Biomedical subjects
Atholl Johnston
Publications and source records attributed to Atholl Johnston.
A pharmacokinetic and clinical review of the potential clinical impact of using different formulations of cyclosporin A. Berlin, Germany, November 19, 2001.
A meeting of 14 transplant and pharmacokinetic specialists from Europe and North America was convened in November 2001 to evaluate scientific and clinical data regarding the use of different formulations of cyclosporin A (CsA). The following consensus was achieved. (1) CsA is a critical-dose drug with a narrow therapeutic window. Clinical outcomes after transplantation are affected by the pharmacokinetic properties of CsA, particularly by its bioavailability, and by intrapatient variability in CsA exposure. (2) Standard bioequivalence criteria do not address differences in CsA pharmacokinetics between transplant recipients and healthy volunteers, or between subpopulations of transplant recipients. (3) In some circumstances, currently available formulations of CsA that meet standard bioequivalence criteria are likely to be nonequivalent with respect to pharmacokinetic characteristics. (4) The choice of CsA formulation can affect the short- and long-term clinical outcome. Currently, there is a lack of clinical comparisons between generic CsA formulations and the Neoral formulation (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey). Initial retrospective data from the Collaborative Transplant Study suggest that use of generic CsA formulations may result in reduced graft survival at 1 year. (5) Management of transplant recipients by monitoring Neoral concentrations 2 hours after dosing (C(2)) reduces the incidence and severity of acute rejection compared with monitoring of trough concentrations with no increase in toxicity. C(2) monitoring has been developed based on the pharmacokinetics of Neoral only and has not been evaluated or validated for generic formulations of CsA. (6) The major costs of care after transplantation relate to the management of poor clinical outcomes and toxicity. CsA formulations with different pharmacokinetic properties may be associated with varying clinical outcomes, which would be expected to affect total health care costs. (7) The transplant physician is responsible for selecting immunosuppressive agents and formulations for his or her patients. Any switch between CsA formulations in a particular patient should take place only in a controlled setting with adequate pharmacokinetic monitoring.
Longitudinal evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral) in pediatric renal transplant recipients and assessment of C2 level as a marker for absorption.
BACKGROUND: There are important differences in CsA pharmacokinetics between adult and pediatric patients, such that pharmacokinetic data can not necessarily be extrapolated from the adult to the pediatric setting. Research in adult renal transplant patients has shown that adequate cyclosporin exposure (AUC0-4) in the first week post-transplant is important for successful clinical outcome, and that cyclosporin concentration at 2 h post-dose (C2) provides the optimal single-time point marker for AUC0-4. Clinically, dose management based on C2 level results in a low incidence of acute rejection in the adult renal transplant population. The study reported here undertook pharmacokinetic profiling in de novo renal transplant patients over a period of 6 months and retrospectively assessed alternative monitoring strategies based on pharmacokinetic findings and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This open-label, observational, prospective study was carried out at four UK transplant centers over a period of 6 months in pediatric de novo renal transplant recipients receiving the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (Neoral) according to local protocol. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic profiles (8-16 blood samples each) were performed on days 5 and 14 and at weeks 4, 13 and 26 post-transplant. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were recruited (median age 10 yr, range 3-18 yr). At 6 months, patient survival was 100% and graft survival was 91%. The incidence of clinically determined acute rejection was 41% (13 of 32). Six patients discontinued Neoral before 6 months: three due to graft loss, one due to rejection, one due to renal toxicity and one due to hypertrichosis. At all time points studied, C2 correlated more closely with AUC0-4 and with AUC0-12 than did the pre-dose cyclosporin concentration (C0, or trough). Patients achieving C2 > 1.5 microg/mL by the fifth postoperative day experienced no acute rejection in the first 6 months, compared with a 50% rejection rate among patients with C2 < 1.5 microg/mL (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that C2 level >1.7 microg/mL was associated with approximately 90% probability of freedom from acute rejection. Analysis of renal function across patients grouped according to cyclosporine exposure (AUC0-4, C2) showed no adverse effects of higher/increased exposure on creatinine or GFR. CONCLUSIONS: C2 level provides a more reliable marker for CsA exposure than C0 in pediatric renal transplant recipients, and is more closely predictive of acute rejection risk. A C2 target of 1.7 microg/mL appears appropriate in this population during the immediate post-transplant period in order to maximize clinical benefit.
