Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B A O'Connell

Publications and source records attributed to B A O'Connell.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Isochromosome 7q: the primary cytogenetic abnormality in hepatosplenic gammadelta T cell lymphoma.

Malignant lymphomas often have complex, nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities. Hepatosplenic gammadelta T cell lymphoma (gammadelta TCL) is an unusual post-thymic T cell lymphoma that primarily involves liver and spleen, often in young adult males. Few cases have had cytogenetic analysis. We report a consistent isochromosome 7q [i(7q)] abnormality in three cases of hepatosplenic gammadelta TCL, one with i(7q) as the sole abnormality at presentation. Three patients, 15-, 37- and 65-year-old males, presented with hepatosplenomegaly and fevers. Histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular genetic studies supported the diagnosis. Spleen, liver, and bone marrow contained sinusoidal infiltrates of atypical lymphoid cells of T cell immunophenotype. PCR performed on two cases demonstrated clonal T cell receptor gamma gene rearrangements. Cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow showed i(7q) as the sole abnormality at presentation in one case. The second case showed i(7q) in addition to two normal chromosomes 7, and other structural and numerical abnormalities. The third case showed i(7q) and a deletion in the long arm of chromosome 11. These findings support the proposal that i(7q) represents the primary nonrandom cytogenetic abnormality in hepatosplenic gammadelta TCL, and plays a role in its pathogenesis.

Adolescent↗

Case report: solid-phase platelet crossmatching to support the alloimmunized patient.

Platelet crossmatching by a solid-phase red cell adherence assay was used to provide compatible platelets for two alloimmunized patients with leukemia. In this study, a successful platelet transfusion was defined as giving a corrected count increment (CCI) of >7,500 in a posttransfusion sample. For patient A, a total of 205 random platelet concentrates (PCs) were crossmatched. Eleven were considered compatible. These 11 PCs were transfused during five transfusion episodes. Four of the five transfusions produced CCIs of >7,500 and were considered successful. Individually, eight of the eleven units were considered in vivo compatible, and five of the eight donors of these units agreed to become apheresis donors. Platelets from three of these five apheresis donors gave CCIs of >7,500. For patient B, 1,074 random PCs were crossmatched, and 332 were considered compatible. These units were administered during 78 different transfusions. Seventy-one of these transfusion episodes resulted in CCIs of >7,500. In addition, 19 apheresis donors were identified by platelet crossmatching, and they provided platelets for 38 of 39 successful transfusions for Patient B. Platelet crossmatching should therefore be considered when a blood bank is called upon to support a refractory thrombocytopenic patient.

Journal Article↗

Selection of histocompatible apheresis platelet donors by cross-matching random donor platelet concentrates.

It can be impossible to identify compatible platelet donors for alloimmunized patients whose HLA type cannot be determined or who have uncommon HLA types. We have previously shown that histocompatible donors can be rapidly identified by "mass screening" of platelet concentrates (PC), which are readily available in all blood banks, using a solid-phase adherence platelet cross-matching technique. Compatible PC were given to five alloimmunized patients with multispecific HLA antibodies refractory to random donor (RD) PC and selected single-donor platelet transfusions. After transfusions which produced satisfactory responses, we identified the original whole blood donors to serve as apheresis donors. Thus, the donors selected were compatible in vitro by cross-matching, and in vivo by transfusion. Only 3% to 13% of PC cross-matched for these alloimmunized patients were potentially compatible and it was necessary to screen large numbers (65 to 205 U) of PC per patient. Eighteen of 22 PC-selected transfusions produced satisfactory increments, allowing selection of 12 donors, all of whom were willing to undergo apheresis. Ten of 12 of these single-donor transfusions were successful; the two unsuccessful transfusions were infused 2 weeks after the initial PC cross-match and were still compatible with the original serum, but incompatible with more recent serum, demonstrating a change in antibody reactivity. The HLA types of the successful single donors selected by PC cross-matching differed widely from the patients' HLA types and, therefore, these donors would not have been selected by standard approaches using HLA typing. Cross-matching large numbers of RD PC for the identification of apheresis donors is helpful in the management of the alloimmunized patient and may be of particular utility for blood centers that do not have access to HLA-typed donor pools.

Blood Component Removal↗

Donor selection for alloimmunized patients by platelet crossmatching of random-donor platelet concentrates.

Samples obtained from bag segments of stored platelet concentrates (PCs) were crossmatched with sera from alloimmunized patients to identify potentially compatible donors. Sera from 41 patients who were refractory to random-donor platelet transfusions were tested. All sera had lymphocytotoxic antibody (LCTAb), and 37 patients had LCTAb that reacted strongly against greater than 75 percent of the cells in the panel. At least 18 units of PCs were tested per patient. Sera from 33 patients were tested by microenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (microELISA). Crossmatches with 703 (74 percent) of 944 PCs were positive, 23 percent were negative, 3 percent were indeterminant. Eight additional patients were also tested with a solid-phase system; 352 (85 percent) of 417 crossmatches were positive and 15 percent were negative. Patients with more reactive LCTAb had very few (often 0-2) in vitro compatible units. Thirty-four transfusions of pooled compatible PCs, all stored less than 3 days, were administered to clinically evaluable patients. Six of 20 transfusions selected by microELISA produced satisfactory increases (corrected count increments [CCIs] greater than 7500) 10 minutes after transfusion in 4 of 14 patients. Eight of 14 transfusions selected by solid-phase produced CCIs greater than 7500 in 5 of 8 patients. Although it is difficult to select large numbers of compatible units for heavily alloimmunized patients by these techniques, some transfusions were successful in patients who had very few HLA-compatible donors. This approach may be of particular value in emergency situations.

Blood Group Incompatibility↗

Incidence of thrombocytopenia and serious hemorrhage among patients with solid tumors.

To evaluate the incidence of thrombocytopenia and bleeding among patients with solid tumors treated intensively with chemotherapy, the records of 1274 patients treated between 1972 and 1980 on protocols known to produce significant myelosuppression were reviewed. Three hundred one patients with solid tumors (breast, lung, melanoma, sarcoma, primary brain, testicular, hypernephroma and others) experienced 5063 days of thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 50,000/microliters) and 670 days of severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 20,000/microliters). The median number of days thrombocytopenia was 6 (range, 1-250). There were only 44 episodes of clinically detectable serious bleeding, primarily gastrointestinal (26/44), during thrombocytopenia and all but seven episodes first occurred at platelet counts between 20,000-50,000/microliters. Fifteen of the 44 bleeding episodes were associated with coagulation abnormalities, 24 occurred during serious infection, and 12 occurred at sites of tumors. One hundred forty-seven of the 301 patients (49%) received platelet transfusions. In 86 thrombocytopenic patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, there was no evidence of CNS bleeding during thrombocytopenia. Hemorrhagic deaths were uncommon, and of the 12 patients who died of bleeding, 7 had normal counts. There is a very low incidence of significant thrombocytopenia or bleeding among patients with solid tumors treated with combination chemotherapy or experimental agents escalated to maximally tolerated doses. These data suggest that with respect to thrombocytopenic bleeding intensive treatment of patients with solid tumors can be pursued with relative safety utilizing the standard transfusion supportive measures now widely available.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Psychopathic disorder.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antisocial Personality Disorder↗

Psychopathic disorder.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antisocial Personality Disorder↗