Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B B Fredholm

Publications and source records attributed to B B Fredholm.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Contribution of adenosine receptors in the control of arteriolar tone and adenosine-angiotensin II interaction.

Adenosine (Ado) mediates vasoconstriction via A(1)-Ado receptors and vasodilation via A(2)-Ado receptors in the kidney. It interacts with angiotensin II (Ang II), which is important for renal hemodynamics and tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). The aim was to investigate the function of Ado receptors in the Ado-Ang II interaction in mouse microperfused, afferent arterioles. Ado (10(-11)-10(-4) mol/l) caused a biphasic response: arteriolar diameters were reduced (-7%) at Ado 10(-11)-10(-9) mol/l and returned to control values at higher concentrations. Treatment with Ang II (10(-10) mol/l) transformed the response into a concentration-dependent constriction. N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (A(1)-Ado receptor agonist) reduced diameters (12% at 10(-6) mol/l). Application of CGS21680 (10(-12)-10(-4) mol/l, A(2A) receptor agonist) increased the diameter by 13%. Pretreatment with ZM241385 (A(2A)-Ado receptor antagonist) alone or in combination with MRS1706 (A(2B)-Ado receptor antagonist) resulted in a pure constriction upon Ado, whereas 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT) (A(1)-Ado receptor antagonist) inhibited the constrictor response. Afferent arterioles of mice lacking A(1)-Ado receptor did not show constriction upon Ado. Treatment with Ado (10(-8) mol/l) increased the response upon Ang II, which was blocked by CPT. Ado (10(-5) mol/l) did not influence the Ang II response, but an additional blockade of A(2)-Ado receptors enhanced it. The action of Ado on constrictor A(1)-Ado receptors and dilatory A(2)-Ado receptors modulates the interaction with Ang II. Both directions of Ado-Ang II interaction, which predominantly leads to an amplification of the contractile response, are important for the operation of the TGF.

Adenosine↗

Differences between A 68930 and SKF 82958 could suggest synergistic roles of D1 and D5 receptors.

The isochroman A 68930 and the benzazepine SKF 82958 are two full dopamine D1 receptor agonists. Responses to these compounds are different in several important aspects. When given to rats in a novel environment, A 68930 caused a dose-dependent (0.019-4.9 mg/kg) suppression of locomotion. SKF 82958 had no such effect at any dose studied (0.051-3.3 mg/kg). In animals habituated to the environment, A 68930 had no effect but SKF 82958 increased locomotor activity. Both A 68930 and SKF 82958 caused a decrease in core temperature at early time points. Both agonists increased c-fos and NGFI-A expression in caudate putamen but only SKF 82958 did so in the accumbens nucleus (at 1.6 mg/kg). Quantitative receptor autoradiography showed that A 68930 is 9-13 times more potent than SKF 82958 at displacing the selective dopamine D1 antagonist [3H]SCH 23390. This difference agrees with the difference observed when the agonists were used to stimulate cAMP formation in cells transfected with the D1 receptor. In contrast, SKF 82958 was 5 times more potent than A 68930 in cells transfected with the D5 receptor. We suggest that the balance between signaling via dopamine D1 and D5 receptors determines the functional effects of agonists at D1/D5 receptors.

Animals↗

Intake inhibition by NPY and CCK-8: A challenge of the notion of NPY as an "Orexigen".

We tested the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) interacts with cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) in inhibition of intake of an intraorally infused solution of sucrose, a test of consummatory ingestive behavior. Both intracerebroventricular infusion of NPY (10 microg) and intraperitoneal injection of CCK-8 (0.5 micro/kg) reduced the intake of a 1M solution of sucrose infused intraorally at a rate of 0.5 ml/min in ovariectomized female rats, but the two peptides did not interact in inhibiting intraoral intake. By contrast, NPY increased intake if the sucrose solution was ingested from a bottle, a test demanding both appetitive and consummatory ingestive responses. CCK-8 inhibited intake in this test and its inhibitory effect was increased by simultaneous treatment with NPY. The activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), a brainstem relay mediating inhibition of intake, judged by the expression of c-fos-like immunoreactivity, was significantly increased after treatment with CCK-8 or NPY to approximately the same extent. Combined treatment with NPY and CCK-8 did not increase the c-fos-like immunoreactivity in the NTS above treatment with NPY or CCK-8 alone. These results strengthen the hypothesis that NPY, like CCK-8, is an inhibitor of consummatory ingestive behavior and suggest that this inhibition is mediated via the NTS.

Analysis of Variance↗

Adenosine A receptors are necessary for protection of the murine heart by remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia.