Monitoring cyclosporin in blood: between-assay differences at trough and 2 hours post-dose (C2).
With the introduction of a cyclosporin monitoring strategy based on the use of a sample collected 2 hours after dosing (C2) rather than the predose sample (C0), there was concern that the differences in blood cyclosporin results from the various assay systems would result in assay-specific target ranges for C2 monitoring. In addition, it was not known if the different proportion of cyclosporin metabolites in the blood 2 hours after dosing compared with that seen in predose samples would alter the relationship between the various assay methodologies. The aim of this study was to address these issues using blood samples from patients who had undergone kidney and liver transplantation. To do this, paired samples were collected predose and 2 hours after cyclosporin dosing at various periods following transplantation in kidney (88 paired samples) and liver (165 paired samples) transplant recipients. Cyclosporin was measured in these samples using five different immunoassays (radioimmunoassay, two fluorescent polarization immunoassays, and two homogeneous immunoassays) and high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results of the study showed that when using these immunoassays to measure blood cyclosporin concentrations at C0, the cross-reactivity of the antibodies in the different immunoassay kits resulted in target therapeutic ranges that would need to vary between assays to maintain parity. However, when the same assays were used to measure the blood cyclosporin concentration at C2, the results were congruent, and assay-specific target therapeutic ranges should not be necessary. Thus, when adopting a C2 monitoring strategy, it is possible to use target therapeutic ranges that are independent of the assay system used.
Predicting coronary risk in the general population--is it necessary to measure high-density lipoprotein cholesterol?
BACKGROUND: The Joint British Societies Coronary Risk Prediction Charts recommend the use of a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol value of 1 mmol/l where actual values have not been measured. It is important to quantify the impact of this advice if risk assessments are to be sufficiently accurate to guide treatment decisions. DESIGN: The risks of 5005 individuals from the Health Survey for England 1998 were calculated using the Joint British Societies charts. Each individual's risk was recalculated assuming a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol value of 1 mmol/l. These risk estimates were compared with those derived from the Framingham equation. METHODS: Using the Framingham equation as the gold standard, the positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals of the Joint British charts with actual and estimated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol values were calculated. RESULTS: At the 30% 10-year coronary heart disease risk threshold using measured high-density lipoprotein cholesterol values, the charts had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 99%. Using an estimated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol value of 1 mmol/l reduced the sensitivity to 58% with a specificity of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of measured high-density lipoprotein cholesterol values there was good agreement between the Framingham equation and the Joint British Societies charts. The use of a fixed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol value of 1 mmol/l introduced important and significant errors into the risk assessment. This study reinforces the need to measure both total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when assessing coronary risk.
Tacrolimus pharmacogenetics: polymorphisms associated with expression of cytochrome p4503A5 and P-glycoprotein correlate with dose requirement.
BACKGROUND: There is marked heterogeneity in blood concentrations of tacrolimus following standard body-weight-based dosing. This is most apparent in black patients, who have a higher dose requirement when compared with other ethnic groups. Differences in intestinal P-glycoprotein and hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P4503A activity have been postulated as contributing to this problem. METHODS: The dose-normalized blood concentrations of tacrolimus at 3 months after renal transplantation were related to CYP3AP1 and multiple drug resistance (MDR)-1 genotypes determined by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: We found that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the CYP3AP1 pseudogene (A/G(44)) that previously has been noted to be more common in African Americans and strongly associated with hepatic CYP3A5 activity correlated well with the tacrolimus dose requirement. A weaker association was found for a polymorphism in the MDR-1 gene, which influences intestinal P-glycoprotein expression. CONCLUSIONS: The CYP3AP1 genotype is a major factor in determining the dose requirement for tacrolimus, and genotyping may be of value in planning patient-specific drug dosing.
