Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Atul Khasnis

Publications and source records attributed to Atul Khasnis.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Recurrent syncope following radiation therapy.

This case report describes a 51-year-old man who presented with syncope. His electrocardiogram showed an abnormally long pause and the electrophysiology study revealed a prolonged H-V interval. This was attributed to the radiation therapy he received to the chest. He was successfully treated with implantation of a permanent pacemaker. This case highlights this rare complication of radiation-induced conduction system disease and management of this potentially life-threatening condition.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗
PubMed2006

Inappropriate ICD therapy: does device configuration make a difference.

INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy (IT) is a common complication in patients with ICD. IT is commonly triggered by supraventricular tachycardias (SVT). Dual chamber ICDs (D-ICDs) may distinguish SVT from ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation better than single chamber ICDs (S-ICDs) and may be associated with a smaller incidence of IT. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 386 patients who had an ICD implanted for an AHA class I indication. Intracardiac electrograms were used to classify shocks as either appropriate or inappropriate. RESULTS: Of 295 patients with an S-ICD, 66 (22.3%) received IT, compared to 5 (5.4%) of 91 patients with a D-ICD. The likelihood of being event-free at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 96.1%, 96.1%, 96.1%, and 89% for patients with D-ICD and 80.7%, 72.7%, 69.6%, and 66.4%, respectively, for patients with S-ICD (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed no significant association with age, sex, history of atrial fibrillation, history of hypertension, or ejection fraction. SVTs were the commonest cause of IT in our patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with D-ICD are less likely to receive IT as compared to patients with S-ICD.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

3-dimensional mapping and radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter in a patient with interrupted inferior vena cava.

The presence of isolated interrupted inferior vena cava (IVC) is very rare. Though the occurrence of typical atrial flutter in this setting has recently been described, the use of 3-dimensional activation mapping to aid the management of such patients has not yet been described. We report the successful ablation of this arrhythmia in a 63-year-old woman using the superior route through the internal jugular vein with the help of a mapping system.

Atrial Flutter↗
PubMed2004

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Mortality benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NS-VT) and inducible VT is well defined. Although NS-VT may suggest an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), the role of ICD therapy is unclear. This retrospective study compares follow-up data in these two groups after ICD implantation. METHODS: 153 consecutive patients with ICD implantation for NS-VT were analyzed. ICM patients received an ICD if they had inducible VT at electrophysiology study (EPS). NICM patients did not routinely undergo EPS before ICD implantation. RESULTS: There were 48 patients (33 males) in NICM group and 105 patients (89 males) in the ICM group. Baseline characteristics including mean ejection fraction (EF), distribution in various New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes, and the mean duration of follow up in the two groups were similar. 50% of the patients in the NICM group and 36% in the ICM group received appropriate therapies (p = 0.106). The mean number of appropriate therapies in the two groups were similar (23.3 +/- 56.7 and 22.5 +/- 59.5 respectively, p = NS). The percentage of patients with inappropriate therapies in the two groups were 27% and 23% respectively (p = NS). Patients in the NICM group received appropriate ICD discharges at a greater rate (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing ICD implantation for NICM and NS-VT receive appropriate ICD therapy at a greater rate than those implanted for ICM, NS-VT, and a positive EPS. Although these data do not prove survival benefit in NICM, they suggest a beneficial effect.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Does device-based testing save time during automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation?

BACKGROUND: Defibrillation testing can be done either via an external cardiac defibrillator or directly via the implanted defibrillator during implantation (device-based testing). The advantage of one testing methodology over the other has not been adequately studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (72% men) were randomized into two groups depending on the defibrillation testing methodology used--external cardiac defibrillation and device-based testing groups. R-wave, pacing threshold, pacing impedance, defibrillation threshold, defibrillation pathway impedance and total procedure time were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Device-based testing did not significantly reduce the procedure time. Lead and defibrillation parameters were similar in both the groups; lead repositioning and replacement were required in three patients in the external cardiac defibrillation group.

Aged↗