Biomedical subjects

B Butler

Publications and source records attributed to B Butler.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed1984

Comparison of noninvasive arrhythmia induction techniques with electrophysiologic studies and evaluation of lorcainide in patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia.

Twenty-six patients (19 men and 7 women) with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) were studied using invasive and noninvasive techniques to induce VT. Of the study population, 12% had syncope and VT on Holter monitoring, 30% had cardiac arrest and 58% had symptomatic VT. All patients had antiarrhythmic agents stopped 5 half-lives before evaluation and then had autonomic profile (upright tilt, cold pressor test, exercise testing and hand grip) as well as programmed electrical stimulation studies performed. Autonomic profile testing induced VT in 5 of 26 patients (19%) and in only 1 patient was the arrhythmia reproducibly induced. All 26 patients had VT induced on electrophysiologic testing; 9 patients had nonsustained and 17 had sustained VT. Lorcainide administered intravenously prevented VT induction in 20 of 26 patients tested, whereas procainamide was effective in 11 of 24 patients. Ten of the 13 not protected by procainamide were protected by lorcainide. Twenty patients were started on long-term lorcainide therapy and followed up for 29 +/- 3.4 months. Five patients have discontinued therapy, 2 because of breakthrough arrhythmias, 2 because of severe sleep-wake disturbances and 1 because of private physician preference. An additional 3 patients died during therapy because of myocardial infarction in 1, progressive myopathy in 1 and sudden death in 1. Sixty percent of patients started on lorcainide therapy have continued. In this patient population, noninvasive induction of VT is not a sensitive or reproducible technique in assessing antiarrhythmic therapy. Furthermore, when selected on the basis of electrophysiologic testing, lorcainide is a well-tolerated and effective antiarrhythmic agent.

Aged↗

PubMed1984

Antiarrhythmic action of bethanidine.

Studies were performed in 20 patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) to determine the efficacy of bethanidine compared with procainamide in preventing VT induced by programmed electrical stimulation. Before administering bethanidine, 5 to 10 mg/kg, the patients received 15 mg of protriptyline orally 24 and 2 hours before electrophysiologic studies to prevent the orthostatic hypotensive effects of bethanidine. Sustained VT (VT not spontaneously stopping) was induced in 8 and nonsustained VT (10 beats or more, terminating spontaneously) was induced in 4 patients. Bethanidine, 5 mg/kg, protected in 7 patients, and 10 mg/kg protected 1 additional patient. Procainamide, 1,000 and 1,500 mg intravenously, protected 8 of 16 patients. Bethanidine prevented VT induction in 50% of the patients not protected by procainamide. Bethanidine facilitated VT induction in 3 patients, while procainamide facilitated VT induction in 1 patient. Four patients with symptomatic VT have received bethanidine therapy for an average of 11 +/- 1.3 months, without clinical recurrence of their VT. Concomitant administration of protriptyline attenuated the acute hemodynamic changes caused by bethanidine and chronic combined therapy of protriptyline and bethanidine abolished the severe orthostatic changes in blood pressure caused by bethanidine. These studies show that bethanidine is effective in preventing VT induction and, thus, its use may not be restricted only to cases of primary ventricular fibrillation.

Bethanidine↗

PubMed1984

The efficacy of cibenzoline in preventing PES induction of ventricular tachycardia in the dog.

The electrophysiologic effects of cibenzoline were studied using programmed electrical stimulation (PES) techniques and were compared to those of quinidine. Cibenzoline, like the conventional class 1 agent quinidine, was effective in preventing arrhythmia induction. Twelve dogs were given 0.02 mg/kg digoxin intravenously for seven days to achieve a steady-state digoxin level. On the eighth day, cibenzoline was administered in incremental doses (0.5 to 10.5 mg/kg) and PES was performed at 30-minute intervals. A mean dose of 2.6 +/- 0.8 mg/kg cibenzoline prevented ventricular tachycardia induction. At this dose, cibenzoline had no significant effect on mean arterial blood pressure, but PR interval increased by 17 +/- 9 per cent, QRS duration by 27 +/- 14 per cent, and the ventricular refractory period (ERP) for the first extra stimulus increased by 35 +/- 9 per cent. A gradual decrease in heart rate and an increase in PR interval and QRS duration was caused by incremental doses of cibenzoline. In six additional animals, quinidine was administered in incremental doses (1 to 30 mg/kg) and PES performed at 30-minute intervals. A mean of 15 +/- 5 mg/kg prevented induction of ventricular tachycardia in five animals. No significant change in heart rate, PR, QRS, and ERP was found at the effective dose.

Animals↗

PubMed1984

The effect of bepridil, verapamil, and quinidine in the prevention of ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation in the digitalized dog.

Bepridil, a new antianginal agent, has calcium channel-blocking activity and antiarrhythmic properties. To test the efficacy of bepridil as an antidysrhythmic agent, we looked at its effect on the induction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in dogs, utilizing programmed electrical stimulation (PES). Incremental doses of bepridil up to 20 mg/kg were given to five nondigitalized dogs and verapamil up to 20 mg, and PES was performed at each dose. Both drugs were not found to facilitate arrhythmia induction. Seventeen dogs were chronically digitalized and following digitalization, VT could be induced in all animals by PES. Six dogs were given bepridil and PES was reperformed at each dose. An average of 1.8 mg/kg was found to protect against induction of VT. Five dogs received verapamil and none was protected (all had VT induced), while five of six dogs given quinidine were protected at an average dose of 15.4 mg/kg. Bepridil produced a significant decrease in heart rate. A significant correlation was found at the effective antiarrhythmic dose of bepridil between percentage change in the effective refractory period for the first extrastimulus (ERP S2) and QTc (r = 0.96), suggesting that a parallel and homogeneous prolongation in repolarization and refractoriness is essential for the antiarrhythmic effect of bepridil. Bepridil is thus an effective antiarrhythmic agent that affords protection against induction of VT, and this action is similar to the conventional class I antiarrhythmic agent, quinidine, while lacking in another calcium channel blocker, verapamil.

Animals↗

PubMed1984

Studies on the possible mechanisms of lidoflazine arrhythmogenicity.

Lidoflazine is a calcium channel blocking agent that is effective and safe in the treatment of angina pectoris, but has been reported to be associated with sudden death when administered for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. Studies were performed in dogs to determine if lidoflazine caused a rise in serum digoxin concentration that could cause arrhythmias or if it was directly arrhythmogenic. Dogs received chronic injections of digoxin and then digoxin in combination with lidoflazine. No increase in digoxin concentration was found. Dogs also underwent programmed electrical stimulation while not receiving medications and then after incremental doses of lidoflazine administered intravenously. Lidoflazine did not cause spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and did not lower the threshold of ventricular tachycardia induction. Combined administration of lidoflazine and digoxin did not facilitate arrhythmia induction. These studies do not support a digoxin-lidoflazine interaction or a direct arrhythmogenic action of lidoflazine.

Animals↗

PubMed1983