Prolapsing aortic dissection.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to B Balasia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The relatively low specificity of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the diagnosis of aortic dissection (AD) or traumatic disruption of the aorta (TDA) has been attributed to linear artifacts. We sought to determine the incidence of intra-aortic linear artifacts in a cohort of patients with suspected AD or TDA, to establish the differential TEE diagnostic criteria between these artifacts and true aortic flaps, and to evaluate their impact on TEE diagnostic accuracy. METHODS AND RESULTS: During an 8-year period, patients at high risk of AD (n = 261) or TDA (n = 90) who underwent a TEE study and had confirmed final diagnoses were studied. In an initial retrospective series, linear artifacts were observed within the ascending and descending aorta in 59 of 230 patients (26%) and 17 of 230 patients (7%), respectively. TEE findings associated with linear artifacts in the ascending aorta were as follows: displacement parallel to aortic walls; similar blood flow velocities on both sides; angle with the aortic wall > 85 degrees; and thickness > 2.5 mm. Diagnostic criteria of reverberant images in the descending aorta were as follows: displacement parallel to aortic walls, overimposition of blood flow, and similar blood flow velocities on both sides of the image. In a subsequent prospective series (n = 121), systematic use of these diagnostic criteria resulted in improved TEE specificity for the identification of true intra-aortic flaps. CONCLUSIONS: Misleading intra-aortic linear artifacts are frequently observed in patients undergoing a TEE study for suspected AD or TDA. Routine use of the herein-proposed diagnostic criteria promises to further improve TEE diagnostic accuracy in the setting of severely ill patients with potential need for prompt surgery.
The acquisition, storage and retrieval of digital echocardiographic studies greatly facilitates image review and quantitation and permits the transmission of studies electronically. However, the considerable size of digital echocardiographic data files makes transmission over existing networks slow and impractical. Reduction in the size of these data files can be accomplished with digital image compression. We sought to evaluate the effects of MPEG-1 compression on the transfer time of digital echocardiographic studies over currently available network connections. Ninety consecutive routine clinical echocardiographic studies were randomly compressed at one of three compression ratios 60:1, 80:1, or 120:1 and sent to a receiving terminal using simulated transmission rates. Compression of digital echocardiographic studies at these ratios which, have been shown to maintain diagnostic image quality, reduced the size of digital echocardiographic studies to less than 1% of their original sizes which allowed transmission of echocardiographic studies over networks using 3ISDN or T1 lines with minimal waiting time.
The advantages of digital echocardiography studies include ease of retrieval, review, comparison, duplication, and quantitation as well as the potential for moving studies over networks. However, the large amounts of data associated with digital echocardiography studies have posed new problems. Reduction of the amount of data can be accomplished with image compression, in particular MPEG-1 (Moving Pictures Expert Group), which is designed for dynamic image sequences. However the effects of different levels of compression on the quality and diagnostic content of echocardiographic images need to be established. Digital sequences of single cardiac cycles were acquired in 40 consecutive patients, MPEG-1-compressed at different effective ratios (60:1, 80:1, 120:1, 200:1, 300:1, 370:1, 500:1), reviewed, and scored for endocardial visualization. The overall visualization scores and percentages of nonvisualized segments in the compressed images were not different from the uncompressed images up to a compression ratio of 200:1. Differential effects of compression were noted on a segmental basis and also varied with baseline image quality. The ability to correctly identify regional wall motion abnormalities did not decrease until compression ratios of 1:200 or higher were used. Digital echocardiography loops, MPEG-1-compressed at an effective ratio of 200:1, demonstrate no degradation in endocardial visualization quality or diagnostic content. Compression at this ratio has the potential to reduce the storage size of digital echocardiography studies to less than 1% of their current size.