Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Anne M Slavotinek

Publications and source records attributed to Anne M Slavotinek.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

De novo variants in the poly(rC)-binding protein gene PCBP1 cause a neurodevelopmental disorder.

Poly(rC)-binding protein 1 (PCBP1), a splicing factor and key member of the hnRNP E family, was initially characterized for its tumor suppressive properties. More recently, its role in gene regulation in the brain and nervous system has attracted growing interest. Through an international multicenter collaboration, we identified 16 de novo pathogenic variants in PCBP1 across 17 subjects from 16 unrelated families. All affected individuals exhibited intellectual disability (ID), with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as a prominent feature. Functional analysis in primary hippocampal mouse neuron cultures indicated that PCBP1 variants impair dendritic arborization, underscoring their deleterious effects. Transcriptomic profiling by RNA sequencing of subject-derived T cells showed a distinctive signature characterized by significantly increased exon skipping. These results highlight the contribution of PCBP1 in neurogenesis and neuritogenesis, which is impacted by loss-of-function variants expressed in neuronal cells, thereby supporting the link between splicing defects and neurodevelopmental disorders. Collectively, our findings demonstrate the prominent role of PCBP1 in neurodevelopment, reaffirming the importance of splicing regulation in mammalian neurodevelopment.

Journal Article

Diagnostic Yield After Postnatal Reanalysis of Prenatal Exome Sequencing Results.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of exome sequencing (ES) relies on correlation with phenotypic features, but fetal phenotyping is often incomplete. The additional yield of postnatal follow-up in cases with negative or inconclusive prenatal ES has not been demonstrated. Our objective was to assess the incremental diagnostic yield of ES reanalysis after initially negative prenatal ES for congenital anomalies incorporating features identified postnatally. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of two prospective cohort studies of ES for fetal anomalies. We included cases in which initial ES utilizing the prenatal phenotype was not diagnostic. The primary outcome was incremental diagnostic yield of ES when incorporating postnatal findings. RESULTS: Eighty-seven cases with negative or inconclusive prenatal ES and postnatal follow-up available were included. Of those, 56 (64%) had new findings postnatally. There was an incremental yield of 2% in the entire cohort, and 7% in those with new postnatal findings. In two additional cases, postnatal evaluation suggested a specific genetic diagnosis that was not detectable with ES. CONCLUSION: Among pregnancies with fetal anomalies and no clear diagnosis identified by prenatal ES, postnatal follow-up is recommended. Reanalysis of ES results can result in a genetic diagnosis in 7% of cases with new findings.

Humans