Biomedical subjects

Axel Dalhoff

Publications and source records attributed to Axel Dalhoff.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Redefining penems.

The antimicrobial class of penems has the potential to address most of the relevant resistance issues associated with beta-lactam antibiotics because of their exceptionally broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and their intrinsic stability against hydrolytic attack by many beta-lactamases including ESBL and AmpC enzymes. The subclass of carbapenems covers the spectrum of hospital pathogens whereas the subclass of penems covers community pathogens. The only currently available penem, faropenem, has a low propensity for resistance development, beta-lactamase induction and selection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This makes it attractive for the treatment of community-acquired infections and for step-down or sequential therapy following carbapenem treatment without jeopardizing the activity of carbapenems or the entire beta-lactam class in the hospital environment.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus levofloxacin (500 mg) in plasma and urine of male and female healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.

The new extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin XR) was designed for once-daily administration in the treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI). The aim of this study was to compare concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion (UE) and pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus those of levofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose. In this randomised crossover study, 12 volunteers (6 males, 6 females) received a single oral dose of 1000 mg ciprofloxacin XR or 500 mg levofloxacin to assess the concentrations (by high-pressure liquid chromatography) in plasma up to 32 h and the UE at intervals up to 36 h. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were studied: C(max), t(max), t(1/2), AUC(plasma0-->infinity), AUC(plasma0-->last), Cl(ren), maximal urinary concentration (U(max)), AUC(urine0-->last) and UE. Both fluoroquinolones were well tolerated. The plasma concentrations of levofloxacin were significantly higher than those of ciprofloxacin XR throughout the study period. The urinary concentrations of ciprofloxacin XR were significantly higher than those of levofloxacin in the first collection interval (0-4 h), whereas the concentrations of levofloxacin were significantly higher than those of ciprofloxacin XR in the five last collection intervals (12-36 h). The median proportions of cumulative renal excretion of the administered dose of the parent drug up to 36 h were 43.1% for ciprofloxacin XR (range, 13.7-50.8%; mean +/- standard deviation (S.D.), 40.5 +/- 9.9%) and 79.8% for levofloxacin (range, 74.0-88.2%; mean +/- S.D., 80.4 +/- 5.5%). C(max), AUC(plasma0-->infinity), AUC(plasma0-->last) and UE were statistically significantly higher in the levofloxacin than in the ciprofloxacin XR phase; t(max), Cl(ren) and U(max) were statistically significantly higher in the ciprofloxacin XR phase than in the levofloxacin phase; and AUC(urine0-->last) and t(1/2) were not statistically different. After an oral administration of ciprofloxacin XR 1000 mg and levofloxacin 500 mg, C(max) and AUC(plasma0-->infinity) were significantly higher in the levofloxacin phase. UE of ciprofloxacin XR 1000 mg once daily, however, was equivalent to that of levofloxacin 500 mg, and overall comparable urinary concentrations and AUC(urine) were reached by both drugs. Therefore, it can be assumed that the two doses investigated can be considered equivalent for the treatment of UTI.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2005

Moxifloxacin and azithromycin but not amoxicillin protect human respiratory epithelial cells against streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro when administered up to 6 hours after challenge.

We determined the protective effect of moxifloxacin, azithromycin, and amoxicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection of respiratory cells. Moxifloxacin and azithromycin effectively killed intracellular S. pneumoniae strains and protected respiratory epithelial cells significantly even when given 6 h after S. pneumoniae challenge. Amoxicillin was less effective.

Amoxicillin↗

PubMed2004

Towards targeted prescribing: will the cure for antimicrobial resistance be specific, directed therapy through improved diagnostic testing?

The discovery of antimicrobial agents was one of the major events of the twentieth century. However, with the 'antibiotic era' barely five decades old, we are now faced with the global problem of emerging resistance in virtually all pathogens. Guidelines and admonishments to improve prescribing have had little effect. At this point, in the twenty-first century, we are on the threshold of another era of discovery-that of molecular diagnostics. We postulate that the development and use of new molecular microbiological testing, coupled with an ever-improving understanding of how best to use these precious drugs in the treatment of infection, offers the greatest hope yet for physician prescribing that can retard, or perhaps even reduce, the development of drug resistance in many microbial species. This diagnostic advance could preserve the utility of antimicrobial agents well into the future for the benefit of all people.