Pharmacokinetics of oral cyclosporine (Neoral) in heart transplant recipients during the immediate period after surgery.
Neoral cyclosporine has better absorption characteristics than the original Sandimmun formulation. This has allowed Neoral to be administered orally in circumstances where Sandimmun had been ineffective, including the postoperative phase of liver transplantation. Sampling strategies, such as the measurement of drug concentration 2 h after oral administration, have been used in a variety of settings to estimate systemic exposure to Neoral (measured as the area under the blood concentration curve (AUC) of the drug) in blood. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether Neoral could be administered orally immediately after heart transplantation and to determine which pharmacokinetic parameters reflect systemic drug exposure in this setting. Eight male patients (mean age 50 years) undergoing a first heart transplant were studied. Neoral was administered orally before surgery and at 12-h intervals via a nasogastric tube after surgery. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on postoperative days 1, 3 and 5. Cyclosporine concentrations were measured with the Dade Behring Emit assay, which is specific for the parent drug. Drug concentrations were dose-normalised and drug exposure was measured by the AUC. Drug exposure following administration (AUC(0-12)) was low on day 1 but increased by 99% between postoperative day 1 and day 5 ( P<0.05), indicating more complete absorption of cyclosporine; exposure in the first 4 h post-dose (AUC(0-4)) increased by 126% ( P<0.01), reflecting more rapid cyclosporine absorption, and the maximum blood concentration observed increased by 137% ( P<0.05) during the same period. The correlation between the cyclosporine trough concentration and AUC(0-12) was low on all days. Due to the changing pattern of cyclosporine absorption, concentration measurements at a single time point could not accurately predict 12-h exposure to the drug on all study days. However, the drug concentration at 2 h post-dose had a high correlation with drug exposure during the first 4 h (correlation of C(2) to AUC(0-4): r(2)>0.93 on all days). Absorption of Neoral was low immediately after heart transplantation but improved substantially during the first 5 days after surgery. No single timed measurement of drug concentration reflected cyclosporine exposure; however, the 2-h concentration did provide an accurate measure of the early phase of drug absorption (AUC(0-4)). Oral administration of Neoral may result in inadequate immunosuppression immediately after heart transplantation unless it is supplemented either by intravenous cyclosporine or by the use of an induction agent.
Recommendations for the implementation of Neoral C(2) monitoring in clinical practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential to maintain the efficacy of many immunosuppressant drugs while minimizing their toxicity. TDM has become more refined with the development of new monitoring techniques and more specific assays. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes current data on TDM of the following immunosuppressant drugs used in organ transplantation: cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. METHODS: Published data were identified by a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature through March 2001 using the terms therapeutic drug monitoring, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Relevant conference abstracts were also included. RESULTS: TDM of cyclosporine has been well studied, and recent findings indicate that monitoring of drug levels 2 hours after dosing is a more sensitive predictor of outcome than trough (C0) monitoring. C0 levels are being used more widely in TDM of tacrolimus; however, the relationship between C0 and area under the curve has varied widely in clinical trials, with correlations ranging from 0.11 to 0.92. The use of TDM of sirolimus, everolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil is evolving rapidly. CONCLUSIONS: TDM of immunosuppressant drugs that have a narrow therapeutic index is an increasingly useful tool for minimizing drug toxicity while maximizing prevention of graft loss and organ rejection.
Influence of albumin supplementation on tacrolimus and cyclosporine therapy early after liver transplantation.
