpretation of renal angiograms. DESIGN: Comparison of the assessment of renal angiograms by three experienced radiologists, who evaluated the number of renal arteries and the presence, location, aspect and severity of a renal artery stenosis. SETTING: General hospital and university hospital serving urban and rural populations. PATIENTS: Patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension referred for diagnostic work-up; 312 angiograms with the intra-arterial digital subtraction technique were obtained from 289 consecutive patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-observer agreement was tested for the following parameters: number of arteries per kidney, presence of stenosis, location of stenosis (truncal, ostial), aspect of stenosis (concentric, eccentric, post-stenotic dilatation), severity of stenosis (reduction of lumen diameter in categories of 30%, 40%, etc. to 100%), and overall quality of the angiographic images. Kappa (kappa) values and weighted kappa between the three pairs of radiologists were used as estimates of inter-observer agreement RESULTS: Agreement about the number of renal arteries was reasonable (kappa = 0.50-0.72), as was agreement about the presence of stenosis (kappa = 0.68-0.86). Agreement about stenosis location and aspect was poor (kappa = 0.26-0.47 and kappa = 0.15-0.26, respectively). There was general agreement about the severity of stenosis (weighted kappa = 0.65-0.70), but it was not possible to distinguish between 50 and 60% stenosis or between 60 and 70% stenosis (kappa < 0.40). No correlation was found between agreement on severity of stenosis and the quality of the images. CONCLUSIONS: It is not realistic to make statements about what degree of renal artery stenosis is clinically significant, as long as the intra-arterial angiogram with digital subtraction remains the gold standard. It is likewise risky to rely too strongly on stenosis morphology as visualized by renal angiography in choosing between balloon angioplasty and stent deployment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis is a rare cause of hypertension. The gold standard for diagnosing renal artery stenosis, renal angiography, is invasive and costly. OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction rule for renal artery stenosis from clinical characteristics that can be used to select patients for renal angiography. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis of data from a prospective cohort of patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis. A prediction rule was derived from the regression model for use in clinical practice. SETTING: 26 hypertension clinics in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: 477 hypertensive patients who underwent renal angiography because they had drug-resistant hypertension or an increase in serum creatinine concentration during therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. RESULTS: Age, sex, atherosclerotic vascular disease, recent onset of hypertension, smoking history, body mass index, presence of an abdominal bruit, serum creatinine concentration, and serum cholesterol level were selected as predictors. The regression model was reliable (goodness-of-fit test, P > 0.2) and discriminated well between patients with stenosis and those with essential hypertension (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.84). The diagnostic accuracy of the regression model was similar to that of renal scintigraphy, which had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis, the clinical prediction rule can be considered as an alternative to renal scintigraphy. It can help to select patients for renal angiography in an efficient manner by reducing the number of angiographic procedures without the risk for missing many renal artery stenoses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The place of renal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Fifteen years of clinical experience.

BACKGROUND: Renal scintigraphy with radiolabeled pentetic acid (diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid [DTPA]) or, more recently, mertiatide (mercaptoacetyltriglycine [MAG3]), with or without captopril challenge, is widely recommended as a diagnostic test for renal artery stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To address (1) whether the diagnostic accuracy has been improved by the use of captopril and the introduction of mertiatide and (2) whether a renal scan that shows abnormalities is a useful criterion to select patients for renal arteriography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standard diagnostic protocol, using both scintigraphy and arteriography, was followed in 505 consecutive high-risk hypertensive patients who were evaluated for renovascular hypertension at the University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, from 1978 to 1992. RESULTS: Renal artery stenosis (> or = 50%) was present in 263 patients. When the single-kidney fractional uptake was used as a diagnostic criterion, a specificity of 0.90 was obtained at a cutoff value of 35% for the worst kidney in scintigraphy using pentetic acid without captopril challenge (n = 225) and at a cutoff value of 37% after captopril challenge (n = 280). This was associated with sensitivity levels of 0.65 and 0.68, respectively. The difference between the uptake of pentetic acid with and without captopril challenge in the 85 patients who were studied under both circumstances was no more accurate as a predictor of renal artery stenosis. In the 93 patients who were studied with mertiatide as well as with pentetic acid, both after captopril challenge, the diagnostic accuracy was no better with mertiatide than with pentetic acid; mertiatide failed to offer any advantage not only when the single-kidney fractional uptake was used as a criterion, but also with the use of other scintigraphic parameters (eg, time to peak, time to pyelum, overall shape of renographic curve, and kidney size). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of renal scintigraphy has not been improved by the introduction of mertiatide or by the use of captopril. The usefulness of scintigraphy as a diagnostic test for the presence of renal artery stenosis remains questionable. The physician will always confront either a substantial number of arteriograms that do not show abnormalities when renal scintigraphy is omitted as a screening step or a substantial number of missed diagnoses when a renal scan that shows abnormalities is used as a prerequisite for arteriography.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1997

Reproducibility and validity of quality of life measurements in hypertensive patients on stable medication.

