Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Andrew T McAfee

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew T McAfee.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Panic disorder and emergency services utilization.

OBJECTIVES: The characteristics of patients with panic disorder in emergency department (ED) patient populations are unknown. This study compares demographic information and emergency care use among patients identified as having a high likelihood of having panic disorder with that of patients who tested negative on the screening test for panic disorder. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban ED. Patients were excluded if they were aged 18 years or younger, were unstable, or could not speak English or Spanish. Of 968 patients, 813 agreed to participate. Over a period of 23 days, patients were administered a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV screening questionnaire (PRIME-MD) for panic disorder along with a survey assessing their use of medical services during the prior year. RESULTS: One hundred patients (12.3%) met PRIME-MD criteria for having a high likelihood of panic disorder. Patients with Medicare were 2.84 times more likely to have a positive result on the screening test than those without insurance. Patients who had four to seven ED visits or eight or more ED visits in one year were 2.63 and 3.10 times more likely to screen positive on the PRIME-MD, respectively, compared with those who had one to three visits. Patients who activated 911 two to ten times or 11 or more times in one year were 2.02 and 4.99 times more likely to screen positive for panic disorder, respectively, compared with those who had never activated 911. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who screen positive for panic disorder use emergency medical services and ED services more frequently. In addition, the overall prevalence of screening positive for panic disorder in an ED is higher than previously reported.

Adult↗

Assessment of stroke index using impedance cardiography: comparison with traditional vital signs for detection of moderate acute blood loss in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Impedance cardiography has been used to detect early hemorrhagic shock, but, to the best of the authors' knowledge, no previous study has looked at the test characteristics of bioimpedance-derived hemodynamic parameters for the detection of a measured loss of blood volume. The authors set out to investigate the effect of controlled hemorrhage on stroke index (SI) using impedance cardiography, and to evaluate the performance of this test for moderate blood loss in comparison with the performance of traditional vital signs. METHODS: Supine and standing measurements of SI were made using a thoracic electrical bioimpedance monitor in 197 healthy, adult volunteers before and after donation of a standard unit (500 mL) of whole blood. Pre- and post-donation means for supine SI, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and for the postural changes in each of these measurements ( triangle up SI, triangle up HR, triangle up SBP, triangle up DBP), were compared using a paired-sample, two-tailed t-test. For each term, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, treating pre- and post-donation populations as independent. Areas under the ROC curves were compared using a method for correlated test result data. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD pre- and post-donation values for SI were 47.0 +/- 6.9 mL/m(2) and 43.9 +/- 7.3 mL/m(2), respectively (p < 0.0001). Mean pre- and post-donation values for triangle up SI were -7.7 +/- 5.8 mL/m(2) and -9.0 +/- 8.2 mL/m(2), respectively (p = 0.02). For discriminating between pre- and post-donation status, the areas under the ROC curves for SI and triangle up SI were 0.62 and 0.58, respectively. In comparison, the areas under the ROC curves for HR, SBP, DBP, triangle up HR, triangle up SBP, and triangle up DBP were 0.49, 0.61, 0.56, 0.82, 0.53, and 0.50, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for triangle up HR was significantly greater than the area under any of the other curves (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate blood loss was associated with a decline in mean SI that was clearly detectable with impedance cardiography. However, as a test for moderate blood loss in this controlled setting, neither SI nor triangle up SI performed better than traditional vital signs.

Adult↗