Drug Prescriptions↗

PubMed2004

Novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for prediction of outcomes with an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin.

The pharmacokinetics of an extended-release (XR) formulation of ciprofloxacin has been compared to that of the immediate-release (IR) product in healthy volunteers. The only significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between the two formulations was seen in the rate constant of absorption, which was approximately 50% greater with the IR formulation. The geometric mean plasma ciprofloxacin concentrations were applied to an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model exposing three different clinical strains of Escherichia coli (MICs, 0.03, 0.5, and 2.0 mg/liter) to 24 h of simulated concentrations in plasma. A novel mathematical model was derived to describe the time course of bacterial CFU, including capacity-limited replication and first-order rate of bacterial clearance, and to model the effects of ciprofloxacin concentrations on these processes. A "mixture model" was employed which allowed as many as three bacterial subpopulations to describe the total bacterial load at any moment. Comparing the two formulations at equivalent daily doses, the rates and extents of bacterial killing were similar with the IR and XR formulations at MICs of 0.03 and 2.0 mg/liter. At an MIC of 0.5 mg/liter, however, the 1,000-mg/day XR formulation showed a moderate advantage in antibacterial effect: the area under the CFU-time curve was 45% higher for the IR regimen; the nadir log CFU and 24-h log CFU values for the IR regimen were 3.75 and 2.49, respectively; and those for XR were 4.54 and 3.13, respectively. The mathematical model explained the differences in bacterial killing rate for two regimens with identical AUC/MIC ratios.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Immunomodulatory effects of quinolones.

We review data on the in-vitro, ex-vivo, in-vivo, and clinical effects of fluoroquinolones on the synthesis of cytokines and their mechanisms of immunomodulation. In general, most fluoroquinolone derivatives superinduce in-vitro interleukin 2 synthesis but inhibit synthesis of interleukin 1 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha; furthermore, they enhance significantly the synthesis of colony-stimulating factors (CSF). Fluoroquinolones affect in-vivo cellular and humoral immunity by attenuating cytokine responses. Interleukins 10 and 12 have an important role in the functional differentiation of immunocompetent cells and trigger the initiation of the acquired immune response. In addition, certain fluoroquinolones were seen to enhance haematopoiesis by increasing the concentrations of CSF in the lung as well as in the bone marrow and shaft. Those fluoroquinolones exerting significant effects on haematopoiesis were those with a cyclopropyl moiety at position N1 of their quinolone core structure. Mechanisms that could explain the various immunomodulatory effects of fluoroquinolones include: (1) an effect on intracellular cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate and phosphodiesterases; (2) an effect on transcription factors such as nuclear factor (NF)kappaB, activator protein 1, NF-interleukin-6 and nuclear factor of activated T cells; and (3) a triggering effect on the eukaryotic equivalent of bacterial SOS response with its ensuing intracellular events. Further studies are required, especially in the clinical setting to exploit fully the potential of the immunomodulatory effect of fluoroquinolones during, for example, immunosuppression, chronic airway inflammatory diseases, and sinusitis.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2003

The art of fusion: from penams and cephems to penems.

This synopsis of published literature summarises the key chemical and bacteriological characteristics of penicillins, i.e. penams, cephalosporins, i.e. cephems, and their hybrid structure, i.e. the penems. Consequently, the antibacterial spectrum of a typical penem, e.g. faropenem, encompasses gram-positive as well as gram-negative species. Dependent from the substituents at position 1 of the five-membered saturated ring fused to the beta-lactam ring oxa-, carba-, or thiopenems can be differentiated. A major determinant of their antibacterial activity and CNS-excitatory potential, however, is the C-2 side chain. The excitatory potential correlates with the basicity of the C-2 side chain as does their antibacterial activity against gram-negative species and non-fermenters like P. aeruginosa. Lipophilicity is a determinant for good in vitro activity against gram-positive bacteria. Several investigational penems exhibit interesting antibacterial spectra, encompassing methicillin resistant staphylococci, enterococci and even P. aeruginosa due to their improved binding affinity to both wild-type and modified low-affinity penicillin binding proteins. The development of these agents may offer therapeutic alternatives for the management of infections.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