OBJECTIVE: The reproducibility and validity of a hypertension-specific questionnaire and a genetic health questionnaire (the MOS Short-form General Health Survey) were evaluated for measuring the quality of life in a randomized controlled trial comparing balloon angioplasty and long-term medication in patients with renovascular hypertension. METHODS: The health questionnaires were filled out by 97 patients with hypertension on stable medication. The reproducibility of the questionnaires was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between the scales of the questionnaires to evaluate the validity. RESULTS: Medication had been changed to eliminate side-effects in an earlier phase of treatment. Only 7% of the patients reported non-compliance with the medication regime. Most patients suffered from physical symptoms, but the impact of long-term antihypertensive medication on the quality of life was not substantial. The reproducibility was good for most scales (ICC > 0.70), except for the role and social functioning scales. All correlations between the scales of the questionnaires were statistically significant and no contradictory correlations were found. CONCLUSIONS: The health questionnaires together form a reproducible and valid instrument for measuring the quality of life of hypertensive patients on stable medication.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗
PubMed1997

Endothelin and active renin levels in essential hypertension and hypertension with renal artery stenosis before and after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether active renin and endothelin levels in venous plasma differ between patients with renal artery stenosis and patients with primary hypertension. Among the patients with renal artery stenosis we also compared active renin and endothelin levels between subjects who had been cured or whose blood pressure had improved after treatment of the stenosis and those without a beneficial reaction after such treatment. METHODS: We measured immunoreactive endothelin and active renin levels in peripheral venous plasma before and 1 h after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in 25 patients with primary hypertension and in 27 patients with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in 21 patients of the latter group. For 11 patients of this group, hypertension was cured or there was an improvement, whereas 10 other patients did not respond to this treatment. Baseline active renin and endothelin levels were compared between these groups, as were the clinical characteristics of the patients. RESULTS: Baseline endothelin levels were similar in members of the renal artery stenosis [median 3.6 pg/ml (range 1.4-11.7)] and in members of the no stenosis group [5.0 pg/ml (1.5-8.0)]. Also baseline endothelin levels did not differ between members of the successfully treated [3.6 pg/ml (1.8-8.9)] and unsuccessfully treated groups [3.75 pg/ml (1.4-8.3)]. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition failed to cause a significant change in endothelin level in members of any of the patient groups. Although baseline renin levels differed significantly between members of the renal artery stenosis and no stenosis groups [40.2 microu/ml (0.9-543) versus 13.4 microu/ml (2.5-931), (P< 0.05)], there was no difference in baseline renin levels between the members of successful and unsuccessful groups [25.7 microu/ml (9.2-475.6) versus 65.3 microu/ml (12.3-542.6)]. ACE inhibition caused a significant increase in renin level in members of all groups except the unsuccessfully treated group. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating endothelin levels did not differ significantly among patients with essential hypertension, hypertension with renal artery stenosis and proven renovascular hypertension and, although the renin-angiotensin system was clearly activated in members of the renovascular hypertension group, ACE inhibition did not affect their endothelin levels. These results suggest that endothelin does not play a direct role in the pathophysiology of renovascular hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Renal artery stenosis towards the year 2000.

FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR SELECTING PATIENTS FOR RENAL ARTERIOGRAPHY: The functional diagnostic tests now available to select patients for renal arteriography, such as captopril-renal scintigraphy and the captopril-peripheral vein renin test, have a high degree of diagnostic accuracy, 70% sensitivity at 90% specificity, but they are still not good enough to assess the large population of hypertensives for renal artery stenosis. The use of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor challenge and the introduction of a new pharmacon, technetium-labelled mercapto-triglycine, have not sufficiently increased the value of scintigraphy and further improvement in the near future seems unlikely. THE USE OF CLINICAL CRITERIA TO IDENTIFY HIGH-RISK PATIENTS: A more realistic approach to the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis is to seek simple and sensible clinical criteria to identify high-risk patients. The blood pressure response to 2 months of treatment with a standardized two-drug regimen is a suitable criterion. Interim analysis of an ongoing prospective multicentre study in the Netherlands indicates that the prevalence of renal artery stenosis is as high as 25% in patients who are resistant to the combination of 10 mg amlodipine + 50 mg atenolol, compared with 15% in patients resistant to the combination of 20 mg enalapril + 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide. When drug resistance is used as the selection criterion for arteriography, the total number of cases detected with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography does not seem to differ according to which of these drug regimens is used. FUTURE POSSIBILITIES: The current enthusiasm for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) and stenting may be premature. With further improvement of non-invasive techniques to visualize the renal arteries, such as colour Doppler ultrasound with microparticle contrast enhancement or magnetic resonance angiography, it should become more attractive to follow patients with renal artery stenosis while they are being treated with drugs rather than automatically resorting to PTRA.

Angioplasty↗
PubMed1994

An improved method for the determination of islet amyloid polypeptide levels in plasma.

We describe an improved method for the determination of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) levels in plasma. Plasma is first extracted with acid-acetone, followed by a specific and sensitive radioimmunoassay (RIA) for IAPP using rabbit-anti-human-IAPP serum. Recovery of synthetic IAPP from plasma was 82 +/- 6% (n = 16). Standard samples, prepared in 'hormone-free' serum, were also extracted with acid-acetone. Displacement curves of serially diluted acid-acetone extracted plasma samples were parallel to the standard curve. The lower detection limit of the RIA was 2.3 +/- 0.1 fmol/sample (n = 5). Intra-assay variations for IAPP concentrations of 4, 17 and 32 pM were 16.3% (n = 10), 9.2% (n = 10) and 6.2% (n = 10); interassay variations were 35.9% (n = 14), 19.9% (n = 15) and 15.4% (n = 15), respectively. Non-stimulated IAPP levels ranged from 2.4 to 12 pM (mean 6 +/- 4 pM, n = 10) in healthy control subjects. IAPP was not detectable in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients before and after glucagon administration. In type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients basal levels ranged from 2.2 to 14.5 pM and glucagon-stimulated levels ranged from 2.2 to 38.9 pM. The increase in IAPP varied from 0 to 24.4 pM. The anti-human-IAPP serum had full cross-reactivity with rat IAPP (= mouse IAPP). Transgenic mice overexpressing the human IAPP gene showed elevated plasma IAPP levels as compared to (non-transgenic) control mice. It is concluded that the method presented for the determination of IAPP in plasma is reliable and easy to perform, yielding reproducible results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amyloid↗