Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Avidan

Publications and source records attributed to B Avidan.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

The value of menotrophin treatment for unexplained infertility prior to an in-vitro fertilization attempt.

This work was undertaken in order to evaluate retrospectively the relative efficacy of ovulation induction by menotrophins and that of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the treatment of unexplained infertility. These two treatments were compared between two groups of patients: 87 couples undergoing 446 cycles of ovulation induction by menotrophins (group A) and 72 couples undergoing 108 cycles of IVF-ET (group B). A total of 30 and 20 pregnancies were achieved in groups A and B for a rate of 34 and 28% per patient, respectively. A similar cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) was achieved for three cycles of ovulation induction (23%) and one cycle of IVF-ET (22%). The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in group A was 22% after three cycles and exceeded that of one IVF-ET cycle (17%). It is concluded that menotrophin treatment in unexplained infertility is highly beneficial and should precede an IVF attempt.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative staging of esophageal malignancy.

Surgery for esophageal cancer carries a high mortality rate and a low rate of resectability for cure. Accurate preoperative staging is therefore of utmost importance. Staging is based on computerized tomography (CT), and recently, the use of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). We performed EUS and CT on 10 patients with esophageal cancer. Tumors were staged according to the TNM classification. According to the CT results, seven patients had a T3 tumor, one T1-2 and two T0. All patients were diagnosed as T3 by EUS. One patient, who was treated by combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, converted to T0. Six patients were operated on, and in five, pathological findings were of an invasive tumor. The T stage was predicted correctly in five patients by CT and in all six patients by EUS. N stage was correctly diagnosed in two patients by CT and in five by EUS. It is concluded that EUS is superior to CT for preoperative staging of esophageal tumors. EUS should be undertaken as a routine procedure prior to surgery for esophageal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