Ambiguous depth planes: perceiving depth from motion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Andrew M Herbert.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 4-year-old 8-10-year-old children and adults to a schematic face, inverted face and jumbled face. The subjects were instructed to fixate the stimuli and no other response was required. The schematic face and inverted face were shown with a frequency of 20% each and the remaining presentations (60%) were of the jumbled face. P1 and N170 peak latency were measurable in the children and adults. These peaks were at longer latencies in the children. P3 was measurable in the adults and 8-10-year-old children but not the 4-year-olds. The adults had larger and longer latency P1 and smaller amplitude N170 to the inverted face than the other faces. In contrast, the P1 was unaffected by inversion in the children and the N170 was not smaller to the inverted or jumbled face. It is concluded that this result reflects developmental differences in the processing of configuration, with the children relying on an under-specified configuration of the face.
The salience of bilateral symmetry varies as a function of the orientation of the symmetry axis. Vertical symmetry is most salient, followed by horizontal and then oblique orientations. We tested symmetry detection in different age groups to determine whether performance of this intermediate-level visual task is affected by normal, nonpathological aging. We tested forty participants and analyzed the results with respect to age group and symmetry orientation (vertical, horizontal, and 45 degree oblique). There was a vertical symmetry detection advantage for all participants, where sensitivity was highest for vertical symmetry, followed by horizontal symmetry, and then the oblique symmetry. Sensitivity to symmetry did not differ for the two younger age groups (aged 19-39 and 40-60), but declined significantly for the group aged 61-70, and declined again for the oldest group aged 71-80. This age-related difference in sensitivity to symmetry was not reflected in a measure of bias, where there were no differences as a function of age.