AIMS: Adenosine is involved in classic pre-conditioning (PC) in most species, acting through especially adenosine A1 and A3 receptors. We studied whether the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) was important for remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia using a mouse with targeted deletion of the A1R gene. METHODS: Remote, delayed adaptation was evoked by brain ischaemia (BIPC) through bilateral ligation of the internal carotid arteries. Through microdialysis probes placed in the brain and the abdominal aorta, we found that plasma adenosine increased following carotid artery ligation. Twenty-four hours after ligation, hearts were isolated, Langendorff perfused and subjected to 40 min global ischaemia and 60 min reperfusion. Hearts from sham operated and BIPC animals either with (A1R+/+) or without (A1R-/-) the gene for the adenosine A(1)R were compared with each other. RESULTS: In wild types, BIPC reduced infarct size and improved functional recovery during reperfusion, but BIPC did not protect hearts of A1R-/- mice. There were no significant differences between sham-operated A1R+/+ and A1R-/- in recovery of function or infarct size. The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase1/2 (ERK1/2), p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) were phosphorylated during reperfusion of sham treated hearts. The increase in ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation detected was attenuated in hearts of BIPC or A1R-/- animals. CONCLUSION: During BIPC adenosine acting on the A1R appears necessary for myocardial protection. MAPK signalling may possibly be involved in organ protection during the delayed phase of remote, delayed adaptation.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Distribution of antinociceptive adenosine A1 receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn, and relationship to primary afferents and neuronal subpopulations.

Adenosine can reduce pain and allodynia in animals and man, probably via spinal adenosine A1 receptors. In the present study, we investigate the distribution of the adenosine A1 receptor in the rat spinal cord dorsal horn using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, radioligand binding, and confocal microscopy. In the lumbar cord dorsal horn, dense immunoreactivity was seen in the inner part of lamina II. This was unaltered by dorsal root section or thoracic cord hemisection. Confocal microscopy of the dorsal horn revealed close anatomical relationships but no or only minor overlap between A1 receptors and immunoreactivity for markers associated with primary afferent central endings: calcitonin gene-related peptide, or isolectin B4, or with neuronal subpopulations: mu-opioid receptor, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, met-enkephalin, parvalbumin, or protein kinase Cgamma, or with glial cells: glial fibrillary acidic protein. A few adenosine A1 receptor positive structures were double-labeled with alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoaxolepropionic acid glutamate receptor subunits 1 and 2/3. The results indicate that most of the adenosine A1 receptors in the dorsal horn are located in inner lamina II postsynaptic neuronal cell bodies and processes whose functional and neurochemical identity is so far unknown. Many adenosine A1 receptor positive structures are in close contact with isolectin B4 positive C-fiber primary afferents and/or postsynaptic structures containing components of importance for the modulation of nociceptive information.

Adenosine↗

Adenosine A(2A) receptor facilitation of hippocampal synaptic transmission is dependent on tonic A(1) receptor inhibition.

Adenosine tonically inhibits synaptic transmission through actions at A(1) receptors. It also facilitates synaptic transmission, but it is unclear if this facilitation results from pre- and/or postsynaptic A(2A) receptor activation or from indirect control of inhibitory GABAergic transmission. The A(2A) receptor agonist, CGS 21680 (10 nM), facilitated synaptic transmission in the CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices (by 14%), independent of whether or not GABAergic transmission was blocked by the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor antagonists, picrotoxin (50 microM) and CGP 55845 (1 microM), respectively. CGS 21680 (10 nM) also inhibited paired-pulse facilitation by 12%, an effect prevented by the A(2A) receptor antagonist, ZM 241385 (20 nM). These effects of CGS 21680 (10 nM) were occluded by adenosine deaminase (2 U/ml) and were made to reappear upon direct activation of A(1) receptors with N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 6 nM). CGS 21680 (10 nM) only facilitated (by 17%) the K(+)-evoked release of glutamate from superfused hippocampal synaptosomes in the presence of 100 nM CPA. This effect of CGS 21680 (10 nM), in contrast to the isoproterenol (30 microM) facilitation of glutamate release, was prevented by the protein kinase C inhibitors, chelerythrine (6 microM) and bisindolylmaleimide (1 microM), but not by the protein kinase A inhibitor, H-89 (1 microM). Isoproterenol (30 microM), but not CGS 21680 (10-300 nM), enhanced synaptosomal cAMP levels, indicating that the CGS 21680-induced facilitation of glutamate release involves a cAMP-independent protein kinase C activation. To discard any direct effect of CGS 21680 on adenosine A(1) receptor, we also show that in autoradiography experiments CGS 21680 only displaced the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyladenosine ([(3)H]DPCPX, 0.5 nM) with an EC(50) of 1 microM in all brain areas studied and CGS 21680 (30 nM) failed to change the ability of CPA to displace DPCPX (1 nM) binding to CHO cells stably transfected with A(1) receptors. Our results suggest that A(2A) receptor agonists facilitate hippocampal synaptic transmission by attenuating the tonic effect of inhibitory presynaptic A(1) receptors located in glutamatergic nerve terminals. This might be a fine-tuning role for adenosine A(2A) receptors to allow frequency-dependent plasticity phenomena without compromising the A(1) receptor-mediated neuroprotective role of adenosine.