Liver transplant recipients administered gelatin (GEL) rather than human albumin solution (HAS) can become profoundly hypoalbuminemic in the early postoperative period and often have hepatic dysfunction at this time. The combined effect of these two abnormalities could be an increase in the unbound (active) concentration of low-extraction highly albumin-bound drugs, such as tacrolimus (TAC). This may increase the efficacy and/or toxicity of such drugs. We prospectively compared the clinical outcome of 69 de novo liver transplant recipients randomized primarily to TAC or cyclosporine (CYA) and secondarily to HAS or GEL therapy during the first 14 days after liver transplantation. Antipyrine clearance on the 7th postoperative day was used as a measure of liver metabolic function. Serum albumin levels were significantly lower in both GEL arms than HAS arms during the first 14 days (P <.001). Although antipyrine clearance was similar in all four trial arms, it was intermediate between that found in historic healthy controls and patients with cirrhosis (P <.0001). Serum creatinine concentrations were significantly greater in the TAC plus GEL arm than the other three arms (P <.001). The linearized treated acute rejection rate was significantly greater in the TAC plus HAS arm than the other three arms (relative risk, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 3.78; P =.03). These data indicate that excess nephrotoxicity can occur with TAC in liver transplant recipients with impaired hepatic metabolism who are administered GEL. In addition, supplementary albumin may reduce the efficacy of TAC in liver transplant recipients at a time when the risk for rejection is greatest.
Oral hydrocortisone administration in children with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency leads to more synchronous joint GH and cortisol secretion.
In humans, GH and cortisol are secreted in a pulsatile fashion and a mutual bidirectional interaction between the GH/IGF-I axis and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has been established. Classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is characterized by a defect in the synthesis of glucocorticoids and often mineralocorticoids, and adrenal hyperandrogenism. Substitution therapy is given to prevent adrenal crises and to suppress the abnormal secretion of androgens and steroid precursors from the adrenal cortex. However, treatment with twice or three times daily oral hydrocortisone does not mimic physiological adrenal rhythms and may influence the activity of the GH/IGF-I axis. We investigated the pattern of GH and cortisol secretion and the synchrony of joint GH-cortisol secretory dynamics in 15 children with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency (5 males and 10 females; median age 9.5 yr, range 6.1-11.0 yr) and 28 short normal children (23 males and 5 females; median age 7.7 yr, range 4.9-9.3 yr). All subjects were prepubertal. Serum GH and cortisol concentrations were determined at 20-min intervals for 24 h. The irregularity of GH and cortisol secretion was assessed using approximate entropy (ApEn), a scale- and model-independent statistic. The synchrony of joint GH-cortisol secretion was quantified using the cross-ApEn statistic. Cross-correlation analysis of GH and cortisol secretory patterns was computed at various time lags covering the 24-h period. Children with CAH had significantly lower mean 24-h serum cortisol concentrations (6.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.6 microg/dl, P < 0.001), ApEn (GH) (0.64 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.74 +/- 0.17, P = 0.04), ApEn (cortisol) (0.54 +/- 0.13 vs. 1.08 +/- 0.18, P < 0.001) and cross-ApEn values of paired GH-cortisol secretion (0.78 +/- 0.19 vs. 1.05 +/- 0.12, P < 0.001) than normal children. There was no difference in mean 24-h GH concentrations between the two groups (4.5 +/- 2.9 vs. 4.5 +/- 1.9 mU/liter). In children with CAH, a significant positive correlation between GH and cortisol was noted at lag time 0 min (r = 0.299, P < 0.01), peaking at 20 min (r = 0.406, P < 0.0001), whereas in normal children, a significant negative correlation between the two hormones was noted at lag time 0 min (r = -0.312, P < 0.01). The above findings suggest that children with classic CAH have a more regular pattern of GH secretion and a more synchronous joint GH-cortisol secretory dynamics than their normal counterparts. These differences reflect bidirectional interactions between the GH/IGF-I axis and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in humans, and are likely to evolve as a result of the exogenous administration of hydrocortisone at fixed doses and at specific time intervals, which leads to a more regular pattern in circulating cortisol concentrations, independent of variations in CRH and ACTH concentrations.