Adenosine↗

Decreased inflammatory pain due to reduced carrageenan-induced inflammation in mice lacking adenosine A3 receptors.

Mice with a targeted disruption of adenosine A(3) receptor (A(3)AR) gene were assessed for their nociceptive threshold and for their localized inflammatory response following carrageenan injected into the hindpaw. Under basal conditions no difference was seen between A(3)AR knock-out (A(3)AR(-/-)) and wild-type (A(3)AR(+/+)) mice in nociceptive response to mechanical or heat stimuli. The antinociceptive response to the intrathecal adenosine analogue R-phenylisopropyl adenosine (R-PIA) was also unchanged in the A(3)AR(-/-) mice. In contrast, heat hyperalgesia, plasma extravasation and edema following carrageenan-induced inflammation in the hind paw were significantly reduced in A(3)AR(-/-) mice compared to the A(3)AR(+/+) controls. Thus, mice lacking A(3)AR had deficits in generating the localized inflammatory response to carrageenan, supporting a pro-inflammatory role of A(3)AR in peripheral tissues. However, no evidence for a role of A(3)AR in nociception and the antinociceptive effect of R-PIA was found.

Animals↗

Adenosine A(1) receptor agonism in the immature rat brain and heart.

We examined if the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist adenosine amine congener (ADAC, 100 microg/kg i.p.) is neuroprotective in 7-day-old rats subjected to hypoxic ischemia. Brain damage, evaluated as weight deficit and gross morphology, was not affected by ADAC treatment. Nonetheless, ADAC (100 microg/kg i.p.) reduced heart rate by 44% (p<0.0001), indicating that the dose given was pharmacologically active. Adenosine A(1) receptors were determined by [(3)H] 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX)-binding and levels were 23% of the adult levels. GTP did not affect [(3)H] DPCPX-binding in the cerebral cortex at postnatal day 7 whereas there was strong enhancement of [(3)H] DPCPX-binding in the heart. This suggested a poor G-protein coupling at postnatal day 7 in the brain, which also was confirmed using GTP [gamma-(35)S]-binding in the presence of an adenosine A(1) receptor agonist. Thus, the lack of a neuroprotective effect of ADAC may be explained by the fact that adenosine A(1) receptors are not part of a functional unit in the 7-day-old rat brain.

Adenosine↗

Hyperalgesia, anxiety, and decreased hypoxic neuroprotection in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor.

Caffeine is believed to act by blocking adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors (A(1)R, A(2A)R), indicating that some A(1) receptors are tonically activated. We generated mice with a targeted disruption of the second coding exon of the A(1)R (A(1)R(-/-)). These animals bred and gained weight normally and had a normal heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature. In most behavioral tests they were similar to A(1)R(+/+) mice, but A(1)R(-/-) mice showed signs of increased anxiety. Electrophysiological recordings from hippocampal slices revealed that both adenosine-mediated inhibition and theophylline-mediated augmentation of excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission were abolished in A(1)R(-/-) mice. In A(1)R(+/-) mice the potency of adenosine was halved, as was the number of A(1)R. In A(1)R(-/-) mice, the analgesic effect of intrathecal adenosine was lost, and thermal hyperalgesia was observed, but the analgesic effect of morphine was intact. The decrease in neuronal activity upon hypoxia was reduced both in hippocampal slices and in brainstem, and functional recovery after hypoxia was attenuated. Thus A(1)Rs do not play an essential role during development, and although they significantly influence synaptic activity, they play a nonessential role in normal physiology. However, under pathophysiological conditions, including noxious stimulation and oxygen deficiency, they are important.

Adenosine↗

Opposite changes in adenosine A1 and A2A receptor mRNA in the rat following sleep deprivation.

Extracellular levels of adenosine increase in basal forebrain following prolonged wakefulness. Moreover, perfusion of adenosine into basal forebrain increases sleep. In this study we have examined the adenosine receptor subtypes, A1 and A2A, for changes in the levels of mRNA using RT-PCR and in situ hybridization and the receptor ligand binding efficiency using autoradiography following 3 and 6 h of sleep deprivation. We observed that A1 receptor mRNA levels increased in basal forebrain with no changes in other forebrain areas examined. A1 receptor binding was not affected. A2A receptor mRNA and ligand binding were undetectable in basal forebrain. However, in the olfactory tubercle, A2A mRNA and receptor binding decreased significantly. Based on the significant increase in the A1 but not in A2A receptor, we hypothesize that the effects of sleep deprivation-induced increased adenosine are mediated by A1 receptor in basal forebrain of rats.

Animals↗

Comparison of the potency of adenosine as an agonist at human adenosine receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

The potency of adenosine and inosine as agonists at human adenosine receptors was examined in a functional assay using changes in cyclic AMP (cAMP) formation in intact Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the human A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors. Adenosine increased cAMP formation in cells expressing the A2A (EC(50): 0.7 microM) and A2B (EC(50): 24 microM) receptors and inhibited forskolin (0.3-3 microM)-stimulated cAMP formation in cells expressing the A1 (EC(50): 0.31 microM) and A3 receptors (EC(50): 0.29 microM). The potency of adenosine at the A2A and A2B receptors was not altered by the presence of the uptake inhibitor nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR), whereas it was increased about 6-fold by NBMPR at the A1 and A3 receptors. In the presence of NBMPR, inosine was a potent agonist (EC(50): 7 and 0.08 microM at the A1 and A3 receptors, respectively), but with low efficacy especially at the A3 receptors. No effect of inosine was seen at the A(2) receptors. Caffeine, theophylline, and paraxanthine shifted the dose-response curve for adenosine at the A1, A2A, and A2B receptors. These results indicate that adenosine is the endogenous agonist at all human adenosine receptors and that physiological levels of this nucleoside can activate A1, A2A, and A3 receptors on cells where they are abundantly expressed, whereas pathophysiological conditions are required to stimulate A2B receptors to produce cyclic AMP.

Adenosine↗

International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors.

Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). The A(2A) and A(2B) receptors preferably interact with members of the G(s) family of G proteins and the A(1) and A(3) receptors with G(i/o) proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A(3) receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, experiments with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiological and particularly pathophysiological conditions. There are pharmacological tools that can be used to classify A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A(2B) receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homology-based modelling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.

Animals↗

Lack of tolerance to motor stimulant effects of a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist.

It is well known that tolerance develops to the actions of caffeine, which acts as an antagonist on adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Since selective adenosine A(2A) antagonists have been proposed as adjuncts to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) therapy in Parkinson's disease we wanted to examine if tolerance also develops to the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2, 4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261). SCH 58261 (0.1 and 7.5 mg/kg) increased basal locomotion and the motor stimulation afforded by apomorphine. Neither effect was subject to tolerance following long-term treatment with the same doses given intraperitoneally twice daily. There were no adaptive changes in A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors or their corresponding messenger RNA or in dopamine D(1) or D(2) receptors. These results demonstrate that the tolerance that develops to caffeine is not secondary to its inhibition of adenosine A(2A) receptors. The results also offer hope that long-term treatment with an adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist may be possible in man.

Animals↗

Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of adenosine A(2A) receptors on nerve growth factor-induced phosphorylation of extracellular regulated kinases 1/2 in PC12 cells.

Effects of nerve growth factor (NGF), adenosine and an adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist (CGS 21680) on the phosphorylation of extracellular-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) were examined in PC12 cells. Adenosine and CGS 21680stimulated ERK1/2, but inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 induced by a 10 min incubation with NGF. Longer treatment with CGS 21680 and NGF (1-2h) resulted in an additive effect on the activation of ERK1/2. Forskolin exerted the same effects, suggesting that they are mediated by cyclic AMP. These results indicate that adenosine A(2A) receptor induced increases in cyclic AMP can stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation per se, inhibit the initial and enhance the late NGF-induced activation of ERK1/2. These results may be explained by the fact that NGF action is mediated via different pathways at early and late time points.

Adenosine↗

Functional uncoupling of adenosine A(2A) receptors and reduced responseto caffeine in mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors.

Dopamine D(2) receptors (Rs) and adenosine A(2A)Rs are coexpressed on striatopallidal neurons, where they mediate opposing actions. In agreement with the idea that D(2)Rs tonically inhibit GABA release from these neurons, stimulation-evoked GABA release was significantly greater from striatal/pallidal slices from D(2)R null mutant (D(2)R(-/-)) than from wild-type (D(2)R(+/+)) mice. Release from heterozygous (D(2)R(+/-)) slices was intermediate. However, contrary to predictions that A(2A)R effects would be enhanced in D(2)R-deficient mice, the A(2A)R agonist CGS 21680 significantly increased GABA release only from D(2)R(+/+) slices. CGS 21680 modulation was observed when D(2)Rs were antagonized by raclopride, suggesting that an acute absence of D(2)Rs cannot explain the results. The lack of CGS 21680 modulation in the D(2)R-deficient mice was also not caused by a compensatory downregulation of A(2A)Rs in the striatum or globus pallidus. However, CGS 21680 significantly stimulated cAMP production only in D(2)R(+/+) striatal/pallidal slices. This functional uncoupling of A(2A)Rs in the D(2)R-deficient mice was not explained by reduced expression of G(s), G(olf), or type VI adenylyl cyclase. Locomotor activity induced by the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine was significantly less pronounced in D(2)R(-/-) mice than in D(2)R(+/+) and D(2)R(+/-) mice, further supporting the idea that D(2)Rs are required for caffeine activation. Caffeine increased c-fos only in D(2)R(-/-) globus pallidus. The present results show that a targeted disruption of the D(2)R reduces coupling of A(2A)Rs on striatopallidal neurons and thereby responses to drugs that act on adenosine receptors. They also reinforce the ideas that D(2)Rs and A(2A)Rs are functionally opposed and that D(2)R-mediated effects normally predominate.

Animals↗

Evidence for increased dorsal hippocampal adenosine release and metabolism during pharmacologically induced seizures in rats.

There is growing pharmacological evidence from several animal models of seizure disorder that adenosine possesses endogenous anticonvulsant activity. In order to further evaluate the role of adenosine in seizure activity, we monitored adenosine and its major biochemical metabolites inosine, xanthine, and hypoxanthine in the dorsal hippocampus by in vivo microdialysis before and during the induction of generalized seizures. Seizures were induced pharmacologically in groups of urethane-anesthetized rats by the administration of bicuculline (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.), kainic acid (12.0 mg/kg, i.v.) or pentylenetetrazol (100-250 mg/kg, i.p). Seizure activity was monitored electrophysiologically from the dorsal hippocampus. Dialysate hippocampal purine levels increased during all three seizure types. The largest increases were for the adenosine metabolites hypoxanthine and inosine, with smaller increases observed for adenosine and xanthine. Intra-hippocampal perfusion with the adenosine deaminase inhibitor erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl-adenine, (EHNA, 300 microM), only slightly increased basal hippocampal adenosine. Guanosine levels in the hippocampus, a purine not directly related to adenosine metabolism, were unaffected by all treatments. These findings demonstrate that an increase in hippocampal adenosine release and metabolism is associated with seizure activity and support the hypothesis that the increased adenosine levels may attenuate hippocampal seizure activity, possibly by terminating ongoing seizures and altering the pattern of subsequent seizures.

Adenine↗

Nitric oxide interacts with oxygen free radicals to evoke the release of adenosine and adenine nucleotides from rat hippocampal slices.

The present study examined some possible mechanisms underlying the previously demonstrated release of adenosine by nitric oxide (NO) donors. Perfusion with the NO-donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl penicillamine (SNAP; 300 microM) led to a significant increase in the release of [3H]purines from both unstimulated and electrically stimulated hippocampal slices prelabeled with [3H]adenine. The NO-donor also evoked the release of endogenous ATP and ADP from unstimulated slices and, when combined with electrical stimulation, the release of ATP, AMP and adenosine. The SNAP-induced [3H]purine release was calcium-dependent, but not affected by the glutamate receptor antagonists MK-801 ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a, d]-cyclohepten-5,10-imine;100 nM) and CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione; 10 microM). Zaprinast (5 microM), an inhibitor of the cyclic GMP-dependent phosphodiesterase and 8-Br-cyclic GMP (0.01-1 mM) failed to evoke the release of purines, whereas generation of oxygen free radicals by xanthine plus xanthine oxidase did evoke purine release. Coperfusion of SNAP with the free radical scavengers superoxide dismutase (SOD; 60 microg/ml) and catalase (50 microg/ml) reduced or eliminated the ability of the NO-donor to enhance [3H]purine release, but the poly (ADP-ribosyl) synthetase (PARS) inhibitor benzamide (500 microM) did not affect it. These data indicate that NO interacts with superoxide, likely forming peroxynitrite, which subsequently acts to release adenosine and adenine nucleotides from hippocampal tissue.

Adenine Nucleotides